| Bartle v. Coleman | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided March 10, 1821 | |
| Full case name | Bartle v. Coleman |
| Citations | 19 U.S. 475 ( more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Marshall |
Bartle v. Coleman, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 475 (1821), was a United States Supreme Court case.
Andrew Bartle, George Coleman, and Ferdinand Marsteller had entered into a contract with the United States government to rebuild a location called Fort Washington, possibly meaning Fort Washington (Maryland) which was captured by the British in the War of 1812. [1]
Arbitrators had rules that Bartle should pay Coleman. [1]
The Supreme Court reversed the judgement. [2]
- Text of Bartle v. Coleman, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 475 (1821) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist
| Bartle v. Coleman | |
|---|---|
| |
| Decided March 10, 1821 | |
| Full case name | Bartle v. Coleman |
| Citations | 19 U.S. 475 ( more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Marshall |
Bartle v. Coleman, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 475 (1821), was a United States Supreme Court case.
Andrew Bartle, George Coleman, and Ferdinand Marsteller had entered into a contract with the United States government to rebuild a location called Fort Washington, possibly meaning Fort Washington (Maryland) which was captured by the British in the War of 1812. [1]
Arbitrators had rules that Bartle should pay Coleman. [1]
The Supreme Court reversed the judgement. [2]
- Text of Bartle v. Coleman, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 475 (1821) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist