This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
A fact from Accountability partner appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk) 19:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: This is my fifth DYK nomination, so I think I am exempt from QPQ (though I will try to do one anyway if I can). I saved this from AfD; expansion began on 27 September with
this edit by
Ficaia; before that,
this was the state of the article pre-expansion.
5x expanded by
WJ94 (
talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC).reply
@
WJ94: Actually, as this is your fifth nomination, you are required to do a QPQ. From
WP:DYK: If you have previously nominated fewer than five articles (whether self-nominated or otherwise), no QPQ is required. The QPQ requirement kicks in starting with your fifth nomination.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 14:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for your reply. It does seem from the wording you quoted that I would be exempt from QPQ: when I made this nomination, I had previously nominated fewer than five articles (i.e., 4). I will try to do a review in the next couple of days nonetheless.
WJ94 (
talk) 09:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
New enough, long enough, neutral in wikivoice and I could not detect any too-close paraphrasing. Accessed the source through the Wikipedia Library, hook fact mostly checks out, but the Wikipedia article does not mention "
sin" by name—only by allusion through the sexual purity stuff. Once changed, I can approve @
WJ94:.
DigitalIceAge (
talk) 17:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
DigitalIceAge: Thanks for your review. How about the following alternative hook?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
A fact from Accountability partner appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk) 19:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: This is my fifth DYK nomination, so I think I am exempt from QPQ (though I will try to do one anyway if I can). I saved this from AfD; expansion began on 27 September with
this edit by
Ficaia; before that,
this was the state of the article pre-expansion.
5x expanded by
WJ94 (
talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC).reply
@
WJ94: Actually, as this is your fifth nomination, you are required to do a QPQ. From
WP:DYK: If you have previously nominated fewer than five articles (whether self-nominated or otherwise), no QPQ is required. The QPQ requirement kicks in starting with your fifth nomination.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 14:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for your reply. It does seem from the wording you quoted that I would be exempt from QPQ: when I made this nomination, I had previously nominated fewer than five articles (i.e., 4). I will try to do a review in the next couple of days nonetheless.
WJ94 (
talk) 09:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
New enough, long enough, neutral in wikivoice and I could not detect any too-close paraphrasing. Accessed the source through the Wikipedia Library, hook fact mostly checks out, but the Wikipedia article does not mention "
sin" by name—only by allusion through the sexual purity stuff. Once changed, I can approve @
WJ94:.
DigitalIceAge (
talk) 17:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
DigitalIceAge: Thanks for your review. How about the following alternative hook?