This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources:  "Argumentum ad baculum" –  news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2011)

Argumentum ad baculum ( Latin for "argument to the cudgel" or "appeal to the stick") is the fallacy committed when one makes an appeal to force ^[1] to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion. ^{[2] [3]} One participates in argumentum ad baculum when one emphasizes the negative consequences of holding the contrary position, regardless of the contrary position's truth value—particularly when the argument-maker himself causes (or threatens to cause) those negative consequences. It is a special case of the appeal to consequences.

Examples

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives this example of argumentum ad baculum:

If you don't join our demonstration against the expansion of the park, we will evict you from your apartment;

So, you should join our demonstration against the expansion of the park. ^[4]

The phrase has also been used to describe the 1856 caning of Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Senator, by one of his pro-slavery opponents, Preston Brooks, on the floor of the United States Senate. ^[5]

See also

• Argument from authority
• Conformity
• Formal fallacy
• In terrorem
• Legal threat
• Management by perkele
• Might makes right
• Proof by intimidation

References

This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e