From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBlood type was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2006 Good article nomineeListed
July 3, 2009 Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Information inconsistent with Human blood group systems

"As of 2019, a total of 41 human blood group systems are recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT)"

at line 15 is inconsistent with

"38 major human systems are identified as of August 2019" at line 11 of the latter article.

I'm requesting help with updating this info in both articles — CrafterNova  [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 19:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Missing test type?

In the section entitled “Blood typing”, the third sentence starts “In these tests…” but it discusses a different test from the first two sentences. It seems there are tests other than agglutination, and should be mentioned between the second and third sentences, but are not. FloydW ( talk) 21:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

That sentence seems to have been left over from this edit, which (correctly IMO) removed information about an experimental test cited to a primary source. I've removed it. Spicy ( talk) 21:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raimondi12 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon ( talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBlood type was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2006 Good article nomineeListed
July 3, 2009 Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Information inconsistent with Human blood group systems

"As of 2019, a total of 41 human blood group systems are recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT)"

at line 15 is inconsistent with

"38 major human systems are identified as of August 2019" at line 11 of the latter article.

I'm requesting help with updating this info in both articles — CrafterNova  [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 19:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Missing test type?

In the section entitled “Blood typing”, the third sentence starts “In these tests…” but it discusses a different test from the first two sentences. It seems there are tests other than agglutination, and should be mentioned between the second and third sentences, but are not. FloydW ( talk) 21:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

That sentence seems to have been left over from this edit, which (correctly IMO) removed information about an experimental test cited to a primary source. I've removed it. Spicy ( talk) 21:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raimondi12 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon ( talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook