 | This is an
explanatory essay about the
Wikipedia:Deletion policy and
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Reasons to delete a template. This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. |
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
|
|
| Articles |
| Templates and modules |
| Files |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
There have been many Wikipedia:Templates for discussion (TfD) debates over the years. This page summarizes how various types of articles, subjects, and issues have often been dealt with on TfD. It is modeled on the equivalent pages for AfD and RfD. However, there are significant differences between AfD, RfD and TfD, chiefly that the other debates are often focused on whether the topic is notable, whereas there is no standard or requirement for notability of templates.
This page summarizes what some editors believe are the typical outcomes of past TfD discussions for some commonly nominated types of templates. This page is not a policy or guideline, and previous outcomes do not bind future ones because consensus can change. All templates should be evaluated individually on their merits and their usefulness to readers. As guidelines and actual practice change, this page should be updated to reflect current outcomes.
Don't rely too much on these "common outcomes" when stating a case at Templates for discussion. Precedent can be useful to help resolve these debates, but editors are not bound to follow past practice. Furthermore, for most examples on this page, counter-examples exist. This page describes some past practices; it does not prescribe mandates for the future.
This page simply attempts to summarize Wikipedia's common daily practice in template debates. If you feel that a common outcome for the type of template you are discussing does not apply, then give a common-sense reason, or another guideline, for why it shouldn't apply.
Consensus has generally held that teams placing 4th or lower in a competition (Summer Olympics, Basketball World Cup, etc) do not merit a navbox for the squad members.
- Examples of previous discussions
Single-game and pool play templates
With the implementation of labelled-section transclusion, it has become easier to transclude specific blocks of code from one article to another. Prior to 2019, a single match (generally for tournaments or leagues in sports such as cricket or football) and pool play tables would be stored as a template and transcluded to 2-3 locations: the main "schedule" article, and the articles of the teams' seasons.
While there have not been enough discussions on these templates from before 2019, the emerging consensus is that new/upcoming seasons should have the match results on a centralized page, which can then be transcluded to the individual team articles as necessary. While creating templates for current sporting events is not yet strictly forbidden, it should be discouraged as the content will presumably be need to be merged into the parent article and section-transcluded eventually anyway.
Wrapper templates which tag a section instead of an article (usually titled "Wrapped template name section") are almost always kept, even if the wrapped template has a section parameter, because they and their shortcuts are easier to type.
Unused templates are generally deleted, especially if the creator is inactive, the template has been replaced (either by a better template or via WP:LST in the original article), it is full of redlinks, etc (basically if there is no reasonable use for it).
In rare cases, a user may request that the template be userfied/draftified so that it can be worked on.
Hidden track listings, such as those that appear in {{ infobox album}}, are generally deleted if there exists a navbox containing the same (or similar) information. These templates are also often deleted if they do not have many bluelinks.
| This is an
explanatory essay about the
Wikipedia:Deletion policy and
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Reasons to delete a template. This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. |
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
|
|
| Articles |
| Templates and modules |
| Files |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
There have been many Wikipedia:Templates for discussion (TfD) debates over the years. This page summarizes how various types of articles, subjects, and issues have often been dealt with on TfD. It is modeled on the equivalent pages for AfD and RfD. However, there are significant differences between AfD, RfD and TfD, chiefly that the other debates are often focused on whether the topic is notable, whereas there is no standard or requirement for notability of templates.
This page summarizes what some editors believe are the typical outcomes of past TfD discussions for some commonly nominated types of templates. This page is not a policy or guideline, and previous outcomes do not bind future ones because consensus can change. All templates should be evaluated individually on their merits and their usefulness to readers. As guidelines and actual practice change, this page should be updated to reflect current outcomes.
Don't rely too much on these "common outcomes" when stating a case at Templates for discussion. Precedent can be useful to help resolve these debates, but editors are not bound to follow past practice. Furthermore, for most examples on this page, counter-examples exist. This page describes some past practices; it does not prescribe mandates for the future.
This page simply attempts to summarize Wikipedia's common daily practice in template debates. If you feel that a common outcome for the type of template you are discussing does not apply, then give a common-sense reason, or another guideline, for why it shouldn't apply.
Consensus has generally held that teams placing 4th or lower in a competition (Summer Olympics, Basketball World Cup, etc) do not merit a navbox for the squad members.
- Examples of previous discussions
Single-game and pool play templates
With the implementation of labelled-section transclusion, it has become easier to transclude specific blocks of code from one article to another. Prior to 2019, a single match (generally for tournaments or leagues in sports such as cricket or football) and pool play tables would be stored as a template and transcluded to 2-3 locations: the main "schedule" article, and the articles of the teams' seasons.
While there have not been enough discussions on these templates from before 2019, the emerging consensus is that new/upcoming seasons should have the match results on a centralized page, which can then be transcluded to the individual team articles as necessary. While creating templates for current sporting events is not yet strictly forbidden, it should be discouraged as the content will presumably be need to be merged into the parent article and section-transcluded eventually anyway.
Wrapper templates which tag a section instead of an article (usually titled "Wrapped template name section") are almost always kept, even if the wrapped template has a section parameter, because they and their shortcuts are easier to type.
Unused templates are generally deleted, especially if the creator is inactive, the template has been replaced (either by a better template or via WP:LST in the original article), it is full of redlinks, etc (basically if there is no reasonable use for it).
In rare cases, a user may request that the template be userfied/draftified so that it can be worked on.
Hidden track listings, such as those that appear in {{ infobox album}}, are generally deleted if there exists a navbox containing the same (or similar) information. These templates are also often deleted if they do not have many bluelinks.