Nomination of Hyde Square (MBTA station) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hyde Square (MBTA station) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyde Square (MBTA station) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 22:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how familiar you are with the formal planning process for transit projects, so forgive me if I'm repeating what you already know. Transit extension projects only really become 'official' when they are added to the MPO projects list / CIP, which qualifies them to seek state and federal funding, and then begin active planning with the environmental assessment. Other T projects discussed on Wikipedia - even those like South Coast Rail which is still in planning hell - have already made it past these steps. The Go Boston 2030 document is really just a wishlist; my understanding is that it doesn't actually constitute a legal advancement of the project. It's the equivalent of me telling my Facebook friends that I want to get a car, versus actually doing the research and seeking a loan.
For this reason, I don't believe the Rozzie and Hyde Square extensions should be added to the templates just yet - to do so would be misleading. As much as I would like to see them happen, there is no guarantee that they will ever even enter planning, much less actually be built. (For that reason, we must not describe them as certainties when talking about them in articles.) There are dozens of ideas on the 2030 wish-list; some of them like BRT on Washington Street in Brighton are patently ridiculous. We should wait until they actually become official projects before including them; there's plenty of time. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for updating me on what belongs on wikipedia - I am a new user and didn't know that unfunded proposals do not belong here. As there should not be a page on this, I still think it should exist on the "route map" section of green line articles as "proposed", to show that it is being considered. But, you are obviously the more experienced user here, so please correct me if I am wrong. Anthonyt31201
|
Hi Anthonyt31201! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Aunt Jemima— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Serols (
talk) 18:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I really do appreciate the work you're doing with MBTA articles - and I don't want to make you feel like I'm picking on you - but I'm not sure whether station layout templates really add much for the Franklin Line articles. Most of the stations are fairly simple designs - one or two side platforms, with perhaps a track fence or nearby road. In general, that information can be more effectively communicated either by prose or by a photograph, which tend to be more intuitive to casual readers than a diagram, and also fit better within the article. Only Walpole has a lot of complexity, and even then I think an aerial photograph or geographic map, rather than stylized diagram, may be clearer. See for example what I've done with Readville.
My personal preference would be to reserve stylized diagrams for where they add the most value (see for example Hoyt–Schermerhorn Streets, where the diagram clarifies a complex track layout) and just have prose/images for the Franklin Line articles. Right now, they awkwardly hang below the infobox; even if placed fully inline like an image, they would occupy space that could be used for a photograph. However, I want to hear your thoughts, and I may well be convinced otherwise. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 06:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing your thoughts - I appreciate the feedback and I agree with you. I think the layouts should be used on more complex stations like Back Bay and Park St, but they don't add much to the other pages. I thought I would add them since several other train station pages (not MBTA) have layouts, but none of the MBTA ones did. I can remove them if you would like me to.
Anthonyt31201 (
talk) 03:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello again! As with the Franklin Line articles, I'm not convinced that most MBTA subway stations really need templates. There was a discussion a long time back that actually had consensus for removing the existing station layout tables for most simple MBTA stations. On the Green Line, only Boylston, Park Street, GC, Lechmere, Kenmore, and maybe BC - half of which you've already done - are likely to add any real illustrative value to the articles. (Reservoir and Riverside carhouses are much too complex for a template; I previously made a map that illustrates Riverside.) The Orange and Blue lines mostly have very simple station layouts. I do think there are several places that your template-creating efforts could be very valuable, if you're interested. JFK/UMass is one - the multiple Red Line platforms, Columbia Junction, and the commuter rail flyover make it a very complicated situation indeed, and one that isn't easy to explain in prose. Framingham, Providence, Greenbush, Kingston/Route 3, Ruggles, and Forest Hills all have intricate layouts that your template skills would be great for.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 05:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- @ Pi.1415926535:
- Thanks for the feedback - and I agree. I wont add any more layouts for the simple stations. But I will make some for the stations you mentioned, I am working on the Framingham one right now.
- Hello again! As with the Franklin Line articles, I'm not convinced that most MBTA subway stations really need templates. There was a discussion a long time back that actually had consensus for removing the existing station layout tables for most simple MBTA stations. On the Green Line, only Boylston, Park Street, GC, Lechmere, Kenmore, and maybe BC - half of which you've already done - are likely to add any real illustrative value to the articles. (Reservoir and Riverside carhouses are much too complex for a template; I previously made a map that illustrates Riverside.) The Orange and Blue lines mostly have very simple station layouts. I do think there are several places that your template-creating efforts could be very valuable, if you're interested. JFK/UMass is one - the multiple Red Line platforms, Columbia Junction, and the commuter rail flyover make it a very complicated situation indeed, and one that isn't easy to explain in prose. Framingham, Providence, Greenbush, Kingston/Route 3, Ruggles, and Forest Hills all have intricate layouts that your template skills would be great for.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 05:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Moved Template;Providence station to Template:Providence station as it appeared to be a typo. Ping if I am wrong. Classicwiki ( talk) (ping me) 04:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Back in August, you helpfully added station listings to the Green Line Extension article, diff: [1]. You included short citations to a reference named "MESA" but the full reference was not included, causing a cite error. Could you correct this oversight?-- agr ( talk) 16:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Fixed. I took that station listing template from the Second Avenue Subway and edited it for the GLX, but I must've forgotten to remove "MESA". My bad. Anthonyt31201 ( talk) 14:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Anthonyt31201. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hub on Causeway
Hello, Anthonyt31201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Hub on Causeway".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 20:02, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Red Line-Blue Line Connector
Hello, Anthonyt31201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Red Line-Blue Line Connector".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 17:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthonyt31201. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthonyt31201. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:Arlington (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Mackensen
(talk) 23:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest |
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
Your draft article, Draft:Proposed expansion of the MBTA subway
Hello, Anthonyt31201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Proposed expansion of the MBTA subway".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Kingston/Route 3 station
Template:Kingston/Route 3 station has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 23:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Boylston (MBTA station)
Template:Boylston (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Greenbush (MBTA station)
Template:Greenbush (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Mackensen
(talk) 02:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:MBTA Green Line 1912–1913
Template:MBTA Green Line 1912–1913 has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Mackensen
(talk) 01:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Lechmere (MBTA station)
Template:Lechmere (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 05:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Providence station
Template:Providence station has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Providence station
Template:Providence station has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 01:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Hyde Square (MBTA station) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hyde Square (MBTA station) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyde Square (MBTA station) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 22:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how familiar you are with the formal planning process for transit projects, so forgive me if I'm repeating what you already know. Transit extension projects only really become 'official' when they are added to the MPO projects list / CIP, which qualifies them to seek state and federal funding, and then begin active planning with the environmental assessment. Other T projects discussed on Wikipedia - even those like South Coast Rail which is still in planning hell - have already made it past these steps. The Go Boston 2030 document is really just a wishlist; my understanding is that it doesn't actually constitute a legal advancement of the project. It's the equivalent of me telling my Facebook friends that I want to get a car, versus actually doing the research and seeking a loan.
For this reason, I don't believe the Rozzie and Hyde Square extensions should be added to the templates just yet - to do so would be misleading. As much as I would like to see them happen, there is no guarantee that they will ever even enter planning, much less actually be built. (For that reason, we must not describe them as certainties when talking about them in articles.) There are dozens of ideas on the 2030 wish-list; some of them like BRT on Washington Street in Brighton are patently ridiculous. We should wait until they actually become official projects before including them; there's plenty of time. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for updating me on what belongs on wikipedia - I am a new user and didn't know that unfunded proposals do not belong here. As there should not be a page on this, I still think it should exist on the "route map" section of green line articles as "proposed", to show that it is being considered. But, you are obviously the more experienced user here, so please correct me if I am wrong. Anthonyt31201
|
|
Hi Anthonyt31201! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Aunt Jemima— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Serols (
talk) 18:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I really do appreciate the work you're doing with MBTA articles - and I don't want to make you feel like I'm picking on you - but I'm not sure whether station layout templates really add much for the Franklin Line articles. Most of the stations are fairly simple designs - one or two side platforms, with perhaps a track fence or nearby road. In general, that information can be more effectively communicated either by prose or by a photograph, which tend to be more intuitive to casual readers than a diagram, and also fit better within the article. Only Walpole has a lot of complexity, and even then I think an aerial photograph or geographic map, rather than stylized diagram, may be clearer. See for example what I've done with Readville.
My personal preference would be to reserve stylized diagrams for where they add the most value (see for example Hoyt–Schermerhorn Streets, where the diagram clarifies a complex track layout) and just have prose/images for the Franklin Line articles. Right now, they awkwardly hang below the infobox; even if placed fully inline like an image, they would occupy space that could be used for a photograph. However, I want to hear your thoughts, and I may well be convinced otherwise. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 06:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing your thoughts - I appreciate the feedback and I agree with you. I think the layouts should be used on more complex stations like Back Bay and Park St, but they don't add much to the other pages. I thought I would add them since several other train station pages (not MBTA) have layouts, but none of the MBTA ones did. I can remove them if you would like me to.
Anthonyt31201 (
talk) 03:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello again! As with the Franklin Line articles, I'm not convinced that most MBTA subway stations really need templates. There was a discussion a long time back that actually had consensus for removing the existing station layout tables for most simple MBTA stations. On the Green Line, only Boylston, Park Street, GC, Lechmere, Kenmore, and maybe BC - half of which you've already done - are likely to add any real illustrative value to the articles. (Reservoir and Riverside carhouses are much too complex for a template; I previously made a map that illustrates Riverside.) The Orange and Blue lines mostly have very simple station layouts. I do think there are several places that your template-creating efforts could be very valuable, if you're interested. JFK/UMass is one - the multiple Red Line platforms, Columbia Junction, and the commuter rail flyover make it a very complicated situation indeed, and one that isn't easy to explain in prose. Framingham, Providence, Greenbush, Kingston/Route 3, Ruggles, and Forest Hills all have intricate layouts that your template skills would be great for.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 05:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- @ Pi.1415926535:
- Thanks for the feedback - and I agree. I wont add any more layouts for the simple stations. But I will make some for the stations you mentioned, I am working on the Framingham one right now.
- Hello again! As with the Franklin Line articles, I'm not convinced that most MBTA subway stations really need templates. There was a discussion a long time back that actually had consensus for removing the existing station layout tables for most simple MBTA stations. On the Green Line, only Boylston, Park Street, GC, Lechmere, Kenmore, and maybe BC - half of which you've already done - are likely to add any real illustrative value to the articles. (Reservoir and Riverside carhouses are much too complex for a template; I previously made a map that illustrates Riverside.) The Orange and Blue lines mostly have very simple station layouts. I do think there are several places that your template-creating efforts could be very valuable, if you're interested. JFK/UMass is one - the multiple Red Line platforms, Columbia Junction, and the commuter rail flyover make it a very complicated situation indeed, and one that isn't easy to explain in prose. Framingham, Providence, Greenbush, Kingston/Route 3, Ruggles, and Forest Hills all have intricate layouts that your template skills would be great for.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 05:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Moved Template;Providence station to Template:Providence station as it appeared to be a typo. Ping if I am wrong. Classicwiki ( talk) (ping me) 04:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Back in August, you helpfully added station listings to the Green Line Extension article, diff: [1]. You included short citations to a reference named "MESA" but the full reference was not included, causing a cite error. Could you correct this oversight?-- agr ( talk) 16:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Fixed. I took that station listing template from the Second Avenue Subway and edited it for the GLX, but I must've forgotten to remove "MESA". My bad. Anthonyt31201 ( talk) 14:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Anthonyt31201. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hub on Causeway
Hello, Anthonyt31201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Hub on Causeway".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 20:02, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Red Line-Blue Line Connector
Hello, Anthonyt31201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Red Line-Blue Line Connector".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 17:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthonyt31201. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthonyt31201. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:Arlington (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Mackensen
(talk) 23:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
|
|
US Banknote Contest |
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
Your draft article, Draft:Proposed expansion of the MBTA subway
Hello, Anthonyt31201. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Proposed expansion of the MBTA subway".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Kingston/Route 3 station
Template:Kingston/Route 3 station has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 23:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Boylston (MBTA station)
Template:Boylston (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Greenbush (MBTA station)
Template:Greenbush (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Mackensen
(talk) 02:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:MBTA Green Line 1912–1913
Template:MBTA Green Line 1912–1913 has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Mackensen
(talk) 01:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Lechmere (MBTA station)
Template:Lechmere (MBTA station) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 05:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Providence station
Template:Providence station has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Providence station
Template:Providence station has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 01:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)