This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Communist Manifesto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 21, 2005, February 21, 2006, February 21, 2008, February 21, 2009, February 21, 2010, February 21, 2012, and February 21, 2015. |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
It sure seems to be getting vandalized a lot — I reverted it to a non-vandalized version, and less than three minutes later, it was vandalized again.
Seane2017 ( talk) 17:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Can I do this as a book report in 7th grade — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.43.225.47 ( talk) 19:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Because the original title is "Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei" the correct translation is "Manifesto of the Communist Party". So the wiki article should be moved to [1], and refer to the book as Manifesto of the Communist Party.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Victory1323 ( talk • contribs)
"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
Source: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
This is the easiest, simplest explanation of the Communist Manifesto, and the quote comes from the Communist Manifesto itself. This quote should be cited in the introduction to the article.
Baxter329 ( talk) 18:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I think the Legacy section would be better split into a separate criticism section for the second paragraph. I was going to just do this, but I figured this page is watched like hawks, so I felt it prudent to solicit additional opinions. Of course, this will probably draw in scores of hostile edits, but I think its important to separate the general legacy from contemporary and modern criticism. Metallurgist ( talk) 20:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Communist Manifesto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 21, 2005, February 21, 2006, February 21, 2008, February 21, 2009, February 21, 2010, February 21, 2012, and February 21, 2015. |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
It sure seems to be getting vandalized a lot — I reverted it to a non-vandalized version, and less than three minutes later, it was vandalized again.
Seane2017 ( talk) 17:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Can I do this as a book report in 7th grade — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.43.225.47 ( talk) 19:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Because the original title is "Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei" the correct translation is "Manifesto of the Communist Party". So the wiki article should be moved to [1], and refer to the book as Manifesto of the Communist Party.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Victory1323 ( talk • contribs)
"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
Source: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
This is the easiest, simplest explanation of the Communist Manifesto, and the quote comes from the Communist Manifesto itself. This quote should be cited in the introduction to the article.
Baxter329 ( talk) 18:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I think the Legacy section would be better split into a separate criticism section for the second paragraph. I was going to just do this, but I figured this page is watched like hawks, so I felt it prudent to solicit additional opinions. Of course, this will probably draw in scores of hostile edits, but I think its important to separate the general legacy from contemporary and modern criticism. Metallurgist ( talk) 20:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)