Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Discworld article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
... is a very important supporting character, but was himself never the focus of any Discworld novel. His name does not belong in the "Groups" column in the list of novels. This one's pretty obvious but as a relative newbie I'd like to get some consensus before I clean it up. (or you guys could take out the Gaspodes yourselves) Gr8moldy ( talk) 16:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
...and outting it on a private wiki. Before a mod firebombs the articles like has happened to Warhammer 40,000, Starcraft, Warcraft (and much more I do not know about.)
But for the love of Pete, please link the main article to whatever wiki you use?
Mopeyennui ( talk)
The motifs column in the novels table is getting silly, and is now starting to include every external reference to anything in the books! Since each book has its own article, I propose deleting this column and adding a paragraph somewhere outlining common motifs within the Discworld series. That is, not only does it no longer list just motifs, but it's largely irrelevant to this article what the motifs of each individual book are. Stephenb (Talk) 09:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
This is the paragraph I would propose to add. I think it sums up most of the column in relation to Discworld, and would mean that the column could be removed in favour of adding the specific "motifs" and references to the articles for the individual books: Stephenb (Talk) 12:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
The Discworld novels contain common themes and motifs that run through the series. Fantasy clichés are parodied in many novels, as are various sub-genres of fantasy, such as fairy tales, witch and vampire stories and so on. Analogies of real-world issues, such as religion, business and politics, are recurring themes, as are music genres such as opera or rock music. Parodies of non-Discworld stories also occur frequently, including Shakespeare, Beatrix Potter and several movies.
...has been nominated for deletion (or possibly merging) Stephenb (Talk) 13:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
There's a suggestion in the article that there is a consensus in fandom that Vetinari represents Machiavelli. Does such a consensus really exist? I don't know much about fan consensus, and I've never attended any meeting of fans, but a comparison with Lorenzo de' Medici seems more credible. Increasingly so in light of the recent Moist von Lipwig stories. Anyway, I'm putting in a citation needed marker, as I don't know about the existence of a consensus.Cmsg 22:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm having a bit of a link blitz... should all novel titles included in this article be linked to their page, or only the first time they're mentioned? Sabrage 17:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
A user has added It's a Wonderful Life to the list of motives in Reaper Man; since I don't remeber having watched the movie, I can't comment on its inclusion, but it probably needs a better justification than: "Windle Poons" spelled backwards is "George Bailey" (huh?). - Mike Rosoft 15:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, in what way are "Lord of the Rings" and "Silmarillion" included as motifs in "Thud"? Besides the usual parody elements present in every Discworld novel? -- megA ( talk) 20:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
<-With difficulty. Carrot as Lawrence is the more tenuous of the two but the multiple shooters thing is a whole plot line. To be honest the reason I was worried about the references going is that they are the best way to distinguish or it's all original thought. Draw the line there, if a source mentions it a motif it's in, if not then leave it to the article on the book. -- Nate1481( t/ c) 15:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
COWER BRIEF MORTALS... erm, I mean... HO HO HO! May the Hogfather bring you what you want for Hogswatch, and may the sun rise in the morning! Blueboar ( talk) 14:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I've put down a call to arms on Terry's Talk page to make the Terry Pratchett article a Featured Article. This will be have to improved too, as it's a sub article - it should consequently become more likely to be seen as potentially FA too, if it gets good enough. Please post ideas for improvement. -- Matt Lewis ( talk) 01:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Update: I've put a list of sub articles on TP's talk page. There are currently about 40, 11 of them Discworld novels. All will need to be up to a reasonable standard - any help is appreciated. -- Matt Lewis ( talk) 13:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
What happened to the Reading Order page? I used this often and rather miss it. Adverge ( talk) 23:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah me too! What happened to the reading order page? User:redsilkroute|redsilkroute]] ( talk) 7 May 2008 (UTC)
-- 61.17.70.18 ( talk) 06:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I see why it was deleted, but for those of us unfamiliar with the books it would be helpful in the "storylines" section to have a list of the book titles for each storyline - maybe in publication order? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Astabeth ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Prepossed: leave this link here : Pratchett’s Discworld « ZapfBlog as it serves to provide help to anyone like me who has taken the time to look and because the link in the article to http://discworldfanatics.co.uk/ is not working-- Sativarg ( talk) 04:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I've never had anything to add to a Wikipedia page, but this seems like a big gap.
Shouldn't there be a mention of Pratchett's book, _Strata_? It was (kind of?) a Discworld parody of Larry Niven's _Ringworld_.
Here's a link on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Strata-Terry-Pratchett/dp/0552133256
---Norm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.167.216.11 ( talk) 04:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
No, indeed it isn't Discworld, but I would agree that it deserves a mention here as it does give a description of a disc like world and allows insight into the development of TP's thinking about Discworld. -- Robin den hertog ( talk) 19:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Sure, at some locations you can find words from TP, saying that. But after reading about the discworld-science … they arte the counterpart to our magic: we’re thinking of magic things, we’re superstitious … sometimes. We like such things, such thoughts. We need ’em. Not allways, not everybody — but: ask Terry! We just think of it while our world is a matter of physics. Discworld is based on magic and the auditors are the dreams there. Dreams of a world without magic. So I think, somebody should have an eye on this. (Me? Sorry, that’s no good idea. I’ve to fight with this words as I’m not english.) -- 87.163.122.30 ( talk) 04:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed a recent edit added row color-coding to the novel table for the various character "groups". The greys are a bit difficult to distinguish from one another, and overall it makes the table a bit messy-looking to my eyes. Additionally, some novels cover multiple groups to varying degrees. Considering the problems, I feel it's better to remove the colors for now, until some consensus can be reached, as (for one) leaving it harms readability in my opinion. Any ideas? -- Fru1tbat ( talk) 17:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed the section on society since as it stood it only contained a bunch of references to pratchetian in-jokes, without any explanation of the point behind them. This was completely out of character with the rest of the 'themes' section and would have been confusing to anyone unless they'd already read the books. I may at some point recreate the section with more fitting content. NetHawk ( talk) 17:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
In the Rincewind section, I changed "the novel, The Last Hero" to "The Discworld fable" as this is how the books describe themselves. I also added information on The Folklore of The Discworld. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.240.66 ( talk) 01:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Here the article says "Taoism-like", in the article that is behind the
Lu-Tze-link, it says "Buddhism-like". Which now is it. Being an expert in none of the two religions, I'd still say Buddhism-like since Lu-Tze is pictured in orange ropes on the cover of Nightwatch.
It could be both. The saffron-colored robes are a nod to Buddhism, but Lu-Tze is an obvious reference to
Lao Tse, upon whose teachings Taoism is based.
Heck you could even throw in Confucianism in there and just state that it is inspired by Oriental Religions.
Gr8moldy (
talk) 21:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Confucianism is based upon Taoism. I believe the intention in the books is for it to be Taoism based as that is rather more similar to it than Buddhism. ~ —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jamesnd (
talk •
contribs) 12:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
The section of the table that says what each book parodies can be very useful. Please don't delete it again, whoever did it! Molly moon 19:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
perhaps when we write what arc a novel belongs to, we should say if it the first or second for example if the novel is with the witches we could put first of the witches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.169.161.1 ( talk) 20:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
The section on Death currently contains this claim "His dialogue is always depicted in small caps, a trait that other characters often remark upon.". I cannot recall other characters remarking upon this trait. Can anyone supply a reference before I remove the claim? Mooncow ( talk) 14:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Does the way Pestilence speaks (Italics with " marks) need to be said, or is it not important enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.247.84 ( talk) 15:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The annotated Pratchett file is linked to from each novel page but hasn't been updated in years. Would it be appropriate to put annotations directly in each novel? Wiki is supposed to be comprehensive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.93.229 ( talk) 04:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I've added a CN tag to the bit which says Pratchett plays the "toyshopowner" in Hogfather. I was under the impression that Tony Robinson played the part of the toy-shop owner, and Pratchett was a toymaker. The reference (27) isn't relevant, as far as I could tell, to what it's supposed to be supporting. Brammers ( talk) 23:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
There's a new paperback that's coming out this year titled "The Wee Free Men: The Beginning". I haven't been able to find any information about whether it is different from the original The Wee Free Men, or just a new edition. We should add references to it once the information becomes available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeshja ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
This is confusing. The "Reading Order" and "Publication Order" can be very different thanks to the many different storylines. The reading order itself can be very different. While many find it good to start at Colour of Magic, others may often want to start with either the most recent film adaptation or the first book of it's series. These can be split up as well - following the announcement of "Raising Taxes", I have had a long-running argument with a friend as to whether this would be part of a "Mosit von Lipwig" series (Going Postal, Making Money, Raising Taxes) or a continuation of the "Ankh-Morpork" series (effectively starting with "The Truth"). This little box should be renamed to "Publication order" to take the ambiguity out of it (with maybe a second box titled "Series order" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendroche ( talk • contribs) 19:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Why is there no page or section for humans in Ankh-Morpork? We've got every last undead or dwarf mentioned in the novels explained, but there's no page for secondary humans such as Sacharissa Crisplock, Rufus Drumknott, William De Worde or Adora Bella Dearheart. 216.41.16.82 ( talk) 18:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Heyday Films (the Creators of Harry Potter) plan a Theatrical-release two-part 3D film series distributed by Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group and Walt Disney Pictures set to be Start on Christmas, 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.217.128 ( talk) 12:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
"...all the main storylines take place around the same period of time (end of the Century of the Fruitbat, beginning of the Century of the Anchovy); the only exception is Small Gods, which is set roughly one hundred years before any of the other stories." —
"Pyramids" would be the other one, n'est-ce pas? --
megA (
talk) 14:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
This section should be renamed "Ankh-Morpork" and include "The Truth" as this, along with the two extant Lipwig books are largely about the development and modernisation of the city. The fact that Going Postal, Making Money and the expected third Lipwig book centre around one character is more of a plot device than a central storyline. Angry Mustelid ( talk) 19:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
This novel by Pratchett and Stephen Baxter is not going to be a Discworld novel, hence I've removed it from the list. See: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/jun/16/terry-pratchett-science-fiction-book etc.
JiMternet ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC).
At the end of the Death Section, it reads, "Death also appears in Good Omens written by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman." However, I believe this is a different Death. They have the same way of talking, but I think there is a different death in each universe. The other four horsemen of the Apocalypse (or Apocralypse in Discworld) in Good Omens are not the same horsemen who appear in the Discworld novel Sourcery. The Discworld War is male, and Pestilence has not been replaced by Pollution. So, do I take out the sentence altogether, or modify it? Or did I not make enough of an argument for two different Deaths? remaai ( talk) 19:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auditors of Reality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auditors of Reality until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..-- User:Salix alba ( talk): 06:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
The reading order section suggests that The Truth could be a standalone story. It does nonetheless incorporate lore from earlier (chronologically) novels such as Vimes becoming Commander of the Watch and it creates a core feature of later (chronological) novels in that the newspapers become a staple part of Ankh Morporkian life - as exploited by Von Lipwig in Going Postal, Making Money and Raising Steam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.1.229 ( talk) 22:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
This article describes Discworld book series, but is associated with Q253295 wikidata, which describes Discworld fictional universe, it should be associated with Q3257270, which represent Discworld book series.
The similar problem is in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discworld_%28world%29 page, which is associated with Q1248783 (Discworld planet) instead of Q253295 (Discworld fictional universe).
I fixed that for en and cs language variants in Wikidata, unfortunately seems that more than 2/3 of language variants have the same or similar problem. 89.102.22.7 ( talk) 19:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
How about re-adding the info about the unfinished “Scouting for Trolls”? I know it's not (going to be) published, but still, a footnote would be in place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.69.148.178 ( talk) 12:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
How many words in total in all the discworld books taken together? Wodorabe ( talk) 17:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
(No pun actually intended, but " novel"/" novel", I now realise.) Having checked for prior comments along this line (and failing to find them, whether or not they exist), I was wondering whether it was worth adding (or changing from 'Miscellaneous', in at least two cases) at least one additional "Groups" keyword to reflect a theme of "Technical/Cultural Advancement" of the Discworld, or something of a similar indication?
Candidates could be Moving Pictures (cinema, albeit short-lived), Men At Arms (firearms, ditto), Soul Music (popular music), Feet of Clay (emancipation), The Truth (printing), Going Postal (stamps), Making Money (fiat currency), Unseen Academicals ((soccer) football), Snuff (emancipation, again), Raising Steam (railways). But that's not a definitive list (there are some technical advancements without cultural ones, or vice-versa, for example), and could probably be added to/removed from by discerning reviewers with time on their hands to discuss such points.
e.g. whether "diplomatic" advancements also qualify J, T5E, T and MR, among possible others, to the changing nature of the Disc or the likes of G!G!'s police-force revisions count. But that's starting to sound too all-encompassing, and probably applicable to every book (e.g. Sourcery's beginning-of-the-end to the 'old regime' of dead-man's-pointy-shoes at UU) in some way or another. 31.83.148.126 ( talk) 01:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I've embarked on a Quality improvement project for Lie-to-children, first introduced as a phrase in The Science of Discworld.
If you've got recommendations for additional secondary sources that could be utilized to further improve the quality of the article, please suggest them at Talk:Lie-to-children.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 02:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Lately User:JesseRafe started removing info from the article on the grounds it is not notable. I asked him to discuss it here first, because I did not understand the specific reasons for the removal ("Per MOS they are not notable"). Because he did not explain it and kept removing the content, providing what seems to me only vague reasons ("There is nothing subjective here, it is cut and dry per WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people), these mentions are non-notable and their inclusion harms the public trust in Wikipedia."), I start the discussion myself and ask to keep the status quo of the article for the time being. Thanks for understanding. My perosnal opinion is that we do not have to use WP:Notability (people) for every name used in any article - it is used to determine whether a person is notable enough to be the topic of an article. WikiHannibal ( talk) 16:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Discworld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://wiki.dyskowe.info/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
I believe that the first reference to the late, lamented Terry Pratchett in this article should use that name, the one he wrote under, not the Sir title draped over him near the end - just as The Beatles doesn't talk about Sir Paul McCartney. - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 22:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
@ WikiHannibal: OK, here we go. Can you elaborate on your edit summary please?
It's not a 'characters' section, it's a 'storylines' section.
What's confusing? I've read the books and that's how the Watch starts out - obsolete due to the Thieves Guild. Then, as the paragraph at the end already states, Vetinari lets them "create a proper police force" at the end of Guards! Guards!. What else are you suggesting you need to know to understand this? -- 86.53.18.62 ( talk) 14:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am the author of the Discworld Reading Order Guide 3.0 featured on this page. I was surprised to see the Guide here again - before it was removed for being "original research" (which it is - it's one fan's interpretation of the order). If you find it helpful and it doesn't break rules, I'm glad it's here - I would appreciate it though if someone could reupload the uncropped version to Wikimedia and delete the crop? This is due to the fact that the cropped Wikimedia file is then indexed and appears in Google images high up, and a lot of people share it without knowing that a full, uncropped version exists. I hope this is not a problem. If you need further information from me, my email address is on the Guide itself (KK). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.24.97.217 ( talk) 23:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Seriously? 198.48.173.209 ( talk) 00:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
I say we remove the entire "Planned Adaptations" section, which is just a poorly-maintained rumor site - "Wee Free Men" talks about things being in development four years ago, "The Watch" is two years old, the "multiple novels" item is vague. Deals are often announced that never happen and Wikipedia isn't a video-industry blog. I say the article shouldn't list something until there's an actual release date, particularly because the article is already loaded with adaptations. Any comments? - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Since forever, the cover of The Colour of Magic had a wrong caption. Do you all want to use the present cover by Alan Smith, which is also used at The Colour of Magic, or a cover by Kirby to represent the Discworld in the infbox? WikiHannibal ( talk) 08:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
It seems strange that there's no section here which shows the publication order. Here's one website which has one: https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/discworld/ UnderEducatedGeezer ( talk) 04:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Not one mention that the elephant/turtle thing is from Hindu creation myth??
https://ocean.si.edu/ocean-life/reptiles/weight-world 2605:A600:1E38:286A:0:0:0:1 ( talk) 22:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Specifially for Unseen Academicals, though perhaps a review is needed for Pyramids, Small Gods, and Monstrous regiment too.
I don't feel like Unseen Academicals fits well with the other "Rincewind" stories. Rincewind stories up to and including The Last continent (and to a slightly lesser extent The Last Hero) have a quite consistent structure that stands out from the other subseries. Rincewind himself flees from problem to problem and the books where he is the lead follow more of a point to point plot format, in the tradition of Colour of Magic / Light Fantastic which clearly draw from D&D style madcap fantast adventure tropes.
Unseen Academicals feels a lot more like the Moist or Industrial Revolution novels. Rincewind, with his minor appearances, doesn't control the story. In terms of cast and structure, Unseen Academicals has most in common with Soul Music with some one-off characters backed up by Ridcully and his staff.
I think the simplest solution is to reclass Unseen Academicals as Industrial Revolution, but some other reshuffle of subseries might serve the other odd ones out better. Perhaps the Subseries column could be replaced with Lead Characters to allow better flexibility? Webbed Hands ( talk) 08:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Discworld article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
... is a very important supporting character, but was himself never the focus of any Discworld novel. His name does not belong in the "Groups" column in the list of novels. This one's pretty obvious but as a relative newbie I'd like to get some consensus before I clean it up. (or you guys could take out the Gaspodes yourselves) Gr8moldy ( talk) 16:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
...and outting it on a private wiki. Before a mod firebombs the articles like has happened to Warhammer 40,000, Starcraft, Warcraft (and much more I do not know about.)
But for the love of Pete, please link the main article to whatever wiki you use?
Mopeyennui ( talk)
The motifs column in the novels table is getting silly, and is now starting to include every external reference to anything in the books! Since each book has its own article, I propose deleting this column and adding a paragraph somewhere outlining common motifs within the Discworld series. That is, not only does it no longer list just motifs, but it's largely irrelevant to this article what the motifs of each individual book are. Stephenb (Talk) 09:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
This is the paragraph I would propose to add. I think it sums up most of the column in relation to Discworld, and would mean that the column could be removed in favour of adding the specific "motifs" and references to the articles for the individual books: Stephenb (Talk) 12:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
The Discworld novels contain common themes and motifs that run through the series. Fantasy clichés are parodied in many novels, as are various sub-genres of fantasy, such as fairy tales, witch and vampire stories and so on. Analogies of real-world issues, such as religion, business and politics, are recurring themes, as are music genres such as opera or rock music. Parodies of non-Discworld stories also occur frequently, including Shakespeare, Beatrix Potter and several movies.
...has been nominated for deletion (or possibly merging) Stephenb (Talk) 13:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
There's a suggestion in the article that there is a consensus in fandom that Vetinari represents Machiavelli. Does such a consensus really exist? I don't know much about fan consensus, and I've never attended any meeting of fans, but a comparison with Lorenzo de' Medici seems more credible. Increasingly so in light of the recent Moist von Lipwig stories. Anyway, I'm putting in a citation needed marker, as I don't know about the existence of a consensus.Cmsg 22:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm having a bit of a link blitz... should all novel titles included in this article be linked to their page, or only the first time they're mentioned? Sabrage 17:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
A user has added It's a Wonderful Life to the list of motives in Reaper Man; since I don't remeber having watched the movie, I can't comment on its inclusion, but it probably needs a better justification than: "Windle Poons" spelled backwards is "George Bailey" (huh?). - Mike Rosoft 15:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, in what way are "Lord of the Rings" and "Silmarillion" included as motifs in "Thud"? Besides the usual parody elements present in every Discworld novel? -- megA ( talk) 20:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
<-With difficulty. Carrot as Lawrence is the more tenuous of the two but the multiple shooters thing is a whole plot line. To be honest the reason I was worried about the references going is that they are the best way to distinguish or it's all original thought. Draw the line there, if a source mentions it a motif it's in, if not then leave it to the article on the book. -- Nate1481( t/ c) 15:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
COWER BRIEF MORTALS... erm, I mean... HO HO HO! May the Hogfather bring you what you want for Hogswatch, and may the sun rise in the morning! Blueboar ( talk) 14:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I've put down a call to arms on Terry's Talk page to make the Terry Pratchett article a Featured Article. This will be have to improved too, as it's a sub article - it should consequently become more likely to be seen as potentially FA too, if it gets good enough. Please post ideas for improvement. -- Matt Lewis ( talk) 01:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Update: I've put a list of sub articles on TP's talk page. There are currently about 40, 11 of them Discworld novels. All will need to be up to a reasonable standard - any help is appreciated. -- Matt Lewis ( talk) 13:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
What happened to the Reading Order page? I used this often and rather miss it. Adverge ( talk) 23:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah me too! What happened to the reading order page? User:redsilkroute|redsilkroute]] ( talk) 7 May 2008 (UTC)
-- 61.17.70.18 ( talk) 06:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I see why it was deleted, but for those of us unfamiliar with the books it would be helpful in the "storylines" section to have a list of the book titles for each storyline - maybe in publication order? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Astabeth ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Prepossed: leave this link here : Pratchett’s Discworld « ZapfBlog as it serves to provide help to anyone like me who has taken the time to look and because the link in the article to http://discworldfanatics.co.uk/ is not working-- Sativarg ( talk) 04:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I've never had anything to add to a Wikipedia page, but this seems like a big gap.
Shouldn't there be a mention of Pratchett's book, _Strata_? It was (kind of?) a Discworld parody of Larry Niven's _Ringworld_.
Here's a link on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Strata-Terry-Pratchett/dp/0552133256
---Norm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.167.216.11 ( talk) 04:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
No, indeed it isn't Discworld, but I would agree that it deserves a mention here as it does give a description of a disc like world and allows insight into the development of TP's thinking about Discworld. -- Robin den hertog ( talk) 19:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Sure, at some locations you can find words from TP, saying that. But after reading about the discworld-science … they arte the counterpart to our magic: we’re thinking of magic things, we’re superstitious … sometimes. We like such things, such thoughts. We need ’em. Not allways, not everybody — but: ask Terry! We just think of it while our world is a matter of physics. Discworld is based on magic and the auditors are the dreams there. Dreams of a world without magic. So I think, somebody should have an eye on this. (Me? Sorry, that’s no good idea. I’ve to fight with this words as I’m not english.) -- 87.163.122.30 ( talk) 04:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed a recent edit added row color-coding to the novel table for the various character "groups". The greys are a bit difficult to distinguish from one another, and overall it makes the table a bit messy-looking to my eyes. Additionally, some novels cover multiple groups to varying degrees. Considering the problems, I feel it's better to remove the colors for now, until some consensus can be reached, as (for one) leaving it harms readability in my opinion. Any ideas? -- Fru1tbat ( talk) 17:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed the section on society since as it stood it only contained a bunch of references to pratchetian in-jokes, without any explanation of the point behind them. This was completely out of character with the rest of the 'themes' section and would have been confusing to anyone unless they'd already read the books. I may at some point recreate the section with more fitting content. NetHawk ( talk) 17:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
In the Rincewind section, I changed "the novel, The Last Hero" to "The Discworld fable" as this is how the books describe themselves. I also added information on The Folklore of The Discworld. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.240.66 ( talk) 01:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Here the article says "Taoism-like", in the article that is behind the
Lu-Tze-link, it says "Buddhism-like". Which now is it. Being an expert in none of the two religions, I'd still say Buddhism-like since Lu-Tze is pictured in orange ropes on the cover of Nightwatch.
It could be both. The saffron-colored robes are a nod to Buddhism, but Lu-Tze is an obvious reference to
Lao Tse, upon whose teachings Taoism is based.
Heck you could even throw in Confucianism in there and just state that it is inspired by Oriental Religions.
Gr8moldy (
talk) 21:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Confucianism is based upon Taoism. I believe the intention in the books is for it to be Taoism based as that is rather more similar to it than Buddhism. ~ —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jamesnd (
talk •
contribs) 12:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
The section of the table that says what each book parodies can be very useful. Please don't delete it again, whoever did it! Molly moon 19:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
perhaps when we write what arc a novel belongs to, we should say if it the first or second for example if the novel is with the witches we could put first of the witches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.169.161.1 ( talk) 20:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
The section on Death currently contains this claim "His dialogue is always depicted in small caps, a trait that other characters often remark upon.". I cannot recall other characters remarking upon this trait. Can anyone supply a reference before I remove the claim? Mooncow ( talk) 14:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Does the way Pestilence speaks (Italics with " marks) need to be said, or is it not important enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.247.84 ( talk) 15:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The annotated Pratchett file is linked to from each novel page but hasn't been updated in years. Would it be appropriate to put annotations directly in each novel? Wiki is supposed to be comprehensive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.93.229 ( talk) 04:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I've added a CN tag to the bit which says Pratchett plays the "toyshopowner" in Hogfather. I was under the impression that Tony Robinson played the part of the toy-shop owner, and Pratchett was a toymaker. The reference (27) isn't relevant, as far as I could tell, to what it's supposed to be supporting. Brammers ( talk) 23:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
There's a new paperback that's coming out this year titled "The Wee Free Men: The Beginning". I haven't been able to find any information about whether it is different from the original The Wee Free Men, or just a new edition. We should add references to it once the information becomes available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeshja ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
This is confusing. The "Reading Order" and "Publication Order" can be very different thanks to the many different storylines. The reading order itself can be very different. While many find it good to start at Colour of Magic, others may often want to start with either the most recent film adaptation or the first book of it's series. These can be split up as well - following the announcement of "Raising Taxes", I have had a long-running argument with a friend as to whether this would be part of a "Mosit von Lipwig" series (Going Postal, Making Money, Raising Taxes) or a continuation of the "Ankh-Morpork" series (effectively starting with "The Truth"). This little box should be renamed to "Publication order" to take the ambiguity out of it (with maybe a second box titled "Series order" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendroche ( talk • contribs) 19:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Why is there no page or section for humans in Ankh-Morpork? We've got every last undead or dwarf mentioned in the novels explained, but there's no page for secondary humans such as Sacharissa Crisplock, Rufus Drumknott, William De Worde or Adora Bella Dearheart. 216.41.16.82 ( talk) 18:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Heyday Films (the Creators of Harry Potter) plan a Theatrical-release two-part 3D film series distributed by Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group and Walt Disney Pictures set to be Start on Christmas, 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.217.128 ( talk) 12:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
"...all the main storylines take place around the same period of time (end of the Century of the Fruitbat, beginning of the Century of the Anchovy); the only exception is Small Gods, which is set roughly one hundred years before any of the other stories." —
"Pyramids" would be the other one, n'est-ce pas? --
megA (
talk) 14:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
This section should be renamed "Ankh-Morpork" and include "The Truth" as this, along with the two extant Lipwig books are largely about the development and modernisation of the city. The fact that Going Postal, Making Money and the expected third Lipwig book centre around one character is more of a plot device than a central storyline. Angry Mustelid ( talk) 19:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
This novel by Pratchett and Stephen Baxter is not going to be a Discworld novel, hence I've removed it from the list. See: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/jun/16/terry-pratchett-science-fiction-book etc.
JiMternet ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC).
At the end of the Death Section, it reads, "Death also appears in Good Omens written by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman." However, I believe this is a different Death. They have the same way of talking, but I think there is a different death in each universe. The other four horsemen of the Apocalypse (or Apocralypse in Discworld) in Good Omens are not the same horsemen who appear in the Discworld novel Sourcery. The Discworld War is male, and Pestilence has not been replaced by Pollution. So, do I take out the sentence altogether, or modify it? Or did I not make enough of an argument for two different Deaths? remaai ( talk) 19:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auditors of Reality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auditors of Reality until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..-- User:Salix alba ( talk): 06:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
The reading order section suggests that The Truth could be a standalone story. It does nonetheless incorporate lore from earlier (chronologically) novels such as Vimes becoming Commander of the Watch and it creates a core feature of later (chronological) novels in that the newspapers become a staple part of Ankh Morporkian life - as exploited by Von Lipwig in Going Postal, Making Money and Raising Steam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.1.229 ( talk) 22:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
This article describes Discworld book series, but is associated with Q253295 wikidata, which describes Discworld fictional universe, it should be associated with Q3257270, which represent Discworld book series.
The similar problem is in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discworld_%28world%29 page, which is associated with Q1248783 (Discworld planet) instead of Q253295 (Discworld fictional universe).
I fixed that for en and cs language variants in Wikidata, unfortunately seems that more than 2/3 of language variants have the same or similar problem. 89.102.22.7 ( talk) 19:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
How about re-adding the info about the unfinished “Scouting for Trolls”? I know it's not (going to be) published, but still, a footnote would be in place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.69.148.178 ( talk) 12:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
How many words in total in all the discworld books taken together? Wodorabe ( talk) 17:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
(No pun actually intended, but " novel"/" novel", I now realise.) Having checked for prior comments along this line (and failing to find them, whether or not they exist), I was wondering whether it was worth adding (or changing from 'Miscellaneous', in at least two cases) at least one additional "Groups" keyword to reflect a theme of "Technical/Cultural Advancement" of the Discworld, or something of a similar indication?
Candidates could be Moving Pictures (cinema, albeit short-lived), Men At Arms (firearms, ditto), Soul Music (popular music), Feet of Clay (emancipation), The Truth (printing), Going Postal (stamps), Making Money (fiat currency), Unseen Academicals ((soccer) football), Snuff (emancipation, again), Raising Steam (railways). But that's not a definitive list (there are some technical advancements without cultural ones, or vice-versa, for example), and could probably be added to/removed from by discerning reviewers with time on their hands to discuss such points.
e.g. whether "diplomatic" advancements also qualify J, T5E, T and MR, among possible others, to the changing nature of the Disc or the likes of G!G!'s police-force revisions count. But that's starting to sound too all-encompassing, and probably applicable to every book (e.g. Sourcery's beginning-of-the-end to the 'old regime' of dead-man's-pointy-shoes at UU) in some way or another. 31.83.148.126 ( talk) 01:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I've embarked on a Quality improvement project for Lie-to-children, first introduced as a phrase in The Science of Discworld.
If you've got recommendations for additional secondary sources that could be utilized to further improve the quality of the article, please suggest them at Talk:Lie-to-children.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 02:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Lately User:JesseRafe started removing info from the article on the grounds it is not notable. I asked him to discuss it here first, because I did not understand the specific reasons for the removal ("Per MOS they are not notable"). Because he did not explain it and kept removing the content, providing what seems to me only vague reasons ("There is nothing subjective here, it is cut and dry per WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people), these mentions are non-notable and their inclusion harms the public trust in Wikipedia."), I start the discussion myself and ask to keep the status quo of the article for the time being. Thanks for understanding. My perosnal opinion is that we do not have to use WP:Notability (people) for every name used in any article - it is used to determine whether a person is notable enough to be the topic of an article. WikiHannibal ( talk) 16:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Discworld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://wiki.dyskowe.info/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
I believe that the first reference to the late, lamented Terry Pratchett in this article should use that name, the one he wrote under, not the Sir title draped over him near the end - just as The Beatles doesn't talk about Sir Paul McCartney. - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 22:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
@ WikiHannibal: OK, here we go. Can you elaborate on your edit summary please?
It's not a 'characters' section, it's a 'storylines' section.
What's confusing? I've read the books and that's how the Watch starts out - obsolete due to the Thieves Guild. Then, as the paragraph at the end already states, Vetinari lets them "create a proper police force" at the end of Guards! Guards!. What else are you suggesting you need to know to understand this? -- 86.53.18.62 ( talk) 14:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am the author of the Discworld Reading Order Guide 3.0 featured on this page. I was surprised to see the Guide here again - before it was removed for being "original research" (which it is - it's one fan's interpretation of the order). If you find it helpful and it doesn't break rules, I'm glad it's here - I would appreciate it though if someone could reupload the uncropped version to Wikimedia and delete the crop? This is due to the fact that the cropped Wikimedia file is then indexed and appears in Google images high up, and a lot of people share it without knowing that a full, uncropped version exists. I hope this is not a problem. If you need further information from me, my email address is on the Guide itself (KK). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.24.97.217 ( talk) 23:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Seriously? 198.48.173.209 ( talk) 00:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
I say we remove the entire "Planned Adaptations" section, which is just a poorly-maintained rumor site - "Wee Free Men" talks about things being in development four years ago, "The Watch" is two years old, the "multiple novels" item is vague. Deals are often announced that never happen and Wikipedia isn't a video-industry blog. I say the article shouldn't list something until there's an actual release date, particularly because the article is already loaded with adaptations. Any comments? - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Since forever, the cover of The Colour of Magic had a wrong caption. Do you all want to use the present cover by Alan Smith, which is also used at The Colour of Magic, or a cover by Kirby to represent the Discworld in the infbox? WikiHannibal ( talk) 08:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
It seems strange that there's no section here which shows the publication order. Here's one website which has one: https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/discworld/ UnderEducatedGeezer ( talk) 04:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Not one mention that the elephant/turtle thing is from Hindu creation myth??
https://ocean.si.edu/ocean-life/reptiles/weight-world 2605:A600:1E38:286A:0:0:0:1 ( talk) 22:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Specifially for Unseen Academicals, though perhaps a review is needed for Pyramids, Small Gods, and Monstrous regiment too.
I don't feel like Unseen Academicals fits well with the other "Rincewind" stories. Rincewind stories up to and including The Last continent (and to a slightly lesser extent The Last Hero) have a quite consistent structure that stands out from the other subseries. Rincewind himself flees from problem to problem and the books where he is the lead follow more of a point to point plot format, in the tradition of Colour of Magic / Light Fantastic which clearly draw from D&D style madcap fantast adventure tropes.
Unseen Academicals feels a lot more like the Moist or Industrial Revolution novels. Rincewind, with his minor appearances, doesn't control the story. In terms of cast and structure, Unseen Academicals has most in common with Soul Music with some one-off characters backed up by Ridcully and his staff.
I think the simplest solution is to reclass Unseen Academicals as Industrial Revolution, but some other reshuffle of subseries might serve the other odd ones out better. Perhaps the Subseries column could be replaced with Lead Characters to allow better flexibility? Webbed Hands ( talk) 08:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)