Pppery is currently feeling
discouraged about Wikipedia and is taking an off-and-on
wikibreak due to loss of motivation. Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated. |
Welcome!
Hello, Pppery, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome!
– Fayenatic L ondon 20:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)The Admin's Barnstar | |
Hi Pppery, I feel sad you are on Wikibreak but it's fine; at least to ease up some offwiki stress. I am also for a while thinking about beng discouraged about Wikipedia. I know it's difficult to be here also, but you're doing perfectly and more than okay. I usually enjoy your work in the technical aspects and WP:RM; those are run-around impact I have known you for. That I will encourage you to come back, being cheered, I award you the Administrators Barnster as a way of missing you, your high impact and otherwise. Feel free, stay safe, and always happy. Cheers! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
Hi! Is there any particular reason you renamed Category:Sexual-related controversies in film to Category:Sex-related controversies in film? My (admittedly WP:INVOLVED) read of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#Category:Sexual-related controversies in film is that we reached consensus for a rename to Category:Sexuality-related controversies in film. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Sorry if I have ticked you off watching other admin talk pages, I just read that you are feeling discouraged and wanted to apologize for my bad behavior. I know that I should've just let you discuss and not impede your discussions. I hope this WikiLove makes you feel better. (By the way, I'm also thinking of leaving/going on a wikibreak for my own reasons, nothing to do with you.) Thanks for all you do here, and please note your contributions are appreciated, no matter if you stay as an admin or not.
thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
You removed a speedy-delete tag from User:WikiWiz31 as there is no obvious mention of it being a sockpuppet. While a page just saying 'hi' is harmless, the block log states that the user is an unnamed LTA (and WP:G5 covers sockpuppetry as well). Due to the contents of the page, are very short userpages created as ban violations, like that one, supposed to be kept, or not? Xeroctic ( talk) 18:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Hey sorry i wasn't finished with it and was going to work on it later can i get it back. i promise i will have it done this week Freedun ( yippity yap) 00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Could you review the speedy deletion for Atter again? :3 Blockhaj ( talk) 00:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery, I don't know what to do to such user. I am about taking them to WP:AN for a partial block or so (this is something you can do, though I thought of being WP:INVOLVED). Do I revert the move? No! I think I will suggest that at AN. Any opinion/help I can get from you? Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 01:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
"Expert in Bible" is just not grammatically correct. I was fixing a typo because the Bible is a proper noun and as such it needs a "the". I might be wrong but I still feel my edit was appropriate. CharlieEdited ( talk) 21:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on cleaning up the archiving process for the DoubleWiki (and for triaging and cleaning bugs in PageTriage) :)
Sohom (
talk)
19:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if it's a glitch or cache issue but the discussion doesn't seem to have been closed. Primefac ( talk) 20:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Seems like there are a lot of them (philosophy, mathematics, physics, a recently created one on data science, economics, ...). Are you planning on going through them all one-by-one? -- JBL ( talk) 18:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Sighyeah I feel you :). (I also do not feel inclined to tackle them -- luckily "cruft from the early days of Wikipedia that sits around generally ignored" is probably not causing too much damage to anything.) -- JBL ( talk) 17:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! What was I screwing up there? Valereee ( talk) 10:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Fossorials has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, saw your recent participation at WT:BLIST and thought you might be the right one to ask. I recently warned an editor for adding what appears to be three malicious URLs, embedded within inline citations, which you can view in this series of edits. I made the mistake when I checked one, and it immediately redirected to a phishing site of some kind. Think I closed out in time, so if you're going to test, be sure to use some kind of protected method to check them out!
I assume they'll need to be blacklisted, but I've never dealt with this before on Wikipedia. Wasn't sure how to properly warn users and where to report. Thanks in advance! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 20:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I’m sorry you’re feeling discouraged. Just wanted to say that your work is appreciated. I hope you re-engage at some point, but take the time you need for yourself. Nice use of the Great Stone Face. ;) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 04:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
First of all, thank you for completing the history merge I requested. Your comment in the edit summary that it's [n]ot strictly needed with only one author, and I suspect many admins would have declined this
has me suspecting I've asked for something strange. My thinking was that since my sandbox copy had a few intermediate edits in it and I only made it to figure out how to do the changes I wanted to do without turning the template documentation into a
WP:BADHOUSE at any point, I'd ask for the history to be merged and then ask for
WP:U1 so my changes and the reasons for them would show up in the history of the page itself and I wouldn't have a page sitting around in my userspace that's just an exact copy of another page that I don't need anymore. Basically like a pull request. I was just trying to minimize the amount of Investigation required for anyone looking at the history in the future to understand my changes, but is this considered Bad?
Kinsio (
talk ★
contribs ★
rights)
04:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I noticed your conversation about creating a Gibraltar template at Template_talk:Post-nominals and how there are no advanced requirements to create one. I'm prepared to create a template for another country, but I wanted to know if you were aware of any template restrictions before making one. – Handoto ( talk) 18:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Why did you do this? Was there some reason I shouldn't inform this user? Did I do something wrong here? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I see you're online, hope you don't mind the direct ping. Draft:Jewel Palmer was created by three blocked socks. Rather than delete it, I thought it would be better to move it to draft. A fourth account has now tried to blank it, and then posted this request following my revert and warning. What's the right thing to do here? Is it another sock, or is the request a matter for oversight? ANI didn't seem like the best place to post this. Thanks, Wikishovel ( talk) 18:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Regarding Polish–Muscovite Wars (1605–1618) and the other deleted broken redirects to Polish–Russian War (1605–1618), I was thinking of either recreating the rest of these or asking for their undeletion. Would you like to undelete any or all of them before I just recreate them?
SilverLocust 💬 20:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you redirected the CSUSB College of Education page to the university article. I'll be working on it in my sandbox. In the mean time, does this page, UCR Graduate School of Education also qualify for deletion? Thanks! House1090 ( talk) 21:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery -- I requested a merge to fix a copy-and-paste split without attribution, following the instructions here which point to WP:HM. To me, this split seems to fall under: "When to request a histmerge: A history merge is required for attribution purposes [...] where there are multiple editors at the old page. [...] While this is not an exhaustive list, any pages meeting the below criteria may be eligible for a histmerge: There are several editors in the page history at the original location"
Could you please help me understand why that doesn't apply here? (And if you can, please redirect me to the correct process)? Thanks! -- Rlandmann ( talk) 01:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Pppery,
I noticed today that you run a lot of Quarry queries, as do I. However, the queries I run were "forked" from other editors' queries a long time ago and I don't understand how to code in Quarry although I've spent some time in the past learning how to code in other languages. Now, two queries that I ran for years without any problems won't run and give me error messages. I was wondering if you'd be willing to look them over and make any necessary corrections.
If you are too busy, I understand but I thought I'd ask in case you'd be willing to help. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you please hide/delete this log action as well as this revision? 102.156.13.95 ( talk) 10:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey 👋,
thank you for engaging with our Growth features and using the new CommunityConfiguration to adjust it. Unfortunately, your last edit to the links for the help panel did not fully take: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=MediaWiki%3AGrowthExperimentsHelpPanel.json&diff=1236433907&oldid=1235040140
Could you redo it, and make sure to actively select the desired page from the dropdown? We know that this is really not ideal and are working on improving it.
We're now prioritizing some more robust error checking T360921 to make sure this does not happen again by accident, and more generally T358659. We noticed this because it triggered a lot of log-spam ( T370941), but that's a bug that we're taking care of on our end.
I'm very sorry about all of this 😔
-- MGrosse-WMF ( talk) 21:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I saw when I came back after reviewing some other reports that they had returned and they were being rude. I've blocked them for 24 hours now. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Regarding your edit here, would you object if I revert? I created a set of redirects ( Grand Tour double, Giro–Tour double, Tour–Vuelta double, Giro–Vuelta double) that all shared a section target on the page " Grand Tour (cycling)". I was aware of the redirect Giro-Tour double, and intended to retarget it to the same page. " Grand Tour (cycling)" seems a more relevant page to target: these redirects are actually about winners of multiple Grand Tours, rather than non-winners of the Triple Crown. Merckx's 1974 wins and Roche's 1987 wins are in the section " Grand Tour (cycling)#Winners of multiple Grand Tours in a single year", but are omitted from the section " Triple Crown of Cycling#Winning two grand tours in one year". Jean-de-Nivelle ( talk) 00:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I noticed you opened the RfD for the user's nonsense redirect Quinton de Penis. After G10-ing another nonsense, Ben Brown (traitor), today, I see they've created since the RfD joke redirects Jamie Olive Oil, Ollie Poope, Communist plot football, COVID's Mum, and the racist Weejio. Clearly at the very least they need their autopatrolled removed. Hyphenation Expert ( talk) 03:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I really admire your contributions to Wikipedia and your resilience! Thank you for your incredible work. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 23:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC) |
The redirect Miligram has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 5 § Miligram until a consensus is reached. Tevildo ( talk) 12:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
So, I saw that you (mostly correctly) declined some history split requests I made. Looking again, I linked the wrong revisions on a bunch of them so I just added the requests back, this time with the correct revisions. However, I disagree with your rationale for declining the Xuastvanift split. As far as I can tell, the revision I linked in that request, Special:PermanentLink/1169404108, has nothing to do with Xuastvanift; it only mentions the kanji. Can you reconsider that one? Nickps ( talk) 01:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Joe Biden participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 16:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to make a comment about a page mover request but I cannot edit the page currently. I don't know if there's an alternative way to comment, without being logged in, but I saw you'd replied to a previous request and are an administrator.
Anyway: I noticed Jruderman requested page mover ability. I'd strongly encourage whoever reviews his request to assess his recent history, particularly in the 2024 CrowdStrike incident page, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination), and also to see his talk page. He is very clearly unfamiliar with the processes of Wikipedia. After no consensus was achieved for the CrowdStrike move, he wanted to unilaterally move the page and multiple people had to explain why that isn't appropriate. I think he is wholly unfamiliar with how consensus is achieved, when pages should he moved, and, to be honest, how Wikipedia "works" in general. I hope his request is investigated thoroughly, particularly the pages I mentioned/linked and the talk page advice others have tried to give him. He needs assistance or ADOPTion, but I'm worried giving him page moving ability is far too early. Thanks. 91.223.100.49 ( talk) 12:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Pppery,
Although my change in the sandbox worked for my particular case I did not make it live as I don’t understand the problem with the test cases - have asked on template talk page at /info/en/?search=Template_talk:To_USD_round#Seems_to_be_something_wrong_with_test_procedure - hope you can explain there Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery, you made this edit last year, and I'm wondering if it worked, as, from what I see, user pages are still being added to the category. Nobody ( talk) 07:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I don't really understand your removal of the speedy deletion tag. I read you edit summary but I don't quite follow. The page has been recreated over and over again by Bobanfasil sockpuppets, and isn't that alone reason to delete? Recreation by sockpuppets? See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobanfasil. Jonteemil ( talk) 21:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery! Hope you are doing well. I believe you did a minor cut/paste mistake when processing Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Category:Palestinian bedouins – it is currently half(?) listed in the HTML comment in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working#Merge then delete. Would you be able to fix this? (I would fix it myself, but I am not sure if I am missing anything :D) Best, House Blaster ( talk · he/they) 03:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, could you clarify the reason for the removal of the speedy deletion tag at Khashayar Farzam? The article was initially created and curated by the group of socks blocked in 2107 here [1] under name "Guptalab" . It was then recreated by a further group of socks, blocked here [2], also under name "Guptalab". So, my understanding is that the article was created by the sock of a blocked user. If I'm missing something here (which I may well be) please let me know. Axad12 ( talk) 18:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I don't think your recent edit to the Template:Speedy deletion navbox did what you meant. I've undone the change for now, but I have no objection to your intended addition if it works correctly and doesn't break the template. Best wishes, Zinnober9 ( talk) 05:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I see you created Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unused maintenance categories and revised Template:Db-c4/doc to state the template adds pages to that category. However when I used {{ db-c4}} today, it did not add any category. It looks like {{ category handler}} needs to be added to that template, similar to how other speedy deletion templates add a category. Thanks, Zyxw ( talk) 09:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, is there any chance that the Big Brother 26 (American season) can be updated to reflect the recent events because the page is fully locked. Thanks. MSalmon ( talk) 13:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Why was this page deleted? Bazinga2242 ( talk) 20:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I'm sad to see you resign, and hope you will return to being an admin soon, though I can totally understand how Wikipedia may have been quite demotivating for you lately. Your contributions as an admin, particularly focus on typically-overlooked administrative areas, are things that the community will be worse off without. Elli ( talk | contribs) 01:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
interface squeegee. I'm stealing that xD – Novem Linguae ( talk) 16:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Eight years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, there's something amiss with User:Pppery/topicons. In some skins, it makes the page title read vertically instead of horizontally, pushing the text "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia", and everything after that, several inches down the page. I use Firefox 129.0.2 under Windows 10.
