This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arvind Kejriwal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Delhi / Haryana / Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance). This article was last assessed in March 2014. Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This has been mentioned by a media organization: Jayanta Deka (17 April 2014). "Election war-rooms now target Wikipedia". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 17 April 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014. Quote

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened: December 8 to 14, 2013 December 22 to 28, 2013 December 29, 2013 to January 4, 2014 February 8 to 14, 2015

Archives ( Index)

1 2

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Aam Aadmi Party#National Convener|National Convener of the Aam Aadmi Party]] The anchor (#National Convener) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Kejariwal arrested today by ED, plz add । 45.124.142.140 ( talk) 15:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

 Not done as you have not cited reliable sources, without which no article should be changed. - Arjayay ( talk) 16:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Ok I am searching the source 45.124.142.140 ( talk) 16:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Here is the source

He is arrested today evening

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/arvind-kejriwal-arrested-by-enforcement-directorate-in-liquor-policy-case-5284679?_gl=1*1gfabjs*_ga*Mm9HdzBGbW1KZGxuemxISmhRcUNhUGpKaHRwcjZtblBubm9FT1p3NjNicEtkb3ZhTjVpUnJxZGYzOUtGYXoxUA

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/ed-arrests-delhi-chief-minister-arvind-kejriwal-in-liquor-policy-case-253073 45.124.142.140 ( talk) 16:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

In Indian politics, controversies emerge regularly. It's unnecessary to list every daily controversy. To avoid negativity the controversies section has been removed. Not to be added or reverted before we discuss it here. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  ^🍁 21:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Regarding the "Lawsuits" section, each part of the section eventually states that Kejriwal apologized. I'm not sure what purpose this section serves in the BLP. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  ^🍁 12:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

please go through WP:CENSOR. You cannot delete a well sourced section, just because you feel "I'm not sure what purpose this section serves in the BLP." Aren't lawsuits part and parcel of every politician? Please start a WP:RFC. This section was sourced by WP:RS and criticism is a part of WP:BLP, if required we can always move it a new article instead of deleting it and retain a summary in the section. Please establish a consensus via WP:RFC before deleting it. I will be restoring it. -- TheMandarin ( talk) 05:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

RFC isn't called before a discussion. I agree that there should be no separate "controversies" section, anything noteworthy should be integrated in proper sections and negative or positive things shouldn't be inflated. The controversies section is inflated negative aspects some of which are simply trivial. Not everything is included in articles. I don't see a similar controversies section on most major politician articles. MrMkG ( talk) 16:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Greetings. I'm following up on a post at WP:BLPN regarding a recent edit. The source offered to support the content in this edit does not appear to be particularly reliable as to BLP content, nor is the content apparently worth any WP:WEIGHT in this subject's biography. It's just someone's opinion of him. So I removed it. See also WP:BLPSPS and WP:RS for more detail on third-party claims and reliable sources.

That said, the BLPN OP was unwilling to discuss the problematic edit here with its proponent. That's also unacceptable. Talk page it, please. Then follow up again at BLPN if there's a genuine failure to reach a consensus. If your consensus is hung up on reliability of a source, see WP:RSN. And WP:ANI is where abusive editing is remedied. Cheers! JFHJr ( ㊟) 22:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I agree that a single book cannot be used for conspiracy theory, and this has to be backed up by third party reliable sources. --- TheMandarin ( talk) 14:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

TheMandarin, I seem to be running into trouble with my edits, so I am asking you for help. Can I add this:

The High Court of Delhi has ruled that Arvind Kejriwal's arrest in the liquor case is valid and rejected the CM's plea against his arrest. ^{[1] [2] [3]}

to this article? If so, where?- Haani40 ( talk) 18:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Being backed by multiple RS, this is a valid addition. Also, the lead is already bloated, so this can be to the relevant section or the main article related to arrest. -- TheMandarin ( talk) 19:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

OK, thanks!- Haani40 ( talk) 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

It's already present and with better wording. This wording can make it sound like a conviction instead of a denial of dismissal of a case. MrMkG ( talk) 15:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply