From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2016 Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on November 1, 2019, and November 1, 2023.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I will review this one, comments to follow. Zawed ( talk) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Lead

  • "...plan many Air raids on Japan...": lower case a for Air.
    • Fixed 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Background

  • wikilink USAAF and recite it in full on first usage as the abbreviation is used later in the article)

Photo reconnaissance sortie

  • wikilink California, Oahu, Kwajalein, Brigadier General, 47th Sentai? If no link for the latter, maybe a note to explain what it is - I assume a squadron or wing?
    • I think California would be over-linking given the relevant location there is linked, but I've linked the others.
  • "...American airmen took 7000..."; for consistency with the presentation of numbers in the rest of the article, shouldn't it be 7,000?

Other stuff

  • Consider, for sake of presentation, putting the notes into columns (suggestion only).
  • Consider putting an image in? There is one of a F-13 on the B29 page.
    • Done. I couldn't find a good and clearly PD one though! Nick-D ( talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 06:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot for the review - I'll follow up on your comments tomorrow or over the weekend Nick-D ( talk) 10:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply
I think that I've now responded to all your comments. Nick-D ( talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Yep, looks good Nick, passing as a GA now. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks again Nick-D ( talk) 09:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2016 Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on November 1, 2019, and November 1, 2023.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I will review this one, comments to follow. Zawed ( talk) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Lead

  • "...plan many Air raids on Japan...": lower case a for Air.
    • Fixed 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Background

  • wikilink USAAF and recite it in full on first usage as the abbreviation is used later in the article)

Photo reconnaissance sortie

  • wikilink California, Oahu, Kwajalein, Brigadier General, 47th Sentai? If no link for the latter, maybe a note to explain what it is - I assume a squadron or wing?
    • I think California would be over-linking given the relevant location there is linked, but I've linked the others.
  • "...American airmen took 7000..."; for consistency with the presentation of numbers in the rest of the article, shouldn't it be 7,000?

Other stuff

  • Consider, for sake of presentation, putting the notes into columns (suggestion only).
  • Consider putting an image in? There is one of a F-13 on the B29 page.
    • Done. I couldn't find a good and clearly PD one though! Nick-D ( talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 06:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot for the review - I'll follow up on your comments tomorrow or over the weekend Nick-D ( talk) 10:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply
I think that I've now responded to all your comments. Nick-D ( talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Yep, looks good Nick, passing as a GA now. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks again Nick-D ( talk) 09:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook