17:4417:44, 15 October 2023diffhist+686
Ibram X. Kendi
As per Bilorv's suggestion and good counsel of avoiding potentially contentious terminology that the word "conspiracy theory" should NOT be used until a major publication such as the NYT uses the same words "conspiracy theory" to describe "Whites have tried to level the playing field with the AIDS virus and cloning" as written by Ibram KendiTag: Reverted
16:3716:37, 15 October 2023diffhist+704
Ibram X. Kendi
Undid revision 1180276371 by
Bilorv (
talk) Please stop removing peoples' content from their own writings. This is Ibram kendi's writings and it's a fact of what he stated that is his underlying philosophy that people must know about.Tags: UndoReverted
03:1303:13, 11 January 2023diffhist−877
James A. Lindsay
Undid revision 1132884180 by
Zaathras (
talk) Simply undoing something to edit-war someone, without actually providing a good reason and simply calling something a reliable source when the source doesn't prove that fact is called misinforming the reader, it is not educational for the reader, to read something from political biased sources on a living persons' biography. Find better citations.Tags: UndoReverted
01:5601:56, 11 January 2023diffhist−877
James A. Lindsay
Undid revision 1132879403 by
MrOllie (
talk) -- simply calling something a conspiracy theory is not a way to use wikipedia edits/reverts. I didn't say something wasn't a conspiracy theory, I simply reverted something stated as "mainstream scholars" but using biased marxist sources that clearly is in opposition to the politics of a living persons' biography. Use the talk page as to why you want to revert..Tags: UndoReverted
01:0601:06, 11 January 2023diffhist−877
James A. Lindsay
→Views: Removed biased marxist "critical theory" professor including the wording of "mainstream scholar" which wasn't the case using unreliable sources. Additionally, "contentious material about living persons that is [..] poorly sourced." Primary sources must use extra caution and care and cannot simply be politically biased book authors. WP:BLPRSTag: Reverted
17:4417:44, 15 October 2023diffhist+686
Ibram X. Kendi
As per Bilorv's suggestion and good counsel of avoiding potentially contentious terminology that the word "conspiracy theory" should NOT be used until a major publication such as the NYT uses the same words "conspiracy theory" to describe "Whites have tried to level the playing field with the AIDS virus and cloning" as written by Ibram KendiTag: Reverted
16:3716:37, 15 October 2023diffhist+704
Ibram X. Kendi
Undid revision 1180276371 by
Bilorv (
talk) Please stop removing peoples' content from their own writings. This is Ibram kendi's writings and it's a fact of what he stated that is his underlying philosophy that people must know about.Tags: UndoReverted
03:1303:13, 11 January 2023diffhist−877
James A. Lindsay
Undid revision 1132884180 by
Zaathras (
talk) Simply undoing something to edit-war someone, without actually providing a good reason and simply calling something a reliable source when the source doesn't prove that fact is called misinforming the reader, it is not educational for the reader, to read something from political biased sources on a living persons' biography. Find better citations.Tags: UndoReverted
01:5601:56, 11 January 2023diffhist−877
James A. Lindsay
Undid revision 1132879403 by
MrOllie (
talk) -- simply calling something a conspiracy theory is not a way to use wikipedia edits/reverts. I didn't say something wasn't a conspiracy theory, I simply reverted something stated as "mainstream scholars" but using biased marxist sources that clearly is in opposition to the politics of a living persons' biography. Use the talk page as to why you want to revert..Tags: UndoReverted
01:0601:06, 11 January 2023diffhist−877
James A. Lindsay
→Views: Removed biased marxist "critical theory" professor including the wording of "mainstream scholar" which wasn't the case using unreliable sources. Additionally, "contentious material about living persons that is [..] poorly sourced." Primary sources must use extra caution and care and cannot simply be politically biased book authors. WP:BLPRSTag: Reverted