This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Glossaries ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles Disability Glossary of communication disorders is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles Medicine High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Autism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 31 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Hannanettles.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The original text of this page is from a public domain resource at http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/glossary/glos1.htm

Maybe this should be moved to wikitionary.

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

-- CopyToWiktionaryBot 15:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Dystonia, loss of balance. etc.? These things are not directly related to communication disorders as far as I can tell. Therefore I have tagged the article. Lighthead ^þ 03:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Dystonia is a problem for speaking, and loss of balance can be related to hearing problems. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 17:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I have found one external online glossary of communication disorders.

• Glossary of medical terms related to communications disorders [ sic

— Wavelength ( talk) 15:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I've removed this (archived now available here) as per the small text at the end of the article it's just an old mirror of Wikipedia's own article. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested « @» ° ∆t° 22:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I've add a reference to the NIH glossary as this article is a copy paste of that source [1]. As I understand it US federal government works are not copyrighted, but NIH own page on copyright links to an article [2] that states under "Misconception #3: I grabbed it from a government site, so it must be free to use." NIH often licenses privately owned material for display on its website, but the scope of the licenses are rarely broad enough to allow the public to use the material for other than a fair use. NIH sites typically alert the public to this fact in their standard disclaimers. So if someone with better knowledge of US copyright could clarify it would be good.
Earwigs also flags [3] it as a copy of Medical College of Georgia [4], which is copyright 2023 but I think this is also a copy from NIH. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested « @» ° ∆t° 23:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

This [5] was pointed out to me, which makes it clear it wouldn't be copyright. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested « @» ° ∆t° 00:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply