This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Society / Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been marked as needing an infobox. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

@ Dronebogus About your improper removal of my contribution to the article and question to you, the person who reverted my edit, from the talk page

1. " I don’t know what this is about but this is the wrong forum" - WP:Talk_page_guidelines disagrees with you and places the obligation on you when your reversion is called into question: "Discuss edits: The talk page is particularly useful to talk about edits. If one of your edits has been reverted, and you change it back again, it is good practice to leave an explanation on the talk page and a note in the edit summary that you have done so. The talk page is also the place to ask about another editor's changes. If someone questions one of your edits, make sure you reply with a full, helpful rationale.

2. Per the above, I will be undoing your reversion with the rationale that 1. I have already explained in the prior comment on this talk page, and 2. you have failed to meet a simple request for justification after I made an edit to bring the wording of the article closer to the provided sources and further away from WP:Libel, which is not something I would quite invoke here, but which I believe merits mention. If you seek to revert again, I would encourage you to seek a single other user's opinion or perhaps do your due diligence of responding to my question of your edit which you purged from the talk page. 49.186.63.35 ( talk) 03:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply

You were mostly complaining about me and making off-topic remarks. Ny talk page would have been more appropriate. As for the actual, now-rephrased question “expert opinion” is a loaded term in general speech, basically meaning “I/you/they/he/she/it is authoritative beyond reasonable doubt”, which as the article implies Levine had been subject to. It’s puffery, basically. We know what his field of expertise is from the first sentence. Dronebogus ( talk) 07:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Plus are you really suggesting someone who compares transgender medical care to Nazi medical experiments and has advocated for overturning a ban on the widely condemned and completely ineffective practice of conversion therapy should uncritically be labeled an “expert” on transgender studies, just because he’s in the field? Dronebogus ( talk) 07:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply