This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force. Psychology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Education Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Arizona supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Roosevelt University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 9 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Marissanicole67. Peer reviewers: Yehkim.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

I dispute the claim

• Moreover, few, if any, children can rely on corrective feedback from adults when they make a grammatical error, due to the fact that adults generally provide feedback regardless of whether a child's utterance was grammatical or not, and children have no way of discerning if a response was intended to be a correction.

Linguists, like the rest of us, suffer from confirmation bias, and Chomskyans are no exception. In reality, it's easy for children to distinguish adult correction from other responses. A toddler says, "I hurt my knee." Adult says, "Aww ... let me look at it ... let me clean it up ... there, there, it's not so bad." A child says, "I breaked my doll." Adult says, "I broke my doll." There is a slight pause before and after "broke" and the word is slightly louder. A child quickly learns that the first response is loving comfort and the second response is a correction. It is preposterous to suggest that "few, if any" children are given reliable corrective feedback, or that children can't tell the difference between corrective feedback and other responses. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 21:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Independent of my opinion of generativism/minimalism/functionalism/what-have-you, I second that I feel this shouldn't be presented as uncontroversial, though I'm not going to cede agreement to the idea that children 'can rely on corrective feedback' (whatever this actually means) based on the above argument. You (or I, or anyone else) would need to cite sources that counter the argument, discuss the matter in-depth, and so on. If you have said sources, feel free to write something up, ask for feedback, etc. If you have them but don't have the time to write, feel free to give me the references and I'll see if I can write something up. LingNerd007 ( talk) 02:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC) reply

could we do that? Mahengrui1 ( talk) 15:49, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply

In order to aid the average reader in understanding concepts in language acquisition, I believe further images and figures would be useful additions. For example, a table summarizing Hockett's design features and providing examples of how each feature is unique (or not) to human language would strengthen the section "As a typically human phenomenon" which already mentions some of Hockett's design features. Jenricano ( talk) 15:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fannav99 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Fannav99 ( talk) 17:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The current article contains the sentence "One such challenge is to explain how children acquire complex vowels in Otomanguean and other language" where "Otomanguean" redirects to Oto-Manguean languages. However, if I search for "complex vowels" in that article, I don't find anything. It would be good to either add a section on "complex vowels" to that article to address the reference, or else update the reference in the current article to be more clear. Thisisnotatest ( talk) 00:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) reply