This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Pharmacology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cue reactivity. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

"A recent meta-analysis of over 40 cue-reactivity studies" -- is this the Carter & Tiffany study cited below? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.30.18 ( talk • contribs) 01:32, February 2, 2009

Good question, the article mentions "numerous laboratory studies" but only one citation is given. I've placed a onesource tag on it. Let's see if we can get some verifiability from more than one source. Or at least proper inline citations that can link statements to the source. OlEnglish ( talk) 19:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 October 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Galaxywest ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Galaxywest ( talk) 16:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,

As part of my course assignment, I have made some additions to the Cue Reactivity Wiki page. My additions include information on cue types, the theoretical background of cue reactivity, factors affecting cue reactivity, the nuanced differences in cue reactivity across substances, the relationship between cue reactivity and substance use relapse, the utility of the cue reactivity paradigm in research, and clinical implications. The efforts of previous editors were incorporated into these additions. Additionally, the summary statement at the beginning of the page and the reference list has been updated to reflect these additions. By accident, I was not logged in when I made these initial edits and the edits were uploaded under username 99.95.97.23. Therefore, if you have any feedback on the edits made by user (99.95.97.23 or Galaxywest) please let me know and I can address your edits/concerns accordingly.

Galaxywest ( talk) 17:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC) reply

{{ subst:GAN|subtopic=culture, sociology and psychology}} Galaxywest ( talk) 14:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply