From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 31

Template:LEN Champions League Performance by clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IDF Enlisted ranks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Finch Central LRT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Had added it to the Line 6 Finch West article before removal. According to the edit summary that the Central line has not been announced possibly making this an OR route. As stated on the article "none of the proposed extensions have been funded for design or construction". WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Keep. This section of the line is not OR, it was part of the original Transit City plan. The stops marked in the template can be seen in the image in this article. [1] BLAIXX 02:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Well, should we add it back and have a section about the Central line? -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Yes, I think we should add it back, the section is already there: Line 6 Finch West#Finch West station to Finch station. BLAIXX 02:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Family of Michelle Robinson Obama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Obama family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1952 Summer Olympics men's water polo game E1-1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes ( talk) 15:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Computable knowledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Navigation box based on WP:OR and with no main article ( Computable knowledge does not exist). The "Proposals and implementations" section is particularly arbitrary; it includes everything from Dewey Decimal Classification to Incompleteness theorem to Wikipedia. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 22:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I agree that the "Proposals and implementations" needs to be trimmed down and focused. However, the template is clearly deemed useful (as its usage in several articles attests), and the fact that there is no "computable knowledge" article is merely a reflection of the myriad of topics that are closely related to that concept, which should indeed be organized in a disambiguation page. In fact, I've gone ahead and created it. -- Waldyrious ( talk) 11:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: The template is based on Stephen Wolfram's "The Quest for Computable Knowledge" as mentioned on its talk page. In fact, and contra the nomination, this navbox is much less WP:OR than most navboxes, given that it was derived largely from a single source. Biogeographist ( talk) 13:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. This is more or less a grabbag apparently sourced to one specific author's opinion on things that go together related to computation and knowledge. It fails numbers 2-4 at WP:NAVBOX and I think #5 is arguable as well. Izno ( talk) 07:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • delete, no parent article. Frietjes ( talk) 16:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 13:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per Izno; and note that we don't actually have an article on computable knowledge, that page is just a disambiguation page that lists articles that don't even mention "computable knowledge". V27t ( talk) 12:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Hi, plz see  
here. Thanks. 
Ema--or (
talk) 22:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
reply

Template:Collapse cell 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020–21 European Rugby Challenge Cup last 16 table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Tahiti Championship D2 Table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:33rd CHP Ordinary Convention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 01:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:7th HK LegCo Current Composition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-use article content with no template parameters, categories, or documentation. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 01:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 31

Template:LEN Champions League Performance by clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IDF Enlisted ranks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Finch Central LRT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Had added it to the Line 6 Finch West article before removal. According to the edit summary that the Central line has not been announced possibly making this an OR route. As stated on the article "none of the proposed extensions have been funded for design or construction". WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Keep. This section of the line is not OR, it was part of the original Transit City plan. The stops marked in the template can be seen in the image in this article. [1] BLAIXX 02:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Well, should we add it back and have a section about the Central line? -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Yes, I think we should add it back, the section is already there: Line 6 Finch West#Finch West station to Finch station. BLAIXX 02:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Family of Michelle Robinson Obama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Obama family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 8. Izno ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1952 Summer Olympics men's water polo game E1-1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes ( talk) 15:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Computable knowledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Navigation box based on WP:OR and with no main article ( Computable knowledge does not exist). The "Proposals and implementations" section is particularly arbitrary; it includes everything from Dewey Decimal Classification to Incompleteness theorem to Wikipedia. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 22:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I agree that the "Proposals and implementations" needs to be trimmed down and focused. However, the template is clearly deemed useful (as its usage in several articles attests), and the fact that there is no "computable knowledge" article is merely a reflection of the myriad of topics that are closely related to that concept, which should indeed be organized in a disambiguation page. In fact, I've gone ahead and created it. -- Waldyrious ( talk) 11:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: The template is based on Stephen Wolfram's "The Quest for Computable Knowledge" as mentioned on its talk page. In fact, and contra the nomination, this navbox is much less WP:OR than most navboxes, given that it was derived largely from a single source. Biogeographist ( talk) 13:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. This is more or less a grabbag apparently sourced to one specific author's opinion on things that go together related to computation and knowledge. It fails numbers 2-4 at WP:NAVBOX and I think #5 is arguable as well. Izno ( talk) 07:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • delete, no parent article. Frietjes ( talk) 16:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 13:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per Izno; and note that we don't actually have an article on computable knowledge, that page is just a disambiguation page that lists articles that don't even mention "computable knowledge". V27t ( talk) 12:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Hi, plz see  
here. Thanks. 
Ema--or (
talk) 22:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
reply

Template:Collapse cell 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020–21 European Rugby Challenge Cup last 16 table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 Tahiti Championship D2 Table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:33rd CHP Ordinary Convention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-article content with no template parameters, documentation, or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 01:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:7th HK LegCo Current Composition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 03:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Single-use article content with no template parameters, categories, or documentation. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 01:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook