This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Mjlissner ( talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

New Page!!

I'm the founder of Free Law Project, and I just created this page, so there's a likelihood of bias here. I did my best to keep things neutral and to the facts. The reason that I created the page was because I discovered that this page redirected to the page for Ravel Law. This is because Ravel Law is working with Harvard Law School on the Free the Law Project (an unrelated project with a very similar name). So, it seems, a well-meaning person set up Free Law Project to redirect to Ravel. I looked into deleting the redirect altogether, but discovered that there are a few things within Wikipedia linking here already (including a template), and those pages are attempting to link to Free Law Project (the non-profit, not the Harvard initiative). Also, looking at the page for deleting redirections, it's suggested to Be Bold and convert redirections to pages if it makes sense to do so. It seemed better to me to satisfy the inbound links and add information to the world by writing an article about Free Law Project.

I'm happy to discuss further, but I'd be even happier if other people fleshed out this page further, beyond what I felt comfortable doing as the director of the organization.-- mjlissner ( talk) 19:11, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above text, plus the fact that without the LATimes I'm about to add, 4 of the 5 article citations are from the FREE.LAW site! Nuts240 ( talk) 20:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply

The about-to-be-merged contents of [[RECAP]], which is a redirect to [[Recap (software)]] mentions that Center for Information Technology Policy has migrated to FREE.LAW (which is FREE LAW PROJECT's site. Nuts240 ( talk) 20:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect FreeListener.com and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § FreeListener.com until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply