This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest we broaden the scope of this category to include airfields, private and public, and airstrips too, even if they are not general aviation airfields to include flying fields for remote controlled planes, or any airstrip with a runway longer than 300 feet or something like that to be more illusionist and state this on the category brief that this doesn't necessarily denote that the place is a "real" airport. MY♥INchile 18:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
per another user's comment i brought it up here. precedent is not policy, wikipedia is not written in stone, why are you so insistent that i don't even bring up the matter? i am talk, just talk back. and being "told" makes it sound like i have been ordered, that is not the case, you keep telling me, that's it. just calm down already. and i challenge both that that there is some unwritten precedent and that i am editing disruptively by discussion instead of editing on a disputed matter. MY♥INchile 18:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest we broaden the scope of this category to include airfields, private and public, and airstrips too, even if they are not general aviation airfields to include flying fields for remote controlled planes, or any airstrip with a runway longer than 300 feet or something like that to be more illusionist and state this on the category brief that this doesn't necessarily denote that the place is a "real" airport. MY♥INchile 18:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
per another user's comment i brought it up here. precedent is not policy, wikipedia is not written in stone, why are you so insistent that i don't even bring up the matter? i am talk, just talk back. and being "told" makes it sound like i have been ordered, that is not the case, you keep telling me, that's it. just calm down already. and i challenge both that that there is some unwritten precedent and that i am editing disruptively by discussion instead of editing on a disputed matter. MY♥INchile 18:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)