A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 8, 2013.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Louisiana / New Orleans / History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance). Military history: North America / United States Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force African diaspora Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Genovese's work on this uprising is relatively limited. The primary sources, as translated by Conrad, are the most reliable. Rothman's scholarship is excellent, but many of the incorrect details I removed are apocryphal, added either by newspaper editors in other cities or by historians drawing on local folklore. Also, there is very little evidence to suggest that Deslondes was the sole leader of the uprising, a likelier theory would involve a greater number of leaders, as the denunciations describe. In any case, Kook's role in the uprising is fairly central and he should be present in any encyclopedic entry on the subject. Danielrasmussen ( talk) 22:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.aaregistry.com/detail.php?id=1122
  • In 1811 German Coast Uprising on 2011-05-25 02:02:21, 404 Not Found
  • In 1811 German Coast Uprising on 2011-06-01 22:32:16, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 22:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC) reply

I tried it again today and got the same "Page not found" message at aaregistry.com. -- 108.45.72.196 ( talk) 20:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

The text said "A group of Africans who have been forcefully enslaved met on January 6, 1811." I changed it to say "...Africans who had been..." to make it past tense, but it stills seems awkward to me and may not even be true since at least one of the Africans, Deslondes, was born a slave. The current statement is that everywhere there had been forcefully enslaved (forcefully is perhaps redundant here). I'd appreciate some opinions on this. CsikosLo ( talk) 14:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply

In 2019, a "re-enactment" with a different interpretation of the meaning of the rebellion and with a number of women participating took place: https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/777810796/hundreds-march-in-reenactment-of-a-historic-but-long-forgotten-slave-rebellion 37.99.48.187 ( talk) 07:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC) reply

I noticed a discrepancy between the page on the 1811 uprising and the page on the uprising’s leader, Charles Delondes. On his page, part of the article reads, “There have many articles which stated the younger Andry had been killed as well. This is completely false. The "younger Andry", Gilbert Andry, died on January the 2nd and was buried on January the 3rd, five days prior to the start of the revolt.[7]” However, on the page about the uprising it says that Gilbert WAS killed during the revolt. These conflicting accounts should be reconciled. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:D100:6970:34C7:B48F:1B35:C8AD ( talk) 17:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply