This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Medicine: Neurology / Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

This article arose from a section of the article on Christopher Gillberg. There was a long discussion about the section in that article.  — Daphne A 10:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm glad you finally put it in a separate article :-)

Fred- Chess 21:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks, I just hadn't thought of it until you recommended it.  — Daphne A 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Regarding the title of this article: the study was done by the Gillberg group, and it was not initially (or ever entirely) about DAMP; so the original title is more appropriate. I ask that the title not be changed without having some discussion first.  — Daphne A 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Some of the material that I removed from the start of the article was good material, which it would be nice to include. The problem was that there were no sources.  — Daphne A 05:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Regarding the title of this article, the study was done by several researchers and clinicians, and not just Gillberg. It was about children with DAMP as descirbed in my version of the article. Initially the term MBD was used instead of the term DAMP.-- Denis Diderot 06:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC) reply

This title should be OK, IMO. / Fred- Chess 18:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Eva Kärfve and Leif Elinder wrote letters to Gothenburg University where they accused Gillberg and Rasmussen of scientific misconduct. At which date did they write a letter? Or did they write two letters separetly? A source would be nice for this statement. Ulner 19:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Gothenburg Study of Children with DAMP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.kammarratten.goteborg.se/docs/domar_2003/5741-02.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060105131010/http://www.kammarratten.goteborg.se/docs/domar_2003/6208-02%20dom.pdf to http://www.kammarratten.goteborg.se/docs/domar_2003/6208-02%20dom.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060105125311/http://www.kammarratten.goteborg.se/docs/domar_2003/3396-03%20dom.pdf to http://www.kammarratten.goteborg.se/docs/domar_2003/3396-03%20dom.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Gothenburg Study of Children with DAMP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930061114/http://svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=6107&a=400673 to http://svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=6107&a=400673
• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikisource/en/c/cb/EthicsCommitteeLetter.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061006123809/http://www.attention-riks.se/index.php?id=118,296,0,0,1,0 to http://www.attention-riks.se/index.php?id=118,296,0,0,1,0
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060211071155/http://autism.verktyget.se/site.aspx?id=612 to http://autism.verktyget.se/site.aspx?id=612
• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.dagensmedicin.se/Article.jsp?article=35760
• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.dagensmedicin.se/Article.jsp?article=39622

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply