From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Polygamy in Indonesia

Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke @ Pharexia:) -- BayuAH Let's Talk! 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply

"Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12#Bigamy (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

"Bigamy (in Civil Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Civil Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 19#Bigamy (in Civil Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Lack of research

The prevalence section of the article says „Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited“ but then doesnt stick to it. I think we should be trimming this section, specifically the percentages. We should be grounded here and stick with the simple fact that there is not much solid research. Also, Amy Moors specifically is not a good source. There is a lot of criiticism against her, like her messing around with samples and sample sizes. At the very least we shouldnt quote her. But generally I think the section should be smaller. 141.15.24.32 ( talk) 13:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Polygamy in Indonesia

Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke @ Pharexia:) -- BayuAH Let's Talk! 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply

"Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12#Bigamy (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

"Bigamy (in Civil Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Civil Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 19#Bigamy (in Civil Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Lack of research

The prevalence section of the article says „Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited“ but then doesnt stick to it. I think we should be trimming this section, specifically the percentages. We should be grounded here and stick with the simple fact that there is not much solid research. Also, Amy Moors specifically is not a good source. There is a lot of criiticism against her, like her messing around with samples and sample sizes. At the very least we shouldnt quote her. But generally I think the section should be smaller. 141.15.24.32 ( talk) 13:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook