Applied ontology can involve the practical application of ontological resources to specific domains, [1] such as management, relationships, biomedicine, information science or geography.[ citation needed] Alternatively, applied ontology can aim more generally at developing improved methodologies for recording and organizing knowledge. [2]
Much[ quantify] work in applied ontology is carried out within the framework of the Semantic Web.
The challenge of applying ontology is ontology's emphasis on a world view orthogonal to epistemology. The emphasis is on being rather than on doing (as implied by " applied") or on knowing. This is explored by philosophers and pragmatists like Fernando Flores and Martin Heidegger.
One way in which that emphasis plays out is in the concept of " speech acts": acts of promising, ordering, apologizing, requesting, inviting or sharing. The study of these acts from an ontological perspective is one of the driving forces behind relationship-oriented applied ontology. [3] This can involve concepts championed by ordinary language philosophers like Ludwig Wittgenstein.
Applying ontology can also involve looking at the relationship between a person's world and that person's actions. The context or clearing is highly influenced by the being of the subject or the field of being itself. This view is highly influenced by the philosophy of phenomenology, [4] the works of Heidegger, and others. [5] [6]
Social scientists adopt a number of approaches to ontology. [7] Some of these are: [8]
Applied ontology, also called domain ontology, is concerned (i) with the question of what entities exist in a particular domain, for example, in the domain of a scientific branch such as biology, or even in the more specialized domain of a scientific theory such as the theory of active immunity; and (ii) with the formal taxonomy of those entities.
The authors' goal in producing this book has been to show how philosophy and information science can learn from one another, so as to create better methodologies for recording and organizing our knowledge about the world.
Talk all you want to, Flores says, but if you want to act powerfully, you need to master 'speech acts': language rituals that build trust between colleagues and customers, word practices that open your eyes to new possibilities. Speech acts are powerful because most of the actions that people engage in -- in business, in marriage, in parenting -- are carried out through conversation.
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)
Applied ontology can involve the practical application of ontological resources to specific domains, [1] such as management, relationships, biomedicine, information science or geography.[ citation needed] Alternatively, applied ontology can aim more generally at developing improved methodologies for recording and organizing knowledge. [2]
Much[ quantify] work in applied ontology is carried out within the framework of the Semantic Web.
The challenge of applying ontology is ontology's emphasis on a world view orthogonal to epistemology. The emphasis is on being rather than on doing (as implied by " applied") or on knowing. This is explored by philosophers and pragmatists like Fernando Flores and Martin Heidegger.
One way in which that emphasis plays out is in the concept of " speech acts": acts of promising, ordering, apologizing, requesting, inviting or sharing. The study of these acts from an ontological perspective is one of the driving forces behind relationship-oriented applied ontology. [3] This can involve concepts championed by ordinary language philosophers like Ludwig Wittgenstein.
Applying ontology can also involve looking at the relationship between a person's world and that person's actions. The context or clearing is highly influenced by the being of the subject or the field of being itself. This view is highly influenced by the philosophy of phenomenology, [4] the works of Heidegger, and others. [5] [6]
Social scientists adopt a number of approaches to ontology. [7] Some of these are: [8]
Applied ontology, also called domain ontology, is concerned (i) with the question of what entities exist in a particular domain, for example, in the domain of a scientific branch such as biology, or even in the more specialized domain of a scientific theory such as the theory of active immunity; and (ii) with the formal taxonomy of those entities.
The authors' goal in producing this book has been to show how philosophy and information science can learn from one another, so as to create better methodologies for recording and organizing our knowledge about the world.
Talk all you want to, Flores says, but if you want to act powerfully, you need to master 'speech acts': language rituals that build trust between colleagues and customers, word practices that open your eyes to new possibilities. Speech acts are powerful because most of the actions that people engage in -- in business, in marriage, in parenting -- are carried out through conversation.
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)