Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcut
Purge

19 April 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

< April 18 April 20 >

Purge server cache

International Online Film Critics' Poll

AfDs for this article:
International Online Film Critics' Poll (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listicle with minimal coverage (and what it does get is from blog-type websites rather than any major news source). Violates MOS:FILMACCOLADES, specifically the sentence 'Awards bestowed by web-only entities are not generally included'. Survived an AfD in 2013 that was marred by WP:SPA activity. Sgubaldo ( talk) 16:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The Summer Obsession

The Summer Obsession (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band, not properly referenced as having a strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The attempted notability claims here are (a) being booked to play a major festival tour but then not doing it because their stage was cancelled, which is not a free pass over the touring criterion; (b) releasing one album on a major label, where NMUSIC requires two; and (c) placing songs in video games and compilation albums, which is the one criterion in NMUSIC that explicitly undermines itself with a "not enough if it's the only criterion they pass" stopper clause.
But this is referenced solely to an AllMusic profile, which is a valid starter source but not enough all by itself, and since all of this happened 15-20 years ago a Google search is only landing me directory entries and primary sources rather than WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage.
So I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with much better access than I've got to archived US music media coverage from the naughts can find enough proper sourcing to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have a lot more than just one GNG-worthy footnote. Bearcat ( talk) 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Paulin Basinga

Paulin Basinga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears PROMO. I don't see articles about this individual, only interviews or use of him as an expert on xyz health topic in various media. Odd that all sourcing here is from Nigeria, but none in the home country, possible "pay to publish" as we see typically in Nigerian media. I have my concerns, bringing ti AfD to discuss. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

December 2009 Lower Dir mosque bombing

December 2009 Lower Dir mosque bombing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources provided are from time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 14:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 19:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Maldives–Switzerland relations

Maldives–Switzerland relations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3 of the 4 sources are primary. The 4th is not indepth. Not much interaction besides diplomatic recognition. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 10:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. There's not much here; not enough for a stand-alone article. The French-language news article noted above is not enough to constitute WP:SIGCOV of this topic. Yilloslime ( talk) 15:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

2013 Mardan funeral suicide bombing

2013 Mardan funeral suicide bombing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources provided are from June 2013. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 19:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yamini Aiyar

AfDs for this article:
Yamini Aiyar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable tag since 2012, most references are WP:PSTS or WP:SPS. May be in the news recently due to stepping down as CEO, but otherwise not notable. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 08:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 14:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Andras de Lisocky

Andras de Lisocky (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NATHLETE, WP:GNG. Only source included is a WP:TRIVIALMENTION Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep, I think WP:NATHLETE is not the appropriate policy because de Lisocky is not a track and field sportsman, road racer, or cross country runner. De Lisocky is a gold medalist at a major international competition, so I do believe that we can be confident that contemporary coverage must exist. Finding those newspapers / other sources may be difficult, but we have to at least put in an effort. -- Habst ( talk) 13:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Dan Levenson (musician)

Dan Levenson (musician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Unref BLP. Boleyn ( talk) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment A book was written about him, and he has written a book books about banjo playing. I have started adding references, but I need to take a break now. StonyBrook babble 22:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:HEY; per WP:GNG—we have WP:SIGCOV from the independent and reliable St. Petersburg Times, from a trade journal and from the book written about him (and these refs barely scratch the surface of what is out there on this elderly prolific artist and educator—after taking another break I will look for more); and per WP:ARTIST #1 (cited by peers as an authority in his field) #2 (renowned for implementing popular field workshops for beginners all around the world) and #3 (large body of highly acclaimed instruction books). StonyBrook babble 12:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Open Book Collective

Open Book Collective (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page may not meet Wikipedia's notability; perhaps - redirect to Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs BoraVoro ( talk) 11:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you @ BoraVoro for your suggestion to delete this page. Maybe to share some details around why I thought it might be good to have a separate page on the Open Book Collective - this Open Access platform and community has been developed out of the Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs project, but as the COPIM project has ended and the Open Book Collective itself has matured and now is its own legal entity, I thought it might make more sense to have a separate entry for that initiative. I agree that the current state of the page is still rudimentary, but my hope is that this will be soo growing to include more detailed information around key collaborations, etc. in the space of non-profit OA book publishing, so would be grateful if this could be given space here on Wikipedia going forward. Thanks so much for your consideration, and all best, Flavoursofopen ( talk) 09:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply
thank you @ Flavoursofopen for your passion and work. I'm not entirely in favor of deletion at this point. I am open to changing or withdrawing my vote. BoraVoro ( talk) 09:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - I added a stub tag to the page. Looking over the coverage of the Open Book Collective on the web, it appears notable enough but the article is just starting and does need work. In this case we should follow Wikipedia's policy of improving an article rather than deleting it. WP:EDITING Myotus ( talk) 19:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Redirect, fails WP:NGO. I cannot find any sourcing that is fully independent of the organizaiton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach61 ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Alex Bhathal

Alex Bhathal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a perennial candidate with no notability outside of her repeated unsuccessful candidacies. The sources presented do not demonstrate in-depth coverage of her as a person, focusing on her various campaigns and a dispute with her party. After politics she appears to be a low-profile individual and this BLP amounts to a Pseudo-biography - "Do any reliable sources cover the individual themselves as a main or sole focus of coverage, or is the person mentioned only in connection with an event or organization? In the second case, it is likely that the event or organization is notable, but that the individual is not." AusLondonder ( talk) 14:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose for several reasons. She didn’t meet SIGCOV in the past, but does now in my judgement. There are a number of articles specifically discussing her- including several not yet featured on the article. See here:
Since the last deletion, she has also been the subject of a 2019 documentary, since shown at a number of film festivals. Just one example: https://cdocff.com.au/the-candidate/
https://amp.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/greens-candidate-horror-show-comes-to-the-big-screen-20190708-p525ae.html
it won an award at a film festival too
https://fan-force.com/films/the-candidate/
(The first screening of the documentary got its own article as a fun side note https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/strewth/green-alight/news-story/34f16b93c3f2d45b59addbf7c21a6053?amp)
I think the previous deletion was 100% correct- but in my opinion, this new content brings her up to notability. GraziePrego ( talk) 14:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Adding more to my vote I understand the deletion arguments if all the coverage about her was solely about the 2018 by-election, but that isn't the case. The SBS articles (two from 2016, one from 2017) are about her at a previous federal election, and they do indeed provide "in-depth coverage of her as a person", describing her religion and the history of her father and grandfather. All of these articles are coverage from before the 2018 by-election. She's not just notable for a single event, she has notability through coverage over years.

Also, I would love clarification as to why Amelia Hamer is notable enough to keep, but this article isn't- Hamer is a candidate at an election that hasn't even been called yet. Bhathal has significantly more coverage. Both are notable enough to keep. GraziePrego ( talk) 02:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

While other stuff exists is not the best argument to make at AfD, I have nominated Amelia Hamer for deletion as she is not notable. AusLondonder ( talk) 19:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to 2018 Batman by-election - the articles that GraziePrego posted were published in 2016 and 2017, nearly in the height of her political activity. Most coverage I can find is concerning controversies of the by-election, which is also the focus of the documentary. I didn't find any coverage of her after she quit her party in 2019 at all, other than on her own website. This is effectively a WP:BLP1E, and I don't think there's any more to write about here than what is already covered in the by-election article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Nicholas Peacock

Nicholas Peacock (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that the titular subject (the diarist/author) or the actual subject (the diary) meet any applicable criteria. In terms of the writer (the author of the diary), writing a personal diary (even in the 18th century) doesn't make one a notable author ( WP:AUTHOR). In terms of the book (based on the diary), there is no indication that WP:NBOOK is met. (It appears to be like any other history work based on collated primary sources). WP:GNG is also not met. Frankly, and with every respect, this is another in a long-line of contributions from a Wikipedia editor who should have considered WP:WITHIN. (And perhaps used this source within and in support of other articles. Rather than writing individual articles on every historical person/name they encountered.) I cannot conceive of any appropriate WP:ATDs (redirect/draftify/etc). And so am left with AfD... Guliolopez ( talk) 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Discussed here [2] and here [3], offering discussion around the time he lived in and the social "things" he kept record of, which really need to be incorporated here so we understand why this person is notable. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Comment. Ehmm. Is being mentioned, somewhat in passing, in two books (in addition to his own diary) significant coverage? To the extent that WP:NBASIC is met? In "Marriage in Ireland, 1660–1925" (2020), Luddy and O'Dowd (pages 115, 229 and 231) simply use Peacock (alongside at least a half-dozen other diarists and contemporaries) as an example of the [pervasive/male] opinion that the "purpose in securing a wife was to have someone look after the house and children". I do not have access to "A New Anatomy of Ireland: The Irish Protestants, 1649-1770" (2004), but Barnard doesn't appear to deal with Peacock as a topic directly or in particular detail. I'm clearly missing something, but WP:NBASIC expects that primary sources (like the subject's own diary) don't contribute to notability. At all. And any secondary sources would need to be substantial and/or numerous. And the few mentions in those two works don't seem to be either.... Guliolopez ( talk) 16:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      More for the social context in which he was alive, they fit him into the social history of the time. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      And this [4] and this [5], second one is probably longer. We should at least have BASIC. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      Hi. The first of those is the same Barnard work ("A New Anatomy of Ireland"; 2004) that you (and I) have already mentioned. It's not additional/extra coverage. The second of those is also Barnard (in "The Irish Book in English"; 2006; edited by Gillespie & Hadfield). Essentially the same coverage. Condensed into a paragraph or so. We're still at 2 (perhaps 2 and a half) relatively short mentions in works which are (quite substantially) about something else. As per my nom, if Peacock is relevant only in the context of the "social history of the time", then that's how he should be covered. WP:WITHIN the relevant section of History of County Limerick or Agriculture in Ireland or Marriage in Ireland or similar. JUST as those works do. Not as a biographical subject/topic in own right... Guliolopez ( talk) 20:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

United States of America Computing Olympiad

AfDs for this article:
United States of America Computing Olympiad (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was nominated a year ago and the result was no consensus, because an organization that is the main feeder competition for the IOI has to have sources. I agree, but really, there is nothing, I've tried. I propose redirection to International Olympiad in Informatics. Snowmanonahoe ( talk · contribs · typos) 15:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment - Here's a couple of news sources I found (however, they aren't in-depth):
- https://www.oregonlive.com/my-north-of-26/2015/06/daniel_chiu_from_catlin_gabel.html
- https://www.ahwatukee.com/news/article_ae8b9bf0-f355-11e4-a52a-a7cc90dfff19.html
- https://scnow.com/news/local/clemson-university-to-host-usa-computing-olympiad-for-top-high-school-students/article_b3187844-0e21-5ed9-877c-8158b66bc8f9.html Staraction ( talk | contribs) 15:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Freedom and Justice (Poland)

Freedom and Justice (Poland) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for over a decade, couldn't find source to meet WP:GNG. Found [6], but seems to be unrelated. Article on plwiki was deleted in 2021, see pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:01:01:Wolność i Sprawiedliwość (Polska). ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sergey Pryadkin

Sergey Pryadkin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a banned sockpuppet, and most of the coverage seems to be WP:ROUTINE. Considered PROD, but decided against given that the sources here. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 14:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Craig Conway (actor)

Craig Conway (actor) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate much beyond fairly trivial mentions. Not seeing in-depth coverage specifically about him and his career. AusLondonder ( talk) 14:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Silfade

Silfade (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I get zero results looking up "silfade". Looking up creator SmokingWOLF, I get two (a 4gamer piece and an interview with Famitsu. Using Google Translate, I see the different spelling 'sylphide'. Again, zero results (except results to the unrelated ballet La Sylphide). Fails WP:GNG. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete because this is probably not notable, but please note that such a search really needs to be perfomed in Japanese (シルフェイド) in order to determine whether there are sufficient sources ( WP:BEFORE); it's not the case that there are no hits when searching in Japanese. The Famitsu link you gave above calls this the maker's most important work. Dekimasu よ! 15:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment: Automation-media.com, forest.watch.impress.co.jp IgelRM ( talk) 16:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

John O'Reilly (baseball)

John O'Reilly (baseball) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable baseball player, fails WP:GNG. This is all the coverage I have found of him and it would fail WP:BLP1E. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 14:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Embassy of East Timor, London

Embassy of East Timor, London (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One sentence-stub that completely fails WP:GNG. Sole source is a government list of diplomatic missions in London. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

MissJirachi

MissJirachi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. WP:BEFORE shows no reliable/sigcov about her mainly. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 13:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Gabriel Mendoza Gagnier

Gabriel Mendoza Gagnier (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Regarding GNG, none of the references really even cover him much less be of GNG scope. Regarding SNG, it basically covers routine participation in three areas. North8000 ( talk) 13:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

MC El Bayadh Bus Crash

MC El Bayadh Bus Crash (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. Article about a bus crash. No wp:notability per the events SNG or GNG. Also per wp:not news. North8000 ( talk) 13:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

John Selby (psychologist)

John Selby (psychologist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this article for deletion because it does not meet the notability guidelines. No reliable sources are referenced or can be found online. Alexwiki0496 ( talk) 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Pala invasion of Kannauj

Pala invasion of Kannauj (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An event that does not meet the threshold for notability of WP:NEVENT as it is not covered significant or extensively in the sources. Doesn't even have a true name, this is clearly WP:OR as it was previously at the title of Dharmapala's invasion of Kannauj. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following articles created by the same author for the same reasons as above:

Chola raid on Rarh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pala invasion of Odisha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Thank you — microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 13:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sudsahab ( talk) 15:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Malik Kafur ( talk) 15:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as I have just run around the presentation and the sources match, so, keep. Will come will see ( talk) 15:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rhona Who Lives by the River

Rhona Who Lives by the River (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indicatoin of wp:notability and even indication of whether this will ever exist. The only source is a 2021 story that they plan to make this series. North8000 ( talk) 13:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

West Indian pound

West Indian pound (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years and there is linkrot. It seems like this was a thing, however it is hard to see how this could be expanded with more information (for example more history, which territories etc). It would be great if there was significant sources discussing this topic in detail but even looking for mentions to WP:V basic facts is difficult. A redirect would be preferable, but I'm not seeing a target. JMWt ( talk) 13:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

List of Fate/Grand Order characters

List of Fate/Grand Order characters (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I'm a big fan of Fate/Grand Order as a game, I feel this list is a behemoth that ultimately fails notability on its own, and has become more of a cruft dragon that doesn't really explain why these characters are important. The bigger issue though is a notability one: while Fate itself definitely has reactions, the harder argument is that FGO's characters on their own do in an overarching way that makes it work for WP:N or WP:LISTN.

Even reception for Mash and Ritsuka would be more for them, and that could be worked into the parent game article (and as someone that tried to do a writeup on Mash, I'm not confident the sources are there) Kung Fu Man ( talk) 02:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Redirect The article is massive with no substance, cites all of ONE source (Anime News Network), and it might as well be written in Martian for people like me who know nothing about the games. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment Changing my vote to redirect. Why the flip do I keep forgetting this is an option? sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It seems like a split consensus between redirect and keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 12:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Paulin Basinga publications

Paulin Basinga publications (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no reason to have a list of someone's publications on Wikipedia, this is what Google Scholar and Research Gate etc are for. Since a PROD was contested, it has to go to AfD (perhaps speedy delete). This page should not be merged to Paulin Basinga as a long list is not useful in a BLP. Ldm1954 ( talk) 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu

Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is advertising. It was deleted before in 2017, and does not seem to have been improved. Just getting a patent is not notable, it has to become a real product/method heavily used. Ldm1954 ( talk) 12:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep:First off, most of the inventions shown on the page are dated AFTER 2017, showing that it has been tremendously improved from 2017 to 2024. I am wondering how you did not see that. Getting a patent is one thing but being mentioned by two succeeding presidents in reputable national newspapers does not seem to me that the subject is non-notable. The page is not advertising as there is no other way to show his inventions other than the tone used, unless you can provide a sample sentence for writing about inventors. His biogas is heavily used in Nigerian prisons to generate electricity and it was in partnership with no other than the Federal Government of Nigeria. There are more than twenty indepth national newspapers which describes his inventions too. So I am wondering how his notability is an issue. Royalrumblebee ( talk) 12:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Bordering on G11 speedy, however he is notable and i believe that the article just needs to be cleaned up and have advertising removed. Nagol0929 ( talk) 15:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Estádio Arena do Município Verde

Estádio Arena do Município Verde (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, notability is not inherited per WP:NARENA and WP:NBUILDING. Nagol0929 ( talk) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Saira Shah Halim

AfDs for this article:
Saira Shah Halim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:NPOL, even WP:BASIC. No in-depth articles, she presents her point of view on national media every day. But this does not prove notability. Only one article is better from India Today. Rest of the news is also non reliable. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 21:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep the article. WP:NPOL isn't the only criteria, I have already told you on another article. She handily passes WP:BASIC of WP:BIO. The criteria needs multiple reliable independent secondary sources. In the absence of any source with in-depth coverage, the criteria also accepts combination of multiple sources with limited but not insignificant coverage.
In here, there is presence of multiple sources with decent in-depth coverage so even the supplementary point isn't needed. The main WP:GNG requirement itself is met. I had added four of them. Indian Express, The Wire, The Print and News Click.
But someone had changed the article completely and turned it into a resume kind of page. That someone had removed all these references and replaced it with an article in
India Today which was written by her and some other things like TedX and "enewsroom.com" but I have fixed it now. MrMkG ( talk) 21:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply
That someone is User:Cikisshpedia who made an account just to do this, I don't know why. MrMkG ( talk) 22:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep the article has a good writing. It covered the cause of her notability for being "involved in social work and activism through 2014 to 2018, and eventually came to the limelight during the CAA-NRC protests". It just need a little bit of cleaning i guess. Hi Bree! ( talk) 09:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) (Removed per WP:SOCKSTRIKE) reply
  • Strong Delete part of an big sockpuppet campaign, and clearly fails WP:NPOL.
Allan Nonymous ( talk) 19:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:GNG and also fails WP:NPOL as there is no in depth coverage of her. Tame Rhino ( talk) 19:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
    You yourself have 33 edits, all of them in AfD. How does that happen?
    There is in fact in-depth coverage of her. Maybe there is a "sockpuppet campaign" around this article but it shouldn't matter if she actually passes WP:GNG. They should just be kept away. MrMkG ( talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus/per the request on my Talk
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment. I'm not an expert in NPOL or NEWSORGINDIA but there does seem to be decent coverage of this person in RS. However, these are all from spring 2022 and WP:N requires sustained coverage. Perhaps @ MrMkG could find coverage from other time periods? JoelleJay ( talk) 15:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
@ JoelleJay Sure. Most of her coverage is in Bengali media and newspapers. Some recent ones are these. Sangbad Pratidin, News18 Bangla. MrMkG ( talk) 22:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Additional input regarding the sources presented herein would be beneficial toward establishing a solid, guideline- and policy-based consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Donating blood isn't notable, details on her husband aren't notable... I only see routine election coverage. I don't see notability. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Doctor that ran for public office, raised their vote count for the party, but no coverage beyond that. Coverage of political candidates is usually done to keep the public informed, but doesn't help here if they are no different than any other of the hundreds of candidates each year around the world. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nominator withdrew, and no delete !votes have been placed. North America 1000 11:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rana Muhammad Faraz Noon

AfDs for this article:
Rana Muhammad Faraz Noon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this BLP won a seat in the National Assembly in 2024 election, but was later disqualified after a recount. He has no prior parliamentary position so IMO, he do not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Most of their press coverage stemmed from his 2024 election win, which was later overturned so he fails WP:GNG as well. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Withdraw I forgot that I nom this for deletion just last month & then later withdrew the nom. I'm withdrawing again. However, I feel its important to discuss whether this person meets the WP:POLITICIAN. --— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 10:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Loudsauce

Loudsauce (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A defunct platform/company of strictly ephemeral interest. Source 4 on the page is a blog post and source 5 is a medium post, so those are WP:SPS. The other 3 are just announcements. Just two paragraphs on FastCompany.com, Metropolis is not independent, there is a single one sentence passing mention in Courier international. So no sources meet WP:SIRS and additional searches do not find any WP:CORPDEPTH sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hemmo Paskiainen

Hemmo Paskiainen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article cites no sources, and I was unable to find significant coverage, only brief mentions. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Pahkasika. toweli ( talk) 12:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sandogo

Sandogo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Set of new geographic pages of villages of Burkina Faso created by User:Hisirmynameismahbeer. All of them seem to be added using copy-paste of a template and some very disputable sources. In this example, a completely unrelated Britannica entry is used as source. I started draftifying some articles and fixing the ones for which information can be found, but this seems a clear case of WP:TNT. Some of these places exist and are found in the 2006 census data ( found here) but they are definitely not "towns", they are often located in a different district than the one in the infobox, and sometimes they are only districts of a city (which would not fulfill WP:NGEO). Broc ( talk) 11:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the reasons added above:

