This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... This article passes GNG because their music has been reviewed four times by reliable publications in the Christian music industry.-- The Cross Bearer ( talk)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... This article passes BAND because their music has been reviewed four times by reliable publications in the Christian music industry, per the No. 1 criteria.-- The Cross Bearer ( talk)
@ Tokyogirl79:: IVM does have editorial oversight, and so does Cross Rhythms. As The Cross Bearer mentioned, Cross Rhythms in particular is the largest Christian radio outlet in the UK. It was even a print magazine at one point. It absolutely has a reliable editorial board. I did volunteer work for them a few years ago, and can personally vouch that Cross Rhythms checks its content for accuracy.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
I do not consider there is "Significant coverage" of this band, two reviews is hardly that! And using Facebook as a reference is really scraping the barrel! Theroadislong ( talk) 08:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... This article passes GNG because their music has been reviewed four times by reliable publications in the Christian music industry.-- The Cross Bearer ( talk)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... This article passes BAND because their music has been reviewed four times by reliable publications in the Christian music industry, per the No. 1 criteria.-- The Cross Bearer ( talk)
@ Tokyogirl79:: IVM does have editorial oversight, and so does Cross Rhythms. As The Cross Bearer mentioned, Cross Rhythms in particular is the largest Christian radio outlet in the UK. It was even a print magazine at one point. It absolutely has a reliable editorial board. I did volunteer work for them a few years ago, and can personally vouch that Cross Rhythms checks its content for accuracy.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
I do not consider there is "Significant coverage" of this band, two reviews is hardly that! And using Facebook as a reference is really scraping the barrel! Theroadislong ( talk) 08:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)