This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Bill's book on 'Great Hot Springs of the West was first published by Capra in 1974 ISBN 0-912264-89-6 184.187.183.165 ( talk) 21:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
why does every lunatic get their own page on wikipedia? This guy doesn't merit mention, unless placed in a section on "wacky" lunatics.
Any discussion as to "this guy shouldn't have an entry in Wikipedia" sounds like a proposed censorship. The Apollo moon landings were arguably the most incredible engineering feats of the 20th century and the fact that some argue that they were faked even more shows what incredible feats they were. Therefore, discussion of those views and the notable personalities who expound them help complete the picture of one of the last century's most notable events.
Personally I believe what Bill Kaysing said - it's not just HIS OWN theory - many, many, many astronomers world-wide believe the moon landing was faked. Do your research, then post spiteful comments.-- Sean-Jin 21:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Are we certain that the author of the Privacy book is the same man as the Apollo revisionist? Or is it possible that they are two men with the same name? In the Privacy book, the author states that he worked for an insurance company and doesn't say anything about a career in rocket engineering or any related field.
Does anyone have a pro-Bill website link? If so, please add it. -- PhilipO 20:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
Should Kaysing's self-published book be listed as a reference?
Does it fit the critera of "reliable? Bubba73 (talk), 02:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
While it is touching to see Kaysing’s adoring fans continue to promote his mythology, we must remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a fan club site. It is ridiculous that this article continues to imply that Kaysing’s claims regarding the moon landings have any validity, as they have all been thoroughly and totally debunked by people who actually know what they are talking about. Get over it, people.
Just to remind everybody, a summary of the situation is as follows - (1) Kaysing did not have any technical qualification. (2) Kaysing made claims that were outside his area of expertise. (3) all of his claims have been debunked by experts in science and engineering. (4) despite this, Kaysing continued to make his claims.
Kaysing, a librarian, had nothing intelligent to say about the moon landings, and it is an insult to pretend otherwise. Logicman1966 ( talk) 03:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
"Bill had become increasingly unstable in the work place and had started to assume that as a document reviewer he should be involved with the technical development of systems." How does a statement such as this make it into "an encyclopedia" without a credible source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.177.134.118 ( talk) 03:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The proposed deletion was contested by deleting the template. Since the deleting IP used bad edit summaries such as Proposed deletion was based on somebody clearly upset at the person in the article. "Non credible" conspiracy theorists are published all over wikipedia
which could just as well have been "please revert all my edits", I accidentally reverted the deletion myself but that was a mistake. So,
User:Rift, if you still want to delete it, you will have to use
WP:AfD. --
Hob Gadling (
talk) 07:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Bill's book on 'Great Hot Springs of the West was first published by Capra in 1974 ISBN 0-912264-89-6 184.187.183.165 ( talk) 21:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
why does every lunatic get their own page on wikipedia? This guy doesn't merit mention, unless placed in a section on "wacky" lunatics.
Any discussion as to "this guy shouldn't have an entry in Wikipedia" sounds like a proposed censorship. The Apollo moon landings were arguably the most incredible engineering feats of the 20th century and the fact that some argue that they were faked even more shows what incredible feats they were. Therefore, discussion of those views and the notable personalities who expound them help complete the picture of one of the last century's most notable events.
Personally I believe what Bill Kaysing said - it's not just HIS OWN theory - many, many, many astronomers world-wide believe the moon landing was faked. Do your research, then post spiteful comments.-- Sean-Jin 21:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Are we certain that the author of the Privacy book is the same man as the Apollo revisionist? Or is it possible that they are two men with the same name? In the Privacy book, the author states that he worked for an insurance company and doesn't say anything about a career in rocket engineering or any related field.
Does anyone have a pro-Bill website link? If so, please add it. -- PhilipO 20:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
Should Kaysing's self-published book be listed as a reference?
Does it fit the critera of "reliable? Bubba73 (talk), 02:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
While it is touching to see Kaysing’s adoring fans continue to promote his mythology, we must remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a fan club site. It is ridiculous that this article continues to imply that Kaysing’s claims regarding the moon landings have any validity, as they have all been thoroughly and totally debunked by people who actually know what they are talking about. Get over it, people.
Just to remind everybody, a summary of the situation is as follows - (1) Kaysing did not have any technical qualification. (2) Kaysing made claims that were outside his area of expertise. (3) all of his claims have been debunked by experts in science and engineering. (4) despite this, Kaysing continued to make his claims.
Kaysing, a librarian, had nothing intelligent to say about the moon landings, and it is an insult to pretend otherwise. Logicman1966 ( talk) 03:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
"Bill had become increasingly unstable in the work place and had started to assume that as a document reviewer he should be involved with the technical development of systems." How does a statement such as this make it into "an encyclopedia" without a credible source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.177.134.118 ( talk) 03:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The proposed deletion was contested by deleting the template. Since the deleting IP used bad edit summaries such as Proposed deletion was based on somebody clearly upset at the person in the article. "Non credible" conspiracy theorists are published all over wikipedia
which could just as well have been "please revert all my edits", I accidentally reverted the deletion myself but that was a mistake. So,
User:Rift, if you still want to delete it, you will have to use
WP:AfD. --
Hob Gadling (
talk) 07:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)