From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zad68 ( talk · contribs) 03:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

  • This is the oldest nomination in its GAN grouping and it deserves a look-through. Zad 68 03:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Status = NOT PASSED

  • Starting review... Zad 68 03:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Review stopped.
  • One confirmed plagiarism issue found and several others suspected.
  • Criticism section takes up nearly half the body of the article, a likely WP:UNDUE problem
  • Bayer source questionable
  • Uses of "claim" and other wording make for WP:POV problems
  • Large sections of text quoted directly from sources, and quoted in a way that modifies the original meaning
  • Also number of (relatively easy to correct) WP:MOS issues

I did not complete the review, as once I saw enough problems, I stopped, so there may also be further issues. This article still needs significant work before GA, starting with rooting out the plagiarism issues, and so it is not being listed for GA. Zad 68 04:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

GA table

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Some issues as noted below, including some confirmed and some suspected plagiarism
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. WP:WTW "current", "upcoming", "claim"
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. uses of WP:WTW "claim", very large and possibly WP:UNDUE Critcism section may not be in line with emphasis found sources (need explanation).
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No recent edit-warring and quiet Talk page
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Not passed.

Notes

MOS compliance

  • "current" is used several times, this time-dates the article and is a WP:WTW relative time reference problem, eliminate it and date the information appropriately
  • "claim" is WP:WTW, see WP:CLAIM
  • prose close-quotes should have the punctuation inside

General

  • Ran MadmanBot against the article, came up clean

Lead

  • "published by the American Psychiatric Association" should have commas before and after

Uses and definition

  • "hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies in the US also generally require a 'five axis' DSM diagnosis of all the patients treated" -- not all hospitals? is "psychiatric hospitals..." meant?
  • "The DSM, including DSM-IV, is a registered trademark belonging to the American Psychiatric Association (APA).[3][4]" -- work this info into the other paragraphs in this section so there isn't a single-sentence paragraph
  • consider switching the order of the top and bottom paragraphs here, it would make more sense to start with the fundamental definition before talking about how it's used
  • in the defintion, why is "and that" substituted with "[which]"? And "...death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom.” was dropped off the end of that sentence and really can't be because it changes the original meaning in an important way. This makes me suspicious that the "no definition adequately..." content also may be problematic.

History

  • The first official attempt was the 1840 census which used a single category, "idiocy/insanity". -- consider: The first official attempt was the 1840 census, which used a single category: "idiocy/insanity".
  • This was subsequently revised several times by APA over the years. APA, ... -- Doesn't "APA" need "the" in front of it?
  • The foreword to the DSM-I states the US Navy had itself made some minor revisions but "the Army established a much more sweeping revision, abandoning the basic outline of the Standard and attempting to express present day concepts of mental disturbance. This nomenclature eventually was adopted by all Armed Forces", and "assorted modifications of the Armed Forces nomenclature [were] introduced into many clinics and hospitals by psychiatrists returning from military duty." The Veterans Administration also adopted a slightly modified version of Medical 203. -- this is a large quote from a primary source, can it be paraphrased, also needs refs
  • In 1950 the --> In 1950, the
  • 46% replied, --> Per MOS a sentence shouldn't start with a digit, recast to avoid this
  • 'neurosis' (nervousness, 'egodystonic) --> extra quote? needs cleanup
  • It was quite similar to the DSM-I. --> "quite" sounds editorial here, consider dropping
  • The term "reaction" was dropped --> this is the first time "reaction" is mentioned, what is it and what is the significance of them dropping it?
  • "personality disorders did not experience emotional distress was discarded" is straight plagiarism out of the source and makes me very suspicious about possible plagiarism in the rest of the article
  • The whole Ronald Bayer description is right out of his own book, this source does not seem likely to be impartial to the events

DSM-IV-TR


Criticism

My first observation is that the Criticism section takes up nearly half the body of the article. Is that in line with what is found in reliable sources? I'm not coming into this article knowing a whole lot about the DSM but it is a bit surprising to me to find such a large Criticism section, can you please comment on this?

Excellent point. Parts of the criticism section are very well-written, with several citations to peer-reviewed journal articles, and adopt a balanced, neutral, encyclopeadic approach. Other sections read like an editorial and/or a clearly biased presentation of one side of a debate. Mark D Worthen PsyD 09:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
I notice that none of the cited criticisms of DSM V were written after publication in May of 2013, but instead focus on criticism that were written before its release. perhaps criticisms of the document should be focused on articles and citations that appear after final publication. It's not as if there are no critiques writeen in the four months it has been out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.249.112.1 ( talk) 15:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC) reply

DSM-5

See also

External links

Media

References

Sourcing


Sources table

In this table:

  • Source lists the source as cited in the article
  • Seems WP:RS? means, "Does this source appear to meet WP:RS for reliable sourcing?"
  • Use OK? means, is the source used appropriately in the article? For the review, a few selected sources will be spot-checked to ensure they aren't plagiarized and support the article content. ? indicates the source was not spot-checked.
  • Notes will summarize problems found and what needs to be done to fix them
Source Seems WP:RS? Use OK? Notes
<ref name="Revolution">{{Cite journal|doi= 10.1002/jhbs.20103|author=Mayes, R. & Horwitz, AV.|year=2005|title=DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness|journal=J Hist Behav Sci|pmid= 15981242|volume=41|issue=3|pages=249–67}}</ref> ?
<ref name="concept&evolution">Dalal PK, Sivakumar T. (2009) [http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2009/51/4/310/58302 Moving towards ICD-11 and DSM-5: Concept and evolution of psychiatric classification.] Indian Journal of Psychiatry, Volume 51, Issue 4, Page 310-319.</ref> ?
<ref name="Cosgrove">Cosgrove, Lisa, Krimsky, Sheldon,Vijayaraghavan, Manisha, Schneider, Lisa, [http://www.tufts.edu/~skrimsky/PDF/DSM%20COI.PDF Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry]</ref> ?
<ref name="DSM-5 Publication Date Moved to May 2013">{{cite press release |last= |first= |title=DSM-5 Publication Date Moved to May 2013 |trans_title= |language= |date=December 10, 2009 |publisher=American Psychiatric Association |location=Arlington, VA |url=http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2009NewsReleases/DSM-5-Publication-Date-Moved-.aspx |format= |accessdate=January 9, 2012 |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20091214011614/http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2009NewsReleases/DSM-5-Publication-Date-Moved-.aspx |archivedate=January 9, 2012 |deadurl=yes |quote= |ref= }}</ref> ?
<ref name="Houts2000">{{cite journal | author = Houts A.C. | year = 2000 | title = Fifty years of psychiatric nomenclature: Reflections on the 1943 War Department Technical Bulletin, Medical 203 | url = http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/72506618/abstract | journal = Journal of Clinical Psychology | volume = 56 | issue = 7| pages = 935–967 | doi = 10.1002/1097-4679(200007)56:7<935::AID-JCLP11>3.0.CO;2-8 | pmid = 10902952 }}</ref> ?
<ref name="HumanizingMadness">{{cite book| last = McLaren| first = Niall| title = Humanizing Madness| year = 2007| publisher = Loving Healing Press| location = Ann Arbor, MI| isbn = 1-932690-39-5| pages = 81–94 }}</ref> ?
<ref name="Oldham">{{cite journal|last=John M. Oldham|title=Personality Disorders|journal=FOCUS|year=2005|volume=3|pages=372–382.|url=http://focus.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?Volume=3&page=372&journalID=21}}</ref> ?
<ref name="Phillips">{{cite journal|last=Phillips|first=James et al.|title=The Six Most Essential Questions in Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Pluralogue. Part 1: Conceptual and Definitional Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis|journal=[[Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine]]|year=2012|month=January 13|volume=7|issue=3|pages=1–51|doi=10.1186/1747-5341-7-3|pmid=22243994|url=http://www.peh-med.com/content/pdf/1747-5341-7-3.pdf|accessdate=24 January 2012|publisher=BioMed Central|issn=1747-5341|pmc=3305603|last2=Frances|first2=Allen|last3=Cerullo|first3=Michael A|last4=Chardavoyne|first4=John|last5=Decker|first5=Hannah S|last6=First|first6=Michael B|last7=Ghaemi|first7=Nassir|last8=Greenberg|first8=Gary|last9=Hinderliter|first9=Andrew C}}</ref> ?
<ref name="PMID5774702">{{cite journal | url = http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/125/10S/30 | pmid = 5774702 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | volume=10 Suppl | year=1969 | month=April | pages=21–9 | last1 = Cooper | first1 = JE | last2 = Kendell | first2 = RE | last3 = Gurland | first3 = BJ | last4 = Sartorius | first4 = N | last5 = Farkas | first5 = T | title = Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: some results from the first comparative investigation | journal = The American Journal of Psychiatry}}</ref> ?
<ref name="Poland01vol1">Poland, JS. (2001) [http://mentalhelp.net/books/books.php?type=de&id=557 Review of Volume 1 of DSM-IV sourcebook]</ref> ?
<ref name="Poland01vol2">Poland, JS. (2001) [http://mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?id=996&type=book&cn=74 Review of vol 2 of DSM-IV sourcebook]</ref> ?
<ref name="titleTrademark''' Electronic Search System (TESS)">{{cite web|url=http://tess2.uspto.gov/|title=Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)|accessdate=2010-02-03}}</ref> ?
<ref name="Transformation">{{cite journal | last1 = Wilson | first1 = M. | date = 1993 March; | title = DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: a history | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=8434655 | journal = Am J Psychiatry | volume = 150 | issue = 3| pages = 399–410 | pmid = 8434655 }}</ref> ?
<ref name="wash-post">Shankar Vedantam, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/25/AR2005062500982.html Psychiatry's Missing Diagnosis: Patients' Diversity Is Often Discounted] Washington Post: Mind and Culture, June 26</ref> ?
<ref name="Widiger2000">{{cite journal |author=Widiger TA, Sankis LM |title=Adult psychopathology: issues and controversies |journal=Annu Rev Psychol |volume=51 |issue= |pages=377–404 |year=2000 |pmid=10751976 |doi=10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.377 }}</ref> ?
<ref>[http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=173760 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 4]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://jhp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/41/4/36 How Using the Dsm Causes Damage: A Client’s Report] Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 4, 36-56 (2001)</ref> ?
<ref>[http://nationalpsychologist.com/2006/11/glasser-headlines-psychotherapy-conference/10879.html The National Psychologist (Susan Bowman, 2006)]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/ArchiveFolder/Research%20Group/Publications/Mad/Madhouse.html Dominic Murphy, PhD; Steven Stich, PhD (1998) Darwin in the Madhouse]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/allinthemind/81-words-the-inside-story-of-psychiatry-and/3246684 81 Words. The Inside Story of Psychiatry]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2065 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 1]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2071 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 2]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2073 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 3]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.dsm5.org/pages/default.aspx DSM-5 development]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.scid4.org/psychometric/scidI_reliability.html What is the Reliability of the SCID-I?]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.scid4.org/psychometric/scidI_validity.html What is the "validity" of the SCID-I?]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.spiritualmentoring.com/page2/page46/page46.html G. Scott Sparrow: DSM-IV-TR In Action]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.torahdec.org/Downloads/DSM-II_Homosexuality_Revision.pdf DSM-II Homosexuality Revision]</ref> ?
<ref>Alexander, B. (2008) [http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/24664654/ What's ‘normal’ sex? Shrinks seek definition Controversy erupts over creation of psychiatric rule book's new edition] MSNBC Today, May.</ref> ?
<ref>Allen Frances, Avram H. Mack, Ruth Ross, and Michael B. First (2000) [http://www.acnp.org/G4/GN401000082/CH081.html The DSM-IV Classification and Psychopharmacology].</ref> ?
<ref>Allen, FJ. (2012) [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201201/is-dsm-5-public-trust-or-apa-cash-cow Is DSM 5 A Public Trust Or An APA Cash Cow? Commercialism And Censorship Trump Concern For Quality] Psychology Today</ref> ?
<ref>American Psychological Association: [http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/therapeutic-response.pdf Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation]</ref> ?
<ref>APA [http://www.psych.org/practice/dsm/summary-of-practice-relevant-changes-to-the-dsm-iv-tr Summary of Practice-Relevant Changes to the DSM-IV-TR].</ref> ?
<ref>Bhugra, D. & Munro, A. (1997) ''Troublesome Disguises: Underdiagnosed Psychiatric Syndromes'' Blackwell Science Ltd</ref> ?
<ref>Chodoff, P. (2005) [http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/40/11/17-a Psychiatric Diagnosis: A 60-Year Perspective] ''Psychiatric News'' June 3, 2005 Volume 40 Number 11, p17</ref> ?
<ref>Dan J. Stein, Katharine A. Phillips, Derek Bolton, K.W.M Fulford, John Z. Sadler, and Kenneth S. Kendler [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3101504/ What is a Mental/Psychiatric Disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V] Psychol Med. 2010 November; 40(11): 1759–1765.</ref> ?
<ref>DW Hands (2004) [http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/112364/on_operationalisms_and_economics/ On Operationalisms and Economics] Journal of Economic Issues</ref> ?
<ref>Grob, GN. (1991) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=2006685 Origins of DSM-I: a study in appearance and reality] ''Am J Psychiatry.'' April;148(4):421–31.</ref> ?
<ref>Healy D (2006) [http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030185&ct=1 The Latest Mania: Selling Bipolar Disorder] PLoS Med 3(4): e185.</ref> ?
<ref>Kleinplatz, P.J & Moser, C. (2005). [http://home.netcom.com/~docx2/kM-response.htm Politics versus science: An addendum and response to Drs. Spitzer and Fink.] Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 17(3/4), 135-139.</ref> ?
<ref>Leda Cosmides, PhD; John Tooby, PhD (1999) Toward an Evolutionary Taxonomy of Treatable Conditions "J of Abnormal Psychology." 1999;108(3):453-464. [http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/papers/taxonomywakefield99.pdf]</ref> ?
<ref>Maser, JD & Akiskal, HS. et al. (2002) [http://psych.theclinics.com/issues/contents?volume=25&issue=4 Spectrum concepts in major mental disorders] ''Psychiatric Clinics of North America'', Vol. 25, Special issue 4</ref> ?
<ref>Maser, JD. & Patterson, T. (2002) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12462864 Spectrum and nosology: implications for DSM-5] ''Psychiatric Clinics of North America'', December, 25(4)p855-885</ref> ?
<ref>McCommon, B. (2006) [http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/57/12/1809 Antipsychiatry and the Gay Rights Movement] Psychiatr Serv 57:1809, December doi 10.1176/appi.ps.57.12.1809</ref> ?
<ref>Michael T. Compton (2007) [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/565489_print Recovery: Patients, Families, Communities] Conference Report, Medscape Psychiatry & Mental Health, October 11–14, 2007</ref> ?
<ref>Paul R. McHugh (2005) [http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/293/20/2526?ijkey=e5f8d881d7f6c0d853ce55e1ac5b693c5c53a950&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha Striving for Coherence: Psychiatry’s Efforts Over Classification] JAMA. 2005;293(no.20)2526-2528.</ref> ?
<ref>Rissmiller, DJ, D.O., Rissmiller, J. (2006) [http://www.ps.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/57/12/1809-a Letter in reply] Psychiatr Serv 57:1809-a-1810, December 2006 doi 10.1176/appi.ps.57.12.1809-a</ref> ?
<ref>Ronald Bayer ''Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis'' (1981).</ref> ?
<ref>Royal College of Psychiatrists: [http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Submission%20to%20the%20Church%20of%20England.pdf Submission to the Church of England’s Listening Exercise on Human Sexuality.]</ref> ?
<ref>Schaffer, David (1996) [https://ww1.cpa-apc.org/Publications/Archives/PDF/1996/Aug/schaffer.pdf A Participant's Observations: Preparing DSM-IV] Can J Psychiatry 1996;41:325–329.</ref> ?
<ref>Sharfstein, SS. (2005) [http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/40/16/3 Big Pharma and American Psychiatry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly] ''Psychiatric News'' August 19, 2005 Volume 40 Number 16</ref> ?
<ref>Speigel, A. (2005) [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050103fa_fact?050103fa_fact The Dictionary of Disorder: How one man revolutionized of 2005-01-03.]</ref> ?
<ref>Spiegel, Alix. (18 January 2002.) [http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=204 "81 Words"]. In Ira Glass (producer), ''This American Life''. Chicago: Chicago Public Radio.</ref> ?
<ref>Spitzer and First (2005) [http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/294/15/1898 Classification of Psychiatric Disorders.] JAMA.2005; 294: 1898-1899.</ref> ?
<ref>Spitzer, Robert L, M.D., Williams, Janet B.W, D.S.W., First, Michael B, M.D., Gibbon, Miriam, M.S.W., [http://nyspi.org/AR2001/Biometrics.htm Biometric Research]</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite book| author = Stanton L. Jones| coauthors = Mark A. Yarhouse| title = Homosexuality: The Use of Scientific Research in the Church's Moral Debate| url = http://books.google.com/?id=9glOXO60Ij0C| date = 2000-11-06| publisher = InterVarsity Press| isbn = 978-0-8308-1567-8 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite book| last = Lane| first = Christopher| title = Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness| year = 2007| publisher = Yale University Press| isbn = 0-300-12446-5| page = 263 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Bentall | first1 = R. | year = 2006 | title = Madness explained : Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a 'complaint-orientated' approach to understanding mental illness | url = http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17441292 | journal = Medical hypotheses | volume = 66 | issue = 2| pages = 220–233 | doi = 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.09.026 | pmid = 16300903 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Krueger | first1 = RF. | last2 = Watson | first2 = D. | last3 = Barlow | first3 = DH. ''et al.'' | year = 2005 | title = Introduction to the Special Section: Toward a Dimensionally Based Taxonomy of Psychopathology | url = http://content.apa.org/journals/abn/114/4 | journal = Journal of Abnormal Psychology | volume = 114 | issue = 4| pages = 491–493 | doi = 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.491 | pmid=16351372 | pmc=2242426}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Pincus | first1 = H. A.| author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | year = 1998 | title = Clinical Significance" and DSM-IV | url = http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/55/12/1145 | journal = Arch Gen Psychiatry | volume = 55 | issue = 12| page = 1145 | pmid = 9862559 | doi = 10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1145 | last2 = Zarin | first2 = DA | last3 = First | first3 = M | pages = 1145; author reply 1147–8 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Spitzer | first1 = R.L. | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | year = 1981 | title = The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues | url = http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/138/2/210 | journal = Am J Psychiatry | volume = 138 | issue = 2| pages = 210–215 | pmid = 7457641 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Spitzer | first1 = RL | last2 = Wakefield | first2 = JC. | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | date = 1999 December; | title = DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for clinical significance: does it help solve the false positives problem? | url = | journal = Am J Psychiatry | volume = 156 | issue = 12| pages = 1856–64 | pmid = 10588397 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wakefield | first1 = Jerome C. | last2 = PhD | first2 = MF| last3 = PhD | first3 = MB| last4 = PhD | first4 = DSW | last5 = Schmitz | first5 = Mark F. | last6 = First | first6 = Michael B. | last7 = MD | first7 = | last8 = Horwitz | first8 = Allan V. | year = 2007 | title = Extending the Bereavement Exclusion for Major Depression to Other Losses: Evidence From the National Comorbidity Survey | url = http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/64/4/433 | journal = Arch Gen Psychiatry | volume = 64 | issue = 4| pages = 433–440 | doi = 10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.433 | pmid = 17404120 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Greenberg | first1=S | last2=Shuman | first2=DW | last3=Meyer | first3=RG | title=Unmasking forensic diagnosis | journal=International Journal of Law and Psychiatry | volume=27 | issue=1 | pages=1–15 | year=2004 | pmid=15019764 | doi=10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.01.001 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | pmid = 11227812 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | volume=39 | issue=3 | year=2001 | month=March | pages=309–14 | last1 = McNally | first1 = RJ | title = On Wakefield's harmful dysfunction analysis of mental disorder | journal = Behaviour research and therapy | doi = 10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00068-1}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | pmid = 17329740 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | doi=10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024026 | volume=190 | year=2007 | month=March | pages=210–6 | title = Diagnostic stability of psychiatric disorders in clinical practice | last1 = Baca-Garcia | first1 = E. | last2 = Perez-Rodriguez | first2 = M. M. | last3 = Basurte-Villamor | first3 = I. | last4 = Del Moral | first4 = A. L. F. | last5 = Jimenez-Arriero | first5 = M. A. | last6 = De Rivera | first6 = J. L. G. | last7 = Saiz-Ruiz | first7 = J. | last8 = Oquendo | first8 = M. A. | journal = The British Journal of Psychiatry | issue = 3}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | url = http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/160/1/4 | pmid = 12505793 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | doi=10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4 | volume=160 | issue=1 | year=2003 | month=January | pages=4–12 | title = Distinguishing Between the Validity and Utility of Psychiatric Diagnoses | last1 = Kendell | first1 = R. | journal = American Journal of Psychiatry | last2 = Jablensky | first2 = A}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kleinman A |title=Triumph or pyrrhic victory? The inclusion of culture in DSM-IV |journal=Harv Rev Psychiatry |volume=4 |issue=6 |pages=343–4 |year=1997 |pmid=9385013 |doi=10.3109/10673229709030563 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal|last=Cosgrove|first=Lisa|coauthors=Krimsky, Sheldon, Vijayaraghavan, Manisha, Schneider, Lisa|title=Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry|journal=Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics|year=2006|volume=75|issue=3|pages=154–160|doi=10.1159/000091772|pmid=16636630}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal|last=Mezzich|first=Juan E.|year=2002|title=International Surveys on the Use of ICD-10 and Related Diagnostic Systems|journal=Psychopathology|volume=35|issue=2–3|pages=72–75|publisher=|doi=10.1159/000065122|url=http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowAbstract&ArtikelNr=65122&Ausgabe=228600&ProduktNr=224276|format=guest editorial, abstract|accessdate=2008-09-02|pmid=12145487}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/11/26/MNJJ1M3DFK.DTL |title=Revision of psychiatric manual under fire|author=Erin Allday |date=November 26, 2011 |work=San Francisco Chronicle }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/opinion/the-dsms-troubled-revision.html | work=The New York Times | first=Gary | last=Greenberg | title=The D.S.M.'s Troubled Revision | date=January 29, 2012}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pointpark.edu/NewsArtsSciences.aspx?id=467 |title=Professor co-authors letter about America’s mental health manual |author= |date=December 12, 2011 |work=Point Park University }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|title='The Encyclopedia of Insanity — A Psychiatric Handbook Lists a Madness for Everyone.'|work=Harpers Magazine|date=February 1997|author=L.J. Davis|url=http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rbell/EncyclopediaOfInsanity.html.gz|archiveurl=http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rbell/EncyclopediaOfInsanity.html.gz|archivedate=January 8, 2013}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|title=Proposed Revision: Definition of a Mental Disorder|url=http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=465|publisher=American Psychiatric Association|accessdate=December 20, 2011|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20100215171046/http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=465|archivedate=January 8, 2013}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|title=Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders|url=http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/SchizophreniaandOtherPsychoticDisorders.aspx|publisher=American Psychiatric Association|accessdate=May 6, 2010}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/775496 |title=DSM-5 Gets APA's Official Stamp of Approval |publisher=Medscape.com |date= |accessdate=2012-12-05}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.psych.org/practice/dsm/dsm-frequently-asked-questions |title=DSM: Frequently Asked Questions | psychiatry.org |publisher=Psych.org |date= |accessdate=2012-11-25}}</ref> ?

Post-GA suggestions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zad68 ( talk · contribs) 03:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

  • This is the oldest nomination in its GAN grouping and it deserves a look-through. Zad 68 03:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Status = NOT PASSED

  • Starting review... Zad 68 03:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Review stopped.
  • One confirmed plagiarism issue found and several others suspected.
  • Criticism section takes up nearly half the body of the article, a likely WP:UNDUE problem
  • Bayer source questionable
  • Uses of "claim" and other wording make for WP:POV problems
  • Large sections of text quoted directly from sources, and quoted in a way that modifies the original meaning
  • Also number of (relatively easy to correct) WP:MOS issues

I did not complete the review, as once I saw enough problems, I stopped, so there may also be further issues. This article still needs significant work before GA, starting with rooting out the plagiarism issues, and so it is not being listed for GA. Zad 68 04:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

GA table

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Some issues as noted below, including some confirmed and some suspected plagiarism
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. WP:WTW "current", "upcoming", "claim"
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. uses of WP:WTW "claim", very large and possibly WP:UNDUE Critcism section may not be in line with emphasis found sources (need explanation).
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No recent edit-warring and quiet Talk page
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Not passed.

Notes

MOS compliance

  • "current" is used several times, this time-dates the article and is a WP:WTW relative time reference problem, eliminate it and date the information appropriately
  • "claim" is WP:WTW, see WP:CLAIM
  • prose close-quotes should have the punctuation inside

General

  • Ran MadmanBot against the article, came up clean

Lead

  • "published by the American Psychiatric Association" should have commas before and after

Uses and definition

  • "hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies in the US also generally require a 'five axis' DSM diagnosis of all the patients treated" -- not all hospitals? is "psychiatric hospitals..." meant?
  • "The DSM, including DSM-IV, is a registered trademark belonging to the American Psychiatric Association (APA).[3][4]" -- work this info into the other paragraphs in this section so there isn't a single-sentence paragraph
  • consider switching the order of the top and bottom paragraphs here, it would make more sense to start with the fundamental definition before talking about how it's used
  • in the defintion, why is "and that" substituted with "[which]"? And "...death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom.” was dropped off the end of that sentence and really can't be because it changes the original meaning in an important way. This makes me suspicious that the "no definition adequately..." content also may be problematic.

History

  • The first official attempt was the 1840 census which used a single category, "idiocy/insanity". -- consider: The first official attempt was the 1840 census, which used a single category: "idiocy/insanity".
  • This was subsequently revised several times by APA over the years. APA, ... -- Doesn't "APA" need "the" in front of it?
  • The foreword to the DSM-I states the US Navy had itself made some minor revisions but "the Army established a much more sweeping revision, abandoning the basic outline of the Standard and attempting to express present day concepts of mental disturbance. This nomenclature eventually was adopted by all Armed Forces", and "assorted modifications of the Armed Forces nomenclature [were] introduced into many clinics and hospitals by psychiatrists returning from military duty." The Veterans Administration also adopted a slightly modified version of Medical 203. -- this is a large quote from a primary source, can it be paraphrased, also needs refs
  • In 1950 the --> In 1950, the
  • 46% replied, --> Per MOS a sentence shouldn't start with a digit, recast to avoid this
  • 'neurosis' (nervousness, 'egodystonic) --> extra quote? needs cleanup
  • It was quite similar to the DSM-I. --> "quite" sounds editorial here, consider dropping
  • The term "reaction" was dropped --> this is the first time "reaction" is mentioned, what is it and what is the significance of them dropping it?
  • "personality disorders did not experience emotional distress was discarded" is straight plagiarism out of the source and makes me very suspicious about possible plagiarism in the rest of the article
  • The whole Ronald Bayer description is right out of his own book, this source does not seem likely to be impartial to the events

DSM-IV-TR


Criticism

My first observation is that the Criticism section takes up nearly half the body of the article. Is that in line with what is found in reliable sources? I'm not coming into this article knowing a whole lot about the DSM but it is a bit surprising to me to find such a large Criticism section, can you please comment on this?

Excellent point. Parts of the criticism section are very well-written, with several citations to peer-reviewed journal articles, and adopt a balanced, neutral, encyclopeadic approach. Other sections read like an editorial and/or a clearly biased presentation of one side of a debate. Mark D Worthen PsyD 09:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
I notice that none of the cited criticisms of DSM V were written after publication in May of 2013, but instead focus on criticism that were written before its release. perhaps criticisms of the document should be focused on articles and citations that appear after final publication. It's not as if there are no critiques writeen in the four months it has been out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.249.112.1 ( talk) 15:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC) reply

DSM-5

See also

External links

Media

References

Sourcing


Sources table

In this table:

  • Source lists the source as cited in the article
  • Seems WP:RS? means, "Does this source appear to meet WP:RS for reliable sourcing?"
  • Use OK? means, is the source used appropriately in the article? For the review, a few selected sources will be spot-checked to ensure they aren't plagiarized and support the article content. ? indicates the source was not spot-checked.
  • Notes will summarize problems found and what needs to be done to fix them
Source Seems WP:RS? Use OK? Notes
<ref name="Revolution">{{Cite journal|doi= 10.1002/jhbs.20103|author=Mayes, R. & Horwitz, AV.|year=2005|title=DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness|journal=J Hist Behav Sci|pmid= 15981242|volume=41|issue=3|pages=249–67}}</ref> ?
<ref name="concept&evolution">Dalal PK, Sivakumar T. (2009) [http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2009/51/4/310/58302 Moving towards ICD-11 and DSM-5: Concept and evolution of psychiatric classification.] Indian Journal of Psychiatry, Volume 51, Issue 4, Page 310-319.</ref> ?
<ref name="Cosgrove">Cosgrove, Lisa, Krimsky, Sheldon,Vijayaraghavan, Manisha, Schneider, Lisa, [http://www.tufts.edu/~skrimsky/PDF/DSM%20COI.PDF Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry]</ref> ?
<ref name="DSM-5 Publication Date Moved to May 2013">{{cite press release |last= |first= |title=DSM-5 Publication Date Moved to May 2013 |trans_title= |language= |date=December 10, 2009 |publisher=American Psychiatric Association |location=Arlington, VA |url=http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2009NewsReleases/DSM-5-Publication-Date-Moved-.aspx |format= |accessdate=January 9, 2012 |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20091214011614/http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2009NewsReleases/DSM-5-Publication-Date-Moved-.aspx |archivedate=January 9, 2012 |deadurl=yes |quote= |ref= }}</ref> ?
<ref name="Houts2000">{{cite journal | author = Houts A.C. | year = 2000 | title = Fifty years of psychiatric nomenclature: Reflections on the 1943 War Department Technical Bulletin, Medical 203 | url = http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/72506618/abstract | journal = Journal of Clinical Psychology | volume = 56 | issue = 7| pages = 935–967 | doi = 10.1002/1097-4679(200007)56:7<935::AID-JCLP11>3.0.CO;2-8 | pmid = 10902952 }}</ref> ?
<ref name="HumanizingMadness">{{cite book| last = McLaren| first = Niall| title = Humanizing Madness| year = 2007| publisher = Loving Healing Press| location = Ann Arbor, MI| isbn = 1-932690-39-5| pages = 81–94 }}</ref> ?
<ref name="Oldham">{{cite journal|last=John M. Oldham|title=Personality Disorders|journal=FOCUS|year=2005|volume=3|pages=372–382.|url=http://focus.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?Volume=3&page=372&journalID=21}}</ref> ?
<ref name="Phillips">{{cite journal|last=Phillips|first=James et al.|title=The Six Most Essential Questions in Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Pluralogue. Part 1: Conceptual and Definitional Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis|journal=[[Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine]]|year=2012|month=January 13|volume=7|issue=3|pages=1–51|doi=10.1186/1747-5341-7-3|pmid=22243994|url=http://www.peh-med.com/content/pdf/1747-5341-7-3.pdf|accessdate=24 January 2012|publisher=BioMed Central|issn=1747-5341|pmc=3305603|last2=Frances|first2=Allen|last3=Cerullo|first3=Michael A|last4=Chardavoyne|first4=John|last5=Decker|first5=Hannah S|last6=First|first6=Michael B|last7=Ghaemi|first7=Nassir|last8=Greenberg|first8=Gary|last9=Hinderliter|first9=Andrew C}}</ref> ?
<ref name="PMID5774702">{{cite journal | url = http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/125/10S/30 | pmid = 5774702 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | volume=10 Suppl | year=1969 | month=April | pages=21–9 | last1 = Cooper | first1 = JE | last2 = Kendell | first2 = RE | last3 = Gurland | first3 = BJ | last4 = Sartorius | first4 = N | last5 = Farkas | first5 = T | title = Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: some results from the first comparative investigation | journal = The American Journal of Psychiatry}}</ref> ?
<ref name="Poland01vol1">Poland, JS. (2001) [http://mentalhelp.net/books/books.php?type=de&id=557 Review of Volume 1 of DSM-IV sourcebook]</ref> ?
<ref name="Poland01vol2">Poland, JS. (2001) [http://mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?id=996&type=book&cn=74 Review of vol 2 of DSM-IV sourcebook]</ref> ?
<ref name="titleTrademark''' Electronic Search System (TESS)">{{cite web|url=http://tess2.uspto.gov/|title=Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)|accessdate=2010-02-03}}</ref> ?
<ref name="Transformation">{{cite journal | last1 = Wilson | first1 = M. | date = 1993 March; | title = DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: a history | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=8434655 | journal = Am J Psychiatry | volume = 150 | issue = 3| pages = 399–410 | pmid = 8434655 }}</ref> ?
<ref name="wash-post">Shankar Vedantam, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/25/AR2005062500982.html Psychiatry's Missing Diagnosis: Patients' Diversity Is Often Discounted] Washington Post: Mind and Culture, June 26</ref> ?
<ref name="Widiger2000">{{cite journal |author=Widiger TA, Sankis LM |title=Adult psychopathology: issues and controversies |journal=Annu Rev Psychol |volume=51 |issue= |pages=377–404 |year=2000 |pmid=10751976 |doi=10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.377 }}</ref> ?
<ref>[http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=173760 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 4]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://jhp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/41/4/36 How Using the Dsm Causes Damage: A Client’s Report] Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 4, 36-56 (2001)</ref> ?
<ref>[http://nationalpsychologist.com/2006/11/glasser-headlines-psychotherapy-conference/10879.html The National Psychologist (Susan Bowman, 2006)]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/ArchiveFolder/Research%20Group/Publications/Mad/Madhouse.html Dominic Murphy, PhD; Steven Stich, PhD (1998) Darwin in the Madhouse]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/allinthemind/81-words-the-inside-story-of-psychiatry-and/3246684 81 Words. The Inside Story of Psychiatry]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2065 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 1]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2071 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 2]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2073 DSM-IV Sourcebook Volume 3]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.dsm5.org/pages/default.aspx DSM-5 development]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.scid4.org/psychometric/scidI_reliability.html What is the Reliability of the SCID-I?]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.scid4.org/psychometric/scidI_validity.html What is the "validity" of the SCID-I?]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.spiritualmentoring.com/page2/page46/page46.html G. Scott Sparrow: DSM-IV-TR In Action]</ref> ?
<ref>[http://www.torahdec.org/Downloads/DSM-II_Homosexuality_Revision.pdf DSM-II Homosexuality Revision]</ref> ?
<ref>Alexander, B. (2008) [http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/24664654/ What's ‘normal’ sex? Shrinks seek definition Controversy erupts over creation of psychiatric rule book's new edition] MSNBC Today, May.</ref> ?
<ref>Allen Frances, Avram H. Mack, Ruth Ross, and Michael B. First (2000) [http://www.acnp.org/G4/GN401000082/CH081.html The DSM-IV Classification and Psychopharmacology].</ref> ?
<ref>Allen, FJ. (2012) [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201201/is-dsm-5-public-trust-or-apa-cash-cow Is DSM 5 A Public Trust Or An APA Cash Cow? Commercialism And Censorship Trump Concern For Quality] Psychology Today</ref> ?
<ref>American Psychological Association: [http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/therapeutic-response.pdf Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation]</ref> ?
<ref>APA [http://www.psych.org/practice/dsm/summary-of-practice-relevant-changes-to-the-dsm-iv-tr Summary of Practice-Relevant Changes to the DSM-IV-TR].</ref> ?
<ref>Bhugra, D. & Munro, A. (1997) ''Troublesome Disguises: Underdiagnosed Psychiatric Syndromes'' Blackwell Science Ltd</ref> ?
<ref>Chodoff, P. (2005) [http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/40/11/17-a Psychiatric Diagnosis: A 60-Year Perspective] ''Psychiatric News'' June 3, 2005 Volume 40 Number 11, p17</ref> ?
<ref>Dan J. Stein, Katharine A. Phillips, Derek Bolton, K.W.M Fulford, John Z. Sadler, and Kenneth S. Kendler [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3101504/ What is a Mental/Psychiatric Disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V] Psychol Med. 2010 November; 40(11): 1759–1765.</ref> ?
<ref>DW Hands (2004) [http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/112364/on_operationalisms_and_economics/ On Operationalisms and Economics] Journal of Economic Issues</ref> ?
<ref>Grob, GN. (1991) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=2006685 Origins of DSM-I: a study in appearance and reality] ''Am J Psychiatry.'' April;148(4):421–31.</ref> ?
<ref>Healy D (2006) [http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030185&ct=1 The Latest Mania: Selling Bipolar Disorder] PLoS Med 3(4): e185.</ref> ?
<ref>Kleinplatz, P.J & Moser, C. (2005). [http://home.netcom.com/~docx2/kM-response.htm Politics versus science: An addendum and response to Drs. Spitzer and Fink.] Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 17(3/4), 135-139.</ref> ?
<ref>Leda Cosmides, PhD; John Tooby, PhD (1999) Toward an Evolutionary Taxonomy of Treatable Conditions "J of Abnormal Psychology." 1999;108(3):453-464. [http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/papers/taxonomywakefield99.pdf]</ref> ?
<ref>Maser, JD & Akiskal, HS. et al. (2002) [http://psych.theclinics.com/issues/contents?volume=25&issue=4 Spectrum concepts in major mental disorders] ''Psychiatric Clinics of North America'', Vol. 25, Special issue 4</ref> ?
<ref>Maser, JD. & Patterson, T. (2002) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12462864 Spectrum and nosology: implications for DSM-5] ''Psychiatric Clinics of North America'', December, 25(4)p855-885</ref> ?
<ref>McCommon, B. (2006) [http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/57/12/1809 Antipsychiatry and the Gay Rights Movement] Psychiatr Serv 57:1809, December doi 10.1176/appi.ps.57.12.1809</ref> ?
<ref>Michael T. Compton (2007) [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/565489_print Recovery: Patients, Families, Communities] Conference Report, Medscape Psychiatry & Mental Health, October 11–14, 2007</ref> ?
<ref>Paul R. McHugh (2005) [http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/293/20/2526?ijkey=e5f8d881d7f6c0d853ce55e1ac5b693c5c53a950&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha Striving for Coherence: Psychiatry’s Efforts Over Classification] JAMA. 2005;293(no.20)2526-2528.</ref> ?
<ref>Rissmiller, DJ, D.O., Rissmiller, J. (2006) [http://www.ps.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/57/12/1809-a Letter in reply] Psychiatr Serv 57:1809-a-1810, December 2006 doi 10.1176/appi.ps.57.12.1809-a</ref> ?
<ref>Ronald Bayer ''Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis'' (1981).</ref> ?
<ref>Royal College of Psychiatrists: [http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Submission%20to%20the%20Church%20of%20England.pdf Submission to the Church of England’s Listening Exercise on Human Sexuality.]</ref> ?
<ref>Schaffer, David (1996) [https://ww1.cpa-apc.org/Publications/Archives/PDF/1996/Aug/schaffer.pdf A Participant's Observations: Preparing DSM-IV] Can J Psychiatry 1996;41:325–329.</ref> ?
<ref>Sharfstein, SS. (2005) [http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/40/16/3 Big Pharma and American Psychiatry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly] ''Psychiatric News'' August 19, 2005 Volume 40 Number 16</ref> ?
<ref>Speigel, A. (2005) [http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050103fa_fact?050103fa_fact The Dictionary of Disorder: How one man revolutionized of 2005-01-03.]</ref> ?
<ref>Spiegel, Alix. (18 January 2002.) [http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=204 "81 Words"]. In Ira Glass (producer), ''This American Life''. Chicago: Chicago Public Radio.</ref> ?
<ref>Spitzer and First (2005) [http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/294/15/1898 Classification of Psychiatric Disorders.] JAMA.2005; 294: 1898-1899.</ref> ?
<ref>Spitzer, Robert L, M.D., Williams, Janet B.W, D.S.W., First, Michael B, M.D., Gibbon, Miriam, M.S.W., [http://nyspi.org/AR2001/Biometrics.htm Biometric Research]</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite book| author = Stanton L. Jones| coauthors = Mark A. Yarhouse| title = Homosexuality: The Use of Scientific Research in the Church's Moral Debate| url = http://books.google.com/?id=9glOXO60Ij0C| date = 2000-11-06| publisher = InterVarsity Press| isbn = 978-0-8308-1567-8 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite book| last = Lane| first = Christopher| title = Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness| year = 2007| publisher = Yale University Press| isbn = 0-300-12446-5| page = 263 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Bentall | first1 = R. | year = 2006 | title = Madness explained : Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a 'complaint-orientated' approach to understanding mental illness | url = http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17441292 | journal = Medical hypotheses | volume = 66 | issue = 2| pages = 220–233 | doi = 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.09.026 | pmid = 16300903 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Krueger | first1 = RF. | last2 = Watson | first2 = D. | last3 = Barlow | first3 = DH. ''et al.'' | year = 2005 | title = Introduction to the Special Section: Toward a Dimensionally Based Taxonomy of Psychopathology | url = http://content.apa.org/journals/abn/114/4 | journal = Journal of Abnormal Psychology | volume = 114 | issue = 4| pages = 491–493 | doi = 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.491 | pmid=16351372 | pmc=2242426}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Pincus | first1 = H. A.| author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | year = 1998 | title = Clinical Significance" and DSM-IV | url = http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/55/12/1145 | journal = Arch Gen Psychiatry | volume = 55 | issue = 12| page = 1145 | pmid = 9862559 | doi = 10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1145 | last2 = Zarin | first2 = DA | last3 = First | first3 = M | pages = 1145; author reply 1147–8 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Spitzer | first1 = R.L. | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | year = 1981 | title = The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues | url = http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/138/2/210 | journal = Am J Psychiatry | volume = 138 | issue = 2| pages = 210–215 | pmid = 7457641 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Spitzer | first1 = RL | last2 = Wakefield | first2 = JC. | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | date = 1999 December; | title = DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for clinical significance: does it help solve the false positives problem? | url = | journal = Am J Psychiatry | volume = 156 | issue = 12| pages = 1856–64 | pmid = 10588397 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wakefield | first1 = Jerome C. | last2 = PhD | first2 = MF| last3 = PhD | first3 = MB| last4 = PhD | first4 = DSW | last5 = Schmitz | first5 = Mark F. | last6 = First | first6 = Michael B. | last7 = MD | first7 = | last8 = Horwitz | first8 = Allan V. | year = 2007 | title = Extending the Bereavement Exclusion for Major Depression to Other Losses: Evidence From the National Comorbidity Survey | url = http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/64/4/433 | journal = Arch Gen Psychiatry | volume = 64 | issue = 4| pages = 433–440 | doi = 10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.433 | pmid = 17404120 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Greenberg | first1=S | last2=Shuman | first2=DW | last3=Meyer | first3=RG | title=Unmasking forensic diagnosis | journal=International Journal of Law and Psychiatry | volume=27 | issue=1 | pages=1–15 | year=2004 | pmid=15019764 | doi=10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.01.001 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | pmid = 11227812 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | volume=39 | issue=3 | year=2001 | month=March | pages=309–14 | last1 = McNally | first1 = RJ | title = On Wakefield's harmful dysfunction analysis of mental disorder | journal = Behaviour research and therapy | doi = 10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00068-1}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | pmid = 17329740 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | doi=10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024026 | volume=190 | year=2007 | month=March | pages=210–6 | title = Diagnostic stability of psychiatric disorders in clinical practice | last1 = Baca-Garcia | first1 = E. | last2 = Perez-Rodriguez | first2 = M. M. | last3 = Basurte-Villamor | first3 = I. | last4 = Del Moral | first4 = A. L. F. | last5 = Jimenez-Arriero | first5 = M. A. | last6 = De Rivera | first6 = J. L. G. | last7 = Saiz-Ruiz | first7 = J. | last8 = Oquendo | first8 = M. A. | journal = The British Journal of Psychiatry | issue = 3}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal | url = http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/160/1/4 | pmid = 12505793 | author-separator =, | author-name-separator= | doi=10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4 | volume=160 | issue=1 | year=2003 | month=January | pages=4–12 | title = Distinguishing Between the Validity and Utility of Psychiatric Diagnoses | last1 = Kendell | first1 = R. | journal = American Journal of Psychiatry | last2 = Jablensky | first2 = A}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kleinman A |title=Triumph or pyrrhic victory? The inclusion of culture in DSM-IV |journal=Harv Rev Psychiatry |volume=4 |issue=6 |pages=343–4 |year=1997 |pmid=9385013 |doi=10.3109/10673229709030563 }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal|last=Cosgrove|first=Lisa|coauthors=Krimsky, Sheldon, Vijayaraghavan, Manisha, Schneider, Lisa|title=Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry|journal=Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics|year=2006|volume=75|issue=3|pages=154–160|doi=10.1159/000091772|pmid=16636630}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite journal|last=Mezzich|first=Juan E.|year=2002|title=International Surveys on the Use of ICD-10 and Related Diagnostic Systems|journal=Psychopathology|volume=35|issue=2–3|pages=72–75|publisher=|doi=10.1159/000065122|url=http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowAbstract&ArtikelNr=65122&Ausgabe=228600&ProduktNr=224276|format=guest editorial, abstract|accessdate=2008-09-02|pmid=12145487}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/11/26/MNJJ1M3DFK.DTL |title=Revision of psychiatric manual under fire|author=Erin Allday |date=November 26, 2011 |work=San Francisco Chronicle }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/opinion/the-dsms-troubled-revision.html | work=The New York Times | first=Gary | last=Greenberg | title=The D.S.M.'s Troubled Revision | date=January 29, 2012}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pointpark.edu/NewsArtsSciences.aspx?id=467 |title=Professor co-authors letter about America’s mental health manual |author= |date=December 12, 2011 |work=Point Park University }}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|title='The Encyclopedia of Insanity — A Psychiatric Handbook Lists a Madness for Everyone.'|work=Harpers Magazine|date=February 1997|author=L.J. Davis|url=http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rbell/EncyclopediaOfInsanity.html.gz|archiveurl=http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rbell/EncyclopediaOfInsanity.html.gz|archivedate=January 8, 2013}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|title=Proposed Revision: Definition of a Mental Disorder|url=http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=465|publisher=American Psychiatric Association|accessdate=December 20, 2011|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20100215171046/http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=465|archivedate=January 8, 2013}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|title=Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders|url=http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/SchizophreniaandOtherPsychoticDisorders.aspx|publisher=American Psychiatric Association|accessdate=May 6, 2010}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/775496 |title=DSM-5 Gets APA's Official Stamp of Approval |publisher=Medscape.com |date= |accessdate=2012-12-05}}</ref> ?
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.psych.org/practice/dsm/dsm-frequently-asked-questions |title=DSM: Frequently Asked Questions | psychiatry.org |publisher=Psych.org |date= |accessdate=2012-11-25}}</ref> ?

Post-GA suggestions


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook