|
Hi IdahoSolo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for updating his page. I'm still in shock. Zongalt ( talk) 23:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Same here, died too young. IdahoSolo ( talk) 23:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, IdahoSolo! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 02:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Ron McMurray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
reddogsix (
talk) 01:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron McMurray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron McMurray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix ( talk) 01:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melinda Smyser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Yates (Idaho), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush-Cheney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Sock or not, that content was simply not appropriate. It seems an awful lot like you're trying to turn local publicity events into philanthropy, which I'm sure would sit well with Melaleuca but does not jive with NPOV. Drmies ( talk) 20:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Couldnt be farther from the truth. I don't have any affiliation with VanderSloot and personal disagree with his politics. I see VanderSloot page for two things to talk about his company Melaleuca since it doesn't have one and of course Mr. VanderSloot himself. I am up for a discussion on Vandersloot Talk page for philanthrophy by him/his company and take it one event at a time instead of just getting rid of all of it at once. ( I do agree that some of it sounds fluffy but could be rewritten). Drmies would you mind starting the discussion on the talk page? I seem to be blocked due to reasons Im still trying to figure out. Thanks IdahoPolitics ( talk) 22:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
IdahoPolitics ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #18612 was submitted on Jun 29, 2017 22:33:32. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 22:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Stephen Yates (Idaho), IdahoPolitics!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
WP:TOOSOON at best. Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 18:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
A tag has been placed on Category:Idaho Libertarians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi IdahoSolo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for updating his page. I'm still in shock. Zongalt ( talk) 23:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Same here, died too young. IdahoSolo ( talk) 23:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, IdahoSolo! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 02:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Ron McMurray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
reddogsix (
talk) 01:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron McMurray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron McMurray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix ( talk) 01:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melinda Smyser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Yates (Idaho), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush-Cheney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Sock or not, that content was simply not appropriate. It seems an awful lot like you're trying to turn local publicity events into philanthropy, which I'm sure would sit well with Melaleuca but does not jive with NPOV. Drmies ( talk) 20:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Couldnt be farther from the truth. I don't have any affiliation with VanderSloot and personal disagree with his politics. I see VanderSloot page for two things to talk about his company Melaleuca since it doesn't have one and of course Mr. VanderSloot himself. I am up for a discussion on Vandersloot Talk page for philanthrophy by him/his company and take it one event at a time instead of just getting rid of all of it at once. ( I do agree that some of it sounds fluffy but could be rewritten). Drmies would you mind starting the discussion on the talk page? I seem to be blocked due to reasons Im still trying to figure out. Thanks IdahoPolitics ( talk) 22:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
IdahoPolitics ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #18612 was submitted on Jun 29, 2017 22:33:32. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 22:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Stephen Yates (Idaho), IdahoPolitics!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
WP:TOOSOON at best. Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 18:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
A tag has been placed on Category:Idaho Libertarians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)