Bangma, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zaken (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sakoula (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gantin, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kouba, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Louksi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cissin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Goupana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lalma, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dassouri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Taonsogo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Syoro (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nabakiesma (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pamno Ouidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pamnonghin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zambanaga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tyébanaga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tansobentinga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nakomtenga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zogona (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Moétenga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kaba, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabala, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabarale (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabarikaha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kankalaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tampouy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tinsouka (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zékounga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gampéla (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kouidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Katabtenga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Nomination withdrawn Broc ( talk) 08:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Gounghin Nord (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Goughin Sud (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Paglayiri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kouritinga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Karpala (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nemnin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Abanga, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Abassi, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Abaye, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ayaraba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Babakou (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Babanloua (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bangaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bangataka (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Baniaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bisnaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dabala, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dabanadeni (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dinkabara (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dwaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dyabafouanou (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Feto Kabaradje (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Habaza (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Haba, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gouerba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Delete all per WP:V and WP:BURDEN. Wikipedia has had presistent problems with dubious geographical oneliners in the past, from California to name one example. You can take the time a user spent on making a particular set of oneliners, and multiply that time by hundreds or a thousand to reach the number of the hours it took to clean it all up. It is imperative to take a hard stance against mass-created geostubs with questionable verifiability. Geschichte ( talk) 23:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • DELETE ALL per WP:BURDEN. Fails WP:GEOLAND. -- Twinkle1990 ( talk) 15:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I can see at least two that are worth keeping - Katabtenga (based on sources in the article) and Dassouri (based on sources in the French article.) Habaza also has text but I can't verify it. I spot checked some of the other settlements and can verify some but not others - Louksi clearly exists, for instance, but Nemnin is a neighbourhood of Ouagadougou which doesn't pass GNG "on its face" in the article - so I'm happy with deleting the rest as a purely procedural concern, without any sort of prejudice on re-creation. SportingFlyer T· C 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ SportingFlyer the reason why I opened this AfD and grouped all pages together is that verifying and sourcing all these articles (of which I would guesstimate 30% are worth keeping) is a huge effort. As Katabtenga is a well sourced article, I will withdraw the nomination for it. Broc ( talk) 08:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this needs more discussion since there is an opinion that some of the articles in this bundled nomination should be Kept.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Procedural keep Sorry, but these should be nominated separately, bundling together could keep a more legitimate town. However I do agree there is a problem here, but the process of bundling all-together is a bit of a shit-show. Govvy ( talk) 10:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    How is keeping a bunch of copy pasted articles that nobody will likely ever nominate separately (I most certainly will not) and containing wrong information a better solution for the encyclopedia? Broc ( talk) 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural Keep and nominate separately – It's already becoming a WP:TRAINWRECK here a bit. The nominator stated in a comment above that, "I would guesstimate 30% are worth keeping". The nominator also stated that they don't want to do the work to nominate each article separately, but this is not a valid criteria for mass deletion. Yes, there have been problems with geography-related articles on English Wikipedia, but this is also not a valid criteria for deletion of this batch as some sort of default, based on the past history of other articles. See also: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. North America 1000 11:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural Keep and nominate separately – If you want them deleted, do the work and review them one by one. — Maile ( talk) 12:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Very nice burden on WP:NPP who is definitely not overloaded already. sarcasmThis would create a huge burden on WP:NPP where editors need to review 50+ pages, all containing wrong or dubious information and poor sourcing, merely because some of these places actually exist and therefore fulfill WP:NGEO. Broc ( talk) 13:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
And honestly the editors arguing for a procedural keep above have forgotten to consider that these are a bunch of copy-pasted recently created pages from the same user (hence the grouping). Broc ( talk) 13:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural delete all If someone wants to create articles, they should do the work and review them one by one rather than mass-produce single-line junk with an unreliable autogenerated source. These could also be redirected to List of cities in Burkina Faso or provincial-level articles like Gayéri (department). Reywas92 Talk 14:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Nette Framework

AfDs for this article:
Nette Framework (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, no independent sources, tagged since 2018. Greenman ( talk) 07:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

French ship Gapeau (B284)

French ship Gapeau (B284) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only reliable source for this fishing ship / unarmed military transport ship is a massive 10-book encyclopedia of all German warships no matter how small or insignificant. The other source, netmarine.net, is more of a large hobby site / semi wiki than anything else ("Si vous souhaitez compléter ces pages par des récits, illustrations ou autres documents, écrivez nous."). Fram ( talk) 07:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Transportation, France, and Germany. Fram ( talk) 07:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. We have always kept commissioned naval vessels. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 08:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • No, we haven't, and is in any case not a reason to keep things. "We keep because we always keep" is ignoring things like Wp:CCC and the stricter standards we have for establishing notability instead of assuming some inherent notability across many topics. Fram ( talk) 09:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • You tried the exact same argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-316, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-422 and the like, which ended in redirection, with the closing admin noting the particular weakness of your argument. Fram ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      • So you discount my argument because you disagree with precedent but then cite a closer's remarks (which did not refer to my argument specifically, incidentally) as some sort of precedent? You've got to laugh! But, other than those numbered vessels, which are all pretty much the same, and some static accommodation barges, would you like to cite the AfDs where commissioned military vessels were deleted. Just so we know. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 10:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    We have if they got more than routine coverage. A fishing vessel pressed into navy service isn't the HMS Ark Royal or USS Missouri, so it won't have that level of coverage. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: Reading the article for 2 seconds shows that it was requisitioned for service as a military ship during World War II, so stating fishing ship / unarmed transport ship, is technically correct but is a misleading strawman. I'm not arguing for or against deletion because I don't know if there is a separate method for assessing the notability of ships, but that statement just irked me. Curbon7 ( talk) 09:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • I meant "unarmed military transport ship", otherwise my addition of "unarmed" would make little sense, but I agree that not including "military" was involuntarily misleading. I've added it now, I hope that's better? Fram ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      Much appreciated Curbon7 ( talk) 09:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The vessel served with two navies and two commercial fishers. Although unarmed in French Navy service, she was definitely armed in Kriegsmarine service. If Netmarine is objected to, I can add from Janes All the World's Ships, which most definitely passes WP:RS. Mjroots ( talk) 10:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Comment Lloyd's Register is also a reliable source. Mjroots ( talk) 19:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      • That Lloyd's mention is reliable, but it doesn't contribute to the topic's notability. See WP:SIGCOV. I'm familiar with Janes' usual entries, and while they're also reliable I'm not sure that will meet the SIGCOV bar either. Ed  [talk]  [OMT] 03:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Mjroots and longstanding practice. Kablammo ( talk) 15:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to List of Vorpostenboote in World War II. I'm not concerned with the scope of Gröner's work, but I am interested in its depth of coverage. From the article's content, I'm guessing it does check that WP:SIGCOV box (in addition to all the other points at WP:GNG). Unfortunately, that's only one source, and Lloyd's table doesn't reach that bar. If there's a typical entry in Jane's Fighting Ships, I'm guessing that wouldn't either. As a result, I think this topic can be covered in the main Vorpostenboote list, or if needed that list could be split. (Per GNG footnote 4: "Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic.") Ed  [talk]  [OMT] 03:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Non-notable boat/fishing trawler/transport. Wasn't involved in any heroic anti-submarine battle or any notable rescue at sea that would garner coverage. What's used for coverage is routine ship registry listings, tracing the vessel's career until being scrapped. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scott Sibley

Scott Sibley (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnt establish his notability as per WP: GNG. While he has held various positions and roles in business and politics I think the references provided do not demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV.

The philanthropy section is also failing as it lacks the necessary citations for verification WP:BLP. Without further evidence of in-depth coverage from independent sources, the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards for a standalone BLP Comintell ( talk) 07:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete or Draftily. Water thin argument for notability. and the page needs complete revamp
Comintell ( talk) 07:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sydney Cooke

Sydney Cooke (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This American skater does not appear to meet the WP:NSKATE: no medals at junior international events (or more important competitions). A PROD was converted to redirect, redirect into a recreated mini-stub, thus listing here. Викидим ( talk) 06:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Doonga

Doonga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed in 2019, removed without explanation. 100% unnotable surname failing WP:NNAME and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Of the sources in the article, one does not seem to mention the name at all, and one is an unreliable user-generated website/database that means nothing in terms of notability. No other sources were found in my search that would help its case. Also appears to have been created by someone who has the surname. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 06:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete – Per nom. Article with zero references. Svartner ( talk) 15:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Bubble laser

Bubble laser (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic example of WP:TOOSOON. Article is based upon a Jan 2024 paper which made a minor splash with popular science blogs and journals. There is no true evidence of notability, this type of article is not what Wikipedia is for. The topic could be returned to in a year if many others copy it. Ldm1954 ( talk) 04:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep: The WP:GNG is the way we determine notability. Simply that a topic is new does not preclude it from being notable. Regarding the one-year test,

Once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage. -- WP:NTEMP

Therefore, I believe there is no need for a year-long wait as you suggest, because the subject meets the GNG. I will substantiate that below:
This topic has recieved significant coverage (full-length articles) in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. These include:
I believe that these sources provide "true evidence of notability" as specified in the GNG. I don't think there are extra subject-specific criteria that would apply to this article. HenryMP02 ( talk) 05:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Sorry, you are citing popular science articles not full fledged referred articles. If there were 30 arXiv by others already then that would indicate that the scientific community considered it valid and notable, without that it is classic WP:TOOSOON. Ldm1954 ( talk) 05:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Draftify, there is just one scientific article and several pop science retellings of it, and it's too soon, as already mentioned, to establish its notability. Artem.G ( talk) 19:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Why doesn't WP:GNG apply to the topic? Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 17:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Answered my own question, WP:SUSTAINED should be satisfied here. Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 17:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ginter Smuts

Ginter Smuts (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Plenty of match reports on .za (South Africa) websites, but I don't see anything about this player by himself. Not enough sourcing for notability. Oaktree b ( talk) 23:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Chun Ge

AfDs for this article:
Chun Ge (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is a non-existent term and there are not many related reference materials in the article. Meets the criteria of Delete policy 6. Neologisms, it is recommended to delete. SU YIQI ( talk) 05:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Mengbi

Mengbi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After conducting a search, I found that the location you mentioned ceased to exist. In November 2015, Mengbi Township and Shuitianba Township were administratively merged to form Shuitianba Town. Therefore, this location no longer exists. I believe this entry meets Wikipedia's deletion policy, specifically criterion ten: Redundant or otherwise useless templates. Hence, I suggest deleting this entry. WYRRRR ( talk) 05:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WYRRRR ( talk) 05:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. 05:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I expanded the article with an infobox and references from the corresponding article in Chinese. Even if two townships have been amalgamated, an article about the structure prior to amalgamation can be valuable. Once notable, always notable. A populated place can be notable whether it is a small part of a municipality or occupies several municipalities. I don't know whether Mengbi is a township, a town, or both, and what the definition of those terms is in China. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep unless somebody can offer a better deletion rationale than this, and/or redirect to an article about Shuitianba if somebody can be bothered to make one. Firstly, this isn't a template, so deletion criteria for templates have nothing to do with whether it's keepable or not — and secondly, we don't automatically delete articles about things that formerly existed just because they don't still exist now. If we really just couldn't find anything more to say about Mengbi than just "it's a place that existed", then redirecting it to an article about Shuitianba could be viable if we had one, but we don't delete articles about places just because they've been merged into other places, because people might very well still want or need information about what Mengbi was. We're an encyclopedia, not just a directory of currently-existing things — defunct things still have legitimate reasons why people might be looking for information about them, so defunctness is not a deletion rationale in and of itself. We can redirect to the successor entity if there's really just not that much to say, but we don't delete articles just because the topic was merged into something else. Bearcat ( talk) 17:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Bearcat Perhaps your argument #2 can be strenghtened by mentioning Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions? As for #1, the correct notability guideline would probably be Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). It would be good to consider whether this entity meets this one.
    The current sourcing is still pretty poor. Once notable always notable - sure, but was this ever notable? Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here 04:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this article needs more discussion, not based on the deletion rationale but on the Piotrus' question about whether this location, prior to it's Merge, was notable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Tappytoon

Tappytoon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a Web fails Wikipedia:Notability (Web); Because it did not meet the conditions for notability. The company's history, adaptation, awards and nomination, etc. were not introduced. Also, there are no articles that can attract attention. It should be deleted or redirected to the list of webtoon sites in Korea. Hkm5420 ( talk) 05:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall

Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bailian Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic does not comply with the Wikipedia's general notability guideline and there is no reliable source to prove popularity. TMXX0818 ( talk) 04:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Found a few sources in Chinese, Bailian seems to be a major company operating many malls, department store chains and other retail chains, probably worth an article. I am always so reluctant to see lack of coverage in English Wikipedia because it's not covered in English, it's important to be inclusive where possible as English doesn't just belong to the US, UK, India etc but to the world as the world's unifying language of communication. Keizers ( talk) 10:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I'm going to change this to an article about the company. Definitely notable with sources. Keizers ( talk) 05:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Tang, Xiaoli 唐小丽; Xuan, Zhaoqiang 轩召强 (2023-10-30). ""百联西郊"今起试营业！好吃好玩的超多，优惠力度大" [Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall starts its trial operation today! There are so many delicious and fun things to eat and great discounts]. People's Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "10月27日，百联西郊购物中心启动试营业，友宠、优雅、饕餮、欢聚、品质、健康6大生活方式板块，为市民带来全新的多维生活体验。现场人气十足，跟随“宁宁”镜头去打卡吧。 ... 百联西郊购物中心，于2004年开业，是国内首家开放式建筑风格的购物中心，也是上海首个拥有露天广场的社区购物中心。"

      From Google Translate: "On 27 October, Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center launched its trial operation, with six major lifestyle sections: pet-friendly, elegant, gourmet, gathering, quality, and healthy, bringing a new multi-dimensional life experience to citizens. The scene is very popular, follow the "Ning Ning" lens to check in. ... Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center opened in 2004 and is the first open mall in China. It is a shopping mall with a traditional architectural style and is also the first community shopping mall with an open-air plaza in Shanghai."

    2. Cheng, Qi 程琦 (2023-10-28). "经过一年多闭店调整，百联西郊焕新回归：引入友宠等多元场景，重塑商业空间" [After more than a year of store closures and adjustments, Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall returns with a new look: introducing diverse scenarios such as friendly pets and reshaping the commercial space]. Eastday [ zh (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14 – via Sina Corporation.

      The article notes: "经过一年闭店调整的百联西郊购物中心于本周正式开启试营业。温暖柔和的秋日阳光透过新开辟的悦活东庭与悦尚西庭的巨幅采光天窗，在下沉式郊点广场相汇绽放，东里西巷人头攒动，共同见证百联西郊在花样年华焕新再出发。"

      From Google Translate: "Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center officially opened for trial operation this week. The warm and soft autumn sunshine shines through the huge skylights of the newly opened Yuehuo East Courtyard and Yueshang West Courtyard, and blooms in the sunken suburb square. The east and west lanes are crowded with people, witnessing the prosperity of Bailian West Suburb in the Mood for Love. Start fresh and start again."

    3. "百联西郊购物中心暂停营业，进行为期一年的闭店改造" [Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center is temporarily closed for one-year renovation]. People's Daily (in Chinese). 2022-06-16. Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "百联西郊购物中心 是国内首家开放式建筑风格的购物中心 是上海首个拥有露天广场的社区购物中心 扎根上海西部18年 它见证着城市商业发展 也承载着长宁几代人 ... 在18年的经营过程中，百联西郊购物中心每年都会对品牌和业态进行局部调整。但随着消费快速升级，消费者越来越注重消费体验以及购物中心的可玩性，局部改造已不能满足品牌迭代更新需求，动线不合理及硬件老化也限制了中心发展，因此最终采用闭店形式进行改造。"

      From Google Translate: "It is the first shopping mall with open architectural style in China. It is the first community shopping mall with an open-air plaza in Shanghai. Rooted in western Shanghai for 18 years It witnesses the commercial development of the city It also carries generations of Changning people ... During its 18 years of operation, Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center has made partial adjustments to its brand and business formats every year. However, with the rapid upgrading of consumption, consumers pay more and more attention to the consumption experience and the playability of shopping malls. Local renovations can no longer meet the needs of brand iteration and update. Unreasonable movement lines and aging hardware also limit the development of the center. Therefore, closed centers were finally adopted. The store format is renovated."

    4. Xu, Jinghui 徐晶卉 (2022-09-13). "破题核心区存量更新，百联西郊迎来一年改造期，焕变"超级社区能量场"" [The inventory of the core area of PoTian is updated, and the western suburbs of Bailian usher in a one-year transformation period to transform into a "super community energy field"]. Wenhui Bao (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "位于区域核心位置上的百联西郊购物中心，需要全新的价值发现和形态重构，来提升其在西郊、古北、大虹桥三大商圈交汇跃升中的竞争优势；给这个类似纽约“上西区”的辐射域，和其中的居民，带来更新鲜的多元生活方式提案。7月起，百联西郊迎来为期一年的闭店改造。"

      From Google Translate: "Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center, located at the core of the region, needs new value discovery and form reconstruction to enhance its competitive advantage in the intersection of the three major business districts of Xijiao, Gubei and Greater Hongqiao; to give this "New York-like" The radiation area of ​​"Upper West Side" and its residents bring fresher and diverse lifestyle proposals. Starting from July, Bailian Xijiao will undergo a one-year store closure and renovation."

    5. "百联西郊购物中心即将焕新启幕，"超级社区"构筑高能级业态生活能量场" [Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center is about to be renovated and opened, and the "super community" will build a high-energy business life energy field]. Forbes China (in Chinese). 2022-09-01. Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "2004年，作为国内第一家北美风格开放式花园购物中心，百联西郊在十八载的岁月中，不断攒拾着区域发展的“西郊记忆”，成为全国购物中心的典范。"

      From Google Translate: "In 2004, as the country's first North American-style open garden shopping mall, Bailian West Suburbs has continued to accumulate the "Western Suburbs Memory" of regional development over the past 18 years, becoming a model for shopping malls nationwide."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall ( simplified Chinese: 百联西郊购物中心; traditional Chinese: 百聯西郊購物中心) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard ( talk) 00:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: page has been moved to Bailian Group • Gene93k ( talk) 11:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear some opinions on these newly found sources. Also, please do not move an article being discussed at an AFD to a different page title. It really confuses XFDCloser which we use to relist and close discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Dokgo Rewind

Dokgo Rewind (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a Film fails Wikipedia:Notability (films); becasue There is a lack of reliable data in the text. And there is a lack of explanation for the movie. Other film pages provide details such as production process, inserted music, etc., but those pages only describe plots and casts. Hkm5420 ( talk) 04:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Jet Fuel Formula

Jet Fuel Formula (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last entry in the now-depopulated Category:The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends episodes (other episodes and story arcs proved to be non-notable and got redirected after prods and AfDs). This one, being the first story arc, is... well, longer than many others but still does not show why it is notable. We have a gigantic plot summary with poor references and my BEFORE fails to find much of use. I suggest redirecting this one as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Anna Burtasova

Anna Burtasova (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person had no notability. Sources of dubious quality. Only one other source could be found, and it alone could not be enough to build an article upon. aaronneallucas ( talk) 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I think it was bad form to nominate this article for an AFD discussion less than an hour after the article was created. That's not enough time to create an article that could withstand scrutiny at an AFD. I'd also like to see some assessment of newly added content since its nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Dian Badenhorst

Dian Badenhorst (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Kataxenna Kova

Kataxenna Kova (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost of material previously deleted and salted at Kataxenna/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kataxenna * Pppery * it has begun... 04:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Melinda Looi

Melinda Looi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Written like an advertisement. Few references beyond press releases. The references which are present are more puff pieces than independent reviews. Geoff | Who, me? 03:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

hi There.
May I know what is the problem with this wikipedia please? thanks. Melinda Looi ( talk) 11:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ange Keffa

Ange Keffa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR as it does not contain the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet it. BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions) 03:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete unless references to significant coverage of this actress in reliable, independent sources can be added to the article. The two current sources simply report that an actress who appeared in a television series has died. She is otherwise a mystery, based on what the article says and does not say. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, and Ivory Coast. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Question Instead of translating this article from French should I have redirected it to Ma Famille instead? Moondragon21 ( talk) 11:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Alberto Oviedo

AfDs for this article:
Alberto Oviedo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probable UPE advertisement for non notable individual. Just another working photographer. Refbombed to primary source showing he has done work but there is a lack of independent coverage about him. None of the claimed awards are major awards or are specifically for him. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Tommy Brandt

AfDs for this article:
Tommy Brandt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician. Has multiple sources but they are either bylined to him or is an interview. Has a big laundry list of awards but none are major. Claims lots of #1 singles but they're are not on the countries national chart. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A search found nothing better. (last afd was for a different Tommy Brandt) duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rinat Baibekov

Rinat Baibekov (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary sourced bio for non notable artist. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete unless an editor can rewrite the article based on newly discovered references to reliable, independent sources that devote enough significant coverage to this artist showing that they meet WP:ARTIST. The "Artist's statement" section is of no value, because an acceptable Wikipedia article about an artist summarizes what sources independent of the artist say, not what the artist says about themself. The "Overview" section is unreferenced, banal and uninformative. The "Exhibitions" section is entirely unreferenced, and is therefore of no value in establishing notability. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete per both above. Johnbod ( talk) 12:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You Are in Love

You Are in Love (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am dubious whether this article passes WP:NSONG or WP:GNG. The track is not subject of significant coverage, and the current information leaves something to be desired. Suggest redirecting it back to 1989 (album) as a standalone article does not look promising for inclusion atp. Ippantekina ( talk) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Ippantekina ( talk) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect No significant coverage in sources other than album reviews. We have to start becoming stricter (or at least enforcing the guidelines more harshly) on the notability of album tracks. ‍  PSA 🏕️  ( talk) 04:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I think album reviews are fine as long as it satisfies GNG ("Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.") So imo it's really a case by case thing, and in this case the encyclopedic content extracted from the existing sources is subpar for a standalone article. Ippantekina ( talk) 04:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Keep. There are sources that do have significant coverage of the song, other than album reviews. [1] [2] [3] These are the three sources that best demonstrate its notability. Brachy08 (Talk) 07:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sleeth, Indiana

Sleeth, Indiana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Carroll County, Indiana has almost entirely listed unincorporated places that are clearly towns, but this one is an exception. There is the usual square pattern of roads just to the east of the (now taken up) rail line, but the aerials and topos show that this wasn't always there: the oldest topos I found (from the 1960s) don't show it at all, and the aerials show it apparently coming into being. Given the location of the label by the grade crossing, I have to suspect this was a rail point for a town which never really materialized. Perhaps someone else can find more info, but searching was surprisingly difficult: Sleeth is apparently a very common name in Indiana. Mangoe ( talk) 02:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Mars Roberge

Mars Roberge (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography with no evidence of notability, but that has persisted for quite a while. Sadads ( talk) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

In the Stars (Ugly Betty)

In the Stars (Ugly Betty) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television episode. Boarder line WP:ALLPLOT Couldnt find any sources on the episode Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Apache Ambari

Apache Ambari (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are references that verify its existence but nothing that shows notability under WP:GNG. Once of many forks from List of Apache Software Foundation projects. Can be redirected back to the list page as an WP:ATD but bringing to discussion in case someone is able to find better sourcing. CNMall41 ( talk) 00:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Michael J. Szanto

Michael J. Szanto (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ad, POV, undisclosed payment Martinc021 ( talk) 00:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: He's published articles in various media and is used as an expert on news programs, but I don't see anything about him as a person. Sourcing used in the article is mostly primary or non-RS. I can't find any articles about him. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Politics, Florida, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unless an editor adds references to reliable sources entirely independent of Szanto that devotes significant coverage to him. What he says on TV or in newspaper opinion pieces are of no value in establishing notability. Coverage of his grandfather is also of no value. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/Today&oldid=1162720113"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcut
Purge

19 April 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

< April 18 April 20 >

Purge server cache

International Online Film Critics' Poll

AfDs for this article:
International Online Film Critics' Poll (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listicle with minimal coverage (and what it does get is from blog-type websites rather than any major news source). Violates MOS:FILMACCOLADES, specifically the sentence 'Awards bestowed by web-only entities are not generally included'. Survived an AfD in 2013 that was marred by WP:SPA activity. Sgubaldo ( talk) 16:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The Summer Obsession

The Summer Obsession (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band, not properly referenced as having a strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The attempted notability claims here are (a) being booked to play a major festival tour but then not doing it because their stage was cancelled, which is not a free pass over the touring criterion; (b) releasing one album on a major label, where NMUSIC requires two; and (c) placing songs in video games and compilation albums, which is the one criterion in NMUSIC that explicitly undermines itself with a "not enough if it's the only criterion they pass" stopper clause.
But this is referenced solely to an AllMusic profile, which is a valid starter source but not enough all by itself, and since all of this happened 15-20 years ago a Google search is only landing me directory entries and primary sources rather than WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage.
So I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with much better access than I've got to archived US music media coverage from the naughts can find enough proper sourcing to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have a lot more than just one GNG-worthy footnote. Bearcat ( talk) 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Paulin Basinga

Paulin Basinga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears PROMO. I don't see articles about this individual, only interviews or use of him as an expert on xyz health topic in various media. Odd that all sourcing here is from Nigeria, but none in the home country, possible "pay to publish" as we see typically in Nigerian media. I have my concerns, bringing ti AfD to discuss. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

December 2009 Lower Dir mosque bombing

December 2009 Lower Dir mosque bombing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources provided are from time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 14:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 19:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Maldives–Switzerland relations

Maldives–Switzerland relations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3 of the 4 sources are primary. The 4th is not indepth. Not much interaction besides diplomatic recognition. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 10:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. There's not much here; not enough for a stand-alone article. The French-language news article noted above is not enough to constitute WP:SIGCOV of this topic. Yilloslime ( talk) 15:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

2013 Mardan funeral suicide bombing

2013 Mardan funeral suicide bombing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources provided are from June 2013. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 19:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yamini Aiyar

AfDs for this article:
Yamini Aiyar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable tag since 2012, most references are WP:PSTS or WP:SPS. May be in the news recently due to stepping down as CEO, but otherwise not notable. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 08:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 14:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Andras de Lisocky

Andras de Lisocky (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NATHLETE, WP:GNG. Only source included is a WP:TRIVIALMENTION Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep, I think WP:NATHLETE is not the appropriate policy because de Lisocky is not a track and field sportsman, road racer, or cross country runner. De Lisocky is a gold medalist at a major international competition, so I do believe that we can be confident that contemporary coverage must exist. Finding those newspapers / other sources may be difficult, but we have to at least put in an effort. -- Habst ( talk) 13:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Dan Levenson (musician)

Dan Levenson (musician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Unref BLP. Boleyn ( talk) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment A book was written about him, and he has written a book books about banjo playing. I have started adding references, but I need to take a break now. StonyBrook babble 22:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:HEY; per WP:GNG—we have WP:SIGCOV from the independent and reliable St. Petersburg Times, from a trade journal and from the book written about him (and these refs barely scratch the surface of what is out there on this elderly prolific artist and educator—after taking another break I will look for more); and per WP:ARTIST #1 (cited by peers as an authority in his field) #2 (renowned for implementing popular field workshops for beginners all around the world) and #3 (large body of highly acclaimed instruction books). StonyBrook babble 12:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Open Book Collective

Open Book Collective (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page may not meet Wikipedia's notability; perhaps - redirect to Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs BoraVoro ( talk) 11:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you @ BoraVoro for your suggestion to delete this page. Maybe to share some details around why I thought it might be good to have a separate page on the Open Book Collective - this Open Access platform and community has been developed out of the Community-Led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs project, but as the COPIM project has ended and the Open Book Collective itself has matured and now is its own legal entity, I thought it might make more sense to have a separate entry for that initiative. I agree that the current state of the page is still rudimentary, but my hope is that this will be soo growing to include more detailed information around key collaborations, etc. in the space of non-profit OA book publishing, so would be grateful if this could be given space here on Wikipedia going forward. Thanks so much for your consideration, and all best, Flavoursofopen ( talk) 09:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply
thank you @ Flavoursofopen for your passion and work. I'm not entirely in favor of deletion at this point. I am open to changing or withdrawing my vote. BoraVoro ( talk) 09:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - I added a stub tag to the page. Looking over the coverage of the Open Book Collective on the web, it appears notable enough but the article is just starting and does need work. In this case we should follow Wikipedia's policy of improving an article rather than deleting it. WP:EDITING Myotus ( talk) 19:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Redirect, fails WP:NGO. I cannot find any sourcing that is fully independent of the organizaiton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach61 ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Alex Bhathal

Alex Bhathal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a perennial candidate with no notability outside of her repeated unsuccessful candidacies. The sources presented do not demonstrate in-depth coverage of her as a person, focusing on her various campaigns and a dispute with her party. After politics she appears to be a low-profile individual and this BLP amounts to a Pseudo-biography - "Do any reliable sources cover the individual themselves as a main or sole focus of coverage, or is the person mentioned only in connection with an event or organization? In the second case, it is likely that the event or organization is notable, but that the individual is not." AusLondonder ( talk) 14:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose for several reasons. She didn’t meet SIGCOV in the past, but does now in my judgement. There are a number of articles specifically discussing her- including several not yet featured on the article. See here:
Since the last deletion, she has also been the subject of a 2019 documentary, since shown at a number of film festivals. Just one example: https://cdocff.com.au/the-candidate/
https://amp.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/greens-candidate-horror-show-comes-to-the-big-screen-20190708-p525ae.html
it won an award at a film festival too
https://fan-force.com/films/the-candidate/
(The first screening of the documentary got its own article as a fun side note https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/strewth/green-alight/news-story/34f16b93c3f2d45b59addbf7c21a6053?amp)
I think the previous deletion was 100% correct- but in my opinion, this new content brings her up to notability. GraziePrego ( talk) 14:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Adding more to my vote I understand the deletion arguments if all the coverage about her was solely about the 2018 by-election, but that isn't the case. The SBS articles (two from 2016, one from 2017) are about her at a previous federal election, and they do indeed provide "in-depth coverage of her as a person", describing her religion and the history of her father and grandfather. All of these articles are coverage from before the 2018 by-election. She's not just notable for a single event, she has notability through coverage over years.

Also, I would love clarification as to why Amelia Hamer is notable enough to keep, but this article isn't- Hamer is a candidate at an election that hasn't even been called yet. Bhathal has significantly more coverage. Both are notable enough to keep. GraziePrego ( talk) 02:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

While other stuff exists is not the best argument to make at AfD, I have nominated Amelia Hamer for deletion as she is not notable. AusLondonder ( talk) 19:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to 2018 Batman by-election - the articles that GraziePrego posted were published in 2016 and 2017, nearly in the height of her political activity. Most coverage I can find is concerning controversies of the by-election, which is also the focus of the documentary. I didn't find any coverage of her after she quit her party in 2019 at all, other than on her own website. This is effectively a WP:BLP1E, and I don't think there's any more to write about here than what is already covered in the by-election article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Nicholas Peacock

Nicholas Peacock (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that the titular subject (the diarist/author) or the actual subject (the diary) meet any applicable criteria. In terms of the writer (the author of the diary), writing a personal diary (even in the 18th century) doesn't make one a notable author ( WP:AUTHOR). In terms of the book (based on the diary), there is no indication that WP:NBOOK is met. (It appears to be like any other history work based on collated primary sources). WP:GNG is also not met. Frankly, and with every respect, this is another in a long-line of contributions from a Wikipedia editor who should have considered WP:WITHIN. (And perhaps used this source within and in support of other articles. Rather than writing individual articles on every historical person/name they encountered.) I cannot conceive of any appropriate WP:ATDs (redirect/draftify/etc). And so am left with AfD... Guliolopez ( talk) 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Discussed here [2] and here [3], offering discussion around the time he lived in and the social "things" he kept record of, which really need to be incorporated here so we understand why this person is notable. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Comment. Ehmm. Is being mentioned, somewhat in passing, in two books (in addition to his own diary) significant coverage? To the extent that WP:NBASIC is met? In "Marriage in Ireland, 1660–1925" (2020), Luddy and O'Dowd (pages 115, 229 and 231) simply use Peacock (alongside at least a half-dozen other diarists and contemporaries) as an example of the [pervasive/male] opinion that the "purpose in securing a wife was to have someone look after the house and children". I do not have access to "A New Anatomy of Ireland: The Irish Protestants, 1649-1770" (2004), but Barnard doesn't appear to deal with Peacock as a topic directly or in particular detail. I'm clearly missing something, but WP:NBASIC expects that primary sources (like the subject's own diary) don't contribute to notability. At all. And any secondary sources would need to be substantial and/or numerous. And the few mentions in those two works don't seem to be either.... Guliolopez ( talk) 16:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      More for the social context in which he was alive, they fit him into the social history of the time. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      And this [4] and this [5], second one is probably longer. We should at least have BASIC. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      Hi. The first of those is the same Barnard work ("A New Anatomy of Ireland"; 2004) that you (and I) have already mentioned. It's not additional/extra coverage. The second of those is also Barnard (in "The Irish Book in English"; 2006; edited by Gillespie & Hadfield). Essentially the same coverage. Condensed into a paragraph or so. We're still at 2 (perhaps 2 and a half) relatively short mentions in works which are (quite substantially) about something else. As per my nom, if Peacock is relevant only in the context of the "social history of the time", then that's how he should be covered. WP:WITHIN the relevant section of History of County Limerick or Agriculture in Ireland or Marriage in Ireland or similar. JUST as those works do. Not as a biographical subject/topic in own right... Guliolopez ( talk) 20:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun ( talk) 15:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

United States of America Computing Olympiad

AfDs for this article:
United States of America Computing Olympiad (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was nominated a year ago and the result was no consensus, because an organization that is the main feeder competition for the IOI has to have sources. I agree, but really, there is nothing, I've tried. I propose redirection to International Olympiad in Informatics. Snowmanonahoe ( talk · contribs · typos) 15:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment - Here's a couple of news sources I found (however, they aren't in-depth):
- https://www.oregonlive.com/my-north-of-26/2015/06/daniel_chiu_from_catlin_gabel.html
- https://www.ahwatukee.com/news/article_ae8b9bf0-f355-11e4-a52a-a7cc90dfff19.html
- https://scnow.com/news/local/clemson-university-to-host-usa-computing-olympiad-for-top-high-school-students/article_b3187844-0e21-5ed9-877c-8158b66bc8f9.html Staraction ( talk | contribs) 15:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Freedom and Justice (Poland)

Freedom and Justice (Poland) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for over a decade, couldn't find source to meet WP:GNG. Found [6], but seems to be unrelated. Article on plwiki was deleted in 2021, see pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:01:01:Wolność i Sprawiedliwość (Polska). ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sergey Pryadkin

Sergey Pryadkin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a banned sockpuppet, and most of the coverage seems to be WP:ROUTINE. Considered PROD, but decided against given that the sources here. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 14:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Craig Conway (actor)

Craig Conway (actor) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate much beyond fairly trivial mentions. Not seeing in-depth coverage specifically about him and his career. AusLondonder ( talk) 14:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Silfade

Silfade (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I get zero results looking up "silfade". Looking up creator SmokingWOLF, I get two (a 4gamer piece and an interview with Famitsu. Using Google Translate, I see the different spelling 'sylphide'. Again, zero results (except results to the unrelated ballet La Sylphide). Fails WP:GNG. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete because this is probably not notable, but please note that such a search really needs to be perfomed in Japanese (シルフェイド) in order to determine whether there are sufficient sources ( WP:BEFORE); it's not the case that there are no hits when searching in Japanese. The Famitsu link you gave above calls this the maker's most important work. Dekimasu よ! 15:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment: Automation-media.com, forest.watch.impress.co.jp IgelRM ( talk) 16:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

John O'Reilly (baseball)

John O'Reilly (baseball) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable baseball player, fails WP:GNG. This is all the coverage I have found of him and it would fail WP:BLP1E. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 14:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Embassy of East Timor, London

Embassy of East Timor, London (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One sentence-stub that completely fails WP:GNG. Sole source is a government list of diplomatic missions in London. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

MissJirachi

MissJirachi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. WP:BEFORE shows no reliable/sigcov about her mainly. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 13:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Gabriel Mendoza Gagnier

Gabriel Mendoza Gagnier (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Regarding GNG, none of the references really even cover him much less be of GNG scope. Regarding SNG, it basically covers routine participation in three areas. North8000 ( talk) 13:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

MC El Bayadh Bus Crash

MC El Bayadh Bus Crash (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. Article about a bus crash. No wp:notability per the events SNG or GNG. Also per wp:not news. North8000 ( talk) 13:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

John Selby (psychologist)

John Selby (psychologist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this article for deletion because it does not meet the notability guidelines. No reliable sources are referenced or can be found online. Alexwiki0496 ( talk) 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Pala invasion of Kannauj

Pala invasion of Kannauj (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An event that does not meet the threshold for notability of WP:NEVENT as it is not covered significant or extensively in the sources. Doesn't even have a true name, this is clearly WP:OR as it was previously at the title of Dharmapala's invasion of Kannauj. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following articles created by the same author for the same reasons as above:

Chola raid on Rarh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pala invasion of Odisha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Thank you — microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 13:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sudsahab ( talk) 15:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Malik Kafur ( talk) 15:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as I have just run around the presentation and the sources match, so, keep. Will come will see ( talk) 15:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rhona Who Lives by the River

Rhona Who Lives by the River (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indicatoin of wp:notability and even indication of whether this will ever exist. The only source is a 2021 story that they plan to make this series. North8000 ( talk) 13:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

West Indian pound

West Indian pound (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years and there is linkrot. It seems like this was a thing, however it is hard to see how this could be expanded with more information (for example more history, which territories etc). It would be great if there was significant sources discussing this topic in detail but even looking for mentions to WP:V basic facts is difficult. A redirect would be preferable, but I'm not seeing a target. JMWt ( talk) 13:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

List of Fate/Grand Order characters

List of Fate/Grand Order characters (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I'm a big fan of Fate/Grand Order as a game, I feel this list is a behemoth that ultimately fails notability on its own, and has become more of a cruft dragon that doesn't really explain why these characters are important. The bigger issue though is a notability one: while Fate itself definitely has reactions, the harder argument is that FGO's characters on their own do in an overarching way that makes it work for WP:N or WP:LISTN.

Even reception for Mash and Ritsuka would be more for them, and that could be worked into the parent game article (and as someone that tried to do a writeup on Mash, I'm not confident the sources are there) Kung Fu Man ( talk) 02:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Redirect The article is massive with no substance, cites all of ONE source (Anime News Network), and it might as well be written in Martian for people like me who know nothing about the games. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment Changing my vote to redirect. Why the flip do I keep forgetting this is an option? sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It seems like a split consensus between redirect and keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk) 12:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Paulin Basinga publications

Paulin Basinga publications (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no reason to have a list of someone's publications on Wikipedia, this is what Google Scholar and Research Gate etc are for. Since a PROD was contested, it has to go to AfD (perhaps speedy delete). This page should not be merged to Paulin Basinga as a long list is not useful in a BLP. Ldm1954 ( talk) 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu

Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is advertising. It was deleted before in 2017, and does not seem to have been improved. Just getting a patent is not notable, it has to become a real product/method heavily used. Ldm1954 ( talk) 12:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep:First off, most of the inventions shown on the page are dated AFTER 2017, showing that it has been tremendously improved from 2017 to 2024. I am wondering how you did not see that. Getting a patent is one thing but being mentioned by two succeeding presidents in reputable national newspapers does not seem to me that the subject is non-notable. The page is not advertising as there is no other way to show his inventions other than the tone used, unless you can provide a sample sentence for writing about inventors. His biogas is heavily used in Nigerian prisons to generate electricity and it was in partnership with no other than the Federal Government of Nigeria. There are more than twenty indepth national newspapers which describes his inventions too. So I am wondering how his notability is an issue. Royalrumblebee ( talk) 12:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Bordering on G11 speedy, however he is notable and i believe that the article just needs to be cleaned up and have advertising removed. Nagol0929 ( talk) 15:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Estádio Arena do Município Verde

Estádio Arena do Município Verde (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, notability is not inherited per WP:NARENA and WP:NBUILDING. Nagol0929 ( talk) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Saira Shah Halim

AfDs for this article:
Saira Shah Halim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:NPOL, even WP:BASIC. No in-depth articles, she presents her point of view on national media every day. But this does not prove notability. Only one article is better from India Today. Rest of the news is also non reliable. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 21:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep the article. WP:NPOL isn't the only criteria, I have already told you on another article. She handily passes WP:BASIC of WP:BIO. The criteria needs multiple reliable independent secondary sources. In the absence of any source with in-depth coverage, the criteria also accepts combination of multiple sources with limited but not insignificant coverage.
In here, there is presence of multiple sources with decent in-depth coverage so even the supplementary point isn't needed. The main WP:GNG requirement itself is met. I had added four of them. Indian Express, The Wire, The Print and News Click.
But someone had changed the article completely and turned it into a resume kind of page. That someone had removed all these references and replaced it with an article in
India Today which was written by her and some other things like TedX and "enewsroom.com" but I have fixed it now. MrMkG ( talk) 21:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply
That someone is User:Cikisshpedia who made an account just to do this, I don't know why. MrMkG ( talk) 22:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep the article has a good writing. It covered the cause of her notability for being "involved in social work and activism through 2014 to 2018, and eventually came to the limelight during the CAA-NRC protests". It just need a little bit of cleaning i guess. Hi Bree! ( talk) 09:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) (Removed per WP:SOCKSTRIKE) reply
  • Strong Delete part of an big sockpuppet campaign, and clearly fails WP:NPOL.
Allan Nonymous ( talk) 19:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:GNG and also fails WP:NPOL as there is no in depth coverage of her. Tame Rhino ( talk) 19:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
    You yourself have 33 edits, all of them in AfD. How does that happen?
    There is in fact in-depth coverage of her. Maybe there is a "sockpuppet campaign" around this article but it shouldn't matter if she actually passes WP:GNG. They should just be kept away. MrMkG ( talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus/per the request on my Talk
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment. I'm not an expert in NPOL or NEWSORGINDIA but there does seem to be decent coverage of this person in RS. However, these are all from spring 2022 and WP:N requires sustained coverage. Perhaps @ MrMkG could find coverage from other time periods? JoelleJay ( talk) 15:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
@ JoelleJay Sure. Most of her coverage is in Bengali media and newspapers. Some recent ones are these. Sangbad Pratidin, News18 Bangla. MrMkG ( talk) 22:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Additional input regarding the sources presented herein would be beneficial toward establishing a solid, guideline- and policy-based consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Donating blood isn't notable, details on her husband aren't notable... I only see routine election coverage. I don't see notability. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Doctor that ran for public office, raised their vote count for the party, but no coverage beyond that. Coverage of political candidates is usually done to keep the public informed, but doesn't help here if they are no different than any other of the hundreds of candidates each year around the world. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nominator withdrew, and no delete !votes have been placed. North America 1000 11:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rana Muhammad Faraz Noon

AfDs for this article:
Rana Muhammad Faraz Noon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this BLP won a seat in the National Assembly in 2024 election, but was later disqualified after a recount. He has no prior parliamentary position so IMO, he do not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Most of their press coverage stemmed from his 2024 election win, which was later overturned so he fails WP:GNG as well. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Withdraw I forgot that I nom this for deletion just last month & then later withdrew the nom. I'm withdrawing again. However, I feel its important to discuss whether this person meets the WP:POLITICIAN. --— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 10:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Loudsauce

Loudsauce (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A defunct platform/company of strictly ephemeral interest. Source 4 on the page is a blog post and source 5 is a medium post, so those are WP:SPS. The other 3 are just announcements. Just two paragraphs on FastCompany.com, Metropolis is not independent, there is a single one sentence passing mention in Courier international. So no sources meet WP:SIRS and additional searches do not find any WP:CORPDEPTH sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hemmo Paskiainen

Hemmo Paskiainen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article cites no sources, and I was unable to find significant coverage, only brief mentions. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Pahkasika. toweli ( talk) 12:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sandogo

Sandogo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Set of new geographic pages of villages of Burkina Faso created by User:Hisirmynameismahbeer. All of them seem to be added using copy-paste of a template and some very disputable sources. In this example, a completely unrelated Britannica entry is used as source. I started draftifying some articles and fixing the ones for which information can be found, but this seems a clear case of WP:TNT. Some of these places exist and are found in the 2006 census data ( found here) but they are definitely not "towns", they are often located in a different district than the one in the infobox, and sometimes they are only districts of a city (which would not fulfill WP:NGEO). Broc ( talk) 11:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the reasons added above:

Bangma, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zaken (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sakoula (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gantin, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kouba, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Louksi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cissin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Goupana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lalma, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dassouri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Taonsogo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Syoro (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nabakiesma (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pamno Ouidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pamnonghin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zambanaga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tyébanaga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tansobentinga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nakomtenga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zogona (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Moétenga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kaba, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabala, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabarale (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabarikaha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kankalaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tampouy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tinsouka (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zékounga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gampéla (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kouidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Katabtenga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Nomination withdrawn Broc ( talk) 08:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Gounghin Nord (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Goughin Sud (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Paglayiri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kouritinga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Karpala (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Nemnin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Abanga, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Abassi, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Abaye, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ayaraba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Babakou (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Babanloua (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bangaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bangataka (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Baniaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bisnaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dabala, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dabanadeni (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dinkabara (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dwaba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dyabafouanou (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Feto Kabaradje (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Habaza (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Haba, Burkina Faso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gouerba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Delete all per WP:V and WP:BURDEN. Wikipedia has had presistent problems with dubious geographical oneliners in the past, from California to name one example. You can take the time a user spent on making a particular set of oneliners, and multiply that time by hundreds or a thousand to reach the number of the hours it took to clean it all up. It is imperative to take a hard stance against mass-created geostubs with questionable verifiability. Geschichte ( talk) 23:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • DELETE ALL per WP:BURDEN. Fails WP:GEOLAND. -- Twinkle1990 ( talk) 15:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I can see at least two that are worth keeping - Katabtenga (based on sources in the article) and Dassouri (based on sources in the French article.) Habaza also has text but I can't verify it. I spot checked some of the other settlements and can verify some but not others - Louksi clearly exists, for instance, but Nemnin is a neighbourhood of Ouagadougou which doesn't pass GNG "on its face" in the article - so I'm happy with deleting the rest as a purely procedural concern, without any sort of prejudice on re-creation. SportingFlyer T· C 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ SportingFlyer the reason why I opened this AfD and grouped all pages together is that verifying and sourcing all these articles (of which I would guesstimate 30% are worth keeping) is a huge effort. As Katabtenga is a well sourced article, I will withdraw the nomination for it. Broc ( talk) 08:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this needs more discussion since there is an opinion that some of the articles in this bundled nomination should be Kept.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Procedural keep Sorry, but these should be nominated separately, bundling together could keep a more legitimate town. However I do agree there is a problem here, but the process of bundling all-together is a bit of a shit-show. Govvy ( talk) 10:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    How is keeping a bunch of copy pasted articles that nobody will likely ever nominate separately (I most certainly will not) and containing wrong information a better solution for the encyclopedia? Broc ( talk) 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural Keep and nominate separately – It's already becoming a WP:TRAINWRECK here a bit. The nominator stated in a comment above that, "I would guesstimate 30% are worth keeping". The nominator also stated that they don't want to do the work to nominate each article separately, but this is not a valid criteria for mass deletion. Yes, there have been problems with geography-related articles on English Wikipedia, but this is also not a valid criteria for deletion of this batch as some sort of default, based on the past history of other articles. See also: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. North America 1000 11:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural Keep and nominate separately – If you want them deleted, do the work and review them one by one. — Maile ( talk) 12:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Very nice burden on WP:NPP who is definitely not overloaded already. sarcasmThis would create a huge burden on WP:NPP where editors need to review 50+ pages, all containing wrong or dubious information and poor sourcing, merely because some of these places actually exist and therefore fulfill WP:NGEO. Broc ( talk) 13:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
And honestly the editors arguing for a procedural keep above have forgotten to consider that these are a bunch of copy-pasted recently created pages from the same user (hence the grouping). Broc ( talk) 13:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural delete all If someone wants to create articles, they should do the work and review them one by one rather than mass-produce single-line junk with an unreliable autogenerated source. These could also be redirected to List of cities in Burkina Faso or provincial-level articles like Gayéri (department). Reywas92 Talk 14:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Nette Framework

AfDs for this article:
Nette Framework (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, no independent sources, tagged since 2018. Greenman ( talk) 07:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

French ship Gapeau (B284)

French ship Gapeau (B284) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only reliable source for this fishing ship / unarmed military transport ship is a massive 10-book encyclopedia of all German warships no matter how small or insignificant. The other source, netmarine.net, is more of a large hobby site / semi wiki than anything else ("Si vous souhaitez compléter ces pages par des récits, illustrations ou autres documents, écrivez nous."). Fram ( talk) 07:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Transportation, France, and Germany. Fram ( talk) 07:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. We have always kept commissioned naval vessels. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 08:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • No, we haven't, and is in any case not a reason to keep things. "We keep because we always keep" is ignoring things like Wp:CCC and the stricter standards we have for establishing notability instead of assuming some inherent notability across many topics. Fram ( talk) 09:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • You tried the exact same argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-316, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LSM-422 and the like, which ended in redirection, with the closing admin noting the particular weakness of your argument. Fram ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      • So you discount my argument because you disagree with precedent but then cite a closer's remarks (which did not refer to my argument specifically, incidentally) as some sort of precedent? You've got to laugh! But, other than those numbered vessels, which are all pretty much the same, and some static accommodation barges, would you like to cite the AfDs where commissioned military vessels were deleted. Just so we know. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 10:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    We have if they got more than routine coverage. A fishing vessel pressed into navy service isn't the HMS Ark Royal or USS Missouri, so it won't have that level of coverage. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: Reading the article for 2 seconds shows that it was requisitioned for service as a military ship during World War II, so stating fishing ship / unarmed transport ship, is technically correct but is a misleading strawman. I'm not arguing for or against deletion because I don't know if there is a separate method for assessing the notability of ships, but that statement just irked me. Curbon7 ( talk) 09:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • I meant "unarmed military transport ship", otherwise my addition of "unarmed" would make little sense, but I agree that not including "military" was involuntarily misleading. I've added it now, I hope that's better? Fram ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      Much appreciated Curbon7 ( talk) 09:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The vessel served with two navies and two commercial fishers. Although unarmed in French Navy service, she was definitely armed in Kriegsmarine service. If Netmarine is objected to, I can add from Janes All the World's Ships, which most definitely passes WP:RS. Mjroots ( talk) 10:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Comment Lloyd's Register is also a reliable source. Mjroots ( talk) 19:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      • That Lloyd's mention is reliable, but it doesn't contribute to the topic's notability. See WP:SIGCOV. I'm familiar with Janes' usual entries, and while they're also reliable I'm not sure that will meet the SIGCOV bar either. Ed  [talk]  [OMT] 03:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Mjroots and longstanding practice. Kablammo ( talk) 15:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to List of Vorpostenboote in World War II. I'm not concerned with the scope of Gröner's work, but I am interested in its depth of coverage. From the article's content, I'm guessing it does check that WP:SIGCOV box (in addition to all the other points at WP:GNG). Unfortunately, that's only one source, and Lloyd's table doesn't reach that bar. If there's a typical entry in Jane's Fighting Ships, I'm guessing that wouldn't either. As a result, I think this topic can be covered in the main Vorpostenboote list, or if needed that list could be split. (Per GNG footnote 4: "Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic.") Ed  [talk]  [OMT] 03:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Non-notable boat/fishing trawler/transport. Wasn't involved in any heroic anti-submarine battle or any notable rescue at sea that would garner coverage. What's used for coverage is routine ship registry listings, tracing the vessel's career until being scrapped. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scott Sibley

Scott Sibley (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnt establish his notability as per WP: GNG. While he has held various positions and roles in business and politics I think the references provided do not demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV.

The philanthropy section is also failing as it lacks the necessary citations for verification WP:BLP. Without further evidence of in-depth coverage from independent sources, the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards for a standalone BLP Comintell ( talk) 07:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete or Draftily. Water thin argument for notability. and the page needs complete revamp
Comintell ( talk) 07:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sydney Cooke

Sydney Cooke (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This American skater does not appear to meet the WP:NSKATE: no medals at junior international events (or more important competitions). A PROD was converted to redirect, redirect into a recreated mini-stub, thus listing here. Викидим ( talk) 06:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Doonga

Doonga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed in 2019, removed without explanation. 100% unnotable surname failing WP:NNAME and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Of the sources in the article, one does not seem to mention the name at all, and one is an unreliable user-generated website/database that means nothing in terms of notability. No other sources were found in my search that would help its case. Also appears to have been created by someone who has the surname. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 06:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete – Per nom. Article with zero references. Svartner ( talk) 15:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Bubble laser

Bubble laser (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic example of WP:TOOSOON. Article is based upon a Jan 2024 paper which made a minor splash with popular science blogs and journals. There is no true evidence of notability, this type of article is not what Wikipedia is for. The topic could be returned to in a year if many others copy it. Ldm1954 ( talk) 04:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep: The WP:GNG is the way we determine notability. Simply that a topic is new does not preclude it from being notable. Regarding the one-year test,

Once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage. -- WP:NTEMP

Therefore, I believe there is no need for a year-long wait as you suggest, because the subject meets the GNG. I will substantiate that below:
This topic has recieved significant coverage (full-length articles) in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. These include:
I believe that these sources provide "true evidence of notability" as specified in the GNG. I don't think there are extra subject-specific criteria that would apply to this article. HenryMP02 ( talk) 05:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Sorry, you are citing popular science articles not full fledged referred articles. If there were 30 arXiv by others already then that would indicate that the scientific community considered it valid and notable, without that it is classic WP:TOOSOON. Ldm1954 ( talk) 05:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Draftify, there is just one scientific article and several pop science retellings of it, and it's too soon, as already mentioned, to establish its notability. Artem.G ( talk) 19:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Why doesn't WP:GNG apply to the topic? Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 17:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Answered my own question, WP:SUSTAINED should be satisfied here. Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 17:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ginter Smuts

Ginter Smuts (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Plenty of match reports on .za (South Africa) websites, but I don't see anything about this player by himself. Not enough sourcing for notability. Oaktree b ( talk) 23:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Chun Ge

AfDs for this article:
Chun Ge (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is a non-existent term and there are not many related reference materials in the article. Meets the criteria of Delete policy 6. Neologisms, it is recommended to delete. SU YIQI ( talk) 05:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Mengbi

Mengbi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After conducting a search, I found that the location you mentioned ceased to exist. In November 2015, Mengbi Township and Shuitianba Township were administratively merged to form Shuitianba Town. Therefore, this location no longer exists. I believe this entry meets Wikipedia's deletion policy, specifically criterion ten: Redundant or otherwise useless templates. Hence, I suggest deleting this entry. WYRRRR ( talk) 05:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WYRRRR ( talk) 05:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. 05:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I expanded the article with an infobox and references from the corresponding article in Chinese. Even if two townships have been amalgamated, an article about the structure prior to amalgamation can be valuable. Once notable, always notable. A populated place can be notable whether it is a small part of a municipality or occupies several municipalities. I don't know whether Mengbi is a township, a town, or both, and what the definition of those terms is in China. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep unless somebody can offer a better deletion rationale than this, and/or redirect to an article about Shuitianba if somebody can be bothered to make one. Firstly, this isn't a template, so deletion criteria for templates have nothing to do with whether it's keepable or not — and secondly, we don't automatically delete articles about things that formerly existed just because they don't still exist now. If we really just couldn't find anything more to say about Mengbi than just "it's a place that existed", then redirecting it to an article about Shuitianba could be viable if we had one, but we don't delete articles about places just because they've been merged into other places, because people might very well still want or need information about what Mengbi was. We're an encyclopedia, not just a directory of currently-existing things — defunct things still have legitimate reasons why people might be looking for information about them, so defunctness is not a deletion rationale in and of itself. We can redirect to the successor entity if there's really just not that much to say, but we don't delete articles just because the topic was merged into something else. Bearcat ( talk) 17:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Bearcat Perhaps your argument #2 can be strenghtened by mentioning Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions? As for #1, the correct notability guideline would probably be Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). It would be good to consider whether this entity meets this one.
    The current sourcing is still pretty poor. Once notable always notable - sure, but was this ever notable? Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here 04:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this article needs more discussion, not based on the deletion rationale but on the Piotrus' question about whether this location, prior to it's Merge, was notable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Tappytoon

Tappytoon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a Web fails Wikipedia:Notability (Web); Because it did not meet the conditions for notability. The company's history, adaptation, awards and nomination, etc. were not introduced. Also, there are no articles that can attract attention. It should be deleted or redirected to the list of webtoon sites in Korea. Hkm5420 ( talk) 05:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall

Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Bailian Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic does not comply with the Wikipedia's general notability guideline and there is no reliable source to prove popularity. TMXX0818 ( talk) 04:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Found a few sources in Chinese, Bailian seems to be a major company operating many malls, department store chains and other retail chains, probably worth an article. I am always so reluctant to see lack of coverage in English Wikipedia because it's not covered in English, it's important to be inclusive where possible as English doesn't just belong to the US, UK, India etc but to the world as the world's unifying language of communication. Keizers ( talk) 10:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I'm going to change this to an article about the company. Definitely notable with sources. Keizers ( talk) 05:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Tang, Xiaoli 唐小丽; Xuan, Zhaoqiang 轩召强 (2023-10-30). ""百联西郊"今起试营业！好吃好玩的超多，优惠力度大" [Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall starts its trial operation today! There are so many delicious and fun things to eat and great discounts]. People's Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "10月27日，百联西郊购物中心启动试营业，友宠、优雅、饕餮、欢聚、品质、健康6大生活方式板块，为市民带来全新的多维生活体验。现场人气十足，跟随“宁宁”镜头去打卡吧。 ... 百联西郊购物中心，于2004年开业，是国内首家开放式建筑风格的购物中心，也是上海首个拥有露天广场的社区购物中心。"

      From Google Translate: "On 27 October, Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center launched its trial operation, with six major lifestyle sections: pet-friendly, elegant, gourmet, gathering, quality, and healthy, bringing a new multi-dimensional life experience to citizens. The scene is very popular, follow the "Ning Ning" lens to check in. ... Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center opened in 2004 and is the first open mall in China. It is a shopping mall with a traditional architectural style and is also the first community shopping mall with an open-air plaza in Shanghai."

    2. Cheng, Qi 程琦 (2023-10-28). "经过一年多闭店调整，百联西郊焕新回归：引入友宠等多元场景，重塑商业空间" [After more than a year of store closures and adjustments, Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall returns with a new look: introducing diverse scenarios such as friendly pets and reshaping the commercial space]. Eastday [ zh (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14 – via Sina Corporation.

      The article notes: "经过一年闭店调整的百联西郊购物中心于本周正式开启试营业。温暖柔和的秋日阳光透过新开辟的悦活东庭与悦尚西庭的巨幅采光天窗，在下沉式郊点广场相汇绽放，东里西巷人头攒动，共同见证百联西郊在花样年华焕新再出发。"

      From Google Translate: "Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center officially opened for trial operation this week. The warm and soft autumn sunshine shines through the huge skylights of the newly opened Yuehuo East Courtyard and Yueshang West Courtyard, and blooms in the sunken suburb square. The east and west lanes are crowded with people, witnessing the prosperity of Bailian West Suburb in the Mood for Love. Start fresh and start again."

    3. "百联西郊购物中心暂停营业，进行为期一年的闭店改造" [Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center is temporarily closed for one-year renovation]. People's Daily (in Chinese). 2022-06-16. Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "百联西郊购物中心 是国内首家开放式建筑风格的购物中心 是上海首个拥有露天广场的社区购物中心 扎根上海西部18年 它见证着城市商业发展 也承载着长宁几代人 ... 在18年的经营过程中，百联西郊购物中心每年都会对品牌和业态进行局部调整。但随着消费快速升级，消费者越来越注重消费体验以及购物中心的可玩性，局部改造已不能满足品牌迭代更新需求，动线不合理及硬件老化也限制了中心发展，因此最终采用闭店形式进行改造。"

      From Google Translate: "It is the first shopping mall with open architectural style in China. It is the first community shopping mall with an open-air plaza in Shanghai. Rooted in western Shanghai for 18 years It witnesses the commercial development of the city It also carries generations of Changning people ... During its 18 years of operation, Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center has made partial adjustments to its brand and business formats every year. However, with the rapid upgrading of consumption, consumers pay more and more attention to the consumption experience and the playability of shopping malls. Local renovations can no longer meet the needs of brand iteration and update. Unreasonable movement lines and aging hardware also limit the development of the center. Therefore, closed centers were finally adopted. The store format is renovated."

    4. Xu, Jinghui 徐晶卉 (2022-09-13). "破题核心区存量更新，百联西郊迎来一年改造期，焕变"超级社区能量场"" [The inventory of the core area of PoTian is updated, and the western suburbs of Bailian usher in a one-year transformation period to transform into a "super community energy field"]. Wenhui Bao (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "位于区域核心位置上的百联西郊购物中心，需要全新的价值发现和形态重构，来提升其在西郊、古北、大虹桥三大商圈交汇跃升中的竞争优势；给这个类似纽约“上西区”的辐射域，和其中的居民，带来更新鲜的多元生活方式提案。7月起，百联西郊迎来为期一年的闭店改造。"

      From Google Translate: "Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center, located at the core of the region, needs new value discovery and form reconstruction to enhance its competitive advantage in the intersection of the three major business districts of Xijiao, Gubei and Greater Hongqiao; to give this "New York-like" The radiation area of ​​"Upper West Side" and its residents bring fresher and diverse lifestyle proposals. Starting from July, Bailian Xijiao will undergo a one-year store closure and renovation."

    5. "百联西郊购物中心即将焕新启幕，"超级社区"构筑高能级业态生活能量场" [Bailian Xijiao Shopping Center is about to be renovated and opened, and the "super community" will build a high-energy business life energy field]. Forbes China (in Chinese). 2022-09-01. Archived from the original on 2024-04-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.

      The article notes: "2004年，作为国内第一家北美风格开放式花园购物中心，百联西郊在十八载的岁月中，不断攒拾着区域发展的“西郊记忆”，成为全国购物中心的典范。"

      From Google Translate: "In 2004, as the country's first North American-style open garden shopping mall, Bailian West Suburbs has continued to accumulate the "Western Suburbs Memory" of regional development over the past 18 years, becoming a model for shopping malls nationwide."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Bailian Xijiao Shopping Mall ( simplified Chinese: 百联西郊购物中心; traditional Chinese: 百聯西郊購物中心) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard ( talk) 00:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: page has been moved to Bailian Group • Gene93k ( talk) 11:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear some opinions on these newly found sources. Also, please do not move an article being discussed at an AFD to a different page title. It really confuses XFDCloser which we use to relist and close discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Dokgo Rewind

Dokgo Rewind (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a Film fails Wikipedia:Notability (films); becasue There is a lack of reliable data in the text. And there is a lack of explanation for the movie. Other film pages provide details such as production process, inserted music, etc., but those pages only describe plots and casts. Hkm5420 ( talk) 04:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Jet Fuel Formula

Jet Fuel Formula (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last entry in the now-depopulated Category:The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends episodes (other episodes and story arcs proved to be non-notable and got redirected after prods and AfDs). This one, being the first story arc, is... well, longer than many others but still does not show why it is notable. We have a gigantic plot summary with poor references and my BEFORE fails to find much of use. I suggest redirecting this one as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Anna Burtasova

Anna Burtasova (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person had no notability. Sources of dubious quality. Only one other source could be found, and it alone could not be enough to build an article upon. aaronneallucas ( talk) 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I think it was bad form to nominate this article for an AFD discussion less than an hour after the article was created. That's not enough time to create an article that could withstand scrutiny at an AFD. I'd also like to see some assessment of newly added content since its nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Dian Badenhorst

Dian Badenhorst (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Kataxenna Kova

Kataxenna Kova (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost of material previously deleted and salted at Kataxenna/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kataxenna * Pppery * it has begun... 04:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Melinda Looi

Melinda Looi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Written like an advertisement. Few references beyond press releases. The references which are present are more puff pieces than independent reviews. Geoff | Who, me? 03:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

hi There.
May I know what is the problem with this wikipedia please? thanks. Melinda Looi ( talk) 11:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ange Keffa

Ange Keffa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR as it does not contain the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet it. BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions) 03:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete unless references to significant coverage of this actress in reliable, independent sources can be added to the article. The two current sources simply report that an actress who appeared in a television series has died. She is otherwise a mystery, based on what the article says and does not say. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, and Ivory Coast. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Question Instead of translating this article from French should I have redirected it to Ma Famille instead? Moondragon21 ( talk) 11:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Alberto Oviedo

AfDs for this article:
Alberto Oviedo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probable UPE advertisement for non notable individual. Just another working photographer. Refbombed to primary source showing he has done work but there is a lack of independent coverage about him. None of the claimed awards are major awards or are specifically for him. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Tommy Brandt

AfDs for this article:
Tommy Brandt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician. Has multiple sources but they are either bylined to him or is an interview. Has a big laundry list of awards but none are major. Claims lots of #1 singles but they're are not on the countries national chart. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A search found nothing better. (last afd was for a different Tommy Brandt) duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rinat Baibekov

Rinat Baibekov (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary sourced bio for non notable artist. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete unless an editor can rewrite the article based on newly discovered references to reliable, independent sources that devote enough significant coverage to this artist showing that they meet WP:ARTIST. The "Artist's statement" section is of no value, because an acceptable Wikipedia article about an artist summarizes what sources independent of the artist say, not what the artist says about themself. The "Overview" section is unreferenced, banal and uninformative. The "Exhibitions" section is entirely unreferenced, and is therefore of no value in establishing notability. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete per both above. Johnbod ( talk) 12:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You Are in Love

You Are in Love (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am dubious whether this article passes WP:NSONG or WP:GNG. The track is not subject of significant coverage, and the current information leaves something to be desired. Suggest redirecting it back to 1989 (album) as a standalone article does not look promising for inclusion atp. Ippantekina ( talk) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Ippantekina ( talk) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect No significant coverage in sources other than album reviews. We have to start becoming stricter (or at least enforcing the guidelines more harshly) on the notability of album tracks. ‍  PSA 🏕️  ( talk) 04:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I think album reviews are fine as long as it satisfies GNG ("Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.") So imo it's really a case by case thing, and in this case the encyclopedic content extracted from the existing sources is subpar for a standalone article. Ippantekina ( talk) 04:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Keep. There are sources that do have significant coverage of the song, other than album reviews. [1] [2] [3] These are the three sources that best demonstrate its notability. Brachy08 (Talk) 07:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sleeth, Indiana

Sleeth, Indiana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Carroll County, Indiana has almost entirely listed unincorporated places that are clearly towns, but this one is an exception. There is the usual square pattern of roads just to the east of the (now taken up) rail line, but the aerials and topos show that this wasn't always there: the oldest topos I found (from the 1960s) don't show it at all, and the aerials show it apparently coming into being. Given the location of the label by the grade crossing, I have to suspect this was a rail point for a town which never really materialized. Perhaps someone else can find more info, but searching was surprisingly difficult: Sleeth is apparently a very common name in Indiana. Mangoe ( talk) 02:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Mars Roberge

Mars Roberge (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography with no evidence of notability, but that has persisted for quite a while. Sadads ( talk) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

In the Stars (Ugly Betty)

In the Stars (Ugly Betty) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television episode. Boarder line WP:ALLPLOT Couldnt find any sources on the episode Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Apache Ambari

Apache Ambari (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are references that verify its existence but nothing that shows notability under WP:GNG. Once of many forks from List of Apache Software Foundation projects. Can be redirected back to the list page as an WP:ATD but bringing to discussion in case someone is able to find better sourcing. CNMall41 ( talk) 00:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Michael J. Szanto

Michael J. Szanto (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ad, POV, undisclosed payment Martinc021 ( talk) 00:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: He's published articles in various media and is used as an expert on news programs, but I don't see anything about him as a person. Sourcing used in the article is mostly primary or non-RS. I can't find any articles about him. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Politics, Florida, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unless an editor adds references to reliable sources entirely independent of Szanto that devotes significant coverage to him. What he says on TV or in newspaper opinion pieces are of no value in establishing notability. Coverage of his grandfather is also of no value. Cullen328 ( talk) 04:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/Today&oldid=1162720113"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE