This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
need some help with this.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earlypsychosis ( talk • contribs) 04:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Earlypsychosis ( talk) 08:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Before one can discuss prevention of psychosis one has to come to some conclusions about the cause. Am in the middle of reading an interested book on the subject. The stuff out of world war two were they found that 50% of troops would have a mental break down after a month of combat and nearly all would have a break down after 6 months of active combat. Environmental causes however are out of vogue and currently neurotransmitters and PET scans are the in thing.-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 23:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I disagree. No one has yet identified a cause, but we are well on the way to preventing psychosis - and reducing further epsiodes (both primary and secondary prevention). Psychosis is a vague construct, with multiple causes, with different individual and cultural expressions (see http://www.understandingpsychosis.com]). The continued search for that one cause (usually funded by drug companies) has limited our understanding of this condition. Its no longer vogue to think of either environmental or biological causes - an abstract dichotomy in our world of continiums.
To date we know that family history, drug use (especially THC in early adolescence), early trauma, inner city living, ethnicity and many other factors contribute to the severity of the condition. The most alarming is that delays to treatment impact on the severity of the condition. Many of these delays are a function of how the mental health system has been structured. Earlypsychosis ( talk) 07:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I have not thoroughly reviewed this but the lede statements "a new paradigm for psychiatry[citation needed]" and "has developed rapidly as an established clinical model" seem contradicted by the Cochrane review cited further in the article. Xasodfuih ( talk) 17:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thanks for your comments and additions I will work on this, but any systematic review of the literature will show a surge of articles on the topic within the last 10 years, has result in the reform of services in the UK (huge increase in established teams and clients served), supported by leading academic institutions and researchs - ( IOP in London, Thomas McGlashan in Yale), new journals started (Early intervention), international association ( IEPA) and a good series of conferences since 1996. The term new paradigm for psychiatry is a direct quote from conference in Staford upon Avon in 1997 by one the keynote speakers - maybe Paul Bebbington. I will check. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earlypsychosis ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
and the WHO Early Psychosis Declaration 2004 Earlypsychosis ( talk) 19:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
http://www.esi-topics.com/schizophrenia/interviews/Dr-Richard-Wyatt.html Earlypsychosis ( talk) 12:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
how can I reference from a leading pscyhiatrist on a website
This is now probably one of the hottest areas of research currently ongoing in psychotic disorders. [1] Jeffrey A. Lieberman Earlypsychosis ( talk) 08:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
"Hottest research area" is one thing, "an established clinical model" quite another (vision statements from WHO notwithstanding). It's perfectly okay to cite some key opinion leaders (although preferably more than one) to support the former claim. For the latter, you'd need some evidence that it works, or at least that it's widely implemented even though it doesn't work (which would be quite in the face of evidence-based medicine). "A proposed but empirically unconfirmed clinical model" seems more appropriate given the current evidence. Xasodfuih ( talk) 22:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)No longer empirically unconfirmed clinical model Earlypsychosis ( talk) 07:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (February 2009) |
the article has 20 references as at 17th Feb. Earlypsychosis ( talk) 11:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Just some critical material that I've stumbled upon. When I'm finished translating Autism, I'll take a look at this..
this is not a good representation of the early psychosis model, as the material focuses on the current RCTs on pharmacological treatment of pre-psychotic (or
prodrome or at risk mental state) patients - and it is easy for all (including those working in the field McGorry PD, Yung A, Phillips L (2001).
"Ethics and early intervention in psychosis: keeping up the pace and staying in step". Schizophr. Res. 51 (1): 17–29.
PMID
11479062. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
to see why there are ethical problems with that!. This is a very small research component of the model.
The early psychosis approach is an intervention for those already psychotic and aims to change the course of the condition...ie a secondary prevention approach to prevent repeated episodes of psychosis (or schizophrenia). We know that the typical pathway for those in the early stages of psychosis is difficult, often involving many years of having the symptoms (duration of untreated psychosis), many help seeking attempts, and a continued decline in social and vocational functioning.(see Lincoln C, Harrigan S, McGorry PD (1998). "Understanding the topography of the early psychosis pathways. An opportunity to reduce delays in treatment". Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 172 (33): 21–5.
PMID
9764122.{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link))
When clinical teams do offer services for pre psychotic clients, the approach is often one of an "active watching brief", psychoeducation, and psychological interventions for young adults (see Gleeson J, Larsen TK, McGorry P (2003). "Psychological treatment in pre- and early psychosis". J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 31 (1): 229–45.
PMID
12722897.{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link))
the early psychosis article lacks some more general overview articles and I am working on adding them soon. Pat MCgorry is the credited with the original idea and his writing is good. The best and latest one is McGorry PD, Killackey E, Yung A (2008).
"Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence and future directions". World Psychiatry. 7 (3): 148–56.
PMC
2559918.
PMID
18836582. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) and Killackey E, Yung AR, McGorry PD (2007). "Early psychosis: where we've been, where we still have to go". Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 16 (2): 102–8.
