This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was reviewed by
Nature (journal) on December 14, 2005. Comments: It was found to have 9 errors. For more information about external reviews of Wikipedia articles and about this review in particular, see this page. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
If you have never used this tool before, I recommend it: http://can-we-link-it.nickj.org/. You just type (or copy) the name of an article in the box, and Nick rummages through your article, to end up by suggesting many different internal links which you might have overlooked. Most of them are good; some are not (you have to check). Nick won't make any suggestions until the syntax of your article is correct: Usually bad syntax is caused by stray brackets or apostrophes in the copy. Nick provides you with a list of the bad apples, but then you have to seek them out. A fairly easy way is to copy the text into a word processor and then search for the stray marks there. (The new links for this article are indicated here.) Of course one must be cautious in doing so and not engage in linking just for the sake of linking. I hope this has been helpful. Again, I recommend using Nick's very valuable tool. Yours sincerely,
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Fix the spelling mistakes in the last sentence of the second paragraph of the education section. Currently the sentence reads "Under the influence of Peter Fraser, whom Dirac called the best mathematics teacher, he had the most interest in prjective geometry, and began applying it to the geometrical version of relativity Minkowski developped". The words "projective" and "developed" are misspelled. Hp 1215 ( talk) 04:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to the end of relevant personal life:
A bust of Paul Dirac now resides at Florida State University near Dirac Library along with other notable figures in STEM, many of which he brought with him to Florida State. ChrisBernhardt ( talk) 04:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Done - added the image in the FSU section, rearranged some of the other images to prevent bunching. Polyamorph ( talk) 14:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm removing this claim: "Dirac further postulated the existence of gravitational waves, declaring them to have "physical significance" in his 1959 lecture at the Lindau Meetings"
Gravitational waves have a long history, including postulates by Laplace and Poincare. See for example Cervantes-Cota, Jorge L., Salvador Galindo-Uribarri, and George F. Smoot. "A brief history of gravitational waves." Universe 2.3 (2016): 22. or https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-secret-history-of-gravitational-waves Johnjbarton ( talk) 14:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
The view on religion section is, IMO, too large compared to its role in Dirac's life. It is 4 times longer than the section on Honors. That seems out of whack. Johnjbarton ( talk) 22:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The current article claims Dirac worked on centrifuges in 1934. This seems unlikely. We should have a citation and and explanation of the context since such work is out of context for this period of Dirac's career.
Two sources date as joining the UK Tubes project which developed the centrifuge:
There is comment in the Kragh book about something in "Chapter 6" which I cannot access. Johnjbarton ( talk) 16:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Can someone help with the source code for harvnb references? Farmelo explains Dirac's isotope separation experiments on p.248-249, and then confirms the 1934 by saying on p.249 that "During a visit to Cambridge in May 1934, Wigner saw the apparatus and asked Dirac questions about it,". I tried to cite these two pages in the article, but my cite only shows the text of p.248 and says that p.249 is unavailable. Can someone fix this? Dirac66 ( talk) 02:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was reviewed by
Nature (journal) on December 14, 2005. Comments: It was found to have 9 errors. For more information about external reviews of Wikipedia articles and about this review in particular, see this page. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
If you have never used this tool before, I recommend it: http://can-we-link-it.nickj.org/. You just type (or copy) the name of an article in the box, and Nick rummages through your article, to end up by suggesting many different internal links which you might have overlooked. Most of them are good; some are not (you have to check). Nick won't make any suggestions until the syntax of your article is correct: Usually bad syntax is caused by stray brackets or apostrophes in the copy. Nick provides you with a list of the bad apples, but then you have to seek them out. A fairly easy way is to copy the text into a word processor and then search for the stray marks there. (The new links for this article are indicated here.) Of course one must be cautious in doing so and not engage in linking just for the sake of linking. I hope this has been helpful. Again, I recommend using Nick's very valuable tool. Yours sincerely,
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Fix the spelling mistakes in the last sentence of the second paragraph of the education section. Currently the sentence reads "Under the influence of Peter Fraser, whom Dirac called the best mathematics teacher, he had the most interest in prjective geometry, and began applying it to the geometrical version of relativity Minkowski developped". The words "projective" and "developed" are misspelled. Hp 1215 ( talk) 04:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to the end of relevant personal life:
A bust of Paul Dirac now resides at Florida State University near Dirac Library along with other notable figures in STEM, many of which he brought with him to Florida State. ChrisBernhardt ( talk) 04:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Done - added the image in the FSU section, rearranged some of the other images to prevent bunching. Polyamorph ( talk) 14:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm removing this claim: "Dirac further postulated the existence of gravitational waves, declaring them to have "physical significance" in his 1959 lecture at the Lindau Meetings"
Gravitational waves have a long history, including postulates by Laplace and Poincare. See for example Cervantes-Cota, Jorge L., Salvador Galindo-Uribarri, and George F. Smoot. "A brief history of gravitational waves." Universe 2.3 (2016): 22. or https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-secret-history-of-gravitational-waves Johnjbarton ( talk) 14:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
The view on religion section is, IMO, too large compared to its role in Dirac's life. It is 4 times longer than the section on Honors. That seems out of whack. Johnjbarton ( talk) 22:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The current article claims Dirac worked on centrifuges in 1934. This seems unlikely. We should have a citation and and explanation of the context since such work is out of context for this period of Dirac's career.
Two sources date as joining the UK Tubes project which developed the centrifuge:
There is comment in the Kragh book about something in "Chapter 6" which I cannot access. Johnjbarton ( talk) 16:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Can someone help with the source code for harvnb references? Farmelo explains Dirac's isotope separation experiments on p.248-249, and then confirms the 1934 by saying on p.249 that "During a visit to Cambridge in May 1934, Wigner saw the apparatus and asked Dirac questions about it,". I tried to cite these two pages in the article, but my cite only shows the text of p.248 and says that p.249 is unavailable. Can someone fix this? Dirac66 ( talk) 02:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)