This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Listas is a parameter found in the coding of the WikiProject Biography box and operates like DEFAULTSORT.
It is a sneaky, hidden and poorly documented template parameter which is one of the primary causes of the weird sorting orders in many categories, especially the maintenance categories created by those boxes and other maintence categories more likely to appear on talk pages.
The problem is that we have a very rudimentary, simplistic sort mechanism. Everything in the sort key is sorted. That includes spaces, punctuation marks, whatever. But it isn't sorted in accordance with anybody's sorting rules. It is simply sorted in accordance with Unicode numbers.
The essential factors that need to be noted, and that need to be included in the instructions to people who will be using "listas" or "DEFAULT" sort include these points:
See Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Ordering names in a category for more essential pointers. Note that this applies not only to articles about people, but to all articles.
One advantage linkas has over DEFAULTSORT is Category:Biography articles with listas parameter. It would be nice if somebody would help out and use that to start cleaning up the problems I mentioned. You could start by fixing everything that comes after Z. Gene Nygaard 05:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Listas is a parameter found in the coding of the WikiProject Biography box and operates like DEFAULTSORT.
listas: This parameter, which is used in the template with the DEFAULTSORT magic word, is a sortkey for the article talk page, e.g. for Prince George of England, you can instead have listas=George of England, Prince -- so that it will show up in the G's. If no listas is provided, the DEFAULTSORT will be PAGENAME (the article title). Some talk pages have DEFAULTSORT placed on them manually, outside the talk page templates. Later placements of DEFAULTSORT on the talk page (inside or outside templates) will over-ride earlier placements. Category piping (in templates or done manually) will over-ride DEFAULTSORT. Guroadrunner 03:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Do I have this right?
JimCubb 05:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Could you add some examples - or brief usage either at the start of this page or on the template, I was just quickly popping here to see how to add it, just needed the basics... Leevanjackson ( talk) 12:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Biography|listas=Smith, John}}
.
Rich
Farmbrough,
21:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC).Just because this sounds so Spanish "las listas" ;) Gracias! ;p -andy 92.228.0.141 ( talk) 19:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I added an option to use "list as", which was reverted by User:Magioladitis citing the following reasons:
User:Bgwhite was also concerned at
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
08:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC).
|category=
, |listas=
and |small=
. Other than
Milhist (which is different from the majority of project banners in many ways, including that it interprets |category=
differently and doesn't recognise |listas=
at all), I know of no exceptions, and none where a parameter alias exists for these three. To introduce an exception is undesirable, since it then means that a param cannot be copied directly from one WikiProject banner transclusion to another. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
09:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
|listas=
set, since it not only affects categories used by the banner in which it is set, but it also affects the sortkey of all other banners and templates.{{
WikiProject Accessibility}}
. If two WikiProject banners on the same talk page both have a |listas=
, with different values (say |listas=Foo
on the first and |listas=Bar
on the second), an error is thrown by the second one: Warning: Default sort key "Bar" overrides earlier default sort key "Foo". and the page is placed in
Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Please register below with your user name, method of working, special expertise, time zone and comments as you feel are appropriate. The last three will become important as we get closer to the end.
As of a few seconds ago the backlog dropped below 100,000 — a mere shadow of its former self.
Rejoice!
All hail Listasbot who did most of the work.
Look at how many of the members of this category are Bands or other Musical Ensembles. Why are they even in the purview of the project?
Be that as it may, since some one feels or felt strongly enough about the ListAs parameter to form a page that is populated by its absence, I will start at the top and work my way to the end, fixing the ones that are obvious. I will also put the DEFAULTSORT on the main page if it is missing.
Is anyone else working on this?
JimCubb (
talk)
21:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
I am working on Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts. The conflicts are mainly of two types.
If an editor is working on either the pages with the listas parameter or the pages without the listas parameter, great care needs to be taken to insure that all the project templates have the same value for the listas parameter (Some templates do not use it but I have not found one yet that complains if it is there.) and delete any DEFAULTSORT line on the page. (The DEFAULTSORT line should be pasted onto the article page if one is not there but that involves a lot more time even though it will have to be done eventually.)
Isn't this fun!
Now that Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts is down to 14 trivial pages, sandboxes and java scripts, I am starting to work on these. I have started with the 1023 pages after Z. If anyone else wants to work on this may I suggest that you indicate that here and where you are starting?
I think the most efficient plan of attack is for the first new person to start at the top of the first page, go as far as is possible in a single session and start at the first page the next time the page changes. The next person could work on the third page exclusively. The next person start at the top of the fifth page. After all the ones after Z are done I will start two pages after the highest page number indicated in the list.
Does that make sense?
I fixed the listas and DEFAULTSORT on almost 90 articles today. There are 154 more articles in this category than there were when I began. Editors are creating problems almost twice as fast as I can fix them. Feel free to jump in, anybody!
Actually you were creating a false positive that would probably never have been caught. I have been told that it is impossible to track articles that lack a DEFAULTSORT value. This is why the listas parameter is tracked.
The editors who are creating problem are the ones who are creating articles and omitting any sort value whether on the article or on the talk page. The good news is that no one has complained that their wonderful article is listed incorrectly in the category that the editor created for it.
That is what the DEFAULTSORT value and listas parameter do. Without a DEFAULTSORT value Matthew S. Petersen would appear under M rather than P in the Category:Federal Election Commission. (It is correct and, unlike many I have seen, in the right place.) Likewise, without the listas parameter Talk:Matthew S. Petersen would appear in the wrong place in Category:Biography articles of living people and any other category where it is assigned by a project banner.
Now you know almost all you need to know about DEFAULTSORT and listas. The only other bit of arcana that may or may not be useful to you is that the LIFETIME template includes a sort value that can replace the DEFAULTSORT value. The folks who have developed and worked on LIFETIME really think it is necessary but I do not think that a way has been developed to locate pages where it has or has not been used.
Thank you for your response and cooperation. Keep creating articles of the caliber of Matthew S. Petersen. It was pleasant to read and a very welcome change from the articles I normally see.
You are welcome. As for the rating, I really do not know. There may be a checklist at WP Biog. I know WP Mil Hist has one. WP Biog is also a good place to get a reviewer if you want one.
As far as I know the LIFETIME sort value works just as well as the DEFAULTSORT.
Happy Editing!
After over 2,000 edits resolving DEFAULTSORT conflicts and adding listas parameters I have observed some difficulties with assigning the listas parameter and specifically with the use of a bot to assign the listas parameter.
I don't know if there are answers to these dilemmas.
This is only a mild alert to the little difficulties that I have encountered and not inteded to be critical.
If anyone reads this, could something be done to encourage editors to work on this category? It is growing despite the efforts of a very few of us to correct the problem.
So what do I do with all the "Æ" articles? I don't want to skip them.
Not really. Right now we have 374,619 without and 248,855 with. The ranks of the unrighteous have been slightly depleted. It is still a 60-40 split but the good guys are gaining. I don't expect the good guys to take the lead in my lifetime.
Actually, it is the larger number that needs to be reduced. Right now it is 368,520. Some bots are doing some very good work. However, Kiyarrlls-, if you feel tempted to join in the fray, you are encouraged to yield to the temptation.
There are no items after the Zs. All names that began with a letter that is not in the English alphabet has a value for the listas parameter. I hope it is the correct one.
There are only 364,972 articles yet to repair.
There was discussion and a sort of consensus regarding sorting of Icelandic names here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Iceland#Sort_keys_for_Icelandic_names. I updated Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Sort by surname and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Iceland-related articles (which, for some reason has been tagged as {{ inactive}}) to mention the last bullet in comment by User:Magioladitis there. Illia Connell ( talk) 03:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
I propose that DEFAULTSORT and listas be the PAGENAME so that they will not appear in this category. What say all of you?
Delete the banner or "tl" the banner?
Project banners should never appear on user pages or user subpages, right?
Granted but there will have to be a way to get those pages excluded once the important items are resolved.
I thought that the nocat tag would do that but I was told elsewhere that it will not.
While I was off worrying about other categories the values aftrer "Z" became populated. I have just finished "Æ" and have done almost all the rest. All that remain are the invalid value that begin with "É". There are 56 of them and I hope to finish them by the end of the week. The values after "Z: will not repopulate. When other letters are emptied please name them here and I will watch them as well. (My schedule is to check for new DEFAULTSORT conflicts and resolve the ones that are not trivial, check for new "importance" parameters that should be "priority" then come here.)
Other editors and their bots are doing much better than I can at taking care of the pages here but I can take care of the alligators that are inadvertantly thrown in. I may start to look for incorrect values in the pages with the listas parameter. (I worked on the "X" entries in the pages without the living parameter yesterday. All of the Chinese generals were listed incorrectly.)
Isn't this fun!
All the pages after "Z" have been fixed. I intend to monitor that section and will attend to any new pages. I will work on "Q" next and "X" after that. I look forward to the day when this category is empty, all the wonderful editors who have worked so hard to clean up this category have moved on and I can drop in once or twice a day to fix any pages.
"Q" and "X" have been done for a long time. "V" is now done. I will empty them each day as well as after "Z" and before "A". The category would empty much more quickly if there were other editors working on it.
|listas=
if there is a sort value somewhere on the article page?
|living=
but the |listas=
. I did not ask about |living=
.We are back below 30,000. If I can do the nobility that will be about another 2-3000. Rich Farmbrough, 20:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC).
Now moved to Category talk:Biography articles without listas parameter/Archive/Biography articles with listas parameter to keep a record of past discussions. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
SmackBot is fixing up some talk pages by copying the DEFAULTSORT at last. Of course there several bots that do this, however I think they have not been running recently. We are about 35k when I started, short term target to get back under 30k again. Rich Farmbrough, 00:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC).
I am on an unscheduled, unannounced but needed break and merely pop in from time to time. I wondered the last time if I should not have done it sooner as the number had dropped by about 12% as opposed to its previous steady rise. A drop of 40% in two days is a very good thing.
A very cursory glance suggests that, aside from the last page (special characters) most of the remaining items are covered by various special naming conventions, Arabic or Northeast Asian, or are bands.
Things are definitely looking up! JimCubb ( talk) 23:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
I found 30k people stubs with no template, so things will get worse for a bit. I also found about a thousand redirects which had the template and didn't need it - they are taken care of. There must be a lot more that have a listas and are redirects. Rich Farmbrough, 09:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC).
". . . things will get worse for a bit." That's a mild way to characterize a jump to over 40,000. However, I understand the reason for the jump. I did the ones before 0 just to get an idea of the nature of the problems. Good luck on cleaning up the rest. I wish I had the time to help. JimCubb ( talk) 04:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Per the above thread, is is possible to get Smackbot back on the task? The count is now 60k+. – S. Rich ( talk) 19:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
We are currently around 144,000. I am making renewed attempts to reduce the number to as near zero as possible by the end of the year, in memory of
Jim Cubb. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
18:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC).
You can use a fork of the quarry SQL query I use to get keywords in the page name. This can be used if you want to target a surname or keyword. The SQL is at https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/29855.
I also use User:Evad37/rater.js, which can autofill the listas parameter and determine class/importance automatically. Thanks for helping with the backlog. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 17:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I've come across this category and would like to help tackle the backlog. My question is, how should I use listas for article names that are disambiguated? For example Arsen Harutyunyan (wrestler) would be listas= Harutyunyan, Arsen, but what about the (wrestler) part? Thanks! -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 02:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
|listas=Harutyunyan, Arsen, wrestler
--
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
19:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Listas is a parameter found in the coding of the WikiProject Biography box and operates like DEFAULTSORT.
It is a sneaky, hidden and poorly documented template parameter which is one of the primary causes of the weird sorting orders in many categories, especially the maintenance categories created by those boxes and other maintence categories more likely to appear on talk pages.
The problem is that we have a very rudimentary, simplistic sort mechanism. Everything in the sort key is sorted. That includes spaces, punctuation marks, whatever. But it isn't sorted in accordance with anybody's sorting rules. It is simply sorted in accordance with Unicode numbers.
The essential factors that need to be noted, and that need to be included in the instructions to people who will be using "listas" or "DEFAULT" sort include these points:
See Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Ordering names in a category for more essential pointers. Note that this applies not only to articles about people, but to all articles.
One advantage linkas has over DEFAULTSORT is Category:Biography articles with listas parameter. It would be nice if somebody would help out and use that to start cleaning up the problems I mentioned. You could start by fixing everything that comes after Z. Gene Nygaard 05:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Listas is a parameter found in the coding of the WikiProject Biography box and operates like DEFAULTSORT.
listas: This parameter, which is used in the template with the DEFAULTSORT magic word, is a sortkey for the article talk page, e.g. for Prince George of England, you can instead have listas=George of England, Prince -- so that it will show up in the G's. If no listas is provided, the DEFAULTSORT will be PAGENAME (the article title). Some talk pages have DEFAULTSORT placed on them manually, outside the talk page templates. Later placements of DEFAULTSORT on the talk page (inside or outside templates) will over-ride earlier placements. Category piping (in templates or done manually) will over-ride DEFAULTSORT. Guroadrunner 03:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Do I have this right?
JimCubb 05:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Could you add some examples - or brief usage either at the start of this page or on the template, I was just quickly popping here to see how to add it, just needed the basics... Leevanjackson ( talk) 12:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Biography|listas=Smith, John}}
.
Rich
Farmbrough,
21:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC).Just because this sounds so Spanish "las listas" ;) Gracias! ;p -andy 92.228.0.141 ( talk) 19:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I added an option to use "list as", which was reverted by User:Magioladitis citing the following reasons:
User:Bgwhite was also concerned at
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
08:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC).
|category=
, |listas=
and |small=
. Other than
Milhist (which is different from the majority of project banners in many ways, including that it interprets |category=
differently and doesn't recognise |listas=
at all), I know of no exceptions, and none where a parameter alias exists for these three. To introduce an exception is undesirable, since it then means that a param cannot be copied directly from one WikiProject banner transclusion to another. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
09:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
|listas=
set, since it not only affects categories used by the banner in which it is set, but it also affects the sortkey of all other banners and templates.{{
WikiProject Accessibility}}
. If two WikiProject banners on the same talk page both have a |listas=
, with different values (say |listas=Foo
on the first and |listas=Bar
on the second), an error is thrown by the second one: Warning: Default sort key "Bar" overrides earlier default sort key "Foo". and the page is placed in
Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Please register below with your user name, method of working, special expertise, time zone and comments as you feel are appropriate. The last three will become important as we get closer to the end.
As of a few seconds ago the backlog dropped below 100,000 — a mere shadow of its former self.
Rejoice!
All hail Listasbot who did most of the work.
Look at how many of the members of this category are Bands or other Musical Ensembles. Why are they even in the purview of the project?
Be that as it may, since some one feels or felt strongly enough about the ListAs parameter to form a page that is populated by its absence, I will start at the top and work my way to the end, fixing the ones that are obvious. I will also put the DEFAULTSORT on the main page if it is missing.
Is anyone else working on this?
JimCubb (
talk)
21:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
I am working on Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts. The conflicts are mainly of two types.
If an editor is working on either the pages with the listas parameter or the pages without the listas parameter, great care needs to be taken to insure that all the project templates have the same value for the listas parameter (Some templates do not use it but I have not found one yet that complains if it is there.) and delete any DEFAULTSORT line on the page. (The DEFAULTSORT line should be pasted onto the article page if one is not there but that involves a lot more time even though it will have to be done eventually.)
Isn't this fun!
Now that Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts is down to 14 trivial pages, sandboxes and java scripts, I am starting to work on these. I have started with the 1023 pages after Z. If anyone else wants to work on this may I suggest that you indicate that here and where you are starting?
I think the most efficient plan of attack is for the first new person to start at the top of the first page, go as far as is possible in a single session and start at the first page the next time the page changes. The next person could work on the third page exclusively. The next person start at the top of the fifth page. After all the ones after Z are done I will start two pages after the highest page number indicated in the list.
Does that make sense?
I fixed the listas and DEFAULTSORT on almost 90 articles today. There are 154 more articles in this category than there were when I began. Editors are creating problems almost twice as fast as I can fix them. Feel free to jump in, anybody!
Actually you were creating a false positive that would probably never have been caught. I have been told that it is impossible to track articles that lack a DEFAULTSORT value. This is why the listas parameter is tracked.
The editors who are creating problem are the ones who are creating articles and omitting any sort value whether on the article or on the talk page. The good news is that no one has complained that their wonderful article is listed incorrectly in the category that the editor created for it.
That is what the DEFAULTSORT value and listas parameter do. Without a DEFAULTSORT value Matthew S. Petersen would appear under M rather than P in the Category:Federal Election Commission. (It is correct and, unlike many I have seen, in the right place.) Likewise, without the listas parameter Talk:Matthew S. Petersen would appear in the wrong place in Category:Biography articles of living people and any other category where it is assigned by a project banner.
Now you know almost all you need to know about DEFAULTSORT and listas. The only other bit of arcana that may or may not be useful to you is that the LIFETIME template includes a sort value that can replace the DEFAULTSORT value. The folks who have developed and worked on LIFETIME really think it is necessary but I do not think that a way has been developed to locate pages where it has or has not been used.
Thank you for your response and cooperation. Keep creating articles of the caliber of Matthew S. Petersen. It was pleasant to read and a very welcome change from the articles I normally see.
You are welcome. As for the rating, I really do not know. There may be a checklist at WP Biog. I know WP Mil Hist has one. WP Biog is also a good place to get a reviewer if you want one.
As far as I know the LIFETIME sort value works just as well as the DEFAULTSORT.
Happy Editing!
After over 2,000 edits resolving DEFAULTSORT conflicts and adding listas parameters I have observed some difficulties with assigning the listas parameter and specifically with the use of a bot to assign the listas parameter.
I don't know if there are answers to these dilemmas.
This is only a mild alert to the little difficulties that I have encountered and not inteded to be critical.
If anyone reads this, could something be done to encourage editors to work on this category? It is growing despite the efforts of a very few of us to correct the problem.
So what do I do with all the "Æ" articles? I don't want to skip them.
Not really. Right now we have 374,619 without and 248,855 with. The ranks of the unrighteous have been slightly depleted. It is still a 60-40 split but the good guys are gaining. I don't expect the good guys to take the lead in my lifetime.
Actually, it is the larger number that needs to be reduced. Right now it is 368,520. Some bots are doing some very good work. However, Kiyarrlls-, if you feel tempted to join in the fray, you are encouraged to yield to the temptation.
There are no items after the Zs. All names that began with a letter that is not in the English alphabet has a value for the listas parameter. I hope it is the correct one.
There are only 364,972 articles yet to repair.
There was discussion and a sort of consensus regarding sorting of Icelandic names here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Iceland#Sort_keys_for_Icelandic_names. I updated Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Sort by surname and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Iceland-related articles (which, for some reason has been tagged as {{ inactive}}) to mention the last bullet in comment by User:Magioladitis there. Illia Connell ( talk) 03:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
I propose that DEFAULTSORT and listas be the PAGENAME so that they will not appear in this category. What say all of you?
Delete the banner or "tl" the banner?
Project banners should never appear on user pages or user subpages, right?
Granted but there will have to be a way to get those pages excluded once the important items are resolved.
I thought that the nocat tag would do that but I was told elsewhere that it will not.
While I was off worrying about other categories the values aftrer "Z" became populated. I have just finished "Æ" and have done almost all the rest. All that remain are the invalid value that begin with "É". There are 56 of them and I hope to finish them by the end of the week. The values after "Z: will not repopulate. When other letters are emptied please name them here and I will watch them as well. (My schedule is to check for new DEFAULTSORT conflicts and resolve the ones that are not trivial, check for new "importance" parameters that should be "priority" then come here.)
Other editors and their bots are doing much better than I can at taking care of the pages here but I can take care of the alligators that are inadvertantly thrown in. I may start to look for incorrect values in the pages with the listas parameter. (I worked on the "X" entries in the pages without the living parameter yesterday. All of the Chinese generals were listed incorrectly.)
Isn't this fun!
All the pages after "Z" have been fixed. I intend to monitor that section and will attend to any new pages. I will work on "Q" next and "X" after that. I look forward to the day when this category is empty, all the wonderful editors who have worked so hard to clean up this category have moved on and I can drop in once or twice a day to fix any pages.
"Q" and "X" have been done for a long time. "V" is now done. I will empty them each day as well as after "Z" and before "A". The category would empty much more quickly if there were other editors working on it.
|listas=
if there is a sort value somewhere on the article page?
|living=
but the |listas=
. I did not ask about |living=
.We are back below 30,000. If I can do the nobility that will be about another 2-3000. Rich Farmbrough, 20:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC).
Now moved to Category talk:Biography articles without listas parameter/Archive/Biography articles with listas parameter to keep a record of past discussions. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
SmackBot is fixing up some talk pages by copying the DEFAULTSORT at last. Of course there several bots that do this, however I think they have not been running recently. We are about 35k when I started, short term target to get back under 30k again. Rich Farmbrough, 00:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC).
I am on an unscheduled, unannounced but needed break and merely pop in from time to time. I wondered the last time if I should not have done it sooner as the number had dropped by about 12% as opposed to its previous steady rise. A drop of 40% in two days is a very good thing.
A very cursory glance suggests that, aside from the last page (special characters) most of the remaining items are covered by various special naming conventions, Arabic or Northeast Asian, or are bands.
Things are definitely looking up! JimCubb ( talk) 23:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
I found 30k people stubs with no template, so things will get worse for a bit. I also found about a thousand redirects which had the template and didn't need it - they are taken care of. There must be a lot more that have a listas and are redirects. Rich Farmbrough, 09:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC).
". . . things will get worse for a bit." That's a mild way to characterize a jump to over 40,000. However, I understand the reason for the jump. I did the ones before 0 just to get an idea of the nature of the problems. Good luck on cleaning up the rest. I wish I had the time to help. JimCubb ( talk) 04:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Per the above thread, is is possible to get Smackbot back on the task? The count is now 60k+. – S. Rich ( talk) 19:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
We are currently around 144,000. I am making renewed attempts to reduce the number to as near zero as possible by the end of the year, in memory of
Jim Cubb. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
18:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC).
You can use a fork of the quarry SQL query I use to get keywords in the page name. This can be used if you want to target a surname or keyword. The SQL is at https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/29855.
I also use User:Evad37/rater.js, which can autofill the listas parameter and determine class/importance automatically. Thanks for helping with the backlog. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 17:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I've come across this category and would like to help tackle the backlog. My question is, how should I use listas for article names that are disambiguated? For example Arsen Harutyunyan (wrestler) would be listas= Harutyunyan, Arsen, but what about the (wrestler) part? Thanks! -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 02:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
|listas=Harutyunyan, Arsen, wrestler
--
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
19:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)