10:1210:12, 24 January 2022diffhist+84
Princely state
→History: Can Ranjit Singh: the "Maharaja of Punjab" (Punjab being a province within India), be the actual ruler of an identified "empire". Or is Ranjit Singh a ruler of a "princely state" in "India" like rest of the Maharaja class?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
09:5809:58, 24 January 2022diffhist+1
Maharaja
→Indian subcontinent: can a "Maharaja" in this case: Ranjit Singh be the ruler of an actually identified "Empire"? or was he the ruler of a princely state like the rest of Maharaja class?Tags: Mobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
09:5309:53, 24 January 2022diffhist+57
Sikh Empire
→Empire: Ranjit Singh was simply a "Maharaja of Punjab" and not such a massive imperialist within the "Indian subcontinent", Sikh propaganda needs to be humbled.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
10:1210:12, 24 January 2022diffhist+84
Princely state
→History: Can Ranjit Singh: the "Maharaja of Punjab" (Punjab being a province within India), be the actual ruler of an identified "empire". Or is Ranjit Singh a ruler of a "princely state" in "India" like rest of the Maharaja class?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
09:5809:58, 24 January 2022diffhist+1
Maharaja
→Indian subcontinent: can a "Maharaja" in this case: Ranjit Singh be the ruler of an actually identified "Empire"? or was he the ruler of a princely state like the rest of Maharaja class?Tags: Mobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
09:5309:53, 24 January 2022diffhist+57
Sikh Empire
→Empire: Ranjit Singh was simply a "Maharaja of Punjab" and not such a massive imperialist within the "Indian subcontinent", Sikh propaganda needs to be humbled.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit