This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
BhutanâIndia relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from BhutanâIndia relations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 647 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on BhutanâIndia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
The map of India (section of The State of Jammu & Kashmir) is not correct. Need to be corrected. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.104.52.2 ( talk) 14:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Absolutely, That's why I have put a header. Please Check :) Krishnarajput015 ( talk) 17:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
File:PM marendra nodi mar gaya meets Bhutan PM Mr. Tshering Tobgay.jpg What is this written below the map Seema Chaurasia ( talk) 08:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Need to correct the map which shows Aksai Chin as part of China. Government of India has ordered Wikipedia to delete map that shows Aksai Chin in China [1]. SaiP ( talk) 17:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Asia or India may be able to help! |
References
@ Dhawangupta: one of the fellow editors suggested a map in the next section please do take a look at it. I think it's an acceptable one. AnM2002 ( talk) 09:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#India offended by our maps, since it is a wider problem than this page. Please make your comments there. And please avoid ranting! -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Dhawangupta: yep this one. AnM2002 ( talk)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The map shows aksai chin as part of China. Replace it with the proper one. SevenFooty ( talk) 03:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I concur with what @ Nizil Shah: has suggested. Displaying territories which are disputed separately is the best way to go forward as has been done on most of the articles relating to India/Kashmir. AnM2002 ( talk) 06:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Calm down! First understand what I am saying, I wrote India/Kashmir and secondly, Aksai chin is disputed and Chinese control doesn't mean it belongs to China, if we go by this then Pakistan should drop it's claim on Kashmir, China on Taiwan and Palestine on Gaza/West Bank. Be sensible and keep your own POV to yourself. AnM2002 ( talk) 07:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
:@ Aghore: that's what I am saying 'nobody owns Wikipedia' and nobody has the right to make disputed claims about a country's sovereignty. I don't know why it's so difficult to understand that rather than putting up a flawed map just put a map which is neutral and acceptable to all and that map is the one attached above by Nazil. Hope you understand! AnM2002 ( talk) 07:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ C1MM: don't become so ignorant/biaded that you can't even understand the difference between a riot article and a disputed map which vehemently disregards the sensitivities of a particular party to the dispute. AnM2002 ( talk) 07:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
For your kind information and just so that you get an idea according to Shimla agreement issue of Kashmir is a bilateral dispute between India and Pakistan and even the UN is accepted this. Kashmir has been removed from the Disputed regions list long ago. AnM2002 ( talk) 07:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Aghore: i corrected your misleading statement saying UNSC has this dispute listed which is false and ill-informed don't twist statements according to your need. AnM2002 ( talk) 08:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC).
Dude! Monitoring team is stationed in every member country and for your information the monitoring team does not solely focus on Kashmir but the international borders and other related matters as the well. The observer group has been defunct for a long time. You really are ill-informed sorry to say. My sole point was if you were so eager to protect the independence of Wikipedia you should have replaced the map with the one which is internationally accepted. DISCLAIMER- use of pronoun'you' is not directed to specific editor. No offence intended hitherto. AnM2002 ( talk) 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There are incidences where the geo political map of Republic of India has been shown inappropriately on more than one wiki page. Editors plz be informed that depicting an incorrect map of India is inappropriate and a criminal offence under section 69A of the Information Technology Act. On one such occasion Government of India has been taken cognizance of the same and initiated a due course of action against Wikipedia. Depicting an incorrect map of India invites two legal options. It can either initiate action under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, which can result in the imprisonment of the parties (read editors) concerned, or invoke section 69A to block access to the website in India. JoJo Rabbit11 ( talk) 06:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I am claiming exemption under WP:3RRNO to defend the encyclopedia against vandals and only till such time as an admin decides the pending RFP. Aghore ( talk) 07:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is not our official map. Upload the correct map of india... Pranab kishor sahoo ( talk) 08:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
See [2]
The Wikipedia page on India-Bhutan relationship had reportedly incorrectly depicted the map of Jammu Kashmir. The government has asked Wikipedia to remove a link from its platform that has shown an incorrect map of Jammu and Kashmir, according to sources.
The Ministry of Electronics and IT has issued an order under Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000 directing Wikipedia to remove the link, they added.
The matter had been flagged by a Twitter user, who highlighted that the Wikipedia page on India-Bhutan relationship had incorrectly depicted the map of Jammu Kashmir, and asked the government to take action.
Sources said taking cognizance of the matter, the ministry issued an order on November 27, 2020 directing Wikipedia to remove the map as it violated the territorial integrity and sovereignty of India. -- Doug Weller talk 10:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Aghore: stop being so pretentious. Your assumptions are becoming too paranoid. We cannot control what others do but ignoring our own errors and putting up a baseless fight to defend them is quite insensible and unbecoming. AnM2002 ( talk) 12:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't personally have the skill set to create a modified map. I hope that someone who does will put forward a reasonable alternative here which adheres to NPOV. Note well: this article (Bhutan-India relations) actually has nothing to do with the India/China border dispute which is hundreds of kilometers away. In articles that do deal with that dispute, we have very good maps which do not take sides in the dispute and do not hide the dispute. Although the depiction of Aksai Chin is incidental here, there is no reason to have it be one-sided.-- Jimbo Wales ( talk) 12:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I had independently opened a RFD over at Commons [3] Aghore ( talk) 13:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The legal team recommended posting a map showing the disputed areas I think C1MM ( talk) 18:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The current map's depiction of India's boundary does not agree with the one at
India, a featured article, specifically
File:India (orthographic projection).svg. As unsourced, disputed content, I am going to remove the current map until a discussion decides what to do about it. @
Iridescent: should you disagree, you are free to restore the map. I believe your protection was intended only to stop sock puppetry, not to stop all editing. The discussion above suggests there is no reason why we would not maintain consistency by copying the two shaded green map from
India, adding the same caption, Area controlled by India shown in dark green; regions claimed but not controlled shown in light green
, and paint Bhutan orange. No argument has been presented why this article should show different boundaries for India than all our other articles about India.
What the Government of India thinks should not alter our actions. If the map is an error, as everyone seems to agree, we must fix it regardless of what India says.
We have the exact same problem with the maps at China-India relations and India-Pakistan relations, and maybe other articles. The problem seems to be an innocuous result of people coloring the SVG world map using its standard boundaries which do not include the disputed territories, per the instructions at Template:Infobox_bilateral_relations#Map. Jehochman Talk 16:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
How about this version? I based it on the original and included the disputed territories per the map at List of disputed territories of India. CThomas3 ( talk) 16:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
What is the reason for showing India's claims on this bilateral map, but not the claims other countries may have on India (and Bhutan for that matter)? CMD ( talk) 17:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I've supplied a modified map as File:India Bhutan Locator2.png, derived from File:India Bhutan Locator.png and File:India Administrative divisions FR.svg and restored the infobox using that map. If folks don't like it, please improve it. If the Indian Government don't like it and are incapable of editing the map, they can send me a better map and I'll do it for them. -- RexxS ( talk) 20:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Even yesterday, I was reverting edits of pages for being "off-topic". Chipmunkdavis's contention that one should display country Y's claims while displaying country X's map seems to fall in the same category. Let us keep the focus on the subject, and do what is right for that subject.
Of course, when both the countries X and Y are being displayed on the same map, both their claims would need to be represented. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 12:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Some one made a new image at File:India Bhutan.png posting it here for discussion participants.
Walrus Ji ( talk) 13:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
I've created a cropped file from another image here- File:India Bhutan Locator2 (cropped).png. We could render this moot by just not having the disputed region in the map. (I've also mentioned this proposal on the India noticeboard). Zoozaz1 talk 03:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Kumarkk1203, I think this crop map is too small to make out the difference in the location of Doka La point. Please make a map with correct location of Doka La and propose here, so that we can see the difference. I understand that you want this crop map to be removed and you want the infobox to be "without map". While in this thread alone, I can count @ Zoozaz1, ChunnuBhai, and Walrus Ji: supporting to keep the cropped map as a place holder with 3 on 1. CMD's position is not clear. Clearly WP:Consensus (so far) is to keep this crop map, meanwhile the larger discussion on a final map version continues. You can wait to hear back from others, but you have no right to remove the placeholder, crop image. Walrus Ji ( talk) 09:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
For a change of pace, here's an issue unrelated to maps. In a couple of places (lead and 1949 treaty section) Bhutan is referred to as "a protected state, but not a protectorate". Currently protected state is a disambiguation page, the relevant entry in which says that protected state is an alternative name for a protectorate. Is there a meaningful difference? Qb42 ( talk) 19:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
The whole Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (including Aksai chin) is part of India.. make the necessary changes within 2 days. Mr. Righteous ( talk) 09:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
As per discussion here & here. The map of India is require to be changed as it incorrectly show the region of aksai-chin and PoK as an entity seperate from India. I dont have the know how to edit he images can somebody plz change it. Thanks DavidWood11 ( talk) 08:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Is this visit particularly notable? Nothing here seems unusual for a Head of Government visiting a neighbouring country, and such visits aren't particularly notable of themselves. This long section smacks of WP:RECENTISM to me. -- LukeSurl t c 18:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The map used in the topic is wrong and it raises question on the integrity of India. It displays Jammu & Kashmir of India as part of Pakistan and China. This displays the lack of information, awareness and responsibility of community which is widely trusted. This is unacceptable and should be corrected as soon as possible.
WellWisher01 ( talk) 15:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
The area illegaly occupied by Pakistan known as Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) is an integral part of India! 2409:4042:2D1E:E5A:0:0:8BC8:E914 ( talk) 14:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
For purpose of info of others and IP 49.36.180.217 ( talk), following are the links to established consensus of 2020:
I don't know why IP want to go back to 2008. Maybe s/he joined back again. Dhawangupta ( talk) 21:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The above suggested map is consistent with the map displayed in the article about India which is:
.
Also, The suggested map displays territory controlled by India shown in dark green; territory claimed but not controlled in light green. So, for the sake of consistency, I want to seek the consensus for this change. Thank you. Jeaucques ( talk) 09:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
May I know the reason for not considering the necessity of highlighting disputed territories on the map? The current map is misleading and erroneous. Also, All country maps in Wikipedia exept this map uses a dark green shade for displaying Non-Disputed territories. Jeaucques ( talk) 14:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
My proposed map is way better than misleading map as it is highlighting at least some territories rather than none. Please reconsider the replacement of that erroneous map with an appropriate one if not mine. Thank you. Jeaucques ( talk) 15:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Aren't there any other editors in the community who are willing to join this discussion? @ CMD's POV is not the ultimate consensus. Jeaucques ( talk) 15:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Chipmunkdavis, can you please explain this revert? Within the scope of showing the borders of the countries India and Bhutan, what claim is not being shown here? Surely ignoring India's claims is just as wrong as treating them as truth, is it not? â bradv 00:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
BhutanâIndia relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from BhutanâIndia relations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 647 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on BhutanâIndia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
The map of India (section of The State of Jammu & Kashmir) is not correct. Need to be corrected. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.104.52.2 ( talk) 14:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Absolutely, That's why I have put a header. Please Check :) Krishnarajput015 ( talk) 17:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
File:PM marendra nodi mar gaya meets Bhutan PM Mr. Tshering Tobgay.jpg What is this written below the map Seema Chaurasia ( talk) 08:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Need to correct the map which shows Aksai Chin as part of China. Government of India has ordered Wikipedia to delete map that shows Aksai Chin in China [1]. SaiP ( talk) 17:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Asia or India may be able to help! |
References
@ Dhawangupta: one of the fellow editors suggested a map in the next section please do take a look at it. I think it's an acceptable one. AnM2002 ( talk) 09:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#India offended by our maps, since it is a wider problem than this page. Please make your comments there. And please avoid ranting! -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Dhawangupta: yep this one. AnM2002 ( talk)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The map shows aksai chin as part of China. Replace it with the proper one. SevenFooty ( talk) 03:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I concur with what @ Nizil Shah: has suggested. Displaying territories which are disputed separately is the best way to go forward as has been done on most of the articles relating to India/Kashmir. AnM2002 ( talk) 06:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Calm down! First understand what I am saying, I wrote India/Kashmir and secondly, Aksai chin is disputed and Chinese control doesn't mean it belongs to China, if we go by this then Pakistan should drop it's claim on Kashmir, China on Taiwan and Palestine on Gaza/West Bank. Be sensible and keep your own POV to yourself. AnM2002 ( talk) 07:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
:@ Aghore: that's what I am saying 'nobody owns Wikipedia' and nobody has the right to make disputed claims about a country's sovereignty. I don't know why it's so difficult to understand that rather than putting up a flawed map just put a map which is neutral and acceptable to all and that map is the one attached above by Nazil. Hope you understand! AnM2002 ( talk) 07:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ C1MM: don't become so ignorant/biaded that you can't even understand the difference between a riot article and a disputed map which vehemently disregards the sensitivities of a particular party to the dispute. AnM2002 ( talk) 07:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
For your kind information and just so that you get an idea according to Shimla agreement issue of Kashmir is a bilateral dispute between India and Pakistan and even the UN is accepted this. Kashmir has been removed from the Disputed regions list long ago. AnM2002 ( talk) 07:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Aghore: i corrected your misleading statement saying UNSC has this dispute listed which is false and ill-informed don't twist statements according to your need. AnM2002 ( talk) 08:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC).
Dude! Monitoring team is stationed in every member country and for your information the monitoring team does not solely focus on Kashmir but the international borders and other related matters as the well. The observer group has been defunct for a long time. You really are ill-informed sorry to say. My sole point was if you were so eager to protect the independence of Wikipedia you should have replaced the map with the one which is internationally accepted. DISCLAIMER- use of pronoun'you' is not directed to specific editor. No offence intended hitherto. AnM2002 ( talk) 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There are incidences where the geo political map of Republic of India has been shown inappropriately on more than one wiki page. Editors plz be informed that depicting an incorrect map of India is inappropriate and a criminal offence under section 69A of the Information Technology Act. On one such occasion Government of India has been taken cognizance of the same and initiated a due course of action against Wikipedia. Depicting an incorrect map of India invites two legal options. It can either initiate action under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, which can result in the imprisonment of the parties (read editors) concerned, or invoke section 69A to block access to the website in India. JoJo Rabbit11 ( talk) 06:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I am claiming exemption under WP:3RRNO to defend the encyclopedia against vandals and only till such time as an admin decides the pending RFP. Aghore ( talk) 07:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is not our official map. Upload the correct map of india... Pranab kishor sahoo ( talk) 08:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
See [2]
The Wikipedia page on India-Bhutan relationship had reportedly incorrectly depicted the map of Jammu Kashmir. The government has asked Wikipedia to remove a link from its platform that has shown an incorrect map of Jammu and Kashmir, according to sources.
The Ministry of Electronics and IT has issued an order under Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000 directing Wikipedia to remove the link, they added.
The matter had been flagged by a Twitter user, who highlighted that the Wikipedia page on India-Bhutan relationship had incorrectly depicted the map of Jammu Kashmir, and asked the government to take action.
Sources said taking cognizance of the matter, the ministry issued an order on November 27, 2020 directing Wikipedia to remove the map as it violated the territorial integrity and sovereignty of India. -- Doug Weller talk 10:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@ Aghore: stop being so pretentious. Your assumptions are becoming too paranoid. We cannot control what others do but ignoring our own errors and putting up a baseless fight to defend them is quite insensible and unbecoming. AnM2002 ( talk) 12:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't personally have the skill set to create a modified map. I hope that someone who does will put forward a reasonable alternative here which adheres to NPOV. Note well: this article (Bhutan-India relations) actually has nothing to do with the India/China border dispute which is hundreds of kilometers away. In articles that do deal with that dispute, we have very good maps which do not take sides in the dispute and do not hide the dispute. Although the depiction of Aksai Chin is incidental here, there is no reason to have it be one-sided.-- Jimbo Wales ( talk) 12:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I had independently opened a RFD over at Commons [3] Aghore ( talk) 13:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The legal team recommended posting a map showing the disputed areas I think C1MM ( talk) 18:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The current map's depiction of India's boundary does not agree with the one at
India, a featured article, specifically
File:India (orthographic projection).svg. As unsourced, disputed content, I am going to remove the current map until a discussion decides what to do about it. @
Iridescent: should you disagree, you are free to restore the map. I believe your protection was intended only to stop sock puppetry, not to stop all editing. The discussion above suggests there is no reason why we would not maintain consistency by copying the two shaded green map from
India, adding the same caption, Area controlled by India shown in dark green; regions claimed but not controlled shown in light green
, and paint Bhutan orange. No argument has been presented why this article should show different boundaries for India than all our other articles about India.
What the Government of India thinks should not alter our actions. If the map is an error, as everyone seems to agree, we must fix it regardless of what India says.
We have the exact same problem with the maps at China-India relations and India-Pakistan relations, and maybe other articles. The problem seems to be an innocuous result of people coloring the SVG world map using its standard boundaries which do not include the disputed territories, per the instructions at Template:Infobox_bilateral_relations#Map. Jehochman Talk 16:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
How about this version? I based it on the original and included the disputed territories per the map at List of disputed territories of India. CThomas3 ( talk) 16:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
What is the reason for showing India's claims on this bilateral map, but not the claims other countries may have on India (and Bhutan for that matter)? CMD ( talk) 17:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I've supplied a modified map as File:India Bhutan Locator2.png, derived from File:India Bhutan Locator.png and File:India Administrative divisions FR.svg and restored the infobox using that map. If folks don't like it, please improve it. If the Indian Government don't like it and are incapable of editing the map, they can send me a better map and I'll do it for them. -- RexxS ( talk) 20:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Even yesterday, I was reverting edits of pages for being "off-topic". Chipmunkdavis's contention that one should display country Y's claims while displaying country X's map seems to fall in the same category. Let us keep the focus on the subject, and do what is right for that subject.
Of course, when both the countries X and Y are being displayed on the same map, both their claims would need to be represented. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 12:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Some one made a new image at File:India Bhutan.png posting it here for discussion participants.
Walrus Ji ( talk) 13:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
I've created a cropped file from another image here- File:India Bhutan Locator2 (cropped).png. We could render this moot by just not having the disputed region in the map. (I've also mentioned this proposal on the India noticeboard). Zoozaz1 talk 03:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Kumarkk1203, I think this crop map is too small to make out the difference in the location of Doka La point. Please make a map with correct location of Doka La and propose here, so that we can see the difference. I understand that you want this crop map to be removed and you want the infobox to be "without map". While in this thread alone, I can count @ Zoozaz1, ChunnuBhai, and Walrus Ji: supporting to keep the cropped map as a place holder with 3 on 1. CMD's position is not clear. Clearly WP:Consensus (so far) is to keep this crop map, meanwhile the larger discussion on a final map version continues. You can wait to hear back from others, but you have no right to remove the placeholder, crop image. Walrus Ji ( talk) 09:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
For a change of pace, here's an issue unrelated to maps. In a couple of places (lead and 1949 treaty section) Bhutan is referred to as "a protected state, but not a protectorate". Currently protected state is a disambiguation page, the relevant entry in which says that protected state is an alternative name for a protectorate. Is there a meaningful difference? Qb42 ( talk) 19:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
The whole Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (including Aksai chin) is part of India.. make the necessary changes within 2 days. Mr. Righteous ( talk) 09:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
As per discussion here & here. The map of India is require to be changed as it incorrectly show the region of aksai-chin and PoK as an entity seperate from India. I dont have the know how to edit he images can somebody plz change it. Thanks DavidWood11 ( talk) 08:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Is this visit particularly notable? Nothing here seems unusual for a Head of Government visiting a neighbouring country, and such visits aren't particularly notable of themselves. This long section smacks of WP:RECENTISM to me. -- LukeSurl t c 18:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The map used in the topic is wrong and it raises question on the integrity of India. It displays Jammu & Kashmir of India as part of Pakistan and China. This displays the lack of information, awareness and responsibility of community which is widely trusted. This is unacceptable and should be corrected as soon as possible.
WellWisher01 ( talk) 15:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
The area illegaly occupied by Pakistan known as Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) is an integral part of India! 2409:4042:2D1E:E5A:0:0:8BC8:E914 ( talk) 14:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
For purpose of info of others and IP 49.36.180.217 ( talk), following are the links to established consensus of 2020:
I don't know why IP want to go back to 2008. Maybe s/he joined back again. Dhawangupta ( talk) 21:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The above suggested map is consistent with the map displayed in the article about India which is:
.
Also, The suggested map displays territory controlled by India shown in dark green; territory claimed but not controlled in light green. So, for the sake of consistency, I want to seek the consensus for this change. Thank you. Jeaucques ( talk) 09:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
May I know the reason for not considering the necessity of highlighting disputed territories on the map? The current map is misleading and erroneous. Also, All country maps in Wikipedia exept this map uses a dark green shade for displaying Non-Disputed territories. Jeaucques ( talk) 14:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
My proposed map is way better than misleading map as it is highlighting at least some territories rather than none. Please reconsider the replacement of that erroneous map with an appropriate one if not mine. Thank you. Jeaucques ( talk) 15:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Aren't there any other editors in the community who are willing to join this discussion? @ CMD's POV is not the ultimate consensus. Jeaucques ( talk) 15:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Chipmunkdavis, can you please explain this revert? Within the scope of showing the borders of the countries India and Bhutan, what claim is not being shown here? Surely ignoring India's claims is just as wrong as treating them as truth, is it not? â bradv 00:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)