Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Both autistic and non-autistic people can find it difficult to empathize with each other. The fact that both people in the interaction have trouble with understanding and empathy is why the theory is called the "double empathy problem". [1]
Neurodiversity paradigm
Philosophy
Organizations
Events
Issues
People
Films
Criticism

The theory of the double empathy problem is a psychological and sociological theory first coined in 2012 by Damian Milton, an autistic autism researcher. [2] This theory proposes that many of the difficulties autistic individuals face when socializing with non-autistic individuals are due, in part, to a lack of mutual understanding between the two groups, meaning that most autistic people struggle to understand and empathize with non-autistic people, whereas most non-autistic people also struggle to understand and empathize with autistic people. This lack of understanding may stem from bidirectional differences in communication style, social-cognitive characteristics, and experiences between autistic and non-autistic individuals, but not necessarily an inherent deficiency. Recent studies have shown that most autistic individuals are able to socialize, communicate effectively, [3] empathize well, [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] and display social reciprocity [9] with most other autistic individuals. [2] [10] This theory and subsequent findings challenge the commonly held belief that the social skills of autistic individuals are inherently impaired, as well as the theory of " mind-blindness" proposed by prominent autism researcher Simon Baron-Cohen in the mid-1980s, which suggested that empathy and theory of mind are universally impaired in autistic individuals. [11] [12] [13] [14]

The double empathy concept has been consistently supported by a substantial number of studies in recent years and has the potential to radically shift goals of interventions and public psychoeducation regarding autism. [13] [15] [16] [17] In recognition of recent findings that support the theory, Baron-Cohen positively recognized the theory of the double empathy problem in two research articles in 2018 [18] and 2022, [19] as well as in multiple podcasts since 2020. [20] [21]

History

Development and spread of mind-blindness theory

Main article: Mind-blindness

Earlier studies on autism regarding theory of mind and empathy had concluded that a lack of theory of mind was one of the primary symptoms of autism. The most popular of these studies were those led by Simon Baron-Cohen in the 1980s and 1990s, who used the term "mind-blindness" to describe his theory in an attempt to empirically explain the tendency of autistic people to avoid eye contact, [11] [22] [23] proposing a homogeneous explanation of autism as due to either a lack of theory of mind or developmental delay in theory of mind in early childhood. [12] Some have additionally described the supposed social impairment present in autistic people as "an extreme form of egocentrism with the resulting lack of consideration for others". [24]

Mind-blindness implies an inability to make sense of and predict another person's behavior, and to attribute mental states such as knowledge, beliefs, desires, emotions, and intentions to oneself and others. [25] [26] The claim that autistic people lack theory of mind is taught across a wide range of psychology textbooks [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] and promoted by over 75% of the top 500 scholarly articles indexed for "theory of mind" and "autism" on Google Scholar, [15] [34] serving as one of psychology's widely promoted topics throughout psychological literature, practice, and instruction. [35] [36] [37] Mind-blindness has also been embraced by scholars in other disciplinary areas such as sociology, [38] philosophy, [39] economics, [40] anthropology, [41] robotics, [42] and narratology. [43]

Problems with earlier studies on theory of mind and empathy in autism

The mind-blindness hypothesis, in addition to being questioned shortly after its publication, [14] has faced a great deal of criticism from the scientific community over the years, [15] [44] in response to the replication studies (mostly with false-belief tasks) that have failed to reveal significant differences in theory of mind between autistic and non-autistic participants, [45] [46] [47] as well as the growing body of evidence for the high degree of heterogeneity in autistic brains at a neurobiological level. [48] [49] [50]

There have been developments of new theory-of-mind measures when existing measures were perceived by some researchers as inadequate. [15] There have been some successful replications demonstrating differences in theory of mind and empathy with some measures such as the Frith– Happé Animations Test, [51] Baron-Cohen's " Reading the Mind in the Eyes" task, [52] [53] and self-report empathy questionnaires — which have been criticized for being vague and imprecise as well as not considering social interaction contexts, reference groups, and the substantially lowered social-desirability bias of autistic individuals. [54] In addition, several independent teams have repetitively failed to replicate highly cited and widely taught findings with picture-sequencing tasks and false-belief tasks such as the Sally–Anne test. [15] Such mixed and inconsistent findings with many different measures have raised doubts regarding the generalizability and validity of the mind-blindness theory of autism. [15] [55]

Furthermore, autism intervention research based on theory of mind has shown little efficacy, [56] [57] and theory-of-mind experiments typically fail to take into account the fact that autistic people have different sensory experiences, which vary between autistic individuals, than non-autistic people. [58] Academics have also noted that many autistic children and adults pass some theory-of-mind tasks but performances vary substantially between diverse tasks and between autistic individuals; hence, Baron-Cohen's earlier repeated assertion of mind-blindness being a universal characteristic of autism across contexts [59] [60] [61] has also been called into question by other researchers since the 1990s. [13] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] In recent years, Baron-Cohen has revised his understanding and his recent well-powered studies have found substantial heterogeneity in empathy and theory of mind among autistic people, with lower performances or scores in theory-of-mind and empathy tasks among autistic people on average, but also a substantial proportion (around 40–60%) of autistic people showing "unimpaired" or even above-average performances in some rather controversial theory-of-mind and empathy measures. [67] [68] [69] Similar results have been consistently demonstrated by other research teams. [70] [71]

Additionally, it has been argued that many professionals and, likewise, parents seem to have neglected that reciprocity needs to be mutual and symmetrical. [72] For example, John Constantino's Social Responsiveness Scale, [73] a 2002 quantitative measure of social reciprocity in children which has since been used extensively in autism research, [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] consisted of the item that asks whether the child "is regarded by other children as odd or weird", which, although seems to indicate a lack of social or emotional reciprocity in the regarder, is used instead to indicate a lack of social or emotional reciprocity in the target child. [72] Several other items in the questionnaire, such as the one that asks whether the child "is not well coordinated in physical activities", seem completely unrelated to reciprocity. [72] [73]

Counter-theory to mind-blindness

Around the early 2010s, academics began to suggest that some studies of theory-of-mind and empathy tests may have misinterpreted autistic people having difficulty understanding non-autistic or neurotypical people as being an intrinsic social deficit present in autistic individuals. They argued that it seemed more likely that autistic people were specifically having trouble understanding neurotypical people in some contexts, due to differences in experiences and social-cognition between the two groups. [2] [79] [80] The theory of the double empathy problem was coined in 2012 by Damian Milton as a counter-theory to mind-blindness in an effort to explain this phenomenon of mutual misunderstanding, defined as follows:

The "double empathy problem": a disjuncture in reciprocity between two differently disposed social actors which becomes more marked the wider the disjuncture in dispositional perceptions of the lifeworld – perceived as a breach in the "natural attitude" of what constitutes "social reality" for "non-autistic spectrum" people and yet an everyday and often traumatic experience for "autistic people". [2]

The claim that autism is characterized by a lack of social or emotional reciprocity has become a truism in academia; for instance, in a 2004 research article examining a hypothesized autism susceptibility gene, the opening line simply stated, without any scientific citations or supporting data, that "impaired reciprocal social interaction is one of the core features of autism". [72] [81] The double empathy theory, subsequent findings, and findings in the broader theory of mind and empathy literature in the past two to three decades contest common assumptions about autistic people in the fields of psychology and psychiatry, which are often riddled with information regarding autism and theory of mind (e.g., autistic people are universally deficient in empathy or theory of mind) that is outdated, overgeneralized, empirically questionable with inconsistent findings, and potentially societally harmful, but still often assumed by some researchers, educators, students, and practitioners as factual. [15] [72] [82]

While the concept of double empathy had existed in prior publications, [35] [72] Milton named and significantly expanded on it. [2] [16] [17] [83] Since 2015, there has been an increasing number of research studies, including experimental studies, qualitative research, and real-life social interaction studies, many of which emerging under the banner of critical autism studies, supporting the double empathy theory and the findings appear consistent. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93]

In the past few years, the double empathy theory has been supported by many autism researchers, including Catherine Crompton, [3] [8] [84] [88] Morton Ann Gernsbacher, [15] Baron-Cohen himself, [18] [19] [20] and the editor-in-chief of the academic journal Autism, Sue Fletcher-Watson. [3] [8] [54] [84] [88] The theory has also been approached by research projects in various disciplinary areas, [17] including but not limited to psychology, sociology, [94] philosophy, [95] neuroscience, [86] [96] linguistics, [89] film studies, [97] and design. [98]

Double empathy and bidirectional communication studies

Interpersonal rapport, empathy, and communication effectiveness

It has been suggested that non-autistic people tend to have a poor understanding of autistic people and lack emotional empathy for autistic people, just as autistic people may have a poor understanding of non-autistic people. [2] [85] [91] [99] Whilst autistic people sometimes have difficulties in understanding non-autistic people and struggle to socialize with non-autistic people, it is likely that most non-autistic people often hold negative stereotypes, views, and/or biases regarding autistic differences, and also struggle to understand autistic people's communication, emotions, and intentions, resulting in and contributing to this "double empathy problem". [85] [100]

Studies from the 2010s and 2020s that have used autistic-autistic pairs to test interpersonal rapport, empathy, and communication effectiveness in adults have shown that autistic adults generally perform better in empathy, rapport, and communication effectiveness when paired with other autistic adults, [3] [6] [87] [91] that higher interpersonal rapport may be present in autistic-autistic interactions than in those between autistic and neurotypical people, [8] [84] [92] and that autistic people may be able to understand and predict each other's thoughts and motivations better than neurotypical people [8] [101] as well as possibly autistic close relatives. [102]

The importance of social reciprocity

One major factor influencing communication effectiveness is social reciprocity. Past research from the 1980s and 1990s has indicated that when professionals, peers, and parents are taught to act reciprocally to autistic children, non-autistic children are considerably more likely to reciprocate with autistic children, who end up becoming more responsive. [103] [104] Non-autistic children can demonstrate reciprocity via imitation, which improves social responsiveness in all children, including autistic children; when a random person imitates an autistic child engaging in object manipulation by manipulating a duplicate object in the same way that the child does, the child makes longer and more frequent eye contact with the person. [105] [106] Similarly, when mothers imitate their autistic children's manipulation of toys, the children not only gaze longer and more frequently at their mothers, but also engage in more exploratory and creative behavior with the toys, on top of showing considerably more positive affect. [107]

In contrast, in a 1992 study on reciprocal interactions, non-autistic preschoolers, called "peer tutors", were taught to prompt for the verbal labels of preferred toys from autistic target children; the peer tutors were told to "wait for the target child to initiate a request for a toy", "ask the target child for the label of the toy", "give the toy to the target child when he labeled it", and "praise the correct answer". [108] None of the autistic children maintained their initiation with the peer tutors even after the training sessions were completed, which was likely because their interaction was neither mutual nor symmetrical. [72] [108] When social interaction is neither mutual nor symmetrical between autistic and non-autistic peers, a double empathy problem occurs, which is likely exacerbated through professionals, peers, and parents neglecting the reciprocal nature of reciprocity. [72]

Bullying and subsequent masking

See also: Autistic masking

Some researchers have argued that autistic people likely understand non-autistic people to a higher degree than vice versa, due to the frequency of masking – i.e., the conscious or subconscious suppression of autistic behaviors and the compensation of difficulties in social interaction by autistic people with the goal of being perceived as neurotypical. [2] [109] [110] Masking begins at a young age as a coping strategy, partly to avoid harassment and bullying, [111] [112] [113] which are highly common experiences for autistic children and adults. [114] [115] [116] [117] High rates of peer victimization are also seen in autistic children and adults. [118] [119]

Whilst many health professionals and researchers have argued from time to time that autism is characterized by a lack of social or emotional reciprocity, the bullying and victimization targeted at autistic people by non-autistic people, along with the problem of ableism in autism research, [120] [121] [122] has been viewed as a demonstration of non-autistic people's lack of social or emotional reciprocity towards autistic people, [72] further suggesting what Milton has described to be a "disjuncture in reciprocity" (i.e., the presence of a "double empathy gap") between autistic and non-autistic people. [2]

Anthropomorphism and understanding for animals

See also: Anthropomorphism and Personification

An area of social-cognitive strength in autistic people centers upon anthropomorphism. [123] A 2018 study has shown that autistic people are likely more prone to object personification, [124] suggesting that autistic empathy may be more complex and all-encompassing, contrary to the popular belief that autistic people lack empathy. Whilst neurotypical participants have outperformed autistic participants in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test designed by Baron-Cohen in 2001, [52] autistic participants have outperformed neurotypical participants in a cartoon version of said test in a 2022 study, [125] supporting the view of social-cognitive differences rather than deficits in the autistic population.

Some autistic people also appear to possess a heightened understanding, empathy, and sensitivity towards animals, [123] [126] [127] [128] once again suggesting social-cognitive differences in autistic people, but not global deficits.

Autistic perspectives and dehumanizing research

Autistic theory of mind, argued to have facilitated the release of cognitive resources, is typically based on the use of rules and logic and may be modulated by differences in thinking. [129] [130] If autistic people were inherently poor at theory of mind and social communication, an interaction between a pair of autistic people would logically be more challenging than one between an autistic and neurotypical person. [3] [8] As a result, Milton has described the belief that autistic people lack theory of mind as a myth analogous to the now-discredited theory that vaccines cause autism. [131]

Many autistic activists have shown support for the double empathy concept, and have argued that past studies done on theory of mind in autism have served to stigmatize autistic people, [10] [44] [132] place the responsibility for autistic-neurotypical misunderstandings solely on autistic people, [91] and dehumanize autistic people by portraying them as unempathetic. [121] Many autistic activists have advocated for the inclusion of autistic people in autism research, promoting the slogan " nothing about us without us". [131] [133] [134] In addition, autistic individuals may tend to have a reliable and scientific understanding of autism that is also less stigmatizing, [135] contrary to the implication that autistic people lack the ability to infer to their selves.

Research has shown that autistic people are more likely to be dehumanized by non-autistic people, [121] [136] and first-hand accounts of autism research, including autoethnographies, [120] blogs, [137] [138] commentaries, [139] and editorials, [35] [140] have described autism research to often be dehumanizing to autistic people. Furthermore, autistic people are said to be "less domesticated" at morphological, physiological, and behavioral levels, and have integrity equivalent to that of non-human animals. [113] Autism has been described as an epidemic, [141] and in some cases, lack of empathy is used to link autism with terrorism. [54] Autistic people are also said to be an economic burden, and extensive arguments supporting the use of eugenics in autism have been published, with exceptions being made only for those who are economically productive and normative enough to not make others uncomfortable. [113]

As a result of this dehumanization, the lack of understanding and resultant stigma and marginalization felt by autistic people in social settings may negatively impact upon their mental health, employment, accessibility to education and services, and experiences with the criminal justice system. [16] [142] [143] [144] [145] Autistic people have increased premature mortality rates and one of the leading causes of death in autistic people is suicide, [146] which is likely exacerbated by this stigma and marginalization. [120] Additionally, many autistic people often feel trapped by the stereotypes this largely non-autistic society has of autism, [100] and have reported changing their behavior (i.e., masking) as a result of those stereotypes. [113] Because a lack of theory of mind is believed to impair autistic people's understanding of their selves and other people, the claim that autistic people lack theory of mind is seen to dispute their autonomy, devalue their self-determination, and undermine their credibility. [147]

Limitations and future directions

The literature on double empathy is still relatively young, and the generalizability of double empathy findings to younger autistic children as well as autistic people with an intellectual disability, speech-language impairment, and/or higher support needs is unknown, may be confounding, and will require further research. [3] [148]

Milton agrees that there currently remain large gaps in this area of research. [17] The vast majority of studies on double empathy, bidirectional communication, and socialization so far have not included autistic children and autistic people who are nonverbal or have an intellectual disability. [1] [3] There exists a high degree of comorbidity between autism and intellectual disability; roughly 30% of autistic people have an intellectual disability, [149] [150] [151] [152] while just roughly 1–3% of the global population or lower has an intellectual disability. [153] [154] In addition, roughly 20–30% of autistic children are either nonverbal or minimally verbal. [155] A 2023 study by Glass & Yuill [93] suggested the presence of similar or higher social synchrony between autistic pairs compared to non-autistic pairs under certain conditions, with participants including autistic children and autistic people who are nonverbal or minimally verbal.

Moreover, double empathy and bidirectional communication studies typically fail to take into account the vast differences in autism and factors like masking, which may possibly interfere with autistic people's ability to communicate and empathize with one another. Acknowledging these differences which may affect communication within and between autistic and non-autistic groups, a 2024 study by Gillespie-Smith et al. [156] suggested a need to (re)frame the double empathy problem to be understood as a Spectrum of Understanding, which sees double empathy in the context of a continuum of neurocommunicative learning, situated between poles of understanding and misunderstanding. In this sense, the Spectrum of Understanding simply illustrates that as individuals learn more about each other from direct interaction, their relationships tend to deepen, their comprehension of each other increases, and they become more able to empathize with each other.

It is important to note that conceptual replications and further studies on double empathy are needed in different groups, including siblings of autistic people, non-autistic pupils in schools including autistic peers, late-diagnosed autistic adults, parents of autistic children, and autism service providers. [157] [148]

Emphasizing that empathy and reciprocity are a "two-way street", [2] [72] Milton and many other researchers propose that further autism research should focus on bridging the double empathy gap by empowering autistic individuals, building rapport and appreciation for their worldview, educating non-autistic people about what being autistic means, and moving towards a more continuous understanding of neurodiversity. [16] [17] [85] [158] [159] [160] It has also been suggested that the medical model of autism – the traditional and dominant model of autism in which autism is viewed as a disorder and deficit [161] – should be moved away from due to its approach being too narrow, individualistic, and deficit-based, [162] as well as how its messaging could contribute to ableism, prejudice, and stigma towards autistic people, [121] [162] [163] [164] further widening this double empathy gap.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Crompton, Catherine J.; DeBrabander, Kilee; Heasman, Brett; Milton, Damian; Sasson, Noah J. (2021-05-11). "Double Empathy: Why Autistic People Are Often Misunderstood". Frontiers for Young Minds. 9: 554875. doi: 10.3389/frym.2021.554875. hdl: 20.500.11820/94ee032a-6103-470a-bc06-08337dd6b512. ISSN  2296-6846.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Milton, Damian E. M. (October 2012). "On the ontological status of autism: the 'double empathy problem'". Disability & Society. 27 (6): 883–887. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.710008. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  54047060.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Crompton, Catherine J.; Ropar, Danielle; Evans-Williams, Claire V. M.; Flynn, Emma G.; Fletcher-Watson, Sue (2020). "Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective". Autism. 24 (7): 1704–1712. doi: 10.1177/1362361320919286. PMC  7545656. PMID  32431157.
  4. ^ a b Sheppard, Elizabeth; Webb, Sophie; Wilkinson, Helen (2023-11-18). "Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions". Autism. doi: 10.1177/13623613231211457. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  37978869.
  5. ^ a b Szechy, Kathryn A.; Turk, Pamela D.; O'Donnell, Lisa A. (2023-08-17). "Autism and Employment Challenges: The Double Empathy Problem and Perceptions of an Autistic Employee in the Workplace". Autism in Adulthood. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0046. ISSN  2573-9581. S2CID  260998172.
  6. ^ a b c Komeda, Hidetsugu; Kosaka, Hirotaka; Saito, Daisuke N.; Mano, Yoko; Jung, Minyoung; Fujii, Takeshi; Yanaka, Hisakazu T.; Munesue, Toshio; Ishitobi, Makoto; Sato, Makoto; Okazawa, Hidehiko (2014-10-20). "Autistic empathy toward autistic others". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 10 (2). Oxford University Press: 145–152. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu126. ISSN  1749-5016. PMC  4321632. PMID  25332405.
  7. ^ a b Komeda, Hidetsugu; Kosaka, Hirotaka; Fujioka, Toru; Jung, Minyoung; Okazawa, Hidehiko (2019-06-04). "Do Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders Help Other People With Autism Spectrum Disorders? An Investigation of Empathy and Helping Motivation in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 10: 376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00376. ISSN  1664-0640. PMC  6558937. PMID  31231254.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Crompton, Catherine J.; Sharp, Martha; Axbey, Harriet; Fletcher-Watson, Sue; Flynn, Emma G.; Ropar, Danielle (2020). "Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport". Frontiers in Psychology. 11: 586171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171. PMC  7645034. PMID  33192918.
  9. ^ a b Chen, Yu-Lun; Senande, Laura L.; Thorsen, Michael; Patten, Kristie (2021). "Peer preferences and characteristics of same-group and cross-group social interactions among autistic and non-autistic adolescents". Autism. 25 (7): 1885–1900. doi: 10.1177/13623613211005918. PMC  8419288. PMID  34169757.
  10. ^ a b DeThorne, Laura S. (2020-03-01). "Revealing the Double Empathy Problem". The ASHA Leader. 25 (3): 58–65. doi: 10.1044/leader.ftr2.25042020.58. S2CID  216359201.
  11. ^ a b Baron-Cohen, Simon; Leslie, Alan M.; Frith, Uta (1985-10-01). "Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind" ?". Cognition. 21 (1): 37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8. ISSN  0010-0277. PMID  2934210. S2CID  14955234.
  12. ^ a b Baron-Cohen, Simon (1990-01-01). "Autism: A Specific Cognitive Disorder of 'Mind-Blindness'". International Review of Psychiatry. 2 (1): 81–90. doi: 10.3109/09540269009028274. ISSN  0954-0261.
  13. ^ a b c Boucher, Jill (2012). "Putting theory of mind in its place: psychological explanations of the socio-emotional-communicative impairments in autistic spectrum disorder". Autism. 16 (3): 226–246. doi: 10.1177/1362361311430403. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  22297199. S2CID  30738704.
  14. ^ a b Shanker, Stuart (2004-10-01). "The Roots of Mindblindness". Theory & Psychology. 14 (5): 685–703. doi: 10.1177/0959354304046179. ISSN  0959-3543. S2CID  143801835.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Gernsbacher, Morton Ann; Yergeau, Melanie (2019). "Empirical Failures of the Claim That Autistic People Lack a Theory of Mind". Archives of Scientific Psychology. 7 (1): 102–118. doi: 10.1037/arc0000067. PMC  6959478. PMID  31938672.
  16. ^ a b c d Milton, Damian (2018-03-02). "The double empathy problem". National Autistic Society. Retrieved 2023-03-19.
  17. ^ a b c d e Milton, Damian; Gurbuz, Emine; López, Beatriz (October 2022). "The 'double empathy problem': Ten years on". Autism. 26 (8): 1901–1903. doi: 10.1177/13623613221129123. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  36263746. S2CID  253020669.
  18. ^ a b Cassidy, Sarah; Bradley, Louise; Shaw, Rebecca; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2018-07-31). "Risk markers for suicidality in autistic adults". Molecular Autism. 9 (1): 42. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0226-4. ISSN  2040-2392. PMC  6069847. PMID  30083306.
  19. ^ a b Richards, Gareth; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2022-05-19). "Evidence of partner similarity for autistic traits, systemizing, and theory of mind via facial expressions". Scientific Reports. 12 (1): 8451. Bibcode: 2022NatSR..12.8451R. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11592-z. PMC  9118825. PMID  35589769.
  20. ^ a b "A Conversation About 'The Pattern Seekers' by Simon Baron-Cohen". 2020-12-19.
  21. ^ Wright, Robert; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2023-06-21). "Autism and the Two Kinds of Empathy". YouTube. Retrieved 2023-06-25.
  22. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (1988-10-01). "Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 18 (3): 379–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02212194. PMID  3049519. S2CID  2050249.
  23. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon; Campbell, Ruth; Karmiloff-Smith, Annette; Grant, Julia; Walker, Jane (November 1995). "Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes?". British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 13 (4): 379–398. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00687.x. S2CID  34341464.
  24. ^ Frith, Uta (2004). "Emanuel Miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45 (4): 672–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00262.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  15056300.
  25. ^ Gallagher, Helen L.; Frith, Christopher D. (2003-02-01). "Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (2): 77–83. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6. ISSN  1364-6613. PMID  12584026. S2CID  14873867.
  26. ^ Wilkinson, Lee A. (2011), "Mindblindness", in Goldstein, Sam; Naglieri, Jack A. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 955–956, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1795, ISBN  978-0-387-77579-1
  27. ^ Kellogg, Ronald Thomas (2007). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN  978-1-4129-3692-7. OCLC  77520655.
  28. ^ Kirk, Samuel A.; Gallagher, James; Coleman, Mary Ruth; Anastasiow, Nicholas J. (2008). Educating exceptional children (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN  978-0-547-12413-1. OCLC  276275401.
  29. ^ Myers, David G. (2010). Myers' psychology for AP (1st ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. ISBN  978-1-4292-4436-7. OCLC  670478661.
  30. ^ Myers, David G. (2011). Exploring psychology (8th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. ISBN  978-1-4292-1635-7. OCLC  568677536.
  31. ^ Mash, Eric J.; Wolfe, David A. (2016). Abnormal child psychology (6th ed.). Australia: Cengage Learning. ISBN  978-1-305-10542-3. OCLC  908991427.
  32. ^ Coon, Dennis; Mitterer, John O.; Martini, Tanya (2018). Psychology : modules for active learning (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN  978-1-305-96411-2. OCLC  990766461.
  33. ^ Sigelman, Carol K.; Rider, Elizabeth A. (2018). Life-span human development (9th ed.). Australia: Cengage Learning. ISBN  978-1-337-51606-8. OCLC  1100692276.
  34. ^ Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (2018-02-25). "Critical Review of Autism and Theory and Mind: A Tech Report". Open Science Framework. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3R2QY.
  35. ^ a b c Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (February 2007). "On Not Being Human". APS Observer. 20 (2): 5–32. ISSN  1050-4672. PMC  4266404. PMID  25520547.
  36. ^ Yergeau, Melanie (2013-09-05). "Clinically Significant Disturbance: On Theorists Who Theorize Theory of Mind". Disability Studies Quarterly. 33 (4). doi: 10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3876. ISSN  2159-8371.
  37. ^ Yergeau, Melanie; Huebner, Bryce (2017-09-06). "Minding Theory of Mind: Minding Theory of Mind". Journal of Social Philosophy. 48 (3): 273–296. doi: 10.1111/josp.12191.
  38. ^ Willey, Angela; Subramaniam, Banu; Hamilton, Jennifer A.; Couperus, Jane (2015). "The Mating Life of Geeks: Love, Neuroscience, and the New Autistic Subject". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 40 (2): 369–391. doi: 10.1086/678146. ISSN  0097-9740. S2CID  146561474.
  39. ^ Barnbaum, Deborah R. (2008). The ethics of autism : among them, but not of them. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN  978-0-253-22013-4. OCLC  560616889.
  40. ^ Singer, Tania; Fehr, Ernst (2005-04-01). "The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy". American Economic Review. 95 (2): 340–345. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670103. hdl: 10419/33340. ISSN  0002-8282. PMID  29125271. S2CID  1480492.
  41. ^ Boyer, Pascal (2003-03-31). "Functional origins of religious concepts: ontological and strategic selection in evolved minds". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 6 (2): 195–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00012.
  42. ^ Scassellati, Brian (2002). "Theory of mind for a humanoid robot". Autonomous Robots. 12 (1): 13–24. doi: 10.1023/A:1013298507114. S2CID  1979315.
  43. ^ Barnes, Jennifer L. (2012). "Fiction, imagination, and social cognition: Insights from autism". Poetics. 40 (4): 299–316. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2012.05.001.
  44. ^ a b Dinishak, Janette; Akhtar, Nameera (June 2013). "A Critical Examination of Mindblindness as a Metaphor for Autism". Child Development Perspectives. 7 (2): 110–114. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12026.
  45. ^ Ozonoff, Sally; Pennington, Bruce F.; Rogers, Sally J. (1991). "Executive Function Deficits in High-Functioning Autistic Individuals: Relationship to Theory of Mind". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 32 (7): 1081–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  1787138.
  46. ^ Oswald, Donald P.; Ollendick, Thomas H. (1989). "Role taking and social competence in autism and mental retardation". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 19 (1): 119–127. doi: 10.1007/BF02212723. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  2708295. S2CID  46444974.
  47. ^ Tager-Flusberg, Helen; Sullivan, Kate (1994). "A second look at second-order belief attribution in autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 24 (5): 577–586. doi: 10.1007/BF02172139. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  7814307. S2CID  25194344.
  48. ^ Toal, F.; Daly, E. M.; Page, L.; Deeley, Q.; Hallahan, B.; Bloemen, O.; Cutter, W. J.; Brammer, M. J.; Curran, S.; Robertson, D.; Murphy, C.; Murphy, K. C.; Murphy, D. G. M. (July 2010). "Clinical and anatomical heterogeneity in autistic spectrum disorder: a structural MRI study". Psychological Medicine. 40 (7): 1171–1181. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991541. ISSN  0033-2917. PMID  19891805. S2CID  10216391.
  49. ^ Lenroot, Rhoshel K.; Yeung, Pui Ka (2013). "Heterogeneity within Autism Spectrum Disorders: What have We Learned from Neuroimaging Studies?". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7: 733. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00733. ISSN  1662-5161. PMC  3812662. PMID  24198778.
  50. ^ Chapman, Robert (2020-08-17). "The reality of autism: On the metaphysics of disorder and diversity". Philosophical Psychology. 33 (6): 799–819. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1751103. hdl: 1983/309dc16c-cfe9-4356-81b8-6d95510b5eb0. ISSN  0951-5089. S2CID  203059811.
  51. ^ Livingston, Lucy A.; Shah, Punit; White, Sarah J.; Happé, Francesca (2021-07-10). "Further developing the Frith–Happé animations: A quicker, more objective, and web-based test of theory of mind for autistic and neurotypical adults". Autism Research. 14 (9): 1905–1912. doi: 10.1002/aur.2575. ISSN  1939-3792. PMID  34245112. S2CID  235786838.
  52. ^ a b Baron-Cohen, Simon; Wheelwright, Sally; Hill, Jacqueline; Raste, Yogini; Plumb, Ian (February 2001). "The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 42 (2): 241–251. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  11280420. S2CID  3016793.
  53. ^ Yeung, Michael K. (2022-02-01). "A systematic review and meta-analysis of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorder: The specificity of deficits and the role of task characteristics". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 133: 104518. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.104518. ISSN  0149-7634. PMID  34974069. S2CID  245591561.
  54. ^ a b c Fletcher-Watson, Sue; Bird, Geoffrey (2019-11-01). "Autism and empathy: What are the real links?". Autism. 24 (1): 3–6. doi: 10.1177/1362361319883506. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  31674189. S2CID  207816582.
  55. ^ Rajendran, Gnanathusharan; Mitchell, Peter (2007). "Cognitive theories of autism". Developmental Review. 27 (2): 224–260. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.02.001. S2CID  34448439.
  56. ^ Fletcher-Watson, Sue; McConnell, Fiona; Manola, Eirini; McConachie, Helen (2014-03-21). "Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD)". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (3): CD008785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008785.pub2. PMC  6923148. PMID  24652601.
  57. ^ Sandbank, Micheal; Bottema-Beutel, Kristen; Crowley, Shannon; Cassidy, Margaret; Dunham, Kacie; Feldman, Jacob I.; Crank, Jenna; Albarran, Susanne A.; Raj, Sweeya; Mahbub, Prachy; Woynaroski, Tiffany G. (2020). "Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children". Psychological Bulletin. 146 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1037/bul0000215. ISSN  1939-1455. PMC  8783568. PMID  31763860.
  58. ^ Bogdashina, Olga (2016). Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger syndrome : different sensory experiences – different perceptual worlds (2nd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN  978-1-84905-673-1. OCLC  922835761.
  59. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (2008). "Theories of the autistic mind". The Psychologist. 21: 112–116.
  60. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (2009). "Autism: The Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S) Theory". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1156 (1): 68–80. Bibcode: 2009NYASA1156...68B. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x. PMID  19338503. S2CID  1440395.
  61. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (2010-11-20), Savic, Ivanka (ed.), "Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism", Progress in Brain Research, Sex Differences in the Human Brain, their Underpinnings and Implications, 186, Elsevier: 167–175, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53630-3.00011-7, ISBN  9780444536303, PMID  21094892
  62. ^ Bailey, Anthony; Phillips, Wendy; Rutter, Michael (1996). "Autism: Towards an Integration of Clinical, Genetic, Neuropsychological, and Neurobiological Perspectives". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 37 (1): 89–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01381.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  8655659.
  63. ^ Bauminger, Nirit; Kasari, Connie (1999). "Brief report: Theory of mind in high-functioning children with autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 29 (1): 81–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1025974701090. PMID  10097997. S2CID  42761063.
  64. ^ Beversdorf, D. Q.; Anderson, J. M.; Manning, S. E.; Anderson, S. L.; Nordgren, R. E.; Felopulos, G. J.; Nadeau, S. E.; Heilman, K. M.; Bauman, M. L. (1998-11-01). "The effect of semantic and emotional context on written recall for verbal language in high functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 65 (5): 685–692. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.685. ISSN  0022-3050. PMC  2170365. PMID  9810938.
  65. ^ Buitelaar, Jan K.; Wees, Marleen van der; Swaab-Barneveld, Hanna; Gaag, Rutger Jan van der (1999). "Verbal Memory and Performance IQ Predict Theory of Mind and Emotion Recognition Ability in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders and in Psychiatric Control Children". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 40 (6): 869–881. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00505. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  10509882.
  66. ^ Ozonoff, Sally; Rogers, Sally J.; Pennington, Bruce F. (1991). "Asperger's Syndrome: Evidence of an Empirical Distinction from High-Functioning Autism". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 32 (7): 1107–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00352.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  1787139.
  67. ^ Baksh, R. Asaad; Abrahams, Sharon; Bertlich, Maya; Cameron, Rebecca; Jany, Sharon; Dorrian, Terin; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Allison, Carrie; Smith, Paula; MacPherson, Sarah E.; Auyeung, Bonnie (2021-10-03). "Social cognition in adults with autism spectrum disorders: Validation of the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT)". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 35 (7): 1275–1293. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1737236. hdl: 20.500.11820/ea02ab9c-73be-4e85-916a-7612aa640013. ISSN  1385-4046. PMID  32189564. S2CID  151487088.
  68. ^ Greenberg, David M.; Warrier, Varun; Allison, Carrie; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2018-11-27). "Testing the Empathizing–Systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (48): 12152–12157. Bibcode: 2018PNAS..11512152G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811032115. ISSN  0027-8424. PMC  6275492. PMID  30420503.
  69. ^ Lombardo, Michael V.; Lai, Meng-Chuan; Auyeung, Bonnie; Holt, Rosemary J.; Allison, Carrie; Smith, Paula; Chakrabarti, Bhismadev; Ruigrok, Amber N. V.; Suckling, John; Bullmore, Edward T.; MRC AIMS Consortium; Bailey, Anthony J.; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Bolton, Patrick F.; Bullmore, Edward T. (2016-10-18). "Unsupervised data-driven stratification of mentalizing heterogeneity in autism". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 35333. Bibcode: 2016NatSR...635333.. doi: 10.1038/srep35333. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  5067562. PMID  27752054.
  70. ^ Hajdúk, Michal; Pinkham, Amy E.; Penn, David L.; Harvey, Philip D.; Sasson, Noah J. (April 2022). "Heterogeneity of social cognitive performance in autism and schizophrenia". Autism Research. 15 (8): 1522–1534. doi: 10.1002/aur.2730. ISSN  1939-3792. PMID  35460541. S2CID  248345497.
  71. ^ Bird, G.; Cook, R. (2013-07-23). "Mixed emotions: the contribution of alexithymia to the emotional symptoms of autism". Translational Psychiatry. 3 (7): e285. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.61. ISSN  2158-3188. PMC  3731793. PMID  23880881.
  72. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (2006). "Toward a Behavior of Reciprocity". The Journal of Developmental Processes. 1 (1): 139–152. PMC  4296736. PMID  25598865.
  73. ^ a b Constantino, John N. (2002). The social responsiveness scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  74. ^ Constantino, John N.; Todd, Richard D. (May 2003). "Autistic Traits in the General Population: A Twin Study". Archives of General Psychiatry. 60 (5): 524–530. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.524. ISSN  0003-990X. PMID  12742874.
  75. ^ Constantino, John N.; Gruber, Christian P.; Davis, Sandra; Hayes, Stephanie; Passanante, Natalie; Przybeck, Thomas (May 2004). "The factor structure of autistic traits". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45 (4): 719–726. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00266.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  15056304.
  76. ^ Towbin, Kenneth E.; Pradella, Anne; Gorrindo, Tristan; Pine, Daniel S.; Leibenluft, Ellen (June 2005). "Autism Spectrum Traits in Children with Mood and Anxiety Disorders". Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 15 (3): 452–464. doi: 10.1089/cap.2005.15.452. ISSN  1044-5463. PMID  16092910.
  77. ^ Nguyen, Phuong H.; Ocansey, Maku E.; Miller, Meghan; Le, Dung T. K.; Schmidt, Rebecca J.; Prado, Elizabeth L. (2019-07-29). "The reliability and validity of the social responsiveness scale to measure autism symptomology in Vietnamese children". Autism Research. 12 (11): 1706–1718. doi: 10.1002/aur.2179. ISSN  1939-3792. PMC  7397486. PMID  31355545.
  78. ^ Kerr-Gaffney, Jess; Harrison, Amy; Tchanturia, Kate (July 2020). "The social responsiveness scale is an efficient screening tool for autism spectrum disorder traits in adults with anorexia nervosa". European Eating Disorders Review. 28 (4): 433–444. doi: 10.1002/erv.2736. ISSN  1072-4133. PMC  8653883. PMID  32243021.
  79. ^ Jackson-Perry, David (2017-09-14). "Autism and Asperger syndrome in adults". Disability & Society. 32 (8): 1280–1282. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1362181. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  149435804.
  80. ^ Rogers, Kimberley; Dziobek, Isabel; Hassenstab, Jason; Wolf, Oliver T.; Convit, Antonio (2007-04-01). "Who Cares? Revisiting Empathy in Asperger Syndrome". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 37 (4): 709–715. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0197-8. ISSN  1573-3432. PMID  16906462. S2CID  13999363.
  81. ^ Wassink, T. H.; Piven, J.; Vieland, V. J.; Pietila, J.; Goedken, R. J.; Folstein, S. E.; Sheffield, V. C. (2004-04-06). "Examination of AVPR1a as an autism susceptibility gene". Molecular Psychiatry. 9 (10): 968–972. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001503. ISSN  1359-4184. PMID  15098001. S2CID  238751.
  82. ^ Marocchini, Eleonora (2023-02-01). "Impairment or difference? The case of Theory of Mind abilities and pragmatic competence in the Autism Spectrum". Applied Psycholinguistics. 44 (3): 365–383. doi: 10.1017/S0142716423000024. ISSN  0142-7164. S2CID  256541508.
  83. ^ Rozsa, Matthew (2021-06-06). "Being autistic may amount to a language difference — not an impairment". Salon. Retrieved 2023-03-19.
  84. ^ a b c d Rifai, Olivia M.; Fletcher-Watson, Sue; Jiménez-Sánchez, Lorena; Crompton, Catherine J. (2022-03-01). "Investigating Markers of Rapport in Autistic and Nonautistic Interactions". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (1): 3–11. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0017. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992924. PMID  36600904.
  85. ^ a b c d Scheerer, Nichole E.; Boucher, Troy Q.; Sasson, Noah J.; Iarocci, Grace (2022-09-01). "Effects of an Educational Presentation About Autism on High School Students' Perceptions of Autistic Adults". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (3): 203–213. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0046. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  9645669. PMID  36606156.
  86. ^ a b Bolis, Dimitris; Lahnakoski, Juha M.; Seidel, Daniela; Tamm, Jeanette; Schilbach, Leonhard (2020-10-26). "Interpersonal similarity of autistic traits predicts friendship quality". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 16 (1–2). Oxford University Press: 222–231. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa147. ISSN  1749-5016. PMC  7812635. PMID  33104781.
  87. ^ a b Morrison, Kerrianne E.; Debrabander, Kilee M.; Jones, Desiree R.; Faso, Daniel J.; Ackerman, Robert A.; Sasson, Noah J. (2020). "Outcomes of real-world social interaction for autistic adults paired with autistic compared to typically developing partners". Autism. 24 (5): 1067–1080. doi: 10.1177/1362361319892701. PMID  31823656. S2CID  209317731.
  88. ^ a b c Crompton, Catherine J.; Hallett, Sonny; Ropar, Danielle; Flynn, Emma; Fletcher-Watson, Sue (2020). "'I never realised everybody felt as happy as I do when I am around autistic people': A thematic analysis of autistic adults' relationships with autistic and neurotypical friends and family". Autism. 24 (6): 1438–1448. doi: 10.1177/1362361320908976. PMC  7376620. PMID  32148068.
  89. ^ a b Williams, Gemma L.; Wharton, Tim; Jagoe, Caroline (2021). "Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic "Impairments" Using Relevance Theory". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 616664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664. PMC  8117104. PMID  33995177.
  90. ^ Chen, Yu-Lun; Schneider, Maxwell; Patten, Kristie (2022-07-22). "Exploring the role of interpersonal contexts in peer relationships among autistic and non-autistic youth in integrated education". Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 946651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946651. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  9355587. PMID  35936294.
  91. ^ a b c d Heasman, Brett; Gillespie, Alex (2018). "Perspective-taking is two-sided: Misunderstandings between people with Asperger's syndrome and their family members". Autism. 22 (6): 740–750. doi: 10.1177/1362361317708287. ISSN  1362-3613. PMC  6055325. PMID  28683569.
  92. ^ a b Granieri, Jessica E.; McNair, Morgan L.; Gerber, Alan H.; Reifler, Rebecca F.; Lerner, Matthew D. (2020-06-04). "Atypical social communication is associated with positive initial impressions among peers with autism spectrum disorder". Autism. 24 (7): 1841–1848. doi: 10.1177/1362361320924906. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  32498545. S2CID  219331201.
  93. ^ a b Glass, Devyn; Yuill, Nicola (2023-06-13). "Moving Together: Social Motor Synchrony in Autistic Peer Partners Depends on Partner and Activity Type". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05917-8. ISSN  1573-3432. PMID  37310543. S2CID  259147542.
  94. ^ Milton, Damian E. M. (2016-11-25). "Disposable dispositions: reflections upon the work of Iris Marion Young in relation to the social oppression of autistic people". Disability & Society. 31 (10): 1403–1407. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1263468. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  151500732.
  95. ^ Chapman, Robert (2019-07-04). "Autism as a Form of Life: Wittgenstein and the Psychological Coherence of Autism: Autism as a Form of Life". Metaphilosophy. 50 (4): 421–440. doi: 10.1111/meta.12366. S2CID  181423539.
  96. ^ Bolis, Dimitris; Balsters, Joshua; Wenderoth, Nicole; Becchio, Cristina; Schilbach, Leonhard (2017). "Beyond Autism: Introducing the Dialectical Misattunement Hypothesis and a Bayesian Account of Intersubjectivity". Psychopathology. 50 (6): 355–372. doi: 10.1159/000484353. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-002E-0068-A. ISSN  0254-4962. PMID  29232684. S2CID  3595888.
  97. ^ Eastwood, Steven; Evans, Bonnie; Gaigg, Sebastian; Harbord, Janet; Milton, Damian (2022-02-07). "Autism through cinema: co-creation and the unmaking of knowledge". International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education: 1–18. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2022.2025492. ISSN  0951-8398. S2CID  246669071.
  98. ^ Gaudion, Katie; Hall, Ashley; Myerson, Jeremy; Pellicano, Liz (June 2014). "Design and wellbeing: Bridging the empathy gap between neurotypical designers and autistic adults" (PDF). Design for Sustainable Wellbeing and Empowerment. 2014: 61–77.
  99. ^ Sasson, Noah J.; Faso, Daniel J.; Nugent, Jack; Lovell, Sarah; Kennedy, Daniel P.; Grossman, Ruth B. (2017-02-01). "Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 40700. Bibcode: 2017NatSR...740700S. doi: 10.1038/srep40700. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  5286449. PMID  28145411.
  100. ^ a b Treweek, Caroline; Wood, Chantelle; Martin, Jilly; Freeth, Megan (April 2019). "Autistic people's perspectives on stereotypes: An interpretative phenomenological analysis". Autism. 23 (3): 759–769. doi: 10.1177/1362361318778286. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  29848001. S2CID  44086997.
  101. ^ Chown, Nicholas (2014-11-26). "More on the ontological status of autism and double empathy". Disability & Society. 29 (10): 1672–1676. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2014.949625. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  143826899.
  102. ^ Sucksmith, E.; Allison, C.; Baron-Cohen, S.; Chakrabarti, B.; Hoekstra, R. A. (2013-01-01). "Empathy and emotion recognition in people with autism, first-degree relatives, and controls". Neuropsychologia. 51 (1): 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.013. ISSN  0028-3932. PMC  6345368. PMID  23174401.
  103. ^ Odom, S. L.; Strain, P. S. (1986). "A comparison of peer-initiation and teacher-antecedent interventions for promoting reciprocal social interaction of autistic preschoolers". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 19 (1): 59–71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-59. PMC  1308041. PMID  3710949.
  104. ^ McEvoy, Mary A.; Nordquist, Vey M.; Twardosz, Sandra; Heckaman, Kelly A.; Wehby, Joseph H.; Denny, R. Kenton (1988). "Promoting autistic children's peer interaction in an integrated early childhood setting using affection activities". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 21 (2): 193–200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-193. PMC  1286111. PMID  3417581.
  105. ^ Dawson, Geraldine; Adams, Alexandra (June 1984). "Imitation and social responsiveness in autistic children". Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 12 (2): 209–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00910664. ISSN  0091-0627. PMID  6725782. S2CID  36581183.
  106. ^ Tiegerman, Ellenmorris; Primavera, Louis H. (March 1984). "Imitating the autistic child: Facilitating communicative gaze behavior". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 14 (1): 27–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02408553. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  6706896. S2CID  38198496.
  107. ^ Dawson, Geraldine; Galpert, Larry (April 1990). "Mothers' use of imitative play for facilitating social responsiveness and toy play in young autistic children". Development and Psychopathology. 2 (2): 151–162. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400000675. ISSN  0954-5794. S2CID  145739085.
  108. ^ a b McGee, Gail G.; Almeida, M. Connie; Sulzer-Azaroff, Beth; Feldman, Robert S. (1992). "Promoting reciprocal interactions via peer incidental teaching". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 25 (1): 117–126. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-117. PMC  1279660. PMID  1582961.
  109. ^ Pearson, Amy; Rose, Kieran (2021-03-01). "A Conceptual Analysis of Autistic Masking: Understanding the Narrative of Stigma and the Illusion of Choice". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (1): 52–60. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0043. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992880. PMID  36601266.
  110. ^ Petrolini, Valentina; Rodríguez-Armendariz, Ekaine; Vicente, Agustín (2023). "Autistic camouflaging across the spectrum". New Ideas in Psychology. 68: 100992. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100992. hdl: 10810/59712. S2CID  253316582.
  111. ^ Cage, Eilidh; Cranney, Rebekah; Botha, Monique (2022-09-01). "Brief Report: Does Autistic Community Connectedness Moderate the Relationship Between Masking and Wellbeing?". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (3): 247–253. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0096. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  9645674. PMID  36606159.
  112. ^ Drake, Kimberly (2022-04-19). "Masking in Autism: The 'Why' Matters". Psych Central. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  113. ^ a b c d Botha, Monique; Dibb, Bridget; Frost, David M. (2022-03-16). ""Autism is me": an investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma". Disability & Society. 37 (3): 427–453. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1822782. hdl: 1893/32042. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  225116488.
  114. ^ Dickter, Cheryl L.; Burk, Joshua A.; Zeman, Janice L.; Taylor, Sara C. (2020-06-01). "Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults". Autism in Adulthood. 2 (2): 144–151. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0023. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992843. PMID  36601572. S2CID  212921826.
  115. ^ Humphrey, Neil; Hebron, Judith (2015-08-03). "Bullying of children and adolescents with autism spectrum conditions: a 'state of the field' review". International Journal of Inclusive Education. 19 (8): 845–862. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2014.981602. ISSN  1360-3116. S2CID  12261937.
  116. ^ Weiss, Jonathan A.; Fardella, Michelle A. (2018-05-25). "Victimization and Perpetration Experiences of Adults With Autism". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 9: 203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00203. ISSN  1664-0640. PMC  5980973. PMID  29887806.
  117. ^ Schroeder, Jessica H.; Cappadocia, M. Catherine; Bebko, James M.; Pepler, Debra J.; Weiss, Jonathan A. (July 2014). "Shedding Light on a Pervasive Problem: A Review of Research on Bullying Experiences Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44 (7): 1520–1534. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-2011-8. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  24464616. S2CID  254567709.
  118. ^ Shtayermman, Oren (2007). "Peer Victimization in Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome: A Link to Depressive Symptomatology, Anxiety Symptomatology and Suicidal Ideation". Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing. 30 (3): 87–107. doi: 10.1080/01460860701525089. ISSN  0146-0862. PMID  17885828. S2CID  38242770.
  119. ^ Fisher, Marisa H.; Taylor, Julie Lounds (May 2016). "Let's talk about it: Peer victimization experiences as reported by adolescents with autism spectrum disorder". Autism. 20 (4): 402–411. doi: 10.1177/1362361315585948. ISSN  1362-3613. PMC  4662636. PMID  26019304.
  120. ^ a b c Botha, Monique (2021-09-28). "Academic, Activist, or Advocate? Angry, Entangled, and Emerging: A Critical Reflection on Autism Knowledge Production". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 727542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727542. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  8506216. PMID  34650484.
  121. ^ a b c d Botha, Monique; Cage, Eilidh (2022-11-24). ""Autism research is in crisis": A mixed method study of researcher's constructions of autistic people and autism research". Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 1050897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050897. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  9730396. PMID  36506950.
  122. ^ "Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities" (PDF). United Nations General Assembly (43rd ed.). 2019-12-17. Retrieved 2023-06-05.
  123. ^ a b Atherton, Gray; Cross, Liam (2018-04-17). "Seeing More Than Human: Autism and Anthropomorphic Theory of Mind". Frontiers in Psychology. 9: 528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00528. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  5932358. PMID  29755383.
  124. ^ White, Rebekah; Remington, Anna (2018). "Object personification in autism: This paper will be very sad if you don't read it". Autism. 23 (4): 1042–1045. doi: 10.1177/1362361318793408. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  30101594. S2CID  51969215.
  125. ^ Cross, Liam; Piovesan, Andrea; Atherton, Gray (2022-07-20). "Autistic people outperform neurotypicals in a cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes". Autism Research. 15 (9): 1603–1608. doi: 10.1002/aur.2782. ISSN  1939-3792. PMC  9543219. PMID  35855595.
  126. ^ Prothmann, Anke; Ettrich, Christine; Prothmann, Sascha (2009). "Preference for, and Responsiveness to, People, Dogs and Objects in Children with Autism". Anthrozoös. 22 (2): 161–171. doi: 10.2752/175303709X434185. ISSN  0892-7936. S2CID  143563380.
  127. ^ Lam, Gary Yu Hin; Holden, Emily; Fitzpatrick, Megan; Raffaele Mendez, Linda; Berkman, Karen (2020-01-22). ""Different but connected": Participatory action research using Photovoice to explore well-being in autistic young adults". Autism. 24 (5): 1246–1259. doi: 10.1177/1362361319898961. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  31968999. S2CID  210864853.
  128. ^ Miralles, Aurélien; Grandgeorge, Marine; Raymond, Michel (2022-04-15). "Self-perceived empathic abilities of people with autism towards living beings mostly differs for humans". Scientific Reports. 12 (1): 6300. Bibcode: 2022NatSR..12.6300M. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10353-2. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  9012821. PMID  35428857.
  129. ^ Spikins, Penny; Wright, Barry; Hodgson, Derek (2016-10-01). "Are there alternative adaptive strategies to human pro-sociality? The role of collaborative morality in the emergence of personality variation and autistic traits". Time and Mind. 9 (4): 289–313. doi: 10.1080/1751696X.2016.1244949. ISSN  1751-696X. S2CID  151820168.
  130. ^ Hadjikhani, N.; Zürcher, N. R.; Rogier, O.; Hippolyte, L.; Lemonnier, E.; Ruest, T.; Ward, N.; Lassalle, A.; Gillberg, N.; Billstedt, E.; Helles, A.; Gillberg, C.; Solomon, P.; Prkachin, K. M.; Gillberg, C. (2014-01-14). "Emotional contagion for pain is intact in autism spectrum disorders". Translational Psychiatry. 4 (1): e343. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.113. ISSN  2158-3188. PMC  3905223. PMID  24424389.
  131. ^ a b Milton, Damian E. M. (2014). "Autistic expertise: A critical reflection on the production of knowledge in autism studies". Autism. 18 (7): 794–802. doi: 10.1177/1362361314525281. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  24637428. S2CID  206715678.
  132. ^ Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (2017-08-06). "Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 58 (7): 859–861. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12706. PMC  5545113. PMID  28621486.
  133. ^ Charlton, James I. (1998). Nothing about us without us : disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN  978-0-520-92544-1. OCLC  42417786.
  134. ^ Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Hanna; Chown, Nick; Stenning, Anna (2020). Neurodiversity studies : a new critical paradigm. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN  978-0-429-32229-7. OCLC  1150829242.
  135. ^ Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen; Kapp, Steven K.; Brooks, Patricia J.; Pickens, Jonathan; Schwartzman, Ben (2017). "Whose Expertise Is It? Evidence for Autistic Adults as Critical Autism Experts". Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00438. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  5368186. PMID  28400742.
  136. ^ Cage, Eilidh; Di Monaco, Jessica; Newell, Victoria (2019-11-21). "Understanding, attitudes and dehumanisation towards autistic people". Autism. 23 (6): 1373–1383. doi: 10.1177/1362361318811290. hdl: 1893/30633. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  30463431. S2CID  53722683.
  137. ^ Luterman, Sara (2019-07-15). "What it's like to be autistic at an autism research conference". Spectrum. Simons Foundation. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  138. ^ Rose, Kieran (2020-02-29). "Regarding the use of dehumanising rhetoric". The Autistic Advocate. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  139. ^ Michael, Cos (2021-06-01). "Is Being Othered a Co-Occurring Condition of Autism?". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (2): 118–119. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0019. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992897. PMID  36601468.
  140. ^ Cowen, Tyler (2009-07-13). "Autism as Academic Paradigm". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  141. ^ Liu, Ka-Yuet; King, Marissa; Bearman, Peter S. (March 2010). "Social Influence and the Autism Epidemic". American Journal of Sociology. 115 (5): 1387–1434. doi: 10.1086/651448. ISSN  0002-9602. PMC  2927813. PMID  20503647.
  142. ^ Camus, Lorna; Macmillan, Kirsty; Rajendran, Gnanathusharan; Stewart, Mary (2022-05-10). "'I too, need to belong': Autistic adults' perspectives on misunderstandings and well-being". PsyArXiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/5mysh.
  143. ^ Redman, S.; Downie, M.; Rennison, R.; Batten, A. (2009). Don't write me off : make the system fair for people with autism. London: National Autistic Society.
  144. ^ Baldwin, Susanna; Costley, Debra; Warren, Anthony (October 2014). "Employment Activities and Experiences of Adults with High-Functioning Autism and Asperger's Disorder". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44 (10): 2440–2449. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2112-z. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  24715257. S2CID  254569665.
  145. ^ "Criminal Legal System - Autistic Self Advocacy Network". Autistic Self Advocacy Network. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 2023-03-26.
  146. ^ Hirvikoski, Tatja; Mittendorfer-Rutz, Ellenor; Boman, Marcus; Larsson, Henrik; Lichtenstein, Paul; Bölte, Sven (March 2016). "Premature mortality in autism spectrum disorder". British Journal of Psychiatry. 208 (3): 232–238. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.160192. ISSN  0007-1250. PMID  26541693. S2CID  25884060.
  147. ^ Yergeau, Melanie (2018). Authoring autism : on rhetoric and neurological queerness. North Carolina, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822372189. ISBN  978-0-8223-7218-9. OCLC  982501293.
  148. ^ a b Yeung, Siu Kit (2022-07-21). "Directions for Open Scholarship in Autism – Embracing Open Scholarship to Meaningfully Improve Lives of Autistic People Together". PsyArXiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/xzkjh.
  149. ^ Bilder, Deborah; Botts, Elizabeth L.; Smith, Ken R.; Pimentel, Richard; Farley, Megan; Viskochil, Joseph; McMahon, William M.; Block, Heidi; Ritvo, Edward; Ritvo, Riva-Ariella; Coon, Hilary (2012-09-25). "Excess Mortality and Causes of Death in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Follow up of the 1980s Utah/UCLA Autism Epidemiologic Study". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 43 (5): 1196–1204. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1664-z. ISSN  0162-3257. PMC  4814267. PMID  23008058.
  150. ^ Polyak, Andrew; Kubina, Richard M.; Girirajan, Santhosh (2015-07-22). "Comorbidity of intellectual disability confounds ascertainment of autism: implications for genetic diagnosis". American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 168 (7): 600–608. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32338. PMID  26198689. S2CID  7635120.
  151. ^ Katusic, Maja Z.; Myers, Scott M.; Weaver, Amy L.; Voigt, Robert G. (2021-12-01). "IQ in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Population-Based Birth Cohort Study". Pediatrics. 148 (6): e2020049899. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049899. ISSN  0031-4005. PMID  34851412. S2CID  243762735.
  152. ^ Shenouda, Josephine; Barrett, Emily; Davidow, Amy L.; Sidwell, Kate; Lescott, Cara; Halperin, William; Silenzio, Vincent M. B.; Zahorodny, Walter (2023-02-01). "Prevalence and Disparities in the Detection of Autism Without Intellectual Disability". Pediatrics. 151 (2): e2022056594. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-056594. ISSN  0031-4005. PMID  36700335. S2CID  256273971.
  153. ^ McKenzie, Katherine; Milton, Meagan; Smith, Glenys; Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène (2016-04-15). "Systematic Review of the Prevalence and Incidence of Intellectual Disabilities: Current Trends and Issues". Current Developmental Disorders Reports. 3 (2): 104–115. doi: 10.1007/s40474-016-0085-7. ISSN  2196-2987. S2CID  76296047.
  154. ^ McBride, Orla; Heslop, Pauline; Glover, Gyles; Taggart, Laurence; Hanna-Trainor, Lisa; Shevlin, Mark; Murphy, Jamie (2021-01-28). "Prevalence estimation of intellectual disability using national administrative and household survey data: The importance of survey question specificity". International Journal of Population Data Science. 6 (1): 1342. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1342. ISSN  2399-4908. PMC  8188522. PMID  34164584.
  155. ^ Brignell, Amanda; Chenausky, Karen V.; Song, Huan; Zhu, Jianwei; Suo, Chen; Morgan, Angela T. (2018-11-05). "Communication interventions for autism spectrum disorder in minimally verbal children". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 (11): CD012324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012324.pub2. PMC  6516977. PMID  30395694.
  156. ^ Gillespie-Smith, Karri; Mair, Ally Pax Arcari; Alabtullatif, Aljawharah; Pain, Helen; McConachie, Doug (2024-02-16). "A Spectrum of Understanding: A Qualitative Exploration of Autistic Adults' Understandings and Perceptions of Friendship(s)". Autism in Adulthood. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0051. ISSN  2573-9581.
  157. ^ Mitchell, Peter; Sheppard, Elizabeth; Cassidy, Sarah (2021). "Autism and the double empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health". British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 39 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12350. PMID  33393101. S2CID  230489027.
  158. ^ Kapp, Steven K.; Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen; Sherman, Lauren E.; Hutman, Ted (2013). "Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity". Developmental Psychology. 49 (1): 59–71. doi: 10.1037/a0028353. ISSN  1939-0599. PMID  22545843.
  159. ^ Jaarsma, Pier; Welin, Stellan (2012). "Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement". Health Care Analysis. 20 (1): 20–30. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9. ISSN  1065-3058. PMID  21311979. S2CID  18618887.
  160. ^ Chapple, Melissa; Davis, Philip; Billington, Josie; Myrick, Joe Anthony; Ruddock, Cassie; Corcoran, Rhiannon (2021-07-27). "Overcoming the Double Empathy Problem Within Pairs of Autistic and Non-autistic Adults Through the Contemplation of Serious Literature". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 708375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708375. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  8354525. PMID  34385964.
  161. ^ Milton, Damian E. M.; Bracher, Mike (June 2013). "Autistics speak but are they heard?". Medical Sociology Online. 7 (2): 61–69.
  162. ^ a b Pellicano, Elizabeth; den Houting, Jacquiline (November 2021). "Annual Research Review: Shifting from 'normal science' to neurodiversity in autism science". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 63 (4): 381–396. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13534. ISSN  0021-9630. PMC  9298391. PMID  34730840.
  163. ^ Woods, Richard (2017-08-09). "Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated for autism: in response to Jonathan Levitt". Disability & Society. 32 (7): 1090–1095. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1328157. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  148783346.
  164. ^ Bottema-Beutel, Kristen; Kapp, Steven K.; Lester, Jessica Nina; Sasson, Noah J.; Hand, Brittany N. (2021-03-01). "Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (1): 18–29. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0014. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992888. PMID  36601265.

Further reading

External links

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Double_empathy_problem&oldid=1218084334"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Both autistic and non-autistic people can find it difficult to empathize with each other. The fact that both people in the interaction have trouble with understanding and empathy is why the theory is called the "double empathy problem". [1]
Neurodiversity paradigm
Philosophy
Organizations
Events
Issues
People
Films
Criticism

The theory of the double empathy problem is a psychological and sociological theory first coined in 2012 by Damian Milton, an autistic autism researcher. [2] This theory proposes that many of the difficulties autistic individuals face when socializing with non-autistic individuals are due, in part, to a lack of mutual understanding between the two groups, meaning that most autistic people struggle to understand and empathize with non-autistic people, whereas most non-autistic people also struggle to understand and empathize with autistic people. This lack of understanding may stem from bidirectional differences in communication style, social-cognitive characteristics, and experiences between autistic and non-autistic individuals, but not necessarily an inherent deficiency. Recent studies have shown that most autistic individuals are able to socialize, communicate effectively, [3] empathize well, [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] and display social reciprocity [9] with most other autistic individuals. [2] [10] This theory and subsequent findings challenge the commonly held belief that the social skills of autistic individuals are inherently impaired, as well as the theory of " mind-blindness" proposed by prominent autism researcher Simon Baron-Cohen in the mid-1980s, which suggested that empathy and theory of mind are universally impaired in autistic individuals. [11] [12] [13] [14]

The double empathy concept has been consistently supported by a substantial number of studies in recent years and has the potential to radically shift goals of interventions and public psychoeducation regarding autism. [13] [15] [16] [17] In recognition of recent findings that support the theory, Baron-Cohen positively recognized the theory of the double empathy problem in two research articles in 2018 [18] and 2022, [19] as well as in multiple podcasts since 2020. [20] [21]

History

Development and spread of mind-blindness theory

Main article: Mind-blindness

Earlier studies on autism regarding theory of mind and empathy had concluded that a lack of theory of mind was one of the primary symptoms of autism. The most popular of these studies were those led by Simon Baron-Cohen in the 1980s and 1990s, who used the term "mind-blindness" to describe his theory in an attempt to empirically explain the tendency of autistic people to avoid eye contact, [11] [22] [23] proposing a homogeneous explanation of autism as due to either a lack of theory of mind or developmental delay in theory of mind in early childhood. [12] Some have additionally described the supposed social impairment present in autistic people as "an extreme form of egocentrism with the resulting lack of consideration for others". [24]

Mind-blindness implies an inability to make sense of and predict another person's behavior, and to attribute mental states such as knowledge, beliefs, desires, emotions, and intentions to oneself and others. [25] [26] The claim that autistic people lack theory of mind is taught across a wide range of psychology textbooks [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] and promoted by over 75% of the top 500 scholarly articles indexed for "theory of mind" and "autism" on Google Scholar, [15] [34] serving as one of psychology's widely promoted topics throughout psychological literature, practice, and instruction. [35] [36] [37] Mind-blindness has also been embraced by scholars in other disciplinary areas such as sociology, [38] philosophy, [39] economics, [40] anthropology, [41] robotics, [42] and narratology. [43]

Problems with earlier studies on theory of mind and empathy in autism

The mind-blindness hypothesis, in addition to being questioned shortly after its publication, [14] has faced a great deal of criticism from the scientific community over the years, [15] [44] in response to the replication studies (mostly with false-belief tasks) that have failed to reveal significant differences in theory of mind between autistic and non-autistic participants, [45] [46] [47] as well as the growing body of evidence for the high degree of heterogeneity in autistic brains at a neurobiological level. [48] [49] [50]

There have been developments of new theory-of-mind measures when existing measures were perceived by some researchers as inadequate. [15] There have been some successful replications demonstrating differences in theory of mind and empathy with some measures such as the Frith– Happé Animations Test, [51] Baron-Cohen's " Reading the Mind in the Eyes" task, [52] [53] and self-report empathy questionnaires — which have been criticized for being vague and imprecise as well as not considering social interaction contexts, reference groups, and the substantially lowered social-desirability bias of autistic individuals. [54] In addition, several independent teams have repetitively failed to replicate highly cited and widely taught findings with picture-sequencing tasks and false-belief tasks such as the Sally–Anne test. [15] Such mixed and inconsistent findings with many different measures have raised doubts regarding the generalizability and validity of the mind-blindness theory of autism. [15] [55]

Furthermore, autism intervention research based on theory of mind has shown little efficacy, [56] [57] and theory-of-mind experiments typically fail to take into account the fact that autistic people have different sensory experiences, which vary between autistic individuals, than non-autistic people. [58] Academics have also noted that many autistic children and adults pass some theory-of-mind tasks but performances vary substantially between diverse tasks and between autistic individuals; hence, Baron-Cohen's earlier repeated assertion of mind-blindness being a universal characteristic of autism across contexts [59] [60] [61] has also been called into question by other researchers since the 1990s. [13] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] In recent years, Baron-Cohen has revised his understanding and his recent well-powered studies have found substantial heterogeneity in empathy and theory of mind among autistic people, with lower performances or scores in theory-of-mind and empathy tasks among autistic people on average, but also a substantial proportion (around 40–60%) of autistic people showing "unimpaired" or even above-average performances in some rather controversial theory-of-mind and empathy measures. [67] [68] [69] Similar results have been consistently demonstrated by other research teams. [70] [71]

Additionally, it has been argued that many professionals and, likewise, parents seem to have neglected that reciprocity needs to be mutual and symmetrical. [72] For example, John Constantino's Social Responsiveness Scale, [73] a 2002 quantitative measure of social reciprocity in children which has since been used extensively in autism research, [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] consisted of the item that asks whether the child "is regarded by other children as odd or weird", which, although seems to indicate a lack of social or emotional reciprocity in the regarder, is used instead to indicate a lack of social or emotional reciprocity in the target child. [72] Several other items in the questionnaire, such as the one that asks whether the child "is not well coordinated in physical activities", seem completely unrelated to reciprocity. [72] [73]

Counter-theory to mind-blindness

Around the early 2010s, academics began to suggest that some studies of theory-of-mind and empathy tests may have misinterpreted autistic people having difficulty understanding non-autistic or neurotypical people as being an intrinsic social deficit present in autistic individuals. They argued that it seemed more likely that autistic people were specifically having trouble understanding neurotypical people in some contexts, due to differences in experiences and social-cognition between the two groups. [2] [79] [80] The theory of the double empathy problem was coined in 2012 by Damian Milton as a counter-theory to mind-blindness in an effort to explain this phenomenon of mutual misunderstanding, defined as follows:

The "double empathy problem": a disjuncture in reciprocity between two differently disposed social actors which becomes more marked the wider the disjuncture in dispositional perceptions of the lifeworld – perceived as a breach in the "natural attitude" of what constitutes "social reality" for "non-autistic spectrum" people and yet an everyday and often traumatic experience for "autistic people". [2]

The claim that autism is characterized by a lack of social or emotional reciprocity has become a truism in academia; for instance, in a 2004 research article examining a hypothesized autism susceptibility gene, the opening line simply stated, without any scientific citations or supporting data, that "impaired reciprocal social interaction is one of the core features of autism". [72] [81] The double empathy theory, subsequent findings, and findings in the broader theory of mind and empathy literature in the past two to three decades contest common assumptions about autistic people in the fields of psychology and psychiatry, which are often riddled with information regarding autism and theory of mind (e.g., autistic people are universally deficient in empathy or theory of mind) that is outdated, overgeneralized, empirically questionable with inconsistent findings, and potentially societally harmful, but still often assumed by some researchers, educators, students, and practitioners as factual. [15] [72] [82]

While the concept of double empathy had existed in prior publications, [35] [72] Milton named and significantly expanded on it. [2] [16] [17] [83] Since 2015, there has been an increasing number of research studies, including experimental studies, qualitative research, and real-life social interaction studies, many of which emerging under the banner of critical autism studies, supporting the double empathy theory and the findings appear consistent. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93]

In the past few years, the double empathy theory has been supported by many autism researchers, including Catherine Crompton, [3] [8] [84] [88] Morton Ann Gernsbacher, [15] Baron-Cohen himself, [18] [19] [20] and the editor-in-chief of the academic journal Autism, Sue Fletcher-Watson. [3] [8] [54] [84] [88] The theory has also been approached by research projects in various disciplinary areas, [17] including but not limited to psychology, sociology, [94] philosophy, [95] neuroscience, [86] [96] linguistics, [89] film studies, [97] and design. [98]

Double empathy and bidirectional communication studies

Interpersonal rapport, empathy, and communication effectiveness

It has been suggested that non-autistic people tend to have a poor understanding of autistic people and lack emotional empathy for autistic people, just as autistic people may have a poor understanding of non-autistic people. [2] [85] [91] [99] Whilst autistic people sometimes have difficulties in understanding non-autistic people and struggle to socialize with non-autistic people, it is likely that most non-autistic people often hold negative stereotypes, views, and/or biases regarding autistic differences, and also struggle to understand autistic people's communication, emotions, and intentions, resulting in and contributing to this "double empathy problem". [85] [100]

Studies from the 2010s and 2020s that have used autistic-autistic pairs to test interpersonal rapport, empathy, and communication effectiveness in adults have shown that autistic adults generally perform better in empathy, rapport, and communication effectiveness when paired with other autistic adults, [3] [6] [87] [91] that higher interpersonal rapport may be present in autistic-autistic interactions than in those between autistic and neurotypical people, [8] [84] [92] and that autistic people may be able to understand and predict each other's thoughts and motivations better than neurotypical people [8] [101] as well as possibly autistic close relatives. [102]

The importance of social reciprocity

One major factor influencing communication effectiveness is social reciprocity. Past research from the 1980s and 1990s has indicated that when professionals, peers, and parents are taught to act reciprocally to autistic children, non-autistic children are considerably more likely to reciprocate with autistic children, who end up becoming more responsive. [103] [104] Non-autistic children can demonstrate reciprocity via imitation, which improves social responsiveness in all children, including autistic children; when a random person imitates an autistic child engaging in object manipulation by manipulating a duplicate object in the same way that the child does, the child makes longer and more frequent eye contact with the person. [105] [106] Similarly, when mothers imitate their autistic children's manipulation of toys, the children not only gaze longer and more frequently at their mothers, but also engage in more exploratory and creative behavior with the toys, on top of showing considerably more positive affect. [107]

In contrast, in a 1992 study on reciprocal interactions, non-autistic preschoolers, called "peer tutors", were taught to prompt for the verbal labels of preferred toys from autistic target children; the peer tutors were told to "wait for the target child to initiate a request for a toy", "ask the target child for the label of the toy", "give the toy to the target child when he labeled it", and "praise the correct answer". [108] None of the autistic children maintained their initiation with the peer tutors even after the training sessions were completed, which was likely because their interaction was neither mutual nor symmetrical. [72] [108] When social interaction is neither mutual nor symmetrical between autistic and non-autistic peers, a double empathy problem occurs, which is likely exacerbated through professionals, peers, and parents neglecting the reciprocal nature of reciprocity. [72]

Bullying and subsequent masking

See also: Autistic masking

Some researchers have argued that autistic people likely understand non-autistic people to a higher degree than vice versa, due to the frequency of masking – i.e., the conscious or subconscious suppression of autistic behaviors and the compensation of difficulties in social interaction by autistic people with the goal of being perceived as neurotypical. [2] [109] [110] Masking begins at a young age as a coping strategy, partly to avoid harassment and bullying, [111] [112] [113] which are highly common experiences for autistic children and adults. [114] [115] [116] [117] High rates of peer victimization are also seen in autistic children and adults. [118] [119]

Whilst many health professionals and researchers have argued from time to time that autism is characterized by a lack of social or emotional reciprocity, the bullying and victimization targeted at autistic people by non-autistic people, along with the problem of ableism in autism research, [120] [121] [122] has been viewed as a demonstration of non-autistic people's lack of social or emotional reciprocity towards autistic people, [72] further suggesting what Milton has described to be a "disjuncture in reciprocity" (i.e., the presence of a "double empathy gap") between autistic and non-autistic people. [2]

Anthropomorphism and understanding for animals

See also: Anthropomorphism and Personification

An area of social-cognitive strength in autistic people centers upon anthropomorphism. [123] A 2018 study has shown that autistic people are likely more prone to object personification, [124] suggesting that autistic empathy may be more complex and all-encompassing, contrary to the popular belief that autistic people lack empathy. Whilst neurotypical participants have outperformed autistic participants in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test designed by Baron-Cohen in 2001, [52] autistic participants have outperformed neurotypical participants in a cartoon version of said test in a 2022 study, [125] supporting the view of social-cognitive differences rather than deficits in the autistic population.

Some autistic people also appear to possess a heightened understanding, empathy, and sensitivity towards animals, [123] [126] [127] [128] once again suggesting social-cognitive differences in autistic people, but not global deficits.

Autistic perspectives and dehumanizing research

Autistic theory of mind, argued to have facilitated the release of cognitive resources, is typically based on the use of rules and logic and may be modulated by differences in thinking. [129] [130] If autistic people were inherently poor at theory of mind and social communication, an interaction between a pair of autistic people would logically be more challenging than one between an autistic and neurotypical person. [3] [8] As a result, Milton has described the belief that autistic people lack theory of mind as a myth analogous to the now-discredited theory that vaccines cause autism. [131]

Many autistic activists have shown support for the double empathy concept, and have argued that past studies done on theory of mind in autism have served to stigmatize autistic people, [10] [44] [132] place the responsibility for autistic-neurotypical misunderstandings solely on autistic people, [91] and dehumanize autistic people by portraying them as unempathetic. [121] Many autistic activists have advocated for the inclusion of autistic people in autism research, promoting the slogan " nothing about us without us". [131] [133] [134] In addition, autistic individuals may tend to have a reliable and scientific understanding of autism that is also less stigmatizing, [135] contrary to the implication that autistic people lack the ability to infer to their selves.

Research has shown that autistic people are more likely to be dehumanized by non-autistic people, [121] [136] and first-hand accounts of autism research, including autoethnographies, [120] blogs, [137] [138] commentaries, [139] and editorials, [35] [140] have described autism research to often be dehumanizing to autistic people. Furthermore, autistic people are said to be "less domesticated" at morphological, physiological, and behavioral levels, and have integrity equivalent to that of non-human animals. [113] Autism has been described as an epidemic, [141] and in some cases, lack of empathy is used to link autism with terrorism. [54] Autistic people are also said to be an economic burden, and extensive arguments supporting the use of eugenics in autism have been published, with exceptions being made only for those who are economically productive and normative enough to not make others uncomfortable. [113]

As a result of this dehumanization, the lack of understanding and resultant stigma and marginalization felt by autistic people in social settings may negatively impact upon their mental health, employment, accessibility to education and services, and experiences with the criminal justice system. [16] [142] [143] [144] [145] Autistic people have increased premature mortality rates and one of the leading causes of death in autistic people is suicide, [146] which is likely exacerbated by this stigma and marginalization. [120] Additionally, many autistic people often feel trapped by the stereotypes this largely non-autistic society has of autism, [100] and have reported changing their behavior (i.e., masking) as a result of those stereotypes. [113] Because a lack of theory of mind is believed to impair autistic people's understanding of their selves and other people, the claim that autistic people lack theory of mind is seen to dispute their autonomy, devalue their self-determination, and undermine their credibility. [147]

Limitations and future directions

The literature on double empathy is still relatively young, and the generalizability of double empathy findings to younger autistic children as well as autistic people with an intellectual disability, speech-language impairment, and/or higher support needs is unknown, may be confounding, and will require further research. [3] [148]

Milton agrees that there currently remain large gaps in this area of research. [17] The vast majority of studies on double empathy, bidirectional communication, and socialization so far have not included autistic children and autistic people who are nonverbal or have an intellectual disability. [1] [3] There exists a high degree of comorbidity between autism and intellectual disability; roughly 30% of autistic people have an intellectual disability, [149] [150] [151] [152] while just roughly 1–3% of the global population or lower has an intellectual disability. [153] [154] In addition, roughly 20–30% of autistic children are either nonverbal or minimally verbal. [155] A 2023 study by Glass & Yuill [93] suggested the presence of similar or higher social synchrony between autistic pairs compared to non-autistic pairs under certain conditions, with participants including autistic children and autistic people who are nonverbal or minimally verbal.

Moreover, double empathy and bidirectional communication studies typically fail to take into account the vast differences in autism and factors like masking, which may possibly interfere with autistic people's ability to communicate and empathize with one another. Acknowledging these differences which may affect communication within and between autistic and non-autistic groups, a 2024 study by Gillespie-Smith et al. [156] suggested a need to (re)frame the double empathy problem to be understood as a Spectrum of Understanding, which sees double empathy in the context of a continuum of neurocommunicative learning, situated between poles of understanding and misunderstanding. In this sense, the Spectrum of Understanding simply illustrates that as individuals learn more about each other from direct interaction, their relationships tend to deepen, their comprehension of each other increases, and they become more able to empathize with each other.

It is important to note that conceptual replications and further studies on double empathy are needed in different groups, including siblings of autistic people, non-autistic pupils in schools including autistic peers, late-diagnosed autistic adults, parents of autistic children, and autism service providers. [157] [148]

Emphasizing that empathy and reciprocity are a "two-way street", [2] [72] Milton and many other researchers propose that further autism research should focus on bridging the double empathy gap by empowering autistic individuals, building rapport and appreciation for their worldview, educating non-autistic people about what being autistic means, and moving towards a more continuous understanding of neurodiversity. [16] [17] [85] [158] [159] [160] It has also been suggested that the medical model of autism – the traditional and dominant model of autism in which autism is viewed as a disorder and deficit [161] – should be moved away from due to its approach being too narrow, individualistic, and deficit-based, [162] as well as how its messaging could contribute to ableism, prejudice, and stigma towards autistic people, [121] [162] [163] [164] further widening this double empathy gap.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Crompton, Catherine J.; DeBrabander, Kilee; Heasman, Brett; Milton, Damian; Sasson, Noah J. (2021-05-11). "Double Empathy: Why Autistic People Are Often Misunderstood". Frontiers for Young Minds. 9: 554875. doi: 10.3389/frym.2021.554875. hdl: 20.500.11820/94ee032a-6103-470a-bc06-08337dd6b512. ISSN  2296-6846.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Milton, Damian E. M. (October 2012). "On the ontological status of autism: the 'double empathy problem'". Disability & Society. 27 (6): 883–887. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.710008. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  54047060.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Crompton, Catherine J.; Ropar, Danielle; Evans-Williams, Claire V. M.; Flynn, Emma G.; Fletcher-Watson, Sue (2020). "Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective". Autism. 24 (7): 1704–1712. doi: 10.1177/1362361320919286. PMC  7545656. PMID  32431157.
  4. ^ a b Sheppard, Elizabeth; Webb, Sophie; Wilkinson, Helen (2023-11-18). "Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions". Autism. doi: 10.1177/13623613231211457. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  37978869.
  5. ^ a b Szechy, Kathryn A.; Turk, Pamela D.; O'Donnell, Lisa A. (2023-08-17). "Autism and Employment Challenges: The Double Empathy Problem and Perceptions of an Autistic Employee in the Workplace". Autism in Adulthood. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0046. ISSN  2573-9581. S2CID  260998172.
  6. ^ a b c Komeda, Hidetsugu; Kosaka, Hirotaka; Saito, Daisuke N.; Mano, Yoko; Jung, Minyoung; Fujii, Takeshi; Yanaka, Hisakazu T.; Munesue, Toshio; Ishitobi, Makoto; Sato, Makoto; Okazawa, Hidehiko (2014-10-20). "Autistic empathy toward autistic others". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 10 (2). Oxford University Press: 145–152. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu126. ISSN  1749-5016. PMC  4321632. PMID  25332405.
  7. ^ a b Komeda, Hidetsugu; Kosaka, Hirotaka; Fujioka, Toru; Jung, Minyoung; Okazawa, Hidehiko (2019-06-04). "Do Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders Help Other People With Autism Spectrum Disorders? An Investigation of Empathy and Helping Motivation in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 10: 376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00376. ISSN  1664-0640. PMC  6558937. PMID  31231254.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Crompton, Catherine J.; Sharp, Martha; Axbey, Harriet; Fletcher-Watson, Sue; Flynn, Emma G.; Ropar, Danielle (2020). "Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport". Frontiers in Psychology. 11: 586171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171. PMC  7645034. PMID  33192918.
  9. ^ a b Chen, Yu-Lun; Senande, Laura L.; Thorsen, Michael; Patten, Kristie (2021). "Peer preferences and characteristics of same-group and cross-group social interactions among autistic and non-autistic adolescents". Autism. 25 (7): 1885–1900. doi: 10.1177/13623613211005918. PMC  8419288. PMID  34169757.
  10. ^ a b DeThorne, Laura S. (2020-03-01). "Revealing the Double Empathy Problem". The ASHA Leader. 25 (3): 58–65. doi: 10.1044/leader.ftr2.25042020.58. S2CID  216359201.
  11. ^ a b Baron-Cohen, Simon; Leslie, Alan M.; Frith, Uta (1985-10-01). "Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind" ?". Cognition. 21 (1): 37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8. ISSN  0010-0277. PMID  2934210. S2CID  14955234.
  12. ^ a b Baron-Cohen, Simon (1990-01-01). "Autism: A Specific Cognitive Disorder of 'Mind-Blindness'". International Review of Psychiatry. 2 (1): 81–90. doi: 10.3109/09540269009028274. ISSN  0954-0261.
  13. ^ a b c Boucher, Jill (2012). "Putting theory of mind in its place: psychological explanations of the socio-emotional-communicative impairments in autistic spectrum disorder". Autism. 16 (3): 226–246. doi: 10.1177/1362361311430403. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  22297199. S2CID  30738704.
  14. ^ a b Shanker, Stuart (2004-10-01). "The Roots of Mindblindness". Theory & Psychology. 14 (5): 685–703. doi: 10.1177/0959354304046179. ISSN  0959-3543. S2CID  143801835.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Gernsbacher, Morton Ann; Yergeau, Melanie (2019). "Empirical Failures of the Claim That Autistic People Lack a Theory of Mind". Archives of Scientific Psychology. 7 (1): 102–118. doi: 10.1037/arc0000067. PMC  6959478. PMID  31938672.
  16. ^ a b c d Milton, Damian (2018-03-02). "The double empathy problem". National Autistic Society. Retrieved 2023-03-19.
  17. ^ a b c d e Milton, Damian; Gurbuz, Emine; López, Beatriz (October 2022). "The 'double empathy problem': Ten years on". Autism. 26 (8): 1901–1903. doi: 10.1177/13623613221129123. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  36263746. S2CID  253020669.
  18. ^ a b Cassidy, Sarah; Bradley, Louise; Shaw, Rebecca; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2018-07-31). "Risk markers for suicidality in autistic adults". Molecular Autism. 9 (1): 42. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0226-4. ISSN  2040-2392. PMC  6069847. PMID  30083306.
  19. ^ a b Richards, Gareth; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2022-05-19). "Evidence of partner similarity for autistic traits, systemizing, and theory of mind via facial expressions". Scientific Reports. 12 (1): 8451. Bibcode: 2022NatSR..12.8451R. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11592-z. PMC  9118825. PMID  35589769.
  20. ^ a b "A Conversation About 'The Pattern Seekers' by Simon Baron-Cohen". 2020-12-19.
  21. ^ Wright, Robert; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2023-06-21). "Autism and the Two Kinds of Empathy". YouTube. Retrieved 2023-06-25.
  22. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (1988-10-01). "Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 18 (3): 379–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02212194. PMID  3049519. S2CID  2050249.
  23. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon; Campbell, Ruth; Karmiloff-Smith, Annette; Grant, Julia; Walker, Jane (November 1995). "Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes?". British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 13 (4): 379–398. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00687.x. S2CID  34341464.
  24. ^ Frith, Uta (2004). "Emanuel Miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45 (4): 672–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00262.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  15056300.
  25. ^ Gallagher, Helen L.; Frith, Christopher D. (2003-02-01). "Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (2): 77–83. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6. ISSN  1364-6613. PMID  12584026. S2CID  14873867.
  26. ^ Wilkinson, Lee A. (2011), "Mindblindness", in Goldstein, Sam; Naglieri, Jack A. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 955–956, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1795, ISBN  978-0-387-77579-1
  27. ^ Kellogg, Ronald Thomas (2007). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN  978-1-4129-3692-7. OCLC  77520655.
  28. ^ Kirk, Samuel A.; Gallagher, James; Coleman, Mary Ruth; Anastasiow, Nicholas J. (2008). Educating exceptional children (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN  978-0-547-12413-1. OCLC  276275401.
  29. ^ Myers, David G. (2010). Myers' psychology for AP (1st ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. ISBN  978-1-4292-4436-7. OCLC  670478661.
  30. ^ Myers, David G. (2011). Exploring psychology (8th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. ISBN  978-1-4292-1635-7. OCLC  568677536.
  31. ^ Mash, Eric J.; Wolfe, David A. (2016). Abnormal child psychology (6th ed.). Australia: Cengage Learning. ISBN  978-1-305-10542-3. OCLC  908991427.
  32. ^ Coon, Dennis; Mitterer, John O.; Martini, Tanya (2018). Psychology : modules for active learning (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN  978-1-305-96411-2. OCLC  990766461.
  33. ^ Sigelman, Carol K.; Rider, Elizabeth A. (2018). Life-span human development (9th ed.). Australia: Cengage Learning. ISBN  978-1-337-51606-8. OCLC  1100692276.
  34. ^ Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (2018-02-25). "Critical Review of Autism and Theory and Mind: A Tech Report". Open Science Framework. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3R2QY.
  35. ^ a b c Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (February 2007). "On Not Being Human". APS Observer. 20 (2): 5–32. ISSN  1050-4672. PMC  4266404. PMID  25520547.
  36. ^ Yergeau, Melanie (2013-09-05). "Clinically Significant Disturbance: On Theorists Who Theorize Theory of Mind". Disability Studies Quarterly. 33 (4). doi: 10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3876. ISSN  2159-8371.
  37. ^ Yergeau, Melanie; Huebner, Bryce (2017-09-06). "Minding Theory of Mind: Minding Theory of Mind". Journal of Social Philosophy. 48 (3): 273–296. doi: 10.1111/josp.12191.
  38. ^ Willey, Angela; Subramaniam, Banu; Hamilton, Jennifer A.; Couperus, Jane (2015). "The Mating Life of Geeks: Love, Neuroscience, and the New Autistic Subject". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 40 (2): 369–391. doi: 10.1086/678146. ISSN  0097-9740. S2CID  146561474.
  39. ^ Barnbaum, Deborah R. (2008). The ethics of autism : among them, but not of them. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN  978-0-253-22013-4. OCLC  560616889.
  40. ^ Singer, Tania; Fehr, Ernst (2005-04-01). "The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy". American Economic Review. 95 (2): 340–345. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670103. hdl: 10419/33340. ISSN  0002-8282. PMID  29125271. S2CID  1480492.
  41. ^ Boyer, Pascal (2003-03-31). "Functional origins of religious concepts: ontological and strategic selection in evolved minds". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 6 (2): 195–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00012.
  42. ^ Scassellati, Brian (2002). "Theory of mind for a humanoid robot". Autonomous Robots. 12 (1): 13–24. doi: 10.1023/A:1013298507114. S2CID  1979315.
  43. ^ Barnes, Jennifer L. (2012). "Fiction, imagination, and social cognition: Insights from autism". Poetics. 40 (4): 299–316. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2012.05.001.
  44. ^ a b Dinishak, Janette; Akhtar, Nameera (June 2013). "A Critical Examination of Mindblindness as a Metaphor for Autism". Child Development Perspectives. 7 (2): 110–114. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12026.
  45. ^ Ozonoff, Sally; Pennington, Bruce F.; Rogers, Sally J. (1991). "Executive Function Deficits in High-Functioning Autistic Individuals: Relationship to Theory of Mind". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 32 (7): 1081–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  1787138.
  46. ^ Oswald, Donald P.; Ollendick, Thomas H. (1989). "Role taking and social competence in autism and mental retardation". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 19 (1): 119–127. doi: 10.1007/BF02212723. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  2708295. S2CID  46444974.
  47. ^ Tager-Flusberg, Helen; Sullivan, Kate (1994). "A second look at second-order belief attribution in autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 24 (5): 577–586. doi: 10.1007/BF02172139. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  7814307. S2CID  25194344.
  48. ^ Toal, F.; Daly, E. M.; Page, L.; Deeley, Q.; Hallahan, B.; Bloemen, O.; Cutter, W. J.; Brammer, M. J.; Curran, S.; Robertson, D.; Murphy, C.; Murphy, K. C.; Murphy, D. G. M. (July 2010). "Clinical and anatomical heterogeneity in autistic spectrum disorder: a structural MRI study". Psychological Medicine. 40 (7): 1171–1181. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991541. ISSN  0033-2917. PMID  19891805. S2CID  10216391.
  49. ^ Lenroot, Rhoshel K.; Yeung, Pui Ka (2013). "Heterogeneity within Autism Spectrum Disorders: What have We Learned from Neuroimaging Studies?". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7: 733. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00733. ISSN  1662-5161. PMC  3812662. PMID  24198778.
  50. ^ Chapman, Robert (2020-08-17). "The reality of autism: On the metaphysics of disorder and diversity". Philosophical Psychology. 33 (6): 799–819. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1751103. hdl: 1983/309dc16c-cfe9-4356-81b8-6d95510b5eb0. ISSN  0951-5089. S2CID  203059811.
  51. ^ Livingston, Lucy A.; Shah, Punit; White, Sarah J.; Happé, Francesca (2021-07-10). "Further developing the Frith–Happé animations: A quicker, more objective, and web-based test of theory of mind for autistic and neurotypical adults". Autism Research. 14 (9): 1905–1912. doi: 10.1002/aur.2575. ISSN  1939-3792. PMID  34245112. S2CID  235786838.
  52. ^ a b Baron-Cohen, Simon; Wheelwright, Sally; Hill, Jacqueline; Raste, Yogini; Plumb, Ian (February 2001). "The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 42 (2): 241–251. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  11280420. S2CID  3016793.
  53. ^ Yeung, Michael K. (2022-02-01). "A systematic review and meta-analysis of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorder: The specificity of deficits and the role of task characteristics". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 133: 104518. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.104518. ISSN  0149-7634. PMID  34974069. S2CID  245591561.
  54. ^ a b c Fletcher-Watson, Sue; Bird, Geoffrey (2019-11-01). "Autism and empathy: What are the real links?". Autism. 24 (1): 3–6. doi: 10.1177/1362361319883506. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  31674189. S2CID  207816582.
  55. ^ Rajendran, Gnanathusharan; Mitchell, Peter (2007). "Cognitive theories of autism". Developmental Review. 27 (2): 224–260. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.02.001. S2CID  34448439.
  56. ^ Fletcher-Watson, Sue; McConnell, Fiona; Manola, Eirini; McConachie, Helen (2014-03-21). "Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD)". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (3): CD008785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008785.pub2. PMC  6923148. PMID  24652601.
  57. ^ Sandbank, Micheal; Bottema-Beutel, Kristen; Crowley, Shannon; Cassidy, Margaret; Dunham, Kacie; Feldman, Jacob I.; Crank, Jenna; Albarran, Susanne A.; Raj, Sweeya; Mahbub, Prachy; Woynaroski, Tiffany G. (2020). "Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children". Psychological Bulletin. 146 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1037/bul0000215. ISSN  1939-1455. PMC  8783568. PMID  31763860.
  58. ^ Bogdashina, Olga (2016). Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger syndrome : different sensory experiences – different perceptual worlds (2nd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN  978-1-84905-673-1. OCLC  922835761.
  59. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (2008). "Theories of the autistic mind". The Psychologist. 21: 112–116.
  60. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (2009). "Autism: The Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S) Theory". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1156 (1): 68–80. Bibcode: 2009NYASA1156...68B. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x. PMID  19338503. S2CID  1440395.
  61. ^ Baron-Cohen, Simon (2010-11-20), Savic, Ivanka (ed.), "Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism", Progress in Brain Research, Sex Differences in the Human Brain, their Underpinnings and Implications, 186, Elsevier: 167–175, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53630-3.00011-7, ISBN  9780444536303, PMID  21094892
  62. ^ Bailey, Anthony; Phillips, Wendy; Rutter, Michael (1996). "Autism: Towards an Integration of Clinical, Genetic, Neuropsychological, and Neurobiological Perspectives". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 37 (1): 89–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01381.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  8655659.
  63. ^ Bauminger, Nirit; Kasari, Connie (1999). "Brief report: Theory of mind in high-functioning children with autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 29 (1): 81–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1025974701090. PMID  10097997. S2CID  42761063.
  64. ^ Beversdorf, D. Q.; Anderson, J. M.; Manning, S. E.; Anderson, S. L.; Nordgren, R. E.; Felopulos, G. J.; Nadeau, S. E.; Heilman, K. M.; Bauman, M. L. (1998-11-01). "The effect of semantic and emotional context on written recall for verbal language in high functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 65 (5): 685–692. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.685. ISSN  0022-3050. PMC  2170365. PMID  9810938.
  65. ^ Buitelaar, Jan K.; Wees, Marleen van der; Swaab-Barneveld, Hanna; Gaag, Rutger Jan van der (1999). "Verbal Memory and Performance IQ Predict Theory of Mind and Emotion Recognition Ability in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders and in Psychiatric Control Children". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 40 (6): 869–881. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00505. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  10509882.
  66. ^ Ozonoff, Sally; Rogers, Sally J.; Pennington, Bruce F. (1991). "Asperger's Syndrome: Evidence of an Empirical Distinction from High-Functioning Autism". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 32 (7): 1107–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00352.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  1787139.
  67. ^ Baksh, R. Asaad; Abrahams, Sharon; Bertlich, Maya; Cameron, Rebecca; Jany, Sharon; Dorrian, Terin; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Allison, Carrie; Smith, Paula; MacPherson, Sarah E.; Auyeung, Bonnie (2021-10-03). "Social cognition in adults with autism spectrum disorders: Validation of the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT)". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 35 (7): 1275–1293. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1737236. hdl: 20.500.11820/ea02ab9c-73be-4e85-916a-7612aa640013. ISSN  1385-4046. PMID  32189564. S2CID  151487088.
  68. ^ Greenberg, David M.; Warrier, Varun; Allison, Carrie; Baron-Cohen, Simon (2018-11-27). "Testing the Empathizing–Systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (48): 12152–12157. Bibcode: 2018PNAS..11512152G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811032115. ISSN  0027-8424. PMC  6275492. PMID  30420503.
  69. ^ Lombardo, Michael V.; Lai, Meng-Chuan; Auyeung, Bonnie; Holt, Rosemary J.; Allison, Carrie; Smith, Paula; Chakrabarti, Bhismadev; Ruigrok, Amber N. V.; Suckling, John; Bullmore, Edward T.; MRC AIMS Consortium; Bailey, Anthony J.; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Bolton, Patrick F.; Bullmore, Edward T. (2016-10-18). "Unsupervised data-driven stratification of mentalizing heterogeneity in autism". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 35333. Bibcode: 2016NatSR...635333.. doi: 10.1038/srep35333. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  5067562. PMID  27752054.
  70. ^ Hajdúk, Michal; Pinkham, Amy E.; Penn, David L.; Harvey, Philip D.; Sasson, Noah J. (April 2022). "Heterogeneity of social cognitive performance in autism and schizophrenia". Autism Research. 15 (8): 1522–1534. doi: 10.1002/aur.2730. ISSN  1939-3792. PMID  35460541. S2CID  248345497.
  71. ^ Bird, G.; Cook, R. (2013-07-23). "Mixed emotions: the contribution of alexithymia to the emotional symptoms of autism". Translational Psychiatry. 3 (7): e285. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.61. ISSN  2158-3188. PMC  3731793. PMID  23880881.
  72. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (2006). "Toward a Behavior of Reciprocity". The Journal of Developmental Processes. 1 (1): 139–152. PMC  4296736. PMID  25598865.
  73. ^ a b Constantino, John N. (2002). The social responsiveness scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  74. ^ Constantino, John N.; Todd, Richard D. (May 2003). "Autistic Traits in the General Population: A Twin Study". Archives of General Psychiatry. 60 (5): 524–530. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.524. ISSN  0003-990X. PMID  12742874.
  75. ^ Constantino, John N.; Gruber, Christian P.; Davis, Sandra; Hayes, Stephanie; Passanante, Natalie; Przybeck, Thomas (May 2004). "The factor structure of autistic traits". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45 (4): 719–726. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00266.x. ISSN  0021-9630. PMID  15056304.
  76. ^ Towbin, Kenneth E.; Pradella, Anne; Gorrindo, Tristan; Pine, Daniel S.; Leibenluft, Ellen (June 2005). "Autism Spectrum Traits in Children with Mood and Anxiety Disorders". Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 15 (3): 452–464. doi: 10.1089/cap.2005.15.452. ISSN  1044-5463. PMID  16092910.
  77. ^ Nguyen, Phuong H.; Ocansey, Maku E.; Miller, Meghan; Le, Dung T. K.; Schmidt, Rebecca J.; Prado, Elizabeth L. (2019-07-29). "The reliability and validity of the social responsiveness scale to measure autism symptomology in Vietnamese children". Autism Research. 12 (11): 1706–1718. doi: 10.1002/aur.2179. ISSN  1939-3792. PMC  7397486. PMID  31355545.
  78. ^ Kerr-Gaffney, Jess; Harrison, Amy; Tchanturia, Kate (July 2020). "The social responsiveness scale is an efficient screening tool for autism spectrum disorder traits in adults with anorexia nervosa". European Eating Disorders Review. 28 (4): 433–444. doi: 10.1002/erv.2736. ISSN  1072-4133. PMC  8653883. PMID  32243021.
  79. ^ Jackson-Perry, David (2017-09-14). "Autism and Asperger syndrome in adults". Disability & Society. 32 (8): 1280–1282. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1362181. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  149435804.
  80. ^ Rogers, Kimberley; Dziobek, Isabel; Hassenstab, Jason; Wolf, Oliver T.; Convit, Antonio (2007-04-01). "Who Cares? Revisiting Empathy in Asperger Syndrome". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 37 (4): 709–715. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0197-8. ISSN  1573-3432. PMID  16906462. S2CID  13999363.
  81. ^ Wassink, T. H.; Piven, J.; Vieland, V. J.; Pietila, J.; Goedken, R. J.; Folstein, S. E.; Sheffield, V. C. (2004-04-06). "Examination of AVPR1a as an autism susceptibility gene". Molecular Psychiatry. 9 (10): 968–972. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001503. ISSN  1359-4184. PMID  15098001. S2CID  238751.
  82. ^ Marocchini, Eleonora (2023-02-01). "Impairment or difference? The case of Theory of Mind abilities and pragmatic competence in the Autism Spectrum". Applied Psycholinguistics. 44 (3): 365–383. doi: 10.1017/S0142716423000024. ISSN  0142-7164. S2CID  256541508.
  83. ^ Rozsa, Matthew (2021-06-06). "Being autistic may amount to a language difference — not an impairment". Salon. Retrieved 2023-03-19.
  84. ^ a b c d Rifai, Olivia M.; Fletcher-Watson, Sue; Jiménez-Sánchez, Lorena; Crompton, Catherine J. (2022-03-01). "Investigating Markers of Rapport in Autistic and Nonautistic Interactions". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (1): 3–11. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0017. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992924. PMID  36600904.
  85. ^ a b c d Scheerer, Nichole E.; Boucher, Troy Q.; Sasson, Noah J.; Iarocci, Grace (2022-09-01). "Effects of an Educational Presentation About Autism on High School Students' Perceptions of Autistic Adults". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (3): 203–213. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0046. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  9645669. PMID  36606156.
  86. ^ a b Bolis, Dimitris; Lahnakoski, Juha M.; Seidel, Daniela; Tamm, Jeanette; Schilbach, Leonhard (2020-10-26). "Interpersonal similarity of autistic traits predicts friendship quality". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 16 (1–2). Oxford University Press: 222–231. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa147. ISSN  1749-5016. PMC  7812635. PMID  33104781.
  87. ^ a b Morrison, Kerrianne E.; Debrabander, Kilee M.; Jones, Desiree R.; Faso, Daniel J.; Ackerman, Robert A.; Sasson, Noah J. (2020). "Outcomes of real-world social interaction for autistic adults paired with autistic compared to typically developing partners". Autism. 24 (5): 1067–1080. doi: 10.1177/1362361319892701. PMID  31823656. S2CID  209317731.
  88. ^ a b c Crompton, Catherine J.; Hallett, Sonny; Ropar, Danielle; Flynn, Emma; Fletcher-Watson, Sue (2020). "'I never realised everybody felt as happy as I do when I am around autistic people': A thematic analysis of autistic adults' relationships with autistic and neurotypical friends and family". Autism. 24 (6): 1438–1448. doi: 10.1177/1362361320908976. PMC  7376620. PMID  32148068.
  89. ^ a b Williams, Gemma L.; Wharton, Tim; Jagoe, Caroline (2021). "Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic "Impairments" Using Relevance Theory". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 616664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664. PMC  8117104. PMID  33995177.
  90. ^ Chen, Yu-Lun; Schneider, Maxwell; Patten, Kristie (2022-07-22). "Exploring the role of interpersonal contexts in peer relationships among autistic and non-autistic youth in integrated education". Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 946651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946651. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  9355587. PMID  35936294.
  91. ^ a b c d Heasman, Brett; Gillespie, Alex (2018). "Perspective-taking is two-sided: Misunderstandings between people with Asperger's syndrome and their family members". Autism. 22 (6): 740–750. doi: 10.1177/1362361317708287. ISSN  1362-3613. PMC  6055325. PMID  28683569.
  92. ^ a b Granieri, Jessica E.; McNair, Morgan L.; Gerber, Alan H.; Reifler, Rebecca F.; Lerner, Matthew D. (2020-06-04). "Atypical social communication is associated with positive initial impressions among peers with autism spectrum disorder". Autism. 24 (7): 1841–1848. doi: 10.1177/1362361320924906. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  32498545. S2CID  219331201.
  93. ^ a b Glass, Devyn; Yuill, Nicola (2023-06-13). "Moving Together: Social Motor Synchrony in Autistic Peer Partners Depends on Partner and Activity Type". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05917-8. ISSN  1573-3432. PMID  37310543. S2CID  259147542.
  94. ^ Milton, Damian E. M. (2016-11-25). "Disposable dispositions: reflections upon the work of Iris Marion Young in relation to the social oppression of autistic people". Disability & Society. 31 (10): 1403–1407. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1263468. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  151500732.
  95. ^ Chapman, Robert (2019-07-04). "Autism as a Form of Life: Wittgenstein and the Psychological Coherence of Autism: Autism as a Form of Life". Metaphilosophy. 50 (4): 421–440. doi: 10.1111/meta.12366. S2CID  181423539.
  96. ^ Bolis, Dimitris; Balsters, Joshua; Wenderoth, Nicole; Becchio, Cristina; Schilbach, Leonhard (2017). "Beyond Autism: Introducing the Dialectical Misattunement Hypothesis and a Bayesian Account of Intersubjectivity". Psychopathology. 50 (6): 355–372. doi: 10.1159/000484353. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-002E-0068-A. ISSN  0254-4962. PMID  29232684. S2CID  3595888.
  97. ^ Eastwood, Steven; Evans, Bonnie; Gaigg, Sebastian; Harbord, Janet; Milton, Damian (2022-02-07). "Autism through cinema: co-creation and the unmaking of knowledge". International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education: 1–18. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2022.2025492. ISSN  0951-8398. S2CID  246669071.
  98. ^ Gaudion, Katie; Hall, Ashley; Myerson, Jeremy; Pellicano, Liz (June 2014). "Design and wellbeing: Bridging the empathy gap between neurotypical designers and autistic adults" (PDF). Design for Sustainable Wellbeing and Empowerment. 2014: 61–77.
  99. ^ Sasson, Noah J.; Faso, Daniel J.; Nugent, Jack; Lovell, Sarah; Kennedy, Daniel P.; Grossman, Ruth B. (2017-02-01). "Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 40700. Bibcode: 2017NatSR...740700S. doi: 10.1038/srep40700. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  5286449. PMID  28145411.
  100. ^ a b Treweek, Caroline; Wood, Chantelle; Martin, Jilly; Freeth, Megan (April 2019). "Autistic people's perspectives on stereotypes: An interpretative phenomenological analysis". Autism. 23 (3): 759–769. doi: 10.1177/1362361318778286. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  29848001. S2CID  44086997.
  101. ^ Chown, Nicholas (2014-11-26). "More on the ontological status of autism and double empathy". Disability & Society. 29 (10): 1672–1676. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2014.949625. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  143826899.
  102. ^ Sucksmith, E.; Allison, C.; Baron-Cohen, S.; Chakrabarti, B.; Hoekstra, R. A. (2013-01-01). "Empathy and emotion recognition in people with autism, first-degree relatives, and controls". Neuropsychologia. 51 (1): 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.013. ISSN  0028-3932. PMC  6345368. PMID  23174401.
  103. ^ Odom, S. L.; Strain, P. S. (1986). "A comparison of peer-initiation and teacher-antecedent interventions for promoting reciprocal social interaction of autistic preschoolers". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 19 (1): 59–71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-59. PMC  1308041. PMID  3710949.
  104. ^ McEvoy, Mary A.; Nordquist, Vey M.; Twardosz, Sandra; Heckaman, Kelly A.; Wehby, Joseph H.; Denny, R. Kenton (1988). "Promoting autistic children's peer interaction in an integrated early childhood setting using affection activities". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 21 (2): 193–200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-193. PMC  1286111. PMID  3417581.
  105. ^ Dawson, Geraldine; Adams, Alexandra (June 1984). "Imitation and social responsiveness in autistic children". Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 12 (2): 209–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00910664. ISSN  0091-0627. PMID  6725782. S2CID  36581183.
  106. ^ Tiegerman, Ellenmorris; Primavera, Louis H. (March 1984). "Imitating the autistic child: Facilitating communicative gaze behavior". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 14 (1): 27–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02408553. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  6706896. S2CID  38198496.
  107. ^ Dawson, Geraldine; Galpert, Larry (April 1990). "Mothers' use of imitative play for facilitating social responsiveness and toy play in young autistic children". Development and Psychopathology. 2 (2): 151–162. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400000675. ISSN  0954-5794. S2CID  145739085.
  108. ^ a b McGee, Gail G.; Almeida, M. Connie; Sulzer-Azaroff, Beth; Feldman, Robert S. (1992). "Promoting reciprocal interactions via peer incidental teaching". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 25 (1): 117–126. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-117. PMC  1279660. PMID  1582961.
  109. ^ Pearson, Amy; Rose, Kieran (2021-03-01). "A Conceptual Analysis of Autistic Masking: Understanding the Narrative of Stigma and the Illusion of Choice". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (1): 52–60. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0043. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992880. PMID  36601266.
  110. ^ Petrolini, Valentina; Rodríguez-Armendariz, Ekaine; Vicente, Agustín (2023). "Autistic camouflaging across the spectrum". New Ideas in Psychology. 68: 100992. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100992. hdl: 10810/59712. S2CID  253316582.
  111. ^ Cage, Eilidh; Cranney, Rebekah; Botha, Monique (2022-09-01). "Brief Report: Does Autistic Community Connectedness Moderate the Relationship Between Masking and Wellbeing?". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (3): 247–253. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0096. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  9645674. PMID  36606159.
  112. ^ Drake, Kimberly (2022-04-19). "Masking in Autism: The 'Why' Matters". Psych Central. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
  113. ^ a b c d Botha, Monique; Dibb, Bridget; Frost, David M. (2022-03-16). ""Autism is me": an investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma". Disability & Society. 37 (3): 427–453. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1822782. hdl: 1893/32042. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  225116488.
  114. ^ Dickter, Cheryl L.; Burk, Joshua A.; Zeman, Janice L.; Taylor, Sara C. (2020-06-01). "Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults". Autism in Adulthood. 2 (2): 144–151. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0023. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992843. PMID  36601572. S2CID  212921826.
  115. ^ Humphrey, Neil; Hebron, Judith (2015-08-03). "Bullying of children and adolescents with autism spectrum conditions: a 'state of the field' review". International Journal of Inclusive Education. 19 (8): 845–862. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2014.981602. ISSN  1360-3116. S2CID  12261937.
  116. ^ Weiss, Jonathan A.; Fardella, Michelle A. (2018-05-25). "Victimization and Perpetration Experiences of Adults With Autism". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 9: 203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00203. ISSN  1664-0640. PMC  5980973. PMID  29887806.
  117. ^ Schroeder, Jessica H.; Cappadocia, M. Catherine; Bebko, James M.; Pepler, Debra J.; Weiss, Jonathan A. (July 2014). "Shedding Light on a Pervasive Problem: A Review of Research on Bullying Experiences Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44 (7): 1520–1534. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-2011-8. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  24464616. S2CID  254567709.
  118. ^ Shtayermman, Oren (2007). "Peer Victimization in Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome: A Link to Depressive Symptomatology, Anxiety Symptomatology and Suicidal Ideation". Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing. 30 (3): 87–107. doi: 10.1080/01460860701525089. ISSN  0146-0862. PMID  17885828. S2CID  38242770.
  119. ^ Fisher, Marisa H.; Taylor, Julie Lounds (May 2016). "Let's talk about it: Peer victimization experiences as reported by adolescents with autism spectrum disorder". Autism. 20 (4): 402–411. doi: 10.1177/1362361315585948. ISSN  1362-3613. PMC  4662636. PMID  26019304.
  120. ^ a b c Botha, Monique (2021-09-28). "Academic, Activist, or Advocate? Angry, Entangled, and Emerging: A Critical Reflection on Autism Knowledge Production". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 727542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727542. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  8506216. PMID  34650484.
  121. ^ a b c d Botha, Monique; Cage, Eilidh (2022-11-24). ""Autism research is in crisis": A mixed method study of researcher's constructions of autistic people and autism research". Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 1050897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050897. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  9730396. PMID  36506950.
  122. ^ "Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities" (PDF). United Nations General Assembly (43rd ed.). 2019-12-17. Retrieved 2023-06-05.
  123. ^ a b Atherton, Gray; Cross, Liam (2018-04-17). "Seeing More Than Human: Autism and Anthropomorphic Theory of Mind". Frontiers in Psychology. 9: 528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00528. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  5932358. PMID  29755383.
  124. ^ White, Rebekah; Remington, Anna (2018). "Object personification in autism: This paper will be very sad if you don't read it". Autism. 23 (4): 1042–1045. doi: 10.1177/1362361318793408. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  30101594. S2CID  51969215.
  125. ^ Cross, Liam; Piovesan, Andrea; Atherton, Gray (2022-07-20). "Autistic people outperform neurotypicals in a cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes". Autism Research. 15 (9): 1603–1608. doi: 10.1002/aur.2782. ISSN  1939-3792. PMC  9543219. PMID  35855595.
  126. ^ Prothmann, Anke; Ettrich, Christine; Prothmann, Sascha (2009). "Preference for, and Responsiveness to, People, Dogs and Objects in Children with Autism". Anthrozoös. 22 (2): 161–171. doi: 10.2752/175303709X434185. ISSN  0892-7936. S2CID  143563380.
  127. ^ Lam, Gary Yu Hin; Holden, Emily; Fitzpatrick, Megan; Raffaele Mendez, Linda; Berkman, Karen (2020-01-22). ""Different but connected": Participatory action research using Photovoice to explore well-being in autistic young adults". Autism. 24 (5): 1246–1259. doi: 10.1177/1362361319898961. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  31968999. S2CID  210864853.
  128. ^ Miralles, Aurélien; Grandgeorge, Marine; Raymond, Michel (2022-04-15). "Self-perceived empathic abilities of people with autism towards living beings mostly differs for humans". Scientific Reports. 12 (1): 6300. Bibcode: 2022NatSR..12.6300M. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10353-2. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  9012821. PMID  35428857.
  129. ^ Spikins, Penny; Wright, Barry; Hodgson, Derek (2016-10-01). "Are there alternative adaptive strategies to human pro-sociality? The role of collaborative morality in the emergence of personality variation and autistic traits". Time and Mind. 9 (4): 289–313. doi: 10.1080/1751696X.2016.1244949. ISSN  1751-696X. S2CID  151820168.
  130. ^ Hadjikhani, N.; Zürcher, N. R.; Rogier, O.; Hippolyte, L.; Lemonnier, E.; Ruest, T.; Ward, N.; Lassalle, A.; Gillberg, N.; Billstedt, E.; Helles, A.; Gillberg, C.; Solomon, P.; Prkachin, K. M.; Gillberg, C. (2014-01-14). "Emotional contagion for pain is intact in autism spectrum disorders". Translational Psychiatry. 4 (1): e343. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.113. ISSN  2158-3188. PMC  3905223. PMID  24424389.
  131. ^ a b Milton, Damian E. M. (2014). "Autistic expertise: A critical reflection on the production of knowledge in autism studies". Autism. 18 (7): 794–802. doi: 10.1177/1362361314525281. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  24637428. S2CID  206715678.
  132. ^ Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (2017-08-06). "Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 58 (7): 859–861. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12706. PMC  5545113. PMID  28621486.
  133. ^ Charlton, James I. (1998). Nothing about us without us : disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN  978-0-520-92544-1. OCLC  42417786.
  134. ^ Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Hanna; Chown, Nick; Stenning, Anna (2020). Neurodiversity studies : a new critical paradigm. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN  978-0-429-32229-7. OCLC  1150829242.
  135. ^ Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen; Kapp, Steven K.; Brooks, Patricia J.; Pickens, Jonathan; Schwartzman, Ben (2017). "Whose Expertise Is It? Evidence for Autistic Adults as Critical Autism Experts". Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00438. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  5368186. PMID  28400742.
  136. ^ Cage, Eilidh; Di Monaco, Jessica; Newell, Victoria (2019-11-21). "Understanding, attitudes and dehumanisation towards autistic people". Autism. 23 (6): 1373–1383. doi: 10.1177/1362361318811290. hdl: 1893/30633. ISSN  1362-3613. PMID  30463431. S2CID  53722683.
  137. ^ Luterman, Sara (2019-07-15). "What it's like to be autistic at an autism research conference". Spectrum. Simons Foundation. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  138. ^ Rose, Kieran (2020-02-29). "Regarding the use of dehumanising rhetoric". The Autistic Advocate. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  139. ^ Michael, Cos (2021-06-01). "Is Being Othered a Co-Occurring Condition of Autism?". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (2): 118–119. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0019. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992897. PMID  36601468.
  140. ^ Cowen, Tyler (2009-07-13). "Autism as Academic Paradigm". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  141. ^ Liu, Ka-Yuet; King, Marissa; Bearman, Peter S. (March 2010). "Social Influence and the Autism Epidemic". American Journal of Sociology. 115 (5): 1387–1434. doi: 10.1086/651448. ISSN  0002-9602. PMC  2927813. PMID  20503647.
  142. ^ Camus, Lorna; Macmillan, Kirsty; Rajendran, Gnanathusharan; Stewart, Mary (2022-05-10). "'I too, need to belong': Autistic adults' perspectives on misunderstandings and well-being". PsyArXiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/5mysh.
  143. ^ Redman, S.; Downie, M.; Rennison, R.; Batten, A. (2009). Don't write me off : make the system fair for people with autism. London: National Autistic Society.
  144. ^ Baldwin, Susanna; Costley, Debra; Warren, Anthony (October 2014). "Employment Activities and Experiences of Adults with High-Functioning Autism and Asperger's Disorder". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44 (10): 2440–2449. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2112-z. ISSN  0162-3257. PMID  24715257. S2CID  254569665.
  145. ^ "Criminal Legal System - Autistic Self Advocacy Network". Autistic Self Advocacy Network. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 2023-03-26.
  146. ^ Hirvikoski, Tatja; Mittendorfer-Rutz, Ellenor; Boman, Marcus; Larsson, Henrik; Lichtenstein, Paul; Bölte, Sven (March 2016). "Premature mortality in autism spectrum disorder". British Journal of Psychiatry. 208 (3): 232–238. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.160192. ISSN  0007-1250. PMID  26541693. S2CID  25884060.
  147. ^ Yergeau, Melanie (2018). Authoring autism : on rhetoric and neurological queerness. North Carolina, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822372189. ISBN  978-0-8223-7218-9. OCLC  982501293.
  148. ^ a b Yeung, Siu Kit (2022-07-21). "Directions for Open Scholarship in Autism – Embracing Open Scholarship to Meaningfully Improve Lives of Autistic People Together". PsyArXiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/xzkjh.
  149. ^ Bilder, Deborah; Botts, Elizabeth L.; Smith, Ken R.; Pimentel, Richard; Farley, Megan; Viskochil, Joseph; McMahon, William M.; Block, Heidi; Ritvo, Edward; Ritvo, Riva-Ariella; Coon, Hilary (2012-09-25). "Excess Mortality and Causes of Death in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Follow up of the 1980s Utah/UCLA Autism Epidemiologic Study". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 43 (5): 1196–1204. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1664-z. ISSN  0162-3257. PMC  4814267. PMID  23008058.
  150. ^ Polyak, Andrew; Kubina, Richard M.; Girirajan, Santhosh (2015-07-22). "Comorbidity of intellectual disability confounds ascertainment of autism: implications for genetic diagnosis". American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 168 (7): 600–608. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32338. PMID  26198689. S2CID  7635120.
  151. ^ Katusic, Maja Z.; Myers, Scott M.; Weaver, Amy L.; Voigt, Robert G. (2021-12-01). "IQ in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Population-Based Birth Cohort Study". Pediatrics. 148 (6): e2020049899. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049899. ISSN  0031-4005. PMID  34851412. S2CID  243762735.
  152. ^ Shenouda, Josephine; Barrett, Emily; Davidow, Amy L.; Sidwell, Kate; Lescott, Cara; Halperin, William; Silenzio, Vincent M. B.; Zahorodny, Walter (2023-02-01). "Prevalence and Disparities in the Detection of Autism Without Intellectual Disability". Pediatrics. 151 (2): e2022056594. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-056594. ISSN  0031-4005. PMID  36700335. S2CID  256273971.
  153. ^ McKenzie, Katherine; Milton, Meagan; Smith, Glenys; Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène (2016-04-15). "Systematic Review of the Prevalence and Incidence of Intellectual Disabilities: Current Trends and Issues". Current Developmental Disorders Reports. 3 (2): 104–115. doi: 10.1007/s40474-016-0085-7. ISSN  2196-2987. S2CID  76296047.
  154. ^ McBride, Orla; Heslop, Pauline; Glover, Gyles; Taggart, Laurence; Hanna-Trainor, Lisa; Shevlin, Mark; Murphy, Jamie (2021-01-28). "Prevalence estimation of intellectual disability using national administrative and household survey data: The importance of survey question specificity". International Journal of Population Data Science. 6 (1): 1342. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1342. ISSN  2399-4908. PMC  8188522. PMID  34164584.
  155. ^ Brignell, Amanda; Chenausky, Karen V.; Song, Huan; Zhu, Jianwei; Suo, Chen; Morgan, Angela T. (2018-11-05). "Communication interventions for autism spectrum disorder in minimally verbal children". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 (11): CD012324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012324.pub2. PMC  6516977. PMID  30395694.
  156. ^ Gillespie-Smith, Karri; Mair, Ally Pax Arcari; Alabtullatif, Aljawharah; Pain, Helen; McConachie, Doug (2024-02-16). "A Spectrum of Understanding: A Qualitative Exploration of Autistic Adults' Understandings and Perceptions of Friendship(s)". Autism in Adulthood. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0051. ISSN  2573-9581.
  157. ^ Mitchell, Peter; Sheppard, Elizabeth; Cassidy, Sarah (2021). "Autism and the double empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health". British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 39 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12350. PMID  33393101. S2CID  230489027.
  158. ^ Kapp, Steven K.; Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen; Sherman, Lauren E.; Hutman, Ted (2013). "Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity". Developmental Psychology. 49 (1): 59–71. doi: 10.1037/a0028353. ISSN  1939-0599. PMID  22545843.
  159. ^ Jaarsma, Pier; Welin, Stellan (2012). "Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement". Health Care Analysis. 20 (1): 20–30. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9. ISSN  1065-3058. PMID  21311979. S2CID  18618887.
  160. ^ Chapple, Melissa; Davis, Philip; Billington, Josie; Myrick, Joe Anthony; Ruddock, Cassie; Corcoran, Rhiannon (2021-07-27). "Overcoming the Double Empathy Problem Within Pairs of Autistic and Non-autistic Adults Through the Contemplation of Serious Literature". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 708375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708375. ISSN  1664-1078. PMC  8354525. PMID  34385964.
  161. ^ Milton, Damian E. M.; Bracher, Mike (June 2013). "Autistics speak but are they heard?". Medical Sociology Online. 7 (2): 61–69.
  162. ^ a b Pellicano, Elizabeth; den Houting, Jacquiline (November 2021). "Annual Research Review: Shifting from 'normal science' to neurodiversity in autism science". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 63 (4): 381–396. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13534. ISSN  0021-9630. PMC  9298391. PMID  34730840.
  163. ^ Woods, Richard (2017-08-09). "Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated for autism: in response to Jonathan Levitt". Disability & Society. 32 (7): 1090–1095. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1328157. ISSN  0968-7599. S2CID  148783346.
  164. ^ Bottema-Beutel, Kristen; Kapp, Steven K.; Lester, Jessica Nina; Sasson, Noah J.; Hand, Brittany N. (2021-03-01). "Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (1): 18–29. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0014. ISSN  2573-9581. PMC  8992888. PMID  36601265.

Further reading

External links

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Double_empathy_problem&oldid=1218084334"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE