A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 27, 2010 and May 27, 2016. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is up with the chart? It makes no sense in the context of this article. 137.48.134.32 20:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
this was one of the tornados that wont be forgoten
The 1927 tornado was not the second costliest tornado on record, Lubbock was the second costliest. Southern Illinois SKYWARN ( talk) 19:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I was thinking that this article should be renamed to something like May 1896 tornado outbreak sequence. This St. Louis event was was just one of (although the worst) several outbreaks over a two week period. I don't know that it makes sense to have one article for each outbreak, considering the current standards, or having one article for the other four outbreaks, and leaving this one by itself. In addition, this article already mentions the other tornadoes of May, 1896.
Here are the details of the outbreaks according to the main outbreak page. Thoughts?
5/15: 85 deaths 5/17: 25 deaths 5/24-25: 79 deaths This one: 305 deaths
Gopher backer ( talk) 01:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I have two photo heavy books on this tornado system that were in print at the time, one of which is listed as a reference/further reading. one of the two (and i don't remember if it was the already referenced one or not) has some information about the aftermath in st. louis. from memory it includes people in the south sicde of the city (the poor/imigreant section at that time) feeling they were being ignored and the residents going as far as to burn the mayor of the city in effigy. would we want to consider adding sourced material about some of the long term after effects? currently there is none at all other than death tolls. and if we start to enter it, I'm not sure if the one source i have would represent enough information (i do not believe, for example, it mentions the illinois side after issues at all) Childhoodtrauma ( talk) 16:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 23:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1896 St. LouisâEast St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.â cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1896 St. LouisâEast St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1896 St. LouisâEast St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 27, 2010 and May 27, 2016. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is up with the chart? It makes no sense in the context of this article. 137.48.134.32 20:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
this was one of the tornados that wont be forgoten
The 1927 tornado was not the second costliest tornado on record, Lubbock was the second costliest. Southern Illinois SKYWARN ( talk) 19:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I was thinking that this article should be renamed to something like May 1896 tornado outbreak sequence. This St. Louis event was was just one of (although the worst) several outbreaks over a two week period. I don't know that it makes sense to have one article for each outbreak, considering the current standards, or having one article for the other four outbreaks, and leaving this one by itself. In addition, this article already mentions the other tornadoes of May, 1896.
Here are the details of the outbreaks according to the main outbreak page. Thoughts?
5/15: 85 deaths 5/17: 25 deaths 5/24-25: 79 deaths This one: 305 deaths
Gopher backer ( talk) 01:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I have two photo heavy books on this tornado system that were in print at the time, one of which is listed as a reference/further reading. one of the two (and i don't remember if it was the already referenced one or not) has some information about the aftermath in st. louis. from memory it includes people in the south sicde of the city (the poor/imigreant section at that time) feeling they were being ignored and the residents going as far as to burn the mayor of the city in effigy. would we want to consider adding sourced material about some of the long term after effects? currently there is none at all other than death tolls. and if we start to enter it, I'm not sure if the one source i have would represent enough information (i do not believe, for example, it mentions the illinois side after issues at all) Childhoodtrauma ( talk) 16:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 23:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1896 St. LouisâEast St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.â cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1896 St. LouisâEast St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1896 St. LouisâEast St. Louis tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)