| ||||
|
|
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
- While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which has a button "Cite" click on it
- Then click on "Automatic" or "Manual"
- For Manual: Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details, then click "Insert"
- For Automatic: Paste the URL or PMID/PMC and click "Generate" and if the article is available on PubMed Central, Citoid will populate a citation which can be inserted by clicking "Insert"
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Sattler, Rita; Tymianski, Michael (1 August 2001). "Molecular mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death". Molecular Neurobiology. pp. 107–129. doi: 10.1385/MN:24:1-3:107.
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry for makeing that commet telling you that it was a "fucking template. read what we are trying to tell you". I should have tried to find a better way to say it without being rude. LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 19:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @ LakesideMiners: I appreciate your apology. Behind every screen there is a person, and I truly appreciate the fact you've acknowledged this. MJV479 ( talk) 19:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. — Paleo Neonate – 01:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Monosodium glutamate; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn ( talk) 17:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Alexbrn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Monosodium glutamate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
Alexbrn (
talk) 17:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Continue doing this and you risk getting blocked.
Alexbrn (
talk) 19:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring at Murder of Seth Rich
You just breached the 1 revert DS restriction at Murder of Seth Rich. Also, sources make it clear that the conspiracy theories about the murder are right wing in nature, this has been discussed ad nauseam on that article's talk page for years. Geogene ( talk) 17:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Geogene you cant claim edit warring at one revert. It has to be at least three. MJV479 ( talk) 22:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Three reverts the rule for most articles, this article is under discretionary sanctions and only allows one revert. There are actually some articles that allow 0. Geogene ( talk) 22:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Weird, I didn't believe you would decide to break the 1RR for a useless piece of text.
I didn't. You did.
Would you like to revert your edit now, or would you rather explain your inability to read an edit history and a calendar at the 3RR noticeboard? -- Calton | Talk 18:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Calton You really came to my talk page to say this? Are you really this immature? Well enjoy your victory I suppose, you really showed me didn't you! MJV479 ( talk) 18:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Are you really this immature?
- I'm quoting and correcting your dumb, inaccurate -- even immature -- edit summary of your edit-warring, and *I'm* the immature one? Look up " psychological projection" when you get the chance. And yes, I DID show you, though I'm not the first and I suspect not the last.
- User:NorthBySouthBaranof has already restored the material your second -- and ACTUAL -- 1RR violation reverted, so I'm not going to report you to the 3RR noticeboard. Try that stunt again, however, and you're not going to get the warning first, and given all the warnings already on this page it won't go well for you. -- Calton | Talk 04:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Charles Joseph Bonaparte at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- The article did not qualify for DYK at all—it wasn't new, expanded, or newly made a GA. Please review the DYK criteria prior to making a future nomination. Thank you for your interest. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
| ||||
|
|
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
- While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which has a button "Cite" click on it
- Then click on "Automatic" or "Manual"
- For Manual: Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details, then click "Insert"
- For Automatic: Paste the URL or PMID/PMC and click "Generate" and if the article is available on PubMed Central, Citoid will populate a citation which can be inserted by clicking "Insert"
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Sattler, Rita; Tymianski, Michael (1 August 2001). "Molecular mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death". Molecular Neurobiology. pp. 107–129. doi: 10.1385/MN:24:1-3:107.
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry for makeing that commet telling you that it was a "fucking template. read what we are trying to tell you". I should have tried to find a better way to say it without being rude. LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 19:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @ LakesideMiners: I appreciate your apology. Behind every screen there is a person, and I truly appreciate the fact you've acknowledged this. MJV479 ( talk) 19:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. — Paleo Neonate – 01:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Monosodium glutamate; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn ( talk) 17:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Alexbrn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Monosodium glutamate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
Alexbrn (
talk) 17:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Continue doing this and you risk getting blocked.
Alexbrn (
talk) 19:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring at Murder of Seth Rich
You just breached the 1 revert DS restriction at Murder of Seth Rich. Also, sources make it clear that the conspiracy theories about the murder are right wing in nature, this has been discussed ad nauseam on that article's talk page for years. Geogene ( talk) 17:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Geogene you cant claim edit warring at one revert. It has to be at least three. MJV479 ( talk) 22:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Three reverts the rule for most articles, this article is under discretionary sanctions and only allows one revert. There are actually some articles that allow 0. Geogene ( talk) 22:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Weird, I didn't believe you would decide to break the 1RR for a useless piece of text.
I didn't. You did.
Would you like to revert your edit now, or would you rather explain your inability to read an edit history and a calendar at the 3RR noticeboard? -- Calton | Talk 18:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Calton You really came to my talk page to say this? Are you really this immature? Well enjoy your victory I suppose, you really showed me didn't you! MJV479 ( talk) 18:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Are you really this immature?
- I'm quoting and correcting your dumb, inaccurate -- even immature -- edit summary of your edit-warring, and *I'm* the immature one? Look up " psychological projection" when you get the chance. And yes, I DID show you, though I'm not the first and I suspect not the last.
- User:NorthBySouthBaranof has already restored the material your second -- and ACTUAL -- 1RR violation reverted, so I'm not going to report you to the 3RR noticeboard. Try that stunt again, however, and you're not going to get the warning first, and given all the warnings already on this page it won't go well for you. -- Calton | Talk 04:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Charles Joseph Bonaparte at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- The article did not qualify for DYK at all—it wasn't new, expanded, or newly made a GA. Please review the DYK criteria prior to making a future nomination. Thank you for your interest. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |