A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 30, 2008, October 1, 2009, and October 1, 2010.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indonesia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

The subtitle "A Purely Internal Army Affair: the PKI and the 'Cornell Paper' " is pretty lengthy and rough. Might someone see a more succinct and elegant phrase? Smilo Don 17:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC) reply

• Surprised this isn't linked yet: Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI. Considering the role it played in propagating the government's version... —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 04:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply

This article states that Dipa Nusantra Aidit was killed on November 25. His Wikipedia page claims he was killed on November 22. I do not know which date is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.136.18.95 ( talk) 02:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC) reply

A great resource is the CIA's official intelligence report (pdf here) that was compiled in 1968 and later declassified under the FOIA. It states that the term coup in its common usage (as an attempted overthrow) "might be misleading" (image). It seems laziness or lack of interest in revealing the truth (because they were communists) left many sources poorly put together. Shouldn't this be corrected? Bataaf van Oranje ( talk) 16:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC) reply

按照古兰经说法不信仰伊斯兰教的都是卡费勒，真主赐予穆斯林的财富都被卡费勒也就是印尼华人抢去了必须用圣战方式夺回来。希望散落世界各地的华人要警惕穆斯林。另外，无论是天主教还是犹太教或者是保守主义，对穆斯林来说那都是邪教。 Jg451 ( talk) 13:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC) reply