This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Awards Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Film: Awards / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Film awards task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Lists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	1st Academy Awards is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on February 27, 2012.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 23, 2010 Featured list candidate Promoted
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 16, 2014, May 16, 2017, May 16, 2019, and May 16, 2023.

It is suggested that the associated page 1st Academy Awards nominees and winners be merged into this one combining all information about the awards for this year on one page, and removing duplicated material. Thanks for your comments. Markhh ( talk) 21:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Not really anything to discuss! The two articles are basically identical, but this one follows the naming convention of all of the others so it is the better choice. I shall enact. Manning ( talk) 03:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Merge follow-up - there was no material on the 1st Academy Awards nominees and winners that was not already in this article as far as I could tell. Here's the diff for the final version in case anyone wants to double-check. Manning ( talk) 03:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Is there much support for sortable tables especially if there is a way of tallying cumulative nomination/win results? The following is sortable but still figuring out how to tally.

Not certain if the coding gets lost in the posting so have saved a copy of the coded page personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.88.72 ( talk) 06:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The problem with those tables is they increase the readibility of the page. Consider the 86 ceremonies use the current table, and there are much more awards in the subsequent years. © Tbhotch ^™ ( en-2.5). 01:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I even remember a book from the late 1990s saying they were BP nominations, yet they no longer are or something. What exactly happened, anyone know? Wgolf ( talk) 23:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC) reply

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Academy Awards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 13:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1st Academy Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208011732/http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/ampas_awards/BasicSearchInput.jsp to http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/ampas_awards/BasicSearchInput.jsp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C927950%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC) reply