 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article could use some data from agriculture and pharmaceutical industry. Here's one reference towards the latter. -- 193.166.137.75 ( talk) 11:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I think information regarding why overuse occurs would be useful if anyone has data on that and whether it is patients or doctors that are the leading cause Manofmyth ( talk) 20:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's both. Lesion 20:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
There are no facts that show that the "overuse" of AB results in Supergerms. There are other factors like ordered "too short application" and patients breaking off their medication by themselves.
in combination with "bacteria sex" passing on their mutations to others *You need an evolution class.
this is can be shown by analyzing Hospital hygienic data (where often such does not exist) compared with agricultural bacteria finding in contrast to pre-antibiotics-reduction-acst era (relative to the AB use )
resistent germs are not simply raised rather they are not exterminated which is also a result by wrong application of ABs
simple test is to expose bacteria constantly to one kind of medicament for example on an agar-agar-plate.
it will not result in germs overcoming the AB ... *Yes it will.
its very simple reason actually bacterias had to face natural ABs ages already if they had been able to overcome it then they would.
one has to consider the huge numbers of generations that mutation would have been propagated to all bacterias already because even that slightly better chance would be multiplied largely by that timeframe. *Bacteria have shown resistance to natural ABs. Bacteria evolve resistance, antagonistic bacteria evolve new antibiotics.
of course one explanation would be that they outmutated it some time ... which would mean they would require to face total mutational extinction on higher probability that they encounter the AB environment ... which would govern limitations on Human AB use to days or even weeks between applications ..
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I'll take a crack at copy-editing the article. It might take a day or two, since I'll be working on it on-and-off. Prof. Squirrel ( talk) 22:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Prof. Squirrel ( talk) 04:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
This article focuses too much on fluoroquinolones. Prof. Squirrel ( talk) 04:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I note no mention of the over the counter sales of antibiotics in the world's second most populous nation. A link to a blog about this (and published by the BMJ): http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2013/08/19/shalini-on-indias-antibiotic-policy/. danno_ uk 02:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
That section may have some content which is useful for this page. Lesion 20:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antibiotic misuse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507021140/http://www.ahrq.gov/research/nov07/1107RA29.htm to http://www.ahrq.gov/research/nov07/1107RA29.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi all. While I think the content in this article is good, I think it would be great to get more recent information on the topic. There has been a lot of research done in recent years, and the most recent citation / talk page comment I see is from 2017. Nellie.roberts ( talk) 01:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article could use some data from agriculture and pharmaceutical industry. Here's one reference towards the latter. -- 193.166.137.75 ( talk) 11:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I think information regarding why overuse occurs would be useful if anyone has data on that and whether it is patients or doctors that are the leading cause Manofmyth ( talk) 20:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's both. Lesion 20:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
There are no facts that show that the "overuse" of AB results in Supergerms. There are other factors like ordered "too short application" and patients breaking off their medication by themselves.
in combination with "bacteria sex" passing on their mutations to others *You need an evolution class.
this is can be shown by analyzing Hospital hygienic data (where often such does not exist) compared with agricultural bacteria finding in contrast to pre-antibiotics-reduction-acst era (relative to the AB use )
resistent germs are not simply raised rather they are not exterminated which is also a result by wrong application of ABs
simple test is to expose bacteria constantly to one kind of medicament for example on an agar-agar-plate.
it will not result in germs overcoming the AB ... *Yes it will.
its very simple reason actually bacterias had to face natural ABs ages already if they had been able to overcome it then they would.
one has to consider the huge numbers of generations that mutation would have been propagated to all bacterias already because even that slightly better chance would be multiplied largely by that timeframe. *Bacteria have shown resistance to natural ABs. Bacteria evolve resistance, antagonistic bacteria evolve new antibiotics.
of course one explanation would be that they outmutated it some time ... which would mean they would require to face total mutational extinction on higher probability that they encounter the AB environment ... which would govern limitations on Human AB use to days or even weeks between applications ..
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I'll take a crack at copy-editing the article. It might take a day or two, since I'll be working on it on-and-off. Prof. Squirrel ( talk) 22:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Prof. Squirrel ( talk) 04:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
This article focuses too much on fluoroquinolones. Prof. Squirrel ( talk) 04:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I note no mention of the over the counter sales of antibiotics in the world's second most populous nation. A link to a blog about this (and published by the BMJ): http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2013/08/19/shalini-on-indias-antibiotic-policy/. danno_ uk 02:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
That section may have some content which is useful for this page. Lesion 20:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antibiotic misuse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507021140/http://www.ahrq.gov/research/nov07/1107RA29.htm to http://www.ahrq.gov/research/nov07/1107RA29.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi all. While I think the content in this article is good, I think it would be great to get more recent information on the topic. There has been a lot of research done in recent years, and the most recent citation / talk page comment I see is from 2017. Nellie.roberts ( talk) 01:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)