This category is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
No, cities of Latvia are established by goverment, other setlements that haven't got city rights like
Kolka may vary in size, thus bouth categories are needed - one for cities recognised by goverment and one for other setlements in Latvia --
Xil/
talk23:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Category towns and villages in Latvia, contains a lot of government recognized cities (or towns), this category contains many of settlements, which does not have city rights. I suggest to move articles about smaller settlements to
Category:Towns and villages in Latvia, but this would leave this category rather small (there are under 10 large cities in Latvia). -
Yyy08:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
How about having two new categories: "Towns and cities in Latvia" and "Villages in Latvia". What to put in each would be obvious and unambiguous.
Artpol12:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)reply
There are two types of cities in Latvia recognised by law - 1.cities of republic and 2.cities, we could make one category called cities and include cities of republic there, another called towns and place all other cities there and third one called villages for other settlements. On other hand I spoke whith Yyy
[1] and we agreed to put all cities recognised by law in category "cities", for now I'm going to do that --
Xil/
talk10:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)reply
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
No, cities of Latvia are established by goverment, other setlements that haven't got city rights like
Kolka may vary in size, thus bouth categories are needed - one for cities recognised by goverment and one for other setlements in Latvia --
Xil/
talk23:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Category towns and villages in Latvia, contains a lot of government recognized cities (or towns), this category contains many of settlements, which does not have city rights. I suggest to move articles about smaller settlements to
Category:Towns and villages in Latvia, but this would leave this category rather small (there are under 10 large cities in Latvia). -
Yyy08:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
How about having two new categories: "Towns and cities in Latvia" and "Villages in Latvia". What to put in each would be obvious and unambiguous.
Artpol12:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)reply
There are two types of cities in Latvia recognised by law - 1.cities of republic and 2.cities, we could make one category called cities and include cities of republic there, another called towns and place all other cities there and third one called villages for other settlements. On other hand I spoke whith Yyy
[1] and we agreed to put all cities recognised by law in category "cities", for now I'm going to do that --
Xil/
talk10:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)reply