PMID
17619539.{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Early intervention in psychosis. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Early intervention in psychosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12365879When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
need some help with this.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earlypsychosis ( talk • contribs) 04:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Earlypsychosis ( talk) 08:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Before one can discuss prevention of psychosis one has to come to some conclusions about the cause. Am in the middle of reading an interested book on the subject. The stuff out of world war two were they found that 50% of troops would have a mental break down after a month of combat and nearly all would have a break down after 6 months of active combat. Environmental causes however are out of vogue and currently neurotransmitters and PET scans are the in thing.-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 23:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I disagree. No one has yet identified a cause, but we are well on the way to preventing psychosis - and reducing further epsiodes (both primary and secondary prevention). Psychosis is a vague construct, with multiple causes, with different individual and cultural expressions (see http://www.understandingpsychosis.com]). The continued search for that one cause (usually funded by drug companies) has limited our understanding of this condition. Its no longer vogue to think of either environmental or biological causes - an abstract dichotomy in our world of continiums.
To date we know that family history, drug use (especially THC in early adolescence), early trauma, inner city living, ethnicity and many other factors contribute to the severity of the condition. The most alarming is that delays to treatment impact on the severity of the condition. Many of these delays are a function of how the mental health system has been structured. Earlypsychosis ( talk) 07:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I have not thoroughly reviewed this but the lede statements "a new paradigm for psychiatry[citation needed]" and "has developed rapidly as an established clinical model" seem contradicted by the Cochrane review cited further in the article. Xasodfuih ( talk) 17:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thanks for your comments and additions I will work on this, but any systematic review of the literature will show a surge of articles on the topic within the last 10 years, has result in the reform of services in the UK (huge increase in established teams and clients served), supported by leading academic institutions and researchs - ( IOP in London, Thomas McGlashan in Yale), new journals started (Early intervention), international association ( IEPA) and a good series of conferences since 1996. The term new paradigm for psychiatry is a direct quote from conference in Staford upon Avon in 1997 by one the keynote speakers - maybe Paul Bebbington. I will check. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earlypsychosis ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
and the WHO Early Psychosis Declaration 2004 Earlypsychosis ( talk) 19:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
http://www.esi-topics.com/schizophrenia/interviews/Dr-Richard-Wyatt.html Earlypsychosis ( talk) 12:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
how can I reference from a leading pscyhiatrist on a website
This is now probably one of the hottest areas of research currently ongoing in psychotic disorders. [1] Jeffrey A. Lieberman Earlypsychosis ( talk) 08:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
"Hottest research area" is one thing, "an established clinical model" quite another (vision statements from WHO notwithstanding). It's perfectly okay to cite some key opinion leaders (although preferably more than one) to support the former claim. For the latter, you'd need some evidence that it works, or at least that it's widely implemented even though it doesn't work (which would be quite in the face of evidence-based medicine). "A proposed but empirically unconfirmed clinical model" seems more appropriate given the current evidence. Xasodfuih ( talk) 22:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)No longer empirically unconfirmed clinical model Earlypsychosis ( talk) 07:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (February 2009) |
the article has 20 references as at 17th Feb. Earlypsychosis ( talk) 11:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Just some critical material that I've stumbled upon. When I'm finished translating Autism, I'll take a look at this..
this is not a good representation of the early psychosis model, as the material focuses on the current RCTs on pharmacological treatment of pre-psychotic (or
prodrome or at risk mental state) patients - and it is easy for all (including those working in the field McGorry PD, Yung A, Phillips L (2001).
"Ethics and early intervention in psychosis: keeping up the pace and staying in step". Schizophr. Res. 51 (1): 17–29.
PMID
11479062. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
to see why there are ethical problems with that!. This is a very small research component of the model.
The early psychosis approach is an intervention for those already psychotic and aims to change the course of the condition...ie a secondary prevention approach to prevent repeated episodes of psychosis (or schizophrenia). We know that the typical pathway for those in the early stages of psychosis is difficult, often involving many years of having the symptoms (duration of untreated psychosis), many help seeking attempts, and a continued decline in social and vocational functioning.(see Lincoln C, Harrigan S, McGorry PD (1998). "Understanding the topography of the early psychosis pathways. An opportunity to reduce delays in treatment". Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 172 (33): 21–5.
PMID
9764122.{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link))
When clinical teams do offer services for pre psychotic clients, the approach is often one of an "active watching brief", psychoeducation, and psychological interventions for young adults (see Gleeson J, Larsen TK, McGorry P (2003). "Psychological treatment in pre- and early psychosis". J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 31 (1): 229–45.
PMID
12722897.{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link))
the early psychosis article lacks some more general overview articles and I am working on adding them soon. Pat MCgorry is the credited with the original idea and his writing is good. The best and latest one is McGorry PD, Killackey E, Yung A (2008).
"Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence and future directions". World Psychiatry. 7 (3): 148–56.
PMC
2559918.
PMID
18836582. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) and Killackey E, Yung AR, McGorry PD (2007). "Early psychosis: where we've been, where we still have to go". Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 16 (2): 102–8.
PMID
17619539.{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Early intervention in psychosis. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Early intervention in psychosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12365879When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)