These skins show the problem:
These skins are fine:
The problem is also evident at any page that transcludes User:Pppery/topicons - such as this user talk page. See for example /info/en/?search=User:Pppery?useskin=vector -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 15:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
I see no namespace editnotice when I visit https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=MOS_talk:EM&action=edit. It appears that you have created the MOS talk namespace editnotice in the wrong namespace. Please fix this by moving Template talk:Editnotices/Namespace/MOS talk to Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MOS talk. GTrang ( talk) 19:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
@ Pppery Hi there, as you're the one you denied history merge of Draft:Make Mate 1 and Make Make 1. Is this same situation with Draft:Bunny and Her Boys and Bunny and her Boys because both were edited by the same editor? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 05:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering why you marked the article Autopista Regional del Centro as unreviewed (see here). I am the user who originally marked it as reviewed after tagging it with the appropriate maintenance tags and ensuring the article met notability guidelines. harrz talk 17:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Pppery! I wanted to let you know that I declined the G4 for Marko Stout as the article is not sufficiently similar to the one previously deleted via discussion. If you feel that Stout's notability remains unchanged, you will need to open another discussion. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Template:Manual edit requests has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 20:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
At
Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Survey_(dark_mode_reporting) you said this involves spending a lot of effort fixing something that isn't really broken
. I responded on how the current system is broken. Would you mind clarifying how the system isn't broken? Thanks, —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {
user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions}
17:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Is there any way to get the history of pages that were in a category? I would have liked to see such a thing for Category:Wikipedia Office-protected pages. Thanks, TrangaBellam ( talk) 06:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello friend. Do you think it's a good idea to mass remove links to Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation? It's still a blue link and it will be unlocked/undeleted at some point. And it may also be good from a strategy/awareness angle to bring some clicks/views/attention to this unusual situation. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 07:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:HouseBlaster submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Former Administrator |
Pppery |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning October 27, 2024 |
Pppery is the definition of a strong back-end line contributor. His work includes expanding the functionality of Template:XFD backlog to cover all XfDs, improving Module:Bad title suggestion, modernizing The Wikipedia Adventure, and a significant rewrite of Module:Authority control. He frequently steps up to the plate to take care of tasks nobody else is doing, including single-handedly keeping down the backlog at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and for many months he was the only one processing the endless requests for assistance at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working. Recently he handed in the mop, and the hope is he finds editing without the tools rejuvenating,. His work is sincerely appreciated by all. |
Recognized for |
strong back-end contributions |
Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, what's with the removed hatnotes on FA and RM dab pages. Let me know asap. Thank you. ScarletViolet t c 12:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia talk:Queen Elizabeth slipped majestically into the water.
Uh-oh, did I misclick? I hope not. Awesome Aasim 01:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you please explain why you declined the history merge at Shenington Airfield?
The whole point of the history merge was to fix the attribution, at Wikipedia:HISTMERGE it says "A history merge is required for attribution purposes, as attribution is lost during a cut/paste page move where there are multiple editors at the old page. In the image shown, it appears as if the user Thegreatrebellion had created the entirety of the added text at Syed Saddiq, when the reality is that there were contributions from over 200 editors at the previous page name of Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman. While this is not an exhaustive list, any pages meeting the below criteria may be eligible for a histmerge: There are several editors in the page history at the original location"
In your edit summary you say " the author seems to intend these as two separate articles", where did you get this information from? The editor hasn't been active since they created the article by copying and pasting and hasn't responded to the message on their page.
The info at Shenington Gliding Club, only consists of 3 lines about the club? How is a gliding club notable enough for a separate article?
Gavbadger ( talk) 20:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Currently, it is owned by Shenington Airfield Ltd, and leases use of the site to various organisations, predominatly the Shenington Gliding Club.is where I got that implication from. If what they intended was a move they wouldn't have done a circular link like that. What I'm seeing there looks like a bad attempt at a split (which should have been attributed per WP:CWW), not an attempt at a cut-paste move that needs repairing. If the eventual outcome is that the gliding club article is deleted or turned back into a redirect, resulting in only an article at the airfield title surviving, I will gladly move the history to the survivor, but right now that's not what I'm seeing. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I want to explain my merge history request. I created a page that is a redirect, "List of WWE Women's United States Championship", as it will be used later on, but I realized after the page's creation that I had made a typo in the name. The page was meant to be titled "List of WWE Women's United States Champions". I went to move the page to have the correct name, but when I did, I noticed that another page had been created after the original page with the name that I had intended. Thus, I wanted to merge the histories of the pages for archival purposes as the latter page was created after the former. I hope that this clears everything up. Thank you for your time. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 ( talk) 21:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Now that you've been resysopped, you may want to change the userbox on your userpage that says you're a former administrator. Or maybe you don't want to. Whatever floats your boat. Just making you aware in case you forgot about it. Useight ( talk) 17:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Would you reconsider your G5 decline on GISB Holdings? PaleWhisper has also been blocked as a sock of Ibn Juferi. Thanks! Dclemens1971 ( talk) 20:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Pppery,
I was running some queries on Quarry and saw that you just ran a lot of queries. I was wondering, would Admins without RfAs include admins who went through an election rather than an RFA? Just curious.
Since you are so adept at queries, I might come to you with a coding problem that keeps coming up if you have a second to look at it. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
I just saw the page of New Pages Feed and have added some references into it. After that, i saw that it was edited by the IP 106.205.136.132, who removed redirect and added new information to the page. forgive if i made a mistake. TheChronikler7 ( talk) 13:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
I desysopped for a couple months a couple years ago. I'd realized one day that I hadn't edited in like two months (and I'm a daily editor), and I decided to try desysopping to see if it had something to do with being an admin. Turned out it had something to do with a particular admin task: moving preps to queues at DYK. This is an area in which plenty of admins work as editors, but almost none working in as admins. I'd felt obligated to perform the task -- it was one of the reasons I'd RfA'd -- even though I was feeling increasingly resentful. As soon as I desysopped, I started editing again, and I realized it had been the sense of obligation and accompanying resentment that had kept me from logging in. I didn't want to see that big pile of work I felt resentful of having to do. Figuring out what the problem was and how to deal with it (stop feeling obligated, it's not my responsibility) let me feel like I could resysop, and I did, deciding I was going to do my fair share of admin work at DYK, and that was it. When I create some work for admins there, I do some admin work there, too. Valereee ( talk) 16:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
I have forgot the password for NGC 2736 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ( blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) How can I log in to that account now or can recover password? CometVolcano ( talk) 03:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery! It's great to see you're back on the sysop bit again :) While I do not want this page again User:Vanderwaalforces/Benin moat (revised), I want its history to be merged to Benin Moat first before deletion. I'm sure you can help with that. Many thanks! Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 09:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
I don't do phabricator. Have no developer skill. Perhaps you ca help AmmandaNP fix UTRS. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you declined my WP:U2 tag and draftifed User:/Blaise Reuterswärd to Draft:Blaise Reuterswärd. I chose to tag for CSD since the user also made an identical version of the page at User:Roxane CANSALAS/Blaise Reuterswärd at nearly the same time. I assumed the one at the malformed username was an actual accident and not an attempt to main space it. (Although I could see how tagging the incorrect user U2 and potentially moving the other user draft to draft space, although I prefer not to do that unless a user has put an AFC template on their userspace draft. So, no big deal, of course, and if this outcome is what you think is best, that's fine. But I do wonder/wish there was an easy way to explain a bit more background in CSDs, potentially. Thanks. Skynxnex ( talk) 17:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Don't worry, you're not an idiot. After all, just a few days prior, I did this. JJP Mas ter ( she/ they) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Barnstar of Motivation | |
Thank you for being my motivation to keep going with Wikipedia! After seeing all of your edits I strive to aim for more effort not just in Wikipedia but also in life! Midpour ( talk) 21:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC) |
Sorry about the double-CSD at Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia talk:Friendly. I was working down a list and didn't notice that you had declined the first CSD. Strangely, I didn't get a notification the first time. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
It appears that you have mistakenly deleted the talk page for the squash player. Please fix this by first moving Talk:Abhay Singh to a temporary title, then undeleting the mistakenly deleted talk page, moving it to Talk:Abhay Singh (squash player), and finally moving the page with the temporary title back to its original location. GTrang ( talk) 17:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Upon thinking your response over, I'm going to slow down with editing. I don't know what I was thinking, but I'm definitely not ready to have that level of power again. I'm sorry for all the trouble I caused with AutoWikiBrowser in the past. Also, happy almost 100k edits! - OpalYosutebito ( talk) 16:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Pppery. I notice that you fully-protected Module:Portal to the admin level. I've been the main editor maintaining the module for the past 2 years, but I'm only a templateeditor not a full admin (since I don't want to deal with wikidrama). It's fine to keep it at admin-level protection, because the module is relatively stable, but wanted to let you know we're going to lose my direct maintenance (i.e., I will have to pester admins now). IMO we don't gain much protection by going from templateeditor to admin level. — hike395 ( talk) 19:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
If this, then how about moving Draft:CaseOh1 to Draft:CaseOh? It was intentionally misnamed by the mover because mainspace CaseOh is protected from this nincompoopery. Thanks for any feedback. JFHJr ( ㊟) 02:07, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
The Barnstar for the Oops | ||
Did not know that Ragpicking was a thing, thanks for linking that page. -- Thebirdlover ( talk) 10:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
Template:Articles with wikipuffery progress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 14:31, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Monthly clean-up category (Articles with wikipuffery) counter has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 14:31, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for that. It was indeed a mouse slip. I immediately undid but you were faster. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Pppery is currently feeling
discouraged about Wikipedia and is taking an off-and-on
wikibreak due to loss of motivation. Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated. |
Welcome!
Hello, Pppery, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome!
– Fayenatic L ondon 20:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Hi Pppery, I feel sad you are on Wikibreak but it's fine; at least to ease up some offwiki stress. I am also for a while thinking about beng discouraged about Wikipedia. I know it's difficult to be here also, but you're doing perfectly and more than okay. I usually enjoy your work in the technical aspects and WP:RM; those are run-around impact I have known you for. That I will encourage you to come back, being cheered, I award you the Administrators Barnster as a way of missing you, your high impact and otherwise. Feel free, stay safe, and always happy. Cheers! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
Hi! Is there any particular reason you renamed Category:Sexual-related controversies in film to Category:Sex-related controversies in film? My (admittedly WP:INVOLVED) read of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#Category:Sexual-related controversies in film is that we reached consensus for a rename to Category:Sexuality-related controversies in film. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Sorry if I have ticked you off watching other admin talk pages, I just read that you are feeling discouraged and wanted to apologize for my bad behavior. I know that I should've just let you discuss and not impede your discussions. I hope this WikiLove makes you feel better. (By the way, I'm also thinking of leaving/going on a wikibreak for my own reasons, nothing to do with you.) Thanks for all you do here, and please note your contributions are appreciated, no matter if you stay as an admin or not.
thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
You removed a speedy-delete tag from User:WikiWiz31 as there is no obvious mention of it being a sockpuppet. While a page just saying 'hi' is harmless, the block log states that the user is an unnamed LTA (and WP:G5 covers sockpuppetry as well). Due to the contents of the page, are very short userpages created as ban violations, like that one, supposed to be kept, or not? Xeroctic ( talk) 18:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Hey sorry i wasn't finished with it and was going to work on it later can i get it back. i promise i will have it done this week Freedun ( yippity yap) 00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Could you review the speedy deletion for Atter again? :3 Blockhaj ( talk) 00:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery, I don't know what to do to such user. I am about taking them to WP:AN for a partial block or so (this is something you can do, though I thought of being WP:INVOLVED). Do I revert the move? No! I think I will suggest that at AN. Any opinion/help I can get from you? Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 01:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
"Expert in Bible" is just not grammatically correct. I was fixing a typo because the Bible is a proper noun and as such it needs a "the". I might be wrong but I still feel my edit was appropriate. CharlieEdited ( talk) 21:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on cleaning up the archiving process for the DoubleWiki (and for triaging and cleaning bugs in PageTriage) :)
Sohom (
talk)
19:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Not sure if it's a glitch or cache issue but the discussion doesn't seem to have been closed. Primefac ( talk) 20:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Seems like there are a lot of them (philosophy, mathematics, physics, a recently created one on data science, economics, ...). Are you planning on going through them all one-by-one? -- JBL ( talk) 18:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Sighyeah I feel you :). (I also do not feel inclined to tackle them -- luckily "cruft from the early days of Wikipedia that sits around generally ignored" is probably not causing too much damage to anything.) -- JBL ( talk) 17:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! What was I screwing up there? Valereee ( talk) 10:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Fossorials has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, saw your recent participation at WT:BLIST and thought you might be the right one to ask. I recently warned an editor for adding what appears to be three malicious URLs, embedded within inline citations, which you can view in this series of edits. I made the mistake when I checked one, and it immediately redirected to a phishing site of some kind. Think I closed out in time, so if you're going to test, be sure to use some kind of protected method to check them out!
I assume they'll need to be blacklisted, but I've never dealt with this before on Wikipedia. Wasn't sure how to properly warn users and where to report. Thanks in advance! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 20:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I’m sorry you’re feeling discouraged. Just wanted to say that your work is appreciated. I hope you re-engage at some point, but take the time you need for yourself. Nice use of the Great Stone Face. ;) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 04:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
First of all, thank you for completing the history merge I requested. Your comment in the edit summary that it's [n]ot strictly needed with only one author, and I suspect many admins would have declined this
has me suspecting I've asked for something strange. My thinking was that since my sandbox copy had a few intermediate edits in it and I only made it to figure out how to do the changes I wanted to do without turning the template documentation into a
WP:BADHOUSE at any point, I'd ask for the history to be merged and then ask for
WP:U1 so my changes and the reasons for them would show up in the history of the page itself and I wouldn't have a page sitting around in my userspace that's just an exact copy of another page that I don't need anymore. Basically like a pull request. I was just trying to minimize the amount of Investigation required for anyone looking at the history in the future to understand my changes, but is this considered Bad?
Kinsio (
talk ★
contribs ★
rights)
04:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I noticed your conversation about creating a Gibraltar template at Template_talk:Post-nominals and how there are no advanced requirements to create one. I'm prepared to create a template for another country, but I wanted to know if you were aware of any template restrictions before making one. – Handoto ( talk) 18:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Why did you do this? Was there some reason I shouldn't inform this user? Did I do something wrong here? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I see you're online, hope you don't mind the direct ping. Draft:Jewel Palmer was created by three blocked socks. Rather than delete it, I thought it would be better to move it to draft. A fourth account has now tried to blank it, and then posted this request following my revert and warning. What's the right thing to do here? Is it another sock, or is the request a matter for oversight? ANI didn't seem like the best place to post this. Thanks, Wikishovel ( talk) 18:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Regarding Polish–Muscovite Wars (1605–1618) and the other deleted broken redirects to Polish–Russian War (1605–1618), I was thinking of either recreating the rest of these or asking for their undeletion. Would you like to undelete any or all of them before I just recreate them?
SilverLocust 💬 20:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you redirected the CSUSB College of Education page to the university article. I'll be working on it in my sandbox. In the mean time, does this page, UCR Graduate School of Education also qualify for deletion? Thanks! House1090 ( talk) 21:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery -- I requested a merge to fix a copy-and-paste split without attribution, following the instructions here which point to WP:HM. To me, this split seems to fall under: "When to request a histmerge: A history merge is required for attribution purposes [...] where there are multiple editors at the old page. [...] While this is not an exhaustive list, any pages meeting the below criteria may be eligible for a histmerge: There are several editors in the page history at the original location"
Could you please help me understand why that doesn't apply here? (And if you can, please redirect me to the correct process)? Thanks! -- Rlandmann ( talk) 01:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Pppery,
I noticed today that you run a lot of Quarry queries, as do I. However, the queries I run were "forked" from other editors' queries a long time ago and I don't understand how to code in Quarry although I've spent some time in the past learning how to code in other languages. Now, two queries that I ran for years without any problems won't run and give me error messages. I was wondering if you'd be willing to look them over and make any necessary corrections.
If you are too busy, I understand but I thought I'd ask in case you'd be willing to help. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Can you please hide/delete this log action as well as this revision? 102.156.13.95 ( talk) 10:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey 👋,
thank you for engaging with our Growth features and using the new CommunityConfiguration to adjust it. Unfortunately, your last edit to the links for the help panel did not fully take: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=MediaWiki%3AGrowthExperimentsHelpPanel.json&diff=1236433907&oldid=1235040140
Could you redo it, and make sure to actively select the desired page from the dropdown? We know that this is really not ideal and are working on improving it.
We're now prioritizing some more robust error checking T360921 to make sure this does not happen again by accident, and more generally T358659. We noticed this because it triggered a lot of log-spam ( T370941), but that's a bug that we're taking care of on our end.
I'm very sorry about all of this 😔
-- MGrosse-WMF ( talk) 21:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I saw when I came back after reviewing some other reports that they had returned and they were being rude. I've blocked them for 24 hours now. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Regarding your edit here, would you object if I revert? I created a set of redirects ( Grand Tour double, Giro–Tour double, Tour–Vuelta double, Giro–Vuelta double) that all shared a section target on the page " Grand Tour (cycling)". I was aware of the redirect Giro-Tour double, and intended to retarget it to the same page. " Grand Tour (cycling)" seems a more relevant page to target: these redirects are actually about winners of multiple Grand Tours, rather than non-winners of the Triple Crown. Merckx's 1974 wins and Roche's 1987 wins are in the section " Grand Tour (cycling)#Winners of multiple Grand Tours in a single year", but are omitted from the section " Triple Crown of Cycling#Winning two grand tours in one year". Jean-de-Nivelle ( talk) 00:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I noticed you opened the RfD for the user's nonsense redirect Quinton de Penis. After G10-ing another nonsense, Ben Brown (traitor), today, I see they've created since the RfD joke redirects Jamie Olive Oil, Ollie Poope, Communist plot football, COVID's Mum, and the racist Weejio. Clearly at the very least they need their autopatrolled removed. Hyphenation Expert ( talk) 03:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I really admire your contributions to Wikipedia and your resilience! Thank you for your incredible work. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 23:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC) |
The redirect Miligram has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 5 § Miligram until a consensus is reached. Tevildo ( talk) 12:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
So, I saw that you (mostly correctly) declined some history split requests I made. Looking again, I linked the wrong revisions on a bunch of them so I just added the requests back, this time with the correct revisions. However, I disagree with your rationale for declining the Xuastvanift split. As far as I can tell, the revision I linked in that request, Special:PermanentLink/1169404108, has nothing to do with Xuastvanift; it only mentions the kanji. Can you reconsider that one? Nickps ( talk) 01:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Joe Biden participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 16:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to make a comment about a page mover request but I cannot edit the page currently. I don't know if there's an alternative way to comment, without being logged in, but I saw you'd replied to a previous request and are an administrator.
Anyway: I noticed Jruderman requested page mover ability. I'd strongly encourage whoever reviews his request to assess his recent history, particularly in the 2024 CrowdStrike incident page, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL (2nd nomination), and also to see his talk page. He is very clearly unfamiliar with the processes of Wikipedia. After no consensus was achieved for the CrowdStrike move, he wanted to unilaterally move the page and multiple people had to explain why that isn't appropriate. I think he is wholly unfamiliar with how consensus is achieved, when pages should he moved, and, to be honest, how Wikipedia "works" in general. I hope his request is investigated thoroughly, particularly the pages I mentioned/linked and the talk page advice others have tried to give him. He needs assistance or ADOPTion, but I'm worried giving him page moving ability is far too early. Thanks. 91.223.100.49 ( talk) 12:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Pppery,
Although my change in the sandbox worked for my particular case I did not make it live as I don’t understand the problem with the test cases - have asked on template talk page at /info/en/?search=Template_talk:To_USD_round#Seems_to_be_something_wrong_with_test_procedure - hope you can explain there Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery, you made this edit last year, and I'm wondering if it worked, as, from what I see, user pages are still being added to the category. Nobody ( talk) 07:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I don't really understand your removal of the speedy deletion tag. I read you edit summary but I don't quite follow. The page has been recreated over and over again by Bobanfasil sockpuppets, and isn't that alone reason to delete? Recreation by sockpuppets? See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobanfasil. Jonteemil ( talk) 21:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pppery! Hope you are doing well. I believe you did a minor cut/paste mistake when processing Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Category:Palestinian bedouins – it is currently half(?) listed in the HTML comment in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working#Merge then delete. Would you be able to fix this? (I would fix it myself, but I am not sure if I am missing anything :D) Best, House Blaster ( talk · he/they) 03:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, could you clarify the reason for the removal of the speedy deletion tag at Khashayar Farzam? The article was initially created and curated by the group of socks blocked in 2107 here [1] under name "Guptalab" . It was then recreated by a further group of socks, blocked here [2], also under name "Guptalab". So, my understanding is that the article was created by the sock of a blocked user. If I'm missing something here (which I may well be) please let me know. Axad12 ( talk) 18:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I don't think your recent edit to the Template:Speedy deletion navbox did what you meant. I've undone the change for now, but I have no objection to your intended addition if it works correctly and doesn't break the template. Best wishes, Zinnober9 ( talk) 05:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I see you created Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unused maintenance categories and revised Template:Db-c4/doc to state the template adds pages to that category. However when I used {{ db-c4}} today, it did not add any category. It looks like {{ category handler}} needs to be added to that template, similar to how other speedy deletion templates add a category. Thanks, Zyxw ( talk) 09:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, is there any chance that the Big Brother 26 (American season) can be updated to reflect the recent events because the page is fully locked. Thanks. MSalmon ( talk) 13:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Why was this page deleted? Bazinga2242 ( talk) 20:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I'm sad to see you resign, and hope you will return to being an admin soon, though I can totally understand how Wikipedia may have been quite demotivating for you lately. Your contributions as an admin, particularly focus on typically-overlooked administrative areas, are things that the community will be worse off without. Elli ( talk | contribs) 01:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
interface squeegee. I'm stealing that xD – Novem Linguae ( talk) 16:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Eight years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, there's something amiss with User:Pppery/topicons. In some skins, it makes the page title read vertically instead of horizontally, pushing the text "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia", and everything after that, several inches down the page. I use Firefox 129.0.2 under Windows 10.
These skins show the problem:
These skins are fine:
The problem is also evident at any page that transcludes User:Pppery/topicons - such as this user talk page. See for example /info/en/?search=User:Pppery?useskin=vector -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 15:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
I see no namespace editnotice when I visit https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=MOS_talk:EM&action=edit. It appears that you have created the MOS talk namespace editnotice in the wrong namespace. Please fix this by moving Template talk:Editnotices/Namespace/MOS talk to Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MOS talk. GTrang ( talk) 19:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
@ Pppery Hi there, as you're the one you denied history merge of Draft:Make Mate 1 and Make Make 1. Is this same situation with Draft:Bunny and Her Boys and Bunny and her Boys because both were edited by the same editor? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 05:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering why you marked the article Autopista Regional del Centro as unreviewed (see here). I am the user who originally marked it as reviewed after tagging it with the appropriate maintenance tags and ensuring the article met notability guidelines. harrz talk 17:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Pppery! I wanted to let you know that I declined the G4 for Marko Stout as the article is not sufficiently similar to the one previously deleted via discussion. If you feel that Stout's notability remains unchanged, you will need to open another discussion. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Template:Manual edit requests has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 20:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
At
Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Survey_(dark_mode_reporting) you said this involves spending a lot of effort fixing something that isn't really broken
. I responded on how the current system is broken. Would you mind clarifying how the system isn't broken? Thanks, —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {
user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions}
17:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Is there any way to get the history of pages that were in a category? I would have liked to see such a thing for Category:Wikipedia Office-protected pages. Thanks, TrangaBellam ( talk) 06:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello friend. Do you think it's a good idea to mass remove links to Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation? It's still a blue link and it will be unlocked/undeleted at some point. And it may also be good from a strategy/awareness angle to bring some clicks/views/attention to this unusual situation. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 07:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:HouseBlaster submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Former Administrator |
Pppery |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning October 27, 2024 |
Pppery is the definition of a strong back-end line contributor. His work includes expanding the functionality of Template:XFD backlog to cover all XfDs, improving Module:Bad title suggestion, modernizing The Wikipedia Adventure, and a significant rewrite of Module:Authority control. He frequently steps up to the plate to take care of tasks nobody else is doing, including single-handedly keeping down the backlog at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and for many months he was the only one processing the endless requests for assistance at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working. Recently he handed in the mop, and the hope is he finds editing without the tools rejuvenating,. His work is sincerely appreciated by all. |
Recognized for |
strong back-end contributions |
Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, what's with the removed hatnotes on FA and RM dab pages. Let me know asap. Thank you. ScarletViolet t c 12:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)