This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

The material in "Criticism" is applied incorrectly. It is sourced to a powerpoint presentation which is not about Collaborative Language Systems therapy but about a medical/behavioral health collaboration. The critique that 30% of patients have poor long-term outcomes is aimed at traditional treatment in general, not the therapy being discussed (which, again, is not Anderson's CLS). 2601:602:9C00:BE00:98B:CE55:E1AE:C674 ( talk) 00:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC) reply