This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
13 September 2008 Delhi bombings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving 13 September 2008 Delhi bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 September 2008. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 13, 2013, September 13, 2018, and September 13, 2021. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kindly help in updating the page. I have requested here also. Thanks. -- Bhadani ( talk) 13:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I request an administrator to please move the article to 2008 Delhi bombings. Places like Greater Kailash and Karol Bagh come under Municipal Corporation of Delhi and not New Delhi Municipal Council. It is really annoying to see the term "New Delhi" being applied for the whole of Delhi. -- Enigma Blues ( talk) 18:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Can anybody supply me the coordinates using Google Earth/Maps? I can then make a map of the blast areas. =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Please provide a source/citation for the entry under motive. I question the neutrality of the "motive" as listed in its current form.
71.58.54.98 ( talk) 21:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Aditya
This template, which appears right below the infobox, treads a bit too much on the text. I noticed the same for the recent Ahmedabad and Bangalore blasts-related pages. It does not augur well for the appearance of the article. Can there be a consensus to sort this out? Mspraveen ( talk) 03:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Please removed this space-consuming (it takes up half of the article) and silly section. All the politicians just repeat their templated response that they use for every terrorist attack. If anyone comes out in favor of the bombing, then put it in, otherwise its just a waste. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
Anyone interested in a writeup for Wikinews? =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
There is always "Press confusion" in such incidents, initial reports from the media can be contradictory because information is not readily available. There is a state of chaos after blasts. Official announcements are also not made at the early stage after the blast. I think the section can be removed.-- Redtigerxyz ( talk) 13:06, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
no reactions on this page? the pak pm/prez reacted to it. http://www.dawn.com/2008/09/14/top16.htm prez/pm
Also see Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing on its way to feature article status soon id imagine. Lihaas ( talk) 07:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Who remembers Mohan Chand Sharma? Anasuya Roy, NDTV.com, December 01, 2008 9:43 AM (New Delhi) ""They had promised us so many things," said Narottam Sharma, father. The government was quick to make promises that Sharma's family would get his full salary as pension. But procedures are yet to be completed."
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 13 September 2008 Delhi bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
13 September 2008 Delhi bombings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving 13 September 2008 Delhi bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 September 2008. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 13, 2013, September 13, 2018, and September 13, 2021. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kindly help in updating the page. I have requested here also. Thanks. -- Bhadani ( talk) 13:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I request an administrator to please move the article to 2008 Delhi bombings. Places like Greater Kailash and Karol Bagh come under Municipal Corporation of Delhi and not New Delhi Municipal Council. It is really annoying to see the term "New Delhi" being applied for the whole of Delhi. -- Enigma Blues ( talk) 18:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Can anybody supply me the coordinates using Google Earth/Maps? I can then make a map of the blast areas. =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Please provide a source/citation for the entry under motive. I question the neutrality of the "motive" as listed in its current form.
71.58.54.98 ( talk) 21:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Aditya
This template, which appears right below the infobox, treads a bit too much on the text. I noticed the same for the recent Ahmedabad and Bangalore blasts-related pages. It does not augur well for the appearance of the article. Can there be a consensus to sort this out? Mspraveen ( talk) 03:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Please removed this space-consuming (it takes up half of the article) and silly section. All the politicians just repeat their templated response that they use for every terrorist attack. If anyone comes out in favor of the bombing, then put it in, otherwise its just a waste. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
Anyone interested in a writeup for Wikinews? =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
There is always "Press confusion" in such incidents, initial reports from the media can be contradictory because information is not readily available. There is a state of chaos after blasts. Official announcements are also not made at the early stage after the blast. I think the section can be removed.-- Redtigerxyz ( talk) 13:06, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
no reactions on this page? the pak pm/prez reacted to it. http://www.dawn.com/2008/09/14/top16.htm prez/pm
Also see Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing on its way to feature article status soon id imagine. Lihaas ( talk) 07:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Who remembers Mohan Chand Sharma? Anasuya Roy, NDTV.com, December 01, 2008 9:43 AM (New Delhi) ""They had promised us so many things," said Narottam Sharma, father. The government was quick to make promises that Sharma's family would get his full salary as pension. But procedures are yet to be completed."
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 13 September 2008 Delhi